Author:
Ferenc Hörcher Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem, Eötvös József Kutatóközpont, Politika- és Államelméleti Kutatóintézet Budapest, Magyarország; University of Public Service, Eötvös József Research Centre, Research Institute for Politics and Government Budapest, Hungary
Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont Filozófiai Intézet Budapest, Magyarország; Research Centre for the Humanities, Institute of Philosophy Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Ferenc Hörcher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

Összefoglaló. Ez a filozófiai esszé arra tesz kísérletet, hogy megpróbálja nyomon követni a világjárvány kibontakozását, a változatos védelmi stratégiákat, valamint a mégiscsak bekövetkező tragédiákat a politikai filozófia perspektívájából. Mégpedig valós időben. Az esszé abból a hipotézisből indul ki, hogy az emberiséget váratlanul érte ugyan a járvány, mégis igen gyorsan tudott reagálni (lásd az oltóanyag előállításának gyorsaságát), az egyes emberek azonban nem tudtak kilépni saját természetük korlátai közül. Ennek megfelelően a hatalom ismét elkövette a szokásos hibákat, a lázadók lázadtak, és a politika továbbra is a konfliktusok kezelésének művészete maradt. A politikával foglalkozóknak azonban kincsesbánya ez a korszak a politika természetének elemzéséhez.

Summary. This paper, written in the genre of the literary essay, tries to keep track of the birth and development of the pandemic, the various defence strategies and the tragedies that took place anyhow, from the perspective of the discipline of political philosophy.

Now political philosophy is not characteristically ready to react promptly to the events of the day. It has got a long term perspective, and therefore has no intention to keep an eye on the headlines of the online news portals. It has got long term debits, which cannot be easily paid back in cash.

And yet the claim of the paper is that in fact we are confronted by a state of affairs when political philosophy is obliged to take note of contemporary events. And it has to try to respond to those events almost “real time” or directly. We are aware of 4 million dead, by now, which is an unacceptable number.

To tackle states of emergency parliaments are usually ready to offer exceptional measures for government action, even in parliamentary democracies. Yet politicians do not necessarily want to take on board the struggle with the virus – they can easily drop it out from the issues of the day –, claiming that public health should not be politicized. Yet by leaving the stage to let professional experts make the decisions, they give up their chance to unite the camp. Statesmen can only unite their camp behind them, if they make use of the window of opportunity opened by an emergency situation, and if they are able to make use of the phobias and anxieties of everyday people, in the fashionable populist, plebeian manner.

The essay analyses two basic relationships influenced by the pandemic. One is claimed to be the intergovernmental, or global scene. Here, the great and developing powers are competing with each other, through the still mostly acceptable international norms of taking advantage of inequality. The other is the inner political scene, where there is a growing distrust between the authorities and the ordinary people, fuelled by restrictions, fake news, and forms either of controlling society by illegal means, or of influencing leaders by indirect means.

The last part of the essay presents three major aspects from where one can analyse the happenings: a social, a communicational and an economic perspective on its effects.

The essay finishes with some cautionary, sceptical notes on human nature, in order to keep vigilance in emergency situations on the loss of balance, either internal or external, to avoid the major dangers.

  • 1

    Arisztotelész. Politika. ford. Szabó Miklós, az eredetivel egybevetette Horváth Henrik. https://mek.oszk.hu/04900/04966/04966.htm [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 2

    Baccini, L., Brodeur, A. & Weymouth, S. (2020) The COVID-19 Pandemic and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, IZA DP No. 13862. http://ftp.iza.org/dp13862.pdf [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 3

    Balázs Z. (2005) Emberi méltóság. Jogelméleti Szemle, No. 4. http://jesz.ajk.elte.hu/balazs24.html [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 4

    Ball, T. & Bellamy, R. (eds) (2003) The Cambridge History of 20th Century Political Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

  • 5

    COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 6

    Freeden, M. (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford, Oxford University Press

  • 7

    Hegel, G. W. F. (1971) A jogfilozófia alapvonalai. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó

  • 8

    Hobbes, T. (1999) Leviatán, vagy az egyházi és világi állam anyaga, formája és hatalma. Ford. Vámosi Pál, Budapest, Kossuth Kiadó

  • 9

    Horkay Hörcher, F. (2012) Hume és az ízlésesztétika brit paradigmája. Magyar Filozófiai Szemle, Vol. 56. No. 1. http://real.mtak.hu/34212/1/Horkay_Horcher_Ferenc_Hume_es_az_izlesesztetika_brit_paradigmaja_u.pdf [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 10

    Hörcher, F. (2002) The question of the limitation of the state by the law: a comparison of Kelsen’s and Hayek’s approach. Rehtstheorie, No. 2–4.

  • 11

    Hörcher, F. (2019) Government as a British Conservative Understands It: Comments on Oakeshott’s Views on Government. In: Kos, E. S. (szerk.) Michael Oakeshott on Authority, Governance, and the State. London, Palgrave Macmillan

  • 12

    Hörcher, F. (2021) The Political Philosophy of the European City. From Polis through City-State, to Megalopolis? Lexington Books, Lanham (MD), Amerikai Egyesült Államok: Rowman and Littlefield

  • 13

    Hume, D. (I. 1992, II. 1994) Arról, hogy lehetséges-e a politikai tudomány. In: David Hume összes esszéi. Budapest, Atlantisz

  • 14

    Hume, D. (2006) Értekezés az emberi természetről. Ford. Bence György. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó

  • 15

    Judd, D., Vazquez, M. & O’Sullivan, D. (2021) Biden says platforms like Facebook are ‘killing people’ with Covid misinformation. CNN, Updated 2158 GMT (0558 HKT) July 17, 2021. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/16/politics/biden-facebook-covid-19/index.html [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 16

    Klein, B., Vazquez, M. & Collins, K. (2021) Biden backs away from his claim that Facebook is ‘killing people’ by allowing Covid misinformation. CNN, Updated 0031 GMT (0831 HKT) July 20, 2021. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/19/politics/joe-biden-facebook/index.html [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 17

    La Fonta, T. (2020) The COVID-19 crisis and the come-back of the nation-state in Europe, RPP Group. https://rpp-group.com/rpp-blog/news-articles/the-covid-19-crisis-and-the-come-back-of-the-nation-state-in-europe/ [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 18

    Machiavelli, N. (2015) A fejedelem. Ford., jegyz. Lutter Éva. Budapest, Helikon Kiadó

  • 19

    Manent, P. (2020a) «Il y a longtemps que nous sommes sortis à bas bruit du régime démocratique et libéral»

  • 20

    https://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/societe/pierre-manent-il-y-a-longtemps-que-nous-sommes-sortis-a-bas-bruit-du-regime-democratique-et-liberal-20200423 [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 21

    Manent, P. (2020b) Time to Wake Up! First Things. https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2020/04/time-to-wake-up [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 22

    Miller, F. (2017) Aristotle’s Political Theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/aristotle-politics/ [letöltve: 2021. július]

  • 23

    Pethő, S. (2007) Arcana Imperii. A sacrum és a politicum kapcsolatának történetéhez. Budapest, Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Hittudományi Kara

  • 24

    Skinner, Q. (2009) A Genealogy of the Modern State. British Academy Lecture, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 162, 2008 Lectures

  • 25

    Weber, M. (1987, 1996) Gazdaság és társadalom 1., 2/3. Budapest, KJK

  • Collapse
  • Expand
The author instructions are available in separate PDFs.
Please, download the Hungarian version from HERE, the English version from HERE.
The Submissions templates are available in MS Word.
For articles in Hungarian, please download it from HERE and for articles in English from HERE.
 

Editor-in-Chief:

Founding Editor-in-Chief:

  • Tamás NÉMETH

Managing Editor:

  • István SABJANICS (Ministry of Interior, Budapest, Hungary)

Editorial Board:

  • Attila ASZÓDI (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)
  • Zoltán BIRKNER (University of Pannonia)
  • Valéria CSÉPE (Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Brain Imaging Centre)
  • Gergely DELI (University of Public Service)
  • Tamás DEZSŐ (Migration Research Institute)
  • Imre DOBÁK (University of Public Service)
  • Marcell Gyula GÁSPÁR (University of Miskolc)
  • József HALLER (University of Public Service)
  • Charaf HASSAN (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)
  • Zoltán GYŐRI (Hungaricum Committee)
  • János JÓZSA (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)
  • András KOLTAY (National Media and Infocommunications Authority)
  • Gábor KOVÁCS (University of Public Service)
  • Levente KOVÁCS buda University)
  • Melinda KOVÁCS (Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE))
  • Miklós MARÓTH (Avicenna Institue of Middle Eastern Studies )
  • Judit MÓGOR (Ministry of Interior National Directorate General for Disaster Management)
  • József PALLO (University of Public Service)
  • István SABJANICS (Ministry of Interior)
  • Péter SZABÓ (Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE))
  • Miklós SZÓCSKA (Semmelweis University)

Ministry of Interior
Science Strategy and Coordination Department
Address: H-2090 Remeteszőlős, Nagykovácsi út 3.
Phone: (+36 26) 795 906
E-mail: scietsec@bm.gov.hu

DOAJ

2023  
CrossRef Documents 32
CrossRef Cites 15
Days from submission to acceptance 59
Days from acceptance to publication 104
Acceptance Rate 81%

2022  
CrossRef Documents 38
CrossRef Cites 10
Days from submission to acceptance 54
Days from acceptance to publication 78
Acceptance Rate 84%

2021  
CrossRef Documents 46
CrossRef Cites 0
Days from submission to acceptance 33
Days from acceptance to publication 85
Acceptance Rate 93%

2020  
CrossRef Documents 13
CrossRef Cites 0
Days from submission to acceptance 30
Days from acceptance to publication 62
Acceptance Rate 93%

Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge none

Scientia et Securitas
Language Hungarian
English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2020
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Academic Council of Home Affairs and
Association of Hungarian PhD and DLA Candidates
Founder's
Address
H-2090 Remeteszőlős, Hungary, Nagykovácsi út 3.
H-1055 Budapest, Hungary Falk Miksa utca 1.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Applied
Licenses
CC-BY 4.0
CC-BY-NC 4.0
ISSN ISSN 2732-2688

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Nov 2023 0 25 3
Dec 2023 0 104 5
Jan 2024 0 20 2
Feb 2024 0 61 2
Mar 2024 0 184 1
Apr 2024 0 13 1
May 2024 0 0 0