Aczél P. (2015) Médiaműveltség. In: Aczél, P., Andok, M., & Bokor, T. (eds) Műveljük a médiát! Budapest, Wolters Kluwer. pp. 133−177.

Akin, H., & Scheufele, D. A. (2017) Overview of the science of science communication. In: Jamieson, K. H., Kahan, D. M., & Scheufele, D. (eds) The Oxford handbook on the science of science communication. Oxford, Oxford University Press. pp. 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.3>

Allchin, D., & Zemplén G. Á. (2020) Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and whole science. Science Education, Vol. 104. No. 5. pp. 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589

ALLEA (2021) Fact or fake? Tackling science disinformation. ALLEA Discussion Paper, 5. Berlin. https://doi.org/10.26356/fact-or-fake

Arnaudo, D., Bradshaw, S., Ooi, H. H., Schwalbe, K., Zakem, V., & Zink, A. (2021) Combating information manipulation: A playbook for elections and beyond. The International Republican Institute & The National Democratic Institute & The Stanford Internet Observatory.

Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2020) Good news about bad news: Gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news. Journal of Cognition, Vol. 3. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.91

Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., … Willer, R. (2020) Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 4. No. 5. pp. 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z.

Bell, D. (1999) The coming of post-industrial society. A venture in social forecasting. New York, Basic Books.

Blanco, F., & Matute, H. (2018) The illusion of causality: A cognitive bias underlying pseudoscience. In: Kaufman, A. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds) Pseudoscience: The conspiracy against science. MIT Press Scholarship Online. pp. 45–75. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037426.003.0003

Boghardt, T. (2009) Operation INFEKTION: Soviet Bloc intelligence and its AIDS disinformation campaign. Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 53. No. 4. pp. 1–24.

Bokor T. (2015) Médiaértés. In: Aczél P., Andok M., & Bokor T. (eds) Műveljük a médiát! Budapest, Wolters Kluwer. pp. 179–239.

Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015) Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, Vol. 65. No. 5. pp. 745–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12171

Bucchi, M. (2009) Beyond technocracy. Science, politics and citizens. New York, Springer.

Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2014) Science communication research. Themes and challenges. In: Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (eds) Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. Second Edition. London & New York, Routledge. pp. 1–15.

Burns, T. W., O’Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003) Science communication. A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 12. No. 2. pp. 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09636625030122004

Cairns, R. (2014) Climates of suspicion. ‘Chemtrail’ conspiracy narratives and the international politics of geoengineering. The Geographical Journal, Vol. 182. No. 1. pp. 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12116

Castells, M. (1996) The rise of the network society. The information age: Economy, society and culture Vol. I. Cambridge, Massachusetts & Oxford, UK, Blackwell.

Castells, M. (1997) The power of identity. The information age: Economy, society and culture Vol. II. Cambridge, Massachusetts & Oxford, UK, Blackwell.

Castells, M. (1998) End of millennium. The information age: Economy, society and culture Vol. III. Cambridge, Massachusetts & Oxford, UK, Blackwell.

CCDH (2020) The anti-vaxx industry. How big tech powers and profits from vaccine misinformation. Center for Countering Digital Hate.

CCDH (2021a) The disinformation dozen. Center for Countering Digital Hate.

CCDH (2021b) The pandemic profiteers. The business of anti-vaxx. Countering Digital Hate.

Cortassa, C. (2016) In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit. Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 25. No. 4. pp. 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963662516629745

Craft, S., Ashley, S., & Maksl, A. (2017) New media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public, Vol. 2. No. 4. pp. 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2057047317725539

Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011) Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 1. No. 9. pp. 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1295

Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, Ch. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, Vol. 40. No. S1. pp. 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568

Einsiedel, E. F. (2014) Publics and their participation in science and technology: Changing roles, blurring boundaries. In: Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (eds) Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. Second Edition. London & New York, Routledge. pp. 125–140.

Ezrahi, Y. (1990) The descent of Icarus. Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Harvard, Harvard University Press.

Fabók B. (2021) Százmilliókkal gazdagította a járvány a vírusszkeptikus Dr. Lenkeit, nagyot szakítottak Dr. Gődénnyel is. G7.hu, 2 June 2021. https://g7.hu/kozelet/20210602/szazmilliokkal-gazdagitotta-a-jarvany-a-virusszkeptikus-dr-lenkeit-nagyot-szakitott-dr-godeny-is/ [Downloaded: 16 April 2022].

Falyuna N. (2019) Esettanulmány a magyar laposföld-hívők online közösségének diskurzusáról. Médiakutató, Vol. 20. No. 4. pp. 65–82.

Falyuna N. (2022a) Az áltudományos diskurzus jellemzői. Az újmédiában megjelenő áltudományos tartalmak nyelvészeti-kommunikációs elemzése. PhD thesis. Manuscript. Budapest, ELTE BTK Nyelvtudományi Doktori Iskola. https://doi.org/10.15476/ELTE.2022.014

Falyuna N. (2022b) A pandémia nyelve, retorikája és kommunikációja. Magyar Tudomány, Vol. 183. No. 5. pp. 610–620.

Falyuna N. (2022c, forthcoming ) “A tudósok fehér galléros bűnözők” – Tudományellenesség és tudománykommunikáció a (dez)információs társadalomban. Filológia.hu.

Falyuna N., Krekó P., & Berkes R. (2022) Álszent antikapitalisták. Nyereségvágyból terjesztett áltudományos dezinformáció az interneten. Political Capital.

Finset, A., Bosworth, H., Butow, P., Gulbrandsen, P., Hulsman, R. L., Pieterse, A. H., … van Weert, J. (2020) Effective health communication - a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 10. No. 5. pp. 873–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027

Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2013) The science of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110. No. Supplement 3. pp. 14031–14032. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312080110

Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2014) The science of science communication II. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111. No. Supplement 4. pp. 13583–13584. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414635111

Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2019) The science of science communication III. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116. No. Supplement 16. pp. 7632–7633. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902256116

Frankel, M. S. (1998) The role of science in making good decisions. https://www.aaas.org/resources/role-science-making-good-decisions [Downloaded: 21 February 2021].

Garrett, R. K. (2017) The “echo chamber” distraction. Disinformation campaigns are the problem, not audience fragmentation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vol. 6. No. 4. pp. 370–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.011

Goertzel, T. (2010) Conspiracy theories in science. EMBO Reports, Vol. 11. No. 7. pp. 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.84

Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998) Science in public. Communication, culture, and credibility. New York, Plenumtrade.

Grundmann, R., & Stehr, N. (2012) The power of scientific knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139137003

Hansson, S. O. (2018) Dealing with climate science denialism: Experiences from confrontations with other forms of pseudoscience. Climate Policy, Vol. 18. No. 9. pp. 1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1415197

Hecht, D. K. (2018) Pseudoscience and the pursuit of truth. In: Kaufman, A. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds) Pseudoscience. The conspiracy against science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. pp. 3–20.

Hussain, A., Ali, S., Ahmed, M., & Hussain, S. (2018) The anti-vaccination movement: A regression in modern medicine. Cureus, Vol. 10. No. 7. e2919. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2919

HVG (2021) Posta Imre és két társa biztosan börtönben tölti az ünnepeket. HVG, 29 October 2021. https://hvg.hu/itthon/20211029_posta_imre_letartoztatas_magyarok_felelos_nemzeti_kormanya [Downloaded: 24 January 2022].

Islam, M. S., Sarkar, T., Khan, S. H., Mostofa Kamal, A.-H., Hasan, S. M. M., Kabir, A., … Seale, H. (2020) COVID-19-related infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 103. No. 4. pp. 1621–1629. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812.

Jenkins, H. (2008) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, New York University Press.

Jennings, R. C. (2014) Theory and practice in science communication. Studies in Science Education, Vol. 50. No. 2. pp. 249–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.831972

Jensen, E. A., & Gerber, A. (2020) Evidence-based science communication. Frontiers in Communication, Vol. 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00078

Kahan, D. M. (2012) Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., & Peterson, M. (eds) Handbook of risk theory. epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk. Amsterdam, Springer. pp. 725–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_28

Kalichman, S. C. (2009) Denying AIDS. Conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and human tragedy. New York, Springer.

Krekó P. (2015) Conspiracy theory as collective motivated cognition. In: Bilewicz, M., Cichocka, A., & W. Soral (eds) The psychology of conspiracy. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 62–75.

Krekó P. (2021) Tömegparanoia 2.0. Összeesküvés-elméletek, álhírek és dezinformáció. Budapest, Athenaeum.

Kutrovátz G., Láng B., & Zemplén G. (2008) A tudomány határai. Budapest, Typotex.

Leßmöllmann, A. (2019) Current trends and future visions of (research on) science communication. In: Leßmöllmann, A., Dascal, M., & Gloning, T. (eds) Science communication. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 657–688. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255522

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) Misinformation and its correction continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 13. No. 3. pp. 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1529100612451018

Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021) Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 32. No. 2. pp. 348–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983

Lewandowsky, S., & Yesilada, M. (2021) Inoculating against the spread of Islamophobic and radical-Islamist disinformation. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, Vol. 6. No. 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00323-z

Lewenstein, B. V. (1995) Science and the media. In: Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T. (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage Publications. pp. 344–361.

Lewenstein, B. V. (2003) Models of public communication of science and technology. Cornell University, Departments of Communication and of Science & Technology Studies.

Lobato, E. J. C., & Zimmerman, C. (2018) The psychology of (pseudo)science: Cognitive, social, and cultural factors. In: Kaufman, A. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds) Pseudoscience: The conspiracy against science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. pp. 21–43. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037426.003.0002

Machlup, F. (1962) The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

Malecki, K. M. C., Keating, J. A., & Safdar, N. (2021) Crisis communication and public perception of COVID-19 risk in the era of social media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol. 72. No. 4. pp. 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa758

Marshall, J. P. (2017) Disinformation society, communication and cosmopolitan democracy. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 9. No. 2. pp. 1–24. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3914-7697

Marshall, J. P., Goodman, J., Zowghi, D., & da Ramini, F. (2015) Disorder and the disinformation society. The social dynamics of information, networks and software. New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693460

McKee, M., & Diethelm, P. (2010) How the growth of denialism undermines public health. BMJ, 2010 Dec 14;341:c6950. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6950. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21156741

Meyer, G. (2016) In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 25. No. 4. pp. 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963662516629747

Michael, M. (1992) Lay discourses of science: Science-in-general, science-in-particular, and self. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 17. No. 3. pp. 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016224399201700303

Miller, J. D. (1983) Scientific literacy. A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, Vol. 112. No. 2. pp. 29–48.

Miller, J. D. (1992) Toward a scientific understanding of the public understanding of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 1. No. 1. pp. 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/1/005

Miller, V. (2020). Understanding digital culture. Second edition. London, Sage Publications.

Mohammed, S. N. (2019) Conspiracy theories and flat-earth videos on YouTube. The Journal of Social Media in Society, Vol. 8. No. 2. pp. 84–102.

Moral, P. (2022) The challenge of disinformation for national security. In: Cayón Peña, J. (ed.) Security and defence: Ethical and legal challenges in the face of current conflicts. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. pp. 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95939-5_8

NASEM = National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017) Communicating science effectively. A research agenda. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23674

O’Brien, T. C., Palmer, R., & Albarracin, D. (2021) Misplaced trust: When trust in science fosters belief in pseudoscience and the benefits of critical evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 96(6099). 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104184

Olshansky, A., Peaslee, R. M., & Landrum, A. R. (2020) Flat-smacked! Converting to flat eartherism. Media and Religion, Vol. 19. No. 2. pp. 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2020.1774257

Pasek, J. (2019) Don’t trust the scientists! Rejecting the scientific consensus “conspiracy”. In: Uscinski, J. (ed.) Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them. Oxford, Oxford University Press. pp. 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844073.001.0001

Peters, M. A. (2020) On the epistemology of conspiracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 53. No. 14. pp. 1413–1417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1741331

Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007) The role of metacognition in social judgment. In: Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds) Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York, Guilford Press. pp. 254–284.

Renn, O., & Levine, D. (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In Kasperson, R. E., & Stallen, P. J. M. (eds) Communicating risks to the public. Dordrecht, Springer. pp. 175–217.

Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019) The fake news game: Actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 22. No. 5. pp. 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491

Rzymski, P., Borkowski, L., Drąg, M., Flisiak, R., Jemielity, J., Krajewski, J., … Fal, A. (2021) The strategies to support the COVID-19 vaccination with evidence-based communication and tackling misinformation. Vaccines, Vol. 9. No. 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9020109.

Schäfer, M. S., Kessler, S. H., & Fähnrich, B. (2019) Analyzing science communication through the lens of communication science. Reviewing the empirical evidence. In: Leßmöllmann, A., Dascal, M., & Gloning, T. (eds): Science communication. Berlin, Boston, De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 77–104.

Schmid-Petri, H., & Bürger, M. (2019) Modeling science communication: From linear to more complex models. In: Leßmöllmann, A., Dascal, M., & Gloning, T. (eds) Science communication. Berlin, Boston, De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 105–122.

Schwarz, N. (2012) Feelings-as-information theory. In: Van Lange, P., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds) Handbook of theories in social psychology. Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage Publications. pp. 289–308. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215

Shapin, S. (2001) How to be antiscientific. In: Labinger, J. A., & Collins, H. (eds) The one culture?: A conversation about science. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. pp. 99–115. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226467245-009

Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2016) The lure of rationality. Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 25. No. 4. pp. 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749

Sługocki, W. Ł., & Sowa, B. (2021) Disinformation as a threat to national security on the example of the COVID-19 pandemic. Security and Defence Quarterly, Vol. 35. No. 3. pp. 63–74. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/138876

Strudwicke, I. J., & Grant, W. J. (2020) #JunkScience: Investigating pseudoscience disinformation in the Russian Internet Research Agency tweets. Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 29. No. 5. pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520935071

Szakács J. (2020) The business of misinformation. CMDS. https://cmds.ceu.edu/business-misinformation [Downloaded: 16 April 2022].

Thorson, E. (2016) Belief echoes. The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication, Vol. 33. No. 3. pp. 460−480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187

Trench, B. (2008) Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In: Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B., & Shi, S. (eds) Communicating science in social contexts: New models, new practices. Dordrecht, Springer. pp. 119–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7

Uscinski, J. (2018) Down the rabbit hole we go! In: Uscinski, J. (ed.) Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them. Oxford, Oxford University Press. pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844073.001.0001

van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, K. (2021) Psychological inolucation against fake news. In: Greifeneder, R., Jaffé, M. E., Newman, W. J., & Schwarz, N. (eds) The psychology of fake news. Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation. Routledge. pp. 147–169.

van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Compton, J. (2020) Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 2020. No. 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790

Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2018) I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 21. No. 10. pp. 1337–1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313883

Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020) Correction as a solution for health misinformation on social media. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 110. No. 3. S78–S80. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2020.305916

Vraga, E. K., & Jacobsen, K. H. (2020) Strategies for effective health communication during the coronavirus pandemic and future emerging infectious disease events. World Medical & Health Policy, Vol. 12. No. 3. pp. 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.359

Webster, F. (2014) Theories of the information society. Fourth edition. London & New York, Routledge.

Weigold, M. F. (2001). Communicating science. A review of the literature science communication. Science Communication, Vol. 23. No. 2. pp. 164–193. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1075547001023002005

Wynne, B. (1987) Risk management and hazardous wastes. Implementation and the dialectics of credibility. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Wynne, B. (1995) Public understanding of science. In: Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T. (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage Publications. pp. 361–388.

Wynne, B. (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science. Hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics, Vol. 9. No. 3. pp. 211–220.

Z. Karvalics L. (2009) Information society dimensions. Szeged.

Zemplén G. (2019) The contribution of laboratory studies, science studies and Science and Technology Studies (STS) to the understanding of scientific communication, In: Leßmöllmann, A., Dascal, M., & Gloning, T. (eds) Science communication. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255522

Ziman, J. M. (2000a) Postacademic science. Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. In: Segerstrale, U. (ed.) Beyond the science wars. The missing discourse about science and society. New York, State University of New York Press. pp. 135–154.

Ziman, J. M. (2000b). Real science. What it is and what it means. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

URL1 = Website of the ‘Doctors for Discernment’ group, https://orvosokatisztanlatasert.hu/ [Downloaded: 27 April 2022].

URL2 = Campaign material of the ‘Normal Life Party’, https://normaliselet.hu/download/covid_allaspont.pdf [Downloaded: 27 April 2022].

URL3 = Blog of the ‘Responsible National Government of Hungarians’ group leader, https://postaimre.euroweb4you.com/ [Downloaded: 27 April 2022].