View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Communication, University of California – Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
  • 2 Department of Media & Communication, YeungNam University, 214-1, Dae-dong, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 712-749, South Korea
Restricted access

Abstract

This article describes the results of a network analysis based on the citation among Communication journals and those academic disciplines that are cited by those journals labeled as “Communication” by the Web of Science. The results indicate that the journals indexed solely as Communication rather than those also tagged as another social science are more central in the citation network. Further, a cluster analysis of the cited disciplines revealed three groupings, a micro psychological cluster, a macro socio-political group and a woman's studies clique. A two-mode network analysis found that the most central Communication journals cited multiple clusters, while the peripheral journals cited only one, suggesting that the structure of influence on the field of Communication is more complex than suggested by Park and Leydesdorff (Scientometrics 81(1):157–175, ). Also, the results indicate that the macro cluster is about twice as influential as the micro cluster, rather than as Park and Leydesdorff suggest that Psychology is the discipline's primary influence.

  • Barnett, GA, Danowski, JA 1992 The structure of communication: A network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research 19:264285 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnett, GA, Danowski, JA, Feeley, TH, Stalker, J 2010 Measuring quality in communication doctoral education using network analysis of faculty-hiring patterns. Journal of Communication 60:388411 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berger, CR, Chaffee, S 1988 Bridging the communication gap. Human Communication Research 15 2 311318 .

  • Berger, CR, Roloff, ME, Roskos-Ewoldsen, DR 2009 What is communication science CR Berger ME Roloff DR Roskos-Ewoldsen eds. The handbook of communication science 2 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA 320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borgatti, SP 2005 Netdraw network visualization Analytic Technologies Harvard, MA.

  • Borgatti, SP, Everett, MG, Freeman, LC 2002 UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis Analytic Technologies Harvard, MA.

  • Chung, CJ, Lee, S, Barnett, GA, Kim, JH 2009 A comparative network analysis of the Korean Society of Journalism and Communication Studies (KSJCS) and the International Communication Association (ICA) in the era of hybridization. Asian Journal of Communication 19 2 170191 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Craig, RT 1993 Why are there so many communication theories?. Journal of Communication 43 3 2633 .

  • Craig, RT 1999 Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory 9 2 119161.

  • Delia, J. G. (1987). Communication research: A history. In S. H. Chaffee & C. R. Berger (eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 2098). Bevery Hills, CA: Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215239.

  • Freeman, I 2004 The developmental of social network analysis: A study of the sociology of science Empirical Press Vancouver.

  • Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.

  • Garfield, E. (2006). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 11231127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32, 241254.

  • Leydesdorff, L 1998 Theories of citation. Scientometrics 43:525 .

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2007). “Betweenness centrality” as an indicator of the “interdisciplinarity” of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (9), 13031309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lievrouw, LA, Rogers, EM, Lowe, CU, Nadel, E 1987 Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks 9:217248 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monge, PR, Contractor, NS 2003 Theories of communication networks Oxford University Press New York.

  • Park, HW, Leydesdorff, L 2009 Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals. Scientometrics 81 1 157175 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, EB, Paisley, W, Garrett, R 1967 Bibliographic citations as unobtrusive measures of scientific communication Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University Stanford, CA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reeves, B, Borgman, CL 1983 A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research 10:119136 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rice, RE, Borgman, CL, Reeves, R 1988 Citation networks of communication journals, 1977–1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research 15 2 256283 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rogers, EM 1994 A history of communication study: A biographical approach Free Press New York.

  • Rogers, EM, Chaffee, SH 1983 Communication as an academic discipline: Dialogue. Journal of Communication 33:1830 .

  • Rogers, EM, Kincaid, DL 1981 Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research Free Press New York.

  • So, CYK 1988 Citation patterns of core communication journals: An assessment of the developmental status of communication. Human Communication Research 15 2 236255 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stephen, T, Geel, R 2007 Normative publication productivity of communication scholars at selected career milestones. Human Communication Research 33:103118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wiemann, JM, Hawkins, RP, Pingree, S 1988 Fragmentation in the field—and the movement toward integration in communication science. Human Communication Research 15:304310 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woelfel, J. & Fink, E. L. (1980). The measurement of communication process: Galileo theory and methods. New York: Academic.

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/