Scientia et Securitas
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 4
Közúti közlekedési balesetben megsérült gyalogosok számának csökkentési lehetőségei
Authors:
Nóra Krizsik Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Közlekedéstechnológiai és Közlekedésgazdasági Tanszék Budapest Magyarország; Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Transport Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary
KTI Magyar Közlekedéstudományi és Logisztikai Intézet Nonprofit Kft. Budapest Magyarország; KTI Hungarian Institute for Transport Sciences and Logistics Non-Profit Limited Liability Company Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by Nóra Krizsik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1042-819X
,
Tibor Sipos Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Közlekedéstechnológiai és Közlekedésgazdasági Tanszék Budapest Magyarország; Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Transport Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary
KTI Magyar Közlekedéstudományi és Logisztikai Intézet Nonprofit Kft. Budapest Magyarország; KTI Hungarian Institute for Transport Sciences and Logistics Non-Profit Limited Liability Company Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by Tibor Sipos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-7659
, and
János Berényi KTI Magyar Közlekedéstudományi és Logisztikai Intézet Nonprofit Kft. Budapest Magyarország; KTI Hungarian Institute for Transport Sciences and Logistics Non-Profit Limited Liability Company Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by János Berényi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-2219
Pages:
358–363
Online Publication Date:
07 May 2024
Publication Date:
05 Aug 2024
Article Category:
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1556/112.2023.00172
Keywords:
pedestrian safety; road safety; vulnerable road users;
Keywords (Hungarian):
gyalogosok biztonsága; közlekedésbiztonság; védtelen közlekedők;
Open access

Összefoglalás.

A közlekedési balesetekben sérült személyek, valamint a baleset miatti anyagi károk jelentős mértékű társadalmi-gazdasági veszteségértéket képviselnek. Kutatásommal célom a közlekedés biztonságosabbá tételéhez szükséges kulcsterületek feltárása és a lehetséges potenciális beavatkozási területek meghatározása volt. Munkám során a 2016–2020 közötti közlekedési balesetek adatait elemeztem leíró statisztikai módszerrel. Megállapítottam, hogy a leginkább kritikus pont a gyalogosok közlekedése. Azokban a balesetekben, ahol volt gyalogos sérült, a balesetek két okcsoportja dominál: gyalogosok hibája (34,3%), valamint a járművezetők gyalogosok részére történő elsőbbségadásának elmaradása (38,1%). Az eredmények lehetőséget adnak a további célirányos vizsgálatokra, valamint a hatékony beavatkozásokra.

Summary.

Transport is an essential part of everybody lives. The aim of transport users is to make their journeys without accidents in the shortest possible time, while optimising their individual resources and inputs. The number of people injured in road traffic accidents with personal injury and the material damage caused by a significant socio-economic loss. By preventing accidents, it is clear that the costs and resources spent on road accidents can be reduced. Therefore, I started my research by determining the share of road user groups in the number of accidents, the number of people injured and the amount of economic loss value associated with accidents. I analysed road accidents between 2016 and 2020. By the accident analysis, I found that among vulnerable road users, the proportion of pedestrians and cyclists injured was extremely high. Injuries in these two transport modes accounted for more than half of the injuries in cars. By calculating the loss value, I found that the damage to the national economy caused by pedestrian injuries was significant. In my research, by analysing the causes of accidents, I found that in accidents where there was a pedestrian injured, two groups of causes dominate: pedestrian error (34.3%) and drivers not giving priority to pedestrians (38.1%). Examining the accident data, it was evident that the number of pedestrian accidents due to pedestrian error is very high, so I continued my research in the area of other activities of pedestrians while walking. I measured pedestrians in 10 locations in Budapest. During the measurements, I recorded and analysed data of 11536 persons. The average rate of distraction was 54.3%, which means that one in two pedestrians is doing some other activity while walking. The most frequent activity was talking to another pedestrian (29.8%), but phone use (15.7%) and head/earphone use (13.5%) were also very significant. My research results so far show that if we want to improve pedestrian safety, we need to reduce accidents caused by pedestrians’ own fault and increase drivers’ willingness to give priority to pedestrians. My research plans also include investigating ways to reduce pedestrian errors, increasing pedestrian awareness and examining pedestrian-driver interactions in more depth. I already have results in this area, but my aim is to identify target areas (including human, infrastructure, vehicle field) for my research that can be implemented in practice, thus helping to improve pedestrian safety and road safety.

  • 1

    Belügyminisztérium (BM), Technológiai és Innovációs Minisztérium (TIM) (2022) Közúti Közlekedésbiztonsági Akcióprogram 2023–2025 – Cél a biztonságos európai mobilitás és közlekedési rendszer. Budapest

  • 2

    Bendak, S., Alnaqbi, A. M., Alzarooni, M. Y., Aljanaahi, S. M., & Alsuwaidi S. J. (2021) Factors affecting pedestrian behaviors at signalized crosswalks: An empirical study. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 76. pp. 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.019

  • 3

    Esztergár-Kiss D., & Csiszár Cs. (2016) Multicriteria Analysis of Hungarian Journey Planners. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, Vol. 44 No. 2. pp. 97–104. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.8570

  • 4

    Európai Bizottság (2018) A bizottság közleménye az Európai Parlamentnek, a Tanácsnak, az Európai Gazdasági és Szociális Bizottságnak és a Régiók Bizottságának. Európa mozgásban, Fenntartható mobilitás Európában: biztonságos, összekapcsolt és tiszta közlekedés, Brüsszel

  • 5

    Európai Unió Tanácsa (2017) Valletta Declaration on Road Safety. Brüsszel

  • 6

    European Commission (2020) Road safety thematic report – Pedestrians. European Road Safety Observatory. Brussels, European Commission, Directorate General for Transport

  • 7

    Hatfield J., & Murphy S. (2007) The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalised and unsignalised intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 39. No. 1. pp. 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.001

  • 8

    Holló P., & Sipos T. (2020) Közúti baleseti veszteségek aktualizálása. Közlekedéstudományi Szemle, Vol. 70. No. 4. pp. 47–52. https://doi.org/10.24228/KTSZ.2020.4.4

  • 9

    Horberry T., Osborne R., & Young K. (2019) Pedestrian smartphone distraction: Prevalence and potential severity. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 60. pp. 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.011

  • 10

    Jankó D. (2019) A 2021–2030 közötti évekre tervezett EU közlekedésbiztonsági akcióprogram irányelvei, célkitűzései és ezek hazai elfogadhatósága. Közlekedéstudományi Szemle, Vol. 69. No. 6. pp. 56–65. https://doi.org/10.24228/KTSZ.2019.6.5

  • 11

    Jiang K., Ling F., Feng Z., Ma C., Kumfer W., Shao C., & Wang K. (2018) Effects of mobile phone distraction on pedestrians’ crossing behavior and visual attention allocation at a signalized intersection: An outdoor experimental study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 115. pp. 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.019

  • 12

    Krizsik N., & Sipos T. (2023) Social Perception of Autonomous Vehicles. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, Vol. 51. No. 2. pp. 133–139. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.20228

  • 13

    Krizsik N., Sipos T., & Berényi J. (2023) Gyalogos közlekedők figyelemelterelő hatásai. I. Közlekedésbiztonsági konferencia – Transport Safety Conference, ISBN: 9786156443205. pp. 110–116. https://tsc.sze.hu/

  • 14

    Krizsik N., Sipos T., & Kővári B. (2022) Nemzetgazdasági veszteségértékek szerepe a személysérüléses közúti közlekedési balesetekben. Közlekedéstudományi Szemle, Vol. 72. No. 5. pp. 55–65. https://doi.org/10.24228/KTSZ.2022.5.5

  • 15

    Lévai Z. (2019) Közlekedésbiztonság. Budapest, Dialóg Campus

  • 16

    Liu Y., Alsaleh R., & Sayed T. (2021) Modeling the influence of mobile phone use distraction on pedestrian reaction times to green signals: A multilevel mixed-effects parametric survival model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 81. pp. 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.05.020

  • 17

    Mészáros G. (2017) A közlekedésibaleset-megelőzés rendszerének információs folyamatai. Magyar Rendészet, Vol. 2. pp. 129–139.

  • 18

    Nagy S., & Csiszár Cs. (2020) The quality of smart mobility: A systematic review. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport, Vol. 109. pp. 117–127. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2020.109.11

  • 19

    Pauer G., Krizsik N., & Szigeti Sz. (2023) Estimating the Underreporting Rate of Injured Cyclists. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, Vol. 67. No. 2. pp. 619–627. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.19429

  • 20

    Pešić, D., Antić, B., Glavić, D., & Milenković, M. (2016) The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at unsignalized intersections – Models for predicting unsafe pedestrians behaviour. Safety Science, Vol. 82. pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.016

  • 21

    Ropaka, M., Nikolaou, D., & Yannis, G. (2020) Investigation of traffic and safety behavior of pedestrians while texting or web-surfing. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 21. No. 6. pp. 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1770741

  • 22

    Thompson, L. L., Rivara, F. P., Ayyagari, R. C., & Ebel, B. E. (2013) Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study. Injury Prevention, Vol. 19. No. 4. pp. 232–237. https://doi.org/doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601

  • 23

    World Health Organization (2018) Global status report on road safety 2018. Geneva

  • 24

    Zhou Z., Liu S., Xu W., Pu Z., Zhang S., & Zhou Y. (2019) Impacts of mobile phone distractions on pedestrian crossing behavior at signalized intersections: An observational study in China. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 11. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019841838

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Scientia et Securitas
Scientia et Securitas
Online ISSN:
2732-2688

Editor-in-Chief:

Founding Editor-in-Chief:

  • Tamás NÉMETH

Managing Editor:

  • István SABJANICS (Ministry of Interior, Budapest, Hungary)

Editorial Board:

  • Attila ASZÓDI (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)
  • Zoltán BIRKNER (University of Pannonia)
  • Valéria CSÉPE (Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Brain Imaging Centre)
  • Gergely DELI (University of Public Service)
  • Tamás DEZSŐ (Migration Research Institute)
  • Imre DOBÁK (University of Public Service)
  • Marcell Gyula GÁSPÁR (University of Miskolc)
  • József HALLER (University of Public Service)
  • Charaf HASSAN (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)
  • Zoltán GYŐRI (Hungaricum Committee)
  • János JÓZSA (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)
  • András KOLTAY (National Media and Infocommunications Authority)
  • Gábor KOVÁCS (University of Public Service)
  • Levente KOVÁCS (Óbuda University)
  • Melinda KOVÁCS (Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE))
  • Miklós MARÓTH (Avicenna Institue of Middle Eastern Studies )
  • Judit MÓGOR (Ministry of Interior National Directorate General for Disaster Management)
  • József PALLO (University of Public Service)
  • István SABJANICS (Ministry of Interior)
  • Péter SZABÓ (Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE))
  • Miklós SZÓCSKA (Semmelweis University)

Ministry of Interior
Science Strategy and Coordination Department
Address: H-2090 Remeteszőlős, Nagykovácsi út 3.
Phone: (+36 26) 795 906
E-mail: scietsec@bm.gov.hu

DOAJ

2023  
CrossRef Documents 32
CrossRef Cites 15
Days from submission to acceptance 59
Days from acceptance to publication 104
Acceptance Rate 81%

2022  
CrossRef Documents 38
CrossRef Cites 10
Days from submission to acceptance 54
Days from acceptance to publication 78
Acceptance Rate 84%

2021  
CrossRef Documents 46
CrossRef Cites 0
Days from submission to acceptance 33
Days from acceptance to publication 85
Acceptance Rate 93%

2020  
CrossRef Documents 13
CrossRef Cites 0
Days from submission to acceptance 30
Days from acceptance to publication 62
Acceptance Rate 93%

Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge none

Scientia et Securitas
Language Hungarian
English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation		 2020
Volumes
per Year		 1
Issues
per Year		 4
Founder Academic Council of Home Affairs and
Association of Hungarian PhD and DLA Candidates
Founder's
Address		 H-2090 Remeteszőlős, Hungary, Nagykovácsi út 3.
H-1055 Budapest, Hungary Falk Miksa utca 1.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address		 H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher		 Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Applied
Licenses		 CC-BY 4.0
CC-BY-NC 4.0
ISSN ISSN 2732-2688

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Apr 2024 0 0 0
May 2024 0 65 16
Jun 2024 0 29 10
Jul 2024 0 39 10
Aug 2024 0 54 21
Sep 2024 0 18 4
Oct 2024 0 35 3