Author:
Authors:
,
, and
T. Sivakumar
T. Sivakumar
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, 608 002, India
Search for other papers by T. Sivakumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T. Sivakumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
R. Manavalan
R. Manavalan
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, 608 002, India
Search for other papers by R. Manavalan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. Manavalan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
K. Valliappan
K. Valliappan
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, 608 002, India
Search for other papers by K. Valliappan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K. Valliappan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
This paper deals with optimization of a liquid-liquid extraction procedure for simultaneous HPLC analysis of domperidone and pantoprazole in human plasma. Central composite design and Derringer's desirability function were used to optimize the concentration of KOH and the volume of ethyl acetate as the main factors affecting the liquid-liquid extraction procedure. After extraction, the analytes were separated quantitatively on a C18 column with 10 mM pH 7.0 phosphate buffer-methanol-acetonitrile 48.46:20:31.54 (υ/υ) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.20 mL min−1 and with UV detection at 285 nm. It was concluded that extraction recovery of both the analytes was affected by KOH concentration and that recovery of pantoprazole was affected by ethyl acetate (extraction solvent) volume. Extraction recovery under optimum extraction conditions was 93.52% for domperidone and 92.72% for pantoprazole. The optimized extraction method was validated. Linearity was established for six levels in the ranges 10–1000 ng mL−1 for pantoprazole and 15–1000 ng mL−1 for domperidone. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and detection (LOD) were estimated as 9.84 and 5.91 ng mL−1, respectively, for pantoprazole and 14.56 and 8.79 ng mL−1 for domperidone. The optimized method was linear, specific, accurate, and precise; the high recovery (>92%) and low relative standard deviation (<2.5%) enable reliable quantification of these analytes in spiked human plasma.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
[1]. A. Fitton L. Wiseman 1995 Drugs 51 460.
-
[2]. J.A. Barone 1999 Ann. Pharmacother. 33 429.
-
[3]. R. Huber W. Muller M.C. Banks S.J. Rogers P.C. Norwood E. Doyle 1990 J. Chromatogr. 529 389.
-
[4]. N.V.S. Ramakrishna K.N. Vishwottam S. Wishu M. Koteshwara 2005 J. Chromatogr. B 822 326.
-
[5]. M. Tanaka H. Yamazaki 1996 Anal, Chem. 68 1513.
-
[6]. Q.B. Cass A.L.G. Degani N.M. Cassiano J. Pedrazolli Jr 2001 J. Chromatogr. B 766 153.
-
[7]. O. Peres C.H. Oliveira A.R.E. Barrientos V.M. Rezende G. de -Nucci 2004 Arzneimittelforschung 54 314.
-
[8]. I. Heykants R. Hendriks W. Meuldermans M. Michiels H. Scheygrond H. Reyntjens 1981 Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 6 61.
-
[9]. Y.C. Huang J.L. Colaizzi R.H. Bierman R. Woestenborghs J.J. Heykants 1986 J. Clin. Pharmacol. 26 628.
-
[10]. W. Meuldermans R. Hurkmans E. Swysen J. Hendricks M. Michiels W. Lauwers J. Heykants 1981 Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 6 49.
-
[11]. M. Michiels R. Hendriks J. Heykants 1981 Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 6 37.
-
[12]. K. Yamamoto M. Hagino H. Kotaki T. Iga 1998 J. Chromatogr. B 720 251.
-
[13]. M. Kobylinska K. Kobylinska 2000 J. Chromatogr. B 744 207.
-
[14]. A.P. Zavitsanos C. MacDonald E. Bassoob D. Gopaul 1999 J. Chromatogr. B 730 9.
-
[15]. M.J. Smit F.C.W. Sutherland H.K.L. Hundt K.J. Swart A.F. Hundt J. Els 2002 J. Chromatogr. A 949 65.
-
[16]. M.J. Sáiz-Abajo J.M. González-Sáiz C. Pizarro 2005 Anal. Chim. Acta 528 63.
-
[17]. T. Sivakumar R. Manavalan K. Valliappan 2007 Acta Chromatogr. 19 29.
-
[18]. T. Sivakumar R. Manavalan C. Muralidharan K. Valliappan 2007 J. Sep. Sci. 30 3143.
-
[19]. T. Sivakumar R. Manavalan C. Muralidharan K. Valliappan 2007 J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 43 1842.
-
[20]. FDA-Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER): Guidance for industry, Bioanalytical method validation, 2001.
-
[21]. S. Mitra 2003 Sample Preparation Techniques in Analytical Chemistry John Wiley and Sons Hoboken, New Jersey 37–138.
-
[22]. A. Jadoul V. Préat 1997 Int. J. Pharm. 154 229.
-
[23]. K. Florey 2002 Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances and Excipients Elsevier Science New York 213–259.
-
[24]. T. Lundstedt E. Seifert L. Abramo B. Thelin Nyström J. Pettersen R. Bergman 1998 Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 42 3.
-
[25]. Q. Beg V. Sahai R. Gupta 2003 Process Biochem. 39 203.
-
[26]. G. Derringer R. Suich 1980 J. Qual. Technol. 12 214.
-
[27]. P. Wester J. Gottfries K. Johansson F. Klintebäck B. Winblad 1987 J. Chromatogr. 415 261.
Senior editors
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Kowalska, Teresa (1946-2023)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sajewicz, Mieczyslaw
Editors(s)
- Danica Agbaba (University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia)
- Łukasz Komsta (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland)
- Ivana Stanimirova-Daszykowska (University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland)
- Monika Waksmundzka-Hajnos (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland)
Editorial Board
- R. Bhushan (The Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India)
- J. Bojarski (Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland)
- B. Chankvetadze (State University of Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia)
- M. Daszykowski (University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland)
- T.H. Dzido (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland)
- A. Felinger (University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary)
- K. Glowniak (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland)
- B. Glód (Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland)
- A. Gumieniczek (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland)
- U. Hubicka (Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland)
- K. Kaczmarski (Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszów, Poland)
- H. Kalász (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
- K. Karljiković Rajić (University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia)
- I. Klebovich (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
- A. Koch (Private Pharmacy, Hamburg, Germany)
- P. Kus (Univerity of Silesia, Katowice, Poland)
- D. Mangelings (Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium)
- E. Mincsovics (Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary)
- Á. M. Móricz (Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary)
- G. Morlock (Giessen University, Giessen, Germany)
- A. Petruczynik (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland)
- R. Skibiński (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland)
- B. Spangenberg (Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany)
- T. Tuzimski (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland)
- Y. Vander Heyden (Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium)
- A. Voelkel (Poznań University of Technology, Poznań, Poland)
- B. Walczak (University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland)
- W. Wasiak (Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland)
- I.G. Zenkevich (St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
KOWALSKA, TERESA (1946-2023)
E-mail: kowalska@us.edu.pl
SAJEWICZ, MIECZYSLAW
E-mail:msajewic@us.edu.pl
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- Science Citation Index
- Sci Search
- Research Alert
- Chemistry Citation Index and Current Content/Physical
- Chemical and Earth Sciences
- SCOPUS
- GoogleScholar
- Index Copernicus
- CABI
- CABELLS Journalytics
| 2022 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
647 |
| Journal Impact Factor | 1.9 |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
Chemistry, Analytical (Q3) |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
1.9 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
1.4 |
| Journal Citation Indicator | 0.41 |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
Chemistry, Analytical (Q3) |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
29 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0.28 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Chemistry (miscellaneous) (Q3) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
3.1 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
General Chemistry 211/407 (48th PCTL) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0.549 |
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
652 |
| Journal Impact Factor | 2,011 |
| Rank by Impact Factor | Chemistry, Analytical 66/87 |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
1,789 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
1,350 |
| Journal Citation Indicator | 0,40 |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator | Chemistry, Analytical 72/99 |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
29 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,27 |
| Scimago Quartile Score | Chemistry (miscellaneous) (Q3) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
2,8 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
General Chemistry 210/409 (Q3) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,586 |
|
2020
|
|
|
Total Cites
|
650
|
|
WoS
|
|
|
Journal
Impact Factor |
1,639
|
|
Rank by
|
Chemistry, Analytical 71/83 (Q4)
|
|
Impact Factor
|
|
|
Impact Factor
|
1,412
|
|
without
|
|
|
Journal Self Cites
|
|
|
5 Year
|
1,301
|
|
Impact Factor
|
|
|
Journal
|
0,34
|
|
Citation Indicator
|
|
|
Rank by Journal
|
Chemistry, Analytical 75/93 (Q4)
|
|
Citation Indicator
|
|
|
Citable
|
45
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Total
|
43
|
|
Articles
|
|
|
Total
|
2
|
|
Reviews
|
|
|
Scimago
|
28
|
|
H-index
|
|
|
Scimago
|
0,316
|
|
Journal Rank
|
|
|
Scimago
|
Chemistry (miscellaneous) Q3
|
|
Quartile Score
|
|
|
Scopus
|
393/181=2,2
|
|
Scite Score
|
|
|
Scopus
|
General Chemistry 215/398 (Q3)
|
|
Scite Score Rank
|
|
|
Scopus
|
0,560
|
|
SNIP
|
|
|
Days from
|
58
|
|
submission
|
|
|
to acceptance
|
|
|
Days from
|
68
|
|
acceptance
|
|
|
to publication
|
|
|
Acceptance
|
51%
|
| Rate |
| 2019 | |
|---|---|
| Total Cites WoS |
495 |
| Impact Factor | 1,418 |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
1,374 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
0,936 |
| Immediacy Index |
0,460 |
| Citable Items |
50 |
| Total Articles |
50 |
| Total Reviews |
0 |
| Cited Half-Life |
6,2 |
| Citing Half-Life |
8,3 |
| Eigenfactor Score |
0,00048 |
| Article Influence Score |
0,164 |
| % Articles in Citable Items |
100,00 |
| Normalized Eigenfactor |
0,05895 |
| Average IF Percentile |
20,349 |
| Scimago H-index |
26 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,255 |
| Scopus Scite Score |
226/167=1,4 |
| Scopus Scite Score Rank |
Chemistry (miscellaneous) 240/398 (Q3) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,494 |
| Acceptance Rate |
41% |
| Acta Chromatographica | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Online only Gold Open Access |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 400 EUR/article |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription Information | Gold Open Access |
| Purchase per Title | |
| Acta Chromatographica | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Size | A4 |
| Year of Foundation |
1988 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Institute of Chemistry, University of Silesia |
| Founder's Address |
PL-40-007 Katowice, Poland, Bankowa 12 |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 2083-5736 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Jul 2023 | 0 | 5 | 12 |
| Aug 2023 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Sep 2023 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Oct 2023 | 0 | 6 | 4 |
| Nov 2023 | 0 | 8 | 5 |
| Dec 2023 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Authors:
, , , , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , and
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory