Strictly, the Pareto distribution is defined on real numbers C > μ. This is convenient if citations are shared between co-authors (as done below). For now, one can think of f(C) as F(C + 0.5) − F(C − 0.5).
The current author's Shleifer number is 3.
Note the difference with the index (Hirsch 2010), which always gives full credit to the most senior author and gives either full or no credit to junior authors.
Note that this is a recent paper. This issue is further discussed below.
Abbas, A. (2011) Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship. Scientometrics, 88 (1), 107–131.
Aghion, P, Algan, Y, Cahuc, P, Shleifer, A 2010 Regulation and distrust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 3 1015–1049 .
Barberis, N, Shleifer, A, Vishny, R 1998 A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics 49 3 307–343 .
Batista, PD, Campiteli, MG, Kinouchi, O, Martinez, AS 2006 Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics 68 1 179–189 .
Egghe, L 1991 The exact place of Zipf's and Pareto's law amongst the classical informetric laws. Scientometrics 20 1 93–106 .
Fok, D, Franses, PH 2007 Modeling the diffusion of scientific publications. Journal of Econometrics 139:376–390 .
Franses, PH 2003 The diffusion of scientific publications: The case of Econometrica, 1987. Scientometrics 56 1 29–42 .
Hirsch, JE 2005 An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 102:16569–16572 .
Hirsch, JE 2010 An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics 85 3 741–754 .
Levitt, JM, Thelwall, M 2010 Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics. Scientometrics 85 1 171–183 .
Schreiber, M 2008 A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics 2 3 211–216 .