Based on data from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and using scientometric methods, we conducted a systematic analysis
of Chinese regional contributions and international collaboration in terms of scientific publications, publication activity,
and citation impact. We found that regional contributions are highly skewed. The top positions measured by number of publications
or citations, share of publications or citations are taken by almost the same set of regions. But this is not the case when
indicators for relative citation impact are used. Comparison between regional scientific output and R&D expenditure shows
that Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the two indicators is rather low among the leading publication regions.