View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Western Avenue, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, UK
Restricted access

Abstract

Manipulated prestige car ownership has been shown previously to enhance male attractiveness. In the current study the illusion of status-linked property ownership was achieved by presenting a target male and female (matched for attractiveness) adopting a casual posture standing in either a ‘high status’ (luxury apartment) or a ‘neutral status’ (standard apartment) context. A between-subjects design was used with the photographic stimuli presented amongst other masking stimuli and rated for attractiveness by opposite-sex university undergraduate participants (N = 102) on a scale of 1–10. The male model was rated significantly more attractive when presented to females in the high status compared to the neutral status context and was also adjudged to be significantly more attractive than the female target superimposed on an identical background. There was no significant difference in the female target models attractiveness ratings given by males across the two contexts. These results were obtained despite no sex-differences being found when separate participants were asked to rate the plausibility of each target model owning or renting the luxury property they were depicted in. These findings add to a growing body of work high-lighting the importance of contextual, evolutionarily relevant status cues in male attractiveness judgements.

  • N E Adler T Boyce M A Chesney S Cohen S Folkman R L Kahn S L Syme 1994 Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient American Psychologist 49 15 24.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • L L Betzig 1986 Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History Hawthorne Aldine: NY.

  • D F Bjorklund T K Shackelford 1999 Differences in parental investment contribute to important differences between men and women Current Directions in Psychological Science 8 3 86 89.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Bliege Bird E A Smith 2005 Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital Current Anthropology 46 2 221 248.

  • M Borgerhoff-Mulder 1990 Kipsigis women's preferences for wealthy men: Evidence for female choice in mammals? Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 27 255 264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D M Buss 1985 Human mate selection American Scientist 73 47 51.

  • D M Buss 1989 Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis testing in 37 Cultures Behavioural and Brain Sciences 12 1 49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D M Buss 2000 Desires in human mating Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 907 39 49.

  • D M Buss 2003 The Evolution of Desire: Strategies on Human Mating (Revised Edition) Free Press New York.

  • D M Buss 2007 The evolution of human mating Acta Psychologica Sinica 39 3 502 512.

  • D M Buss 2012 Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind Pearson Education USA.

  • D M Buss M Abbott A Angleitner A Asherian A Biaggio 1990 International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21 5 47.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D M Buss M Barnes 1986 Preferences in human mate selection Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 559 570.

  • D M Buss D P Schmitt 1993 Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating Psychological Review 100 2 204 232.

  • D M Buss T K Shackelford L A Kirkpatrick R J Larsen 2001 A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values Journal of Marriage and Family 63 491 503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • C Cameron S Oskamp W Sparkes 1977 Courtship american style: Newspaper ads Family Coordinator 26 27 30.

  • CN Dewall JK Maner 2008 High status men (but not women) capture the eye of the beholder Evolutionary Psychology 6 328 341.

  • M J Dunn R Searle 2010 Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings British Journal of Psychology 101 69 80.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • P W Eastwick E J Finkel 2008 Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 2 245 264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • B J Ellis D Symons 1990 Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach Journal of Sex Research 27 527 556.

  • M Escasa P B Gray J Q Patton 2010 Male traits associated with attractiveness in Conambo, Ecuador Evolution and Human Behaviour 31 193 200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • W A Fisher D Byrne L A White K Kelley 1988 Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality Journal of Sex Research 25 123 151.

  • R Fisman S S Iyengar E Kamenica I Simonson 2006 Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating environment The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 673 697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • C S Ford F A Beach 1951 Patterns of Sexual Behaviour Harper and Row New York.

  • S W Gangestad J A Simpson 2000 The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism Behavioural and Brain Sciences 23 4 573 644.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • S W Gangestad R Thornhill C Garver-Apgar 2005 Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences 272 2023 2027.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D C Geary 1998 Sexual selection, the division of labour, and the evolution of sex differences Behavioural and Brain Sciences 21 444 447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D C Geary 2000 Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment Psychological Bulletin 126 55 77.

  • D C Geary 2005 Evolution of Paternal Investment DM Buss The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology John Wiley and Sons Hoboken, NJ 483 505.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • V Griskevicious JM Tybur JM Sundie RB Cialdini GF Miller DT Kenrick 2007 Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 85 102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J C Goodale 1971 Tiwi Wives: A Study of the Women of Melville Island, North Australia University of Washington Press Seattle.

  • R Goodwin 1990 Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar? Sex Roles 23 501 513.

  • J Gottschall R Berkey M Cawson C Drown M Fleischner 2003 Patterns of characterization in folktales across geographic regions and levels of cultural complexity: Literature as a neglected source of quantitative data Human Nature 14 365 382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J Gottschall J Martin H Quish J Rea 2004 Sex differences in mate choice criteria are reflected in folktales from around the world and in historical European literature Evolution and Human Behaviour 25 102 112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M Gurven J Winking H Kaplan C von Rueden L Mcallister 2009 A bioeconomic approach to marriage and the sexual division of labor Human Nature 20 151 183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • E Hill E Nocks L Gardner 1987 Manipulation by status and physical displays Ethology and Sociobiology 8 43 154.

  • G J Hitsch A Hortacsu D Ariely 2006 What makes you click? Mate preferences and matching outcomes in online dating.

  • R L Hopcroft 2006 Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States Evolution and Human Behaviour 27 104 120.

  • DT Kenrick JM Sundie LD Nicastle GO Stone 2001 Can one ever be too wealthy or too chaste? Searching for nonlinearities in mate judgment Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 462 471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Y Khallad 2005 Mate selection in Jordon: Effects of sex, socio-economic status, and culture Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22 155 168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Koestner L Wheeler 1988 Self-presentation in personal advertisements: The influence of implicit notions of attraction and role expectations Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 5 149 160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • N P Li J M Bailey D T Kenrick J A Linsenmeier 2002 The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 6 947 955.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • N P Li D T Kenrick 2006 Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 468 489.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • N M Malamuth 1996 Sexually explicit media, gender differences, and evolutionary theory Journal of Communication 46 8 31.

  • R M A Nelissen M H C Meijers 2011 Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status Evolution and Human Behaviour.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M B Oliver J S Hyde 1993 Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis Psychological Bulletin 114 29 51.

  • E G Pillsworth M G Haselton 2006 Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention Evolution and Human Behaviour 27 247 258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TV Pollet D Nettle 2007 Driving a hard bargain: Sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population Biology Letters.

  • R A Price S G Vandenberg 1980 Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples Behaviour Genetics 10 59 71.

  • M P Provost N F Troje V L Quinsey 2008 Short-term mating strategies and attraction to masculinity in point-light walkers Evolution and Human Behavior 29 65 69.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • G Saad 2007 The Evolutionary Basis of Consumption.

  • G Saad JG Vongas 2009 The effect of conspicuous consumption on men's testosterone levels Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 110 80 92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DP Schmitt 2003 Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 85 10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • T K Shackelford D P Schmitt DM Buss 2005 Universal dimensions of human mate preferences Personality and Individual Differences 39 447 458.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • G A Shuler D M Mccord 2010 Determinants of male attractiveness: “hotness” ratings as a function of perceived resources American Journal of Psychological Research 6 1 10 23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D Singh 1993 Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 2 293 307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • S Sprecher Q Sullivan E Hatfield 1994 Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 6 1074 1080.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JM Sundie DT Kenrick V Griskevicius JM Tybur KD Vohs DJ Beal 2011 Peacocks, porches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 664 680.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J M Townsend 1989 Mate selection criteria: A pilot study Ethology and Sociobiology 10 241 253.

  • J M Townsend 1995 Sex without emotional involvement: An evolutionary interpretation of sex differences Archives of Sexual Behaviour 24 173 205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J M Townsend G Levy 1990 Effects of potential partners’ costume and physical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection Archives of Sexual Behaviour 19 149 164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J M Townsend T Wasserman 1998 Sexual attractiveness: sex differences in assessment and criteria Evolution and Human Behaviour 19 171 191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R L Trivers 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection B Campbell Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871–1971 Aldine Chicago 136 179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • C Von Rueden M Gurven H Kaplan 2008 The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society Evolution and Human Behaviour 29 402 415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M W Wiederman S L Dubois 1998 Evolution and sex differences in preferences for short-term mates: results from a policy capturing study Evolution and Human Behaviour 19 153 170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • G D Wilson 1987 Male-female differences in sexual activity, enjoyment, and fantasies Personality and Individual Differences 8 125 27.

No Evolutionist is an Island

A review of Kevin N. Laland and Gillian R. Brown (2011) Sense and Nonsense. Evolutionary perspectives of human behaviour Oxford: Oxford University Press. 270 pages, ISBN: 978-0-19-958696-7