Authors:
Y. Q. Cheng Department of Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
Geological Scientific Research Institute of Shengli Oilfield, Sinopec, Dongying, 257001, China

Search for other papers by Y. Q. Cheng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Y. X. Zhang Department of Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

Search for other papers by Y. X. Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. D. Qi Department of Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

Search for other papers by S. D. Qi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
H. L. Chen Department of Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

Search for other papers by H. L. Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
X. G. Chen Department of Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

Search for other papers by X. G. Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

Summary

1,7-Dihydroxy-3,8-dimethoxyxanthone (X1) and 1,8-dihydroxy-3,7-dimethoxyxanthone (X2) are two important xanthones of the Tibetan medicinal plant Gentianopsis paludosa (Hook. f.) Ma. They are very similar in structure, the only difference being exchange of OH and OCH3 at the 7 and 8 positions. By calculations based on the geometry of the molecules using the MM+ force field, the different distances between the hydroxyl groups of the two xanthones were obtained (4.64774 Å for X2 and 7.19412 Å for X1), therefore, the two hydroxyl groups of X1 should freely interact with more water molecules than those of X2 in aqueous solution. In other words, X2 is more hydrophobic than X1. Micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEKC) was therefore chosen for separation of the compounds. The optimum separation conditions were: 20 mm borate + 20 mm SDS (pH 9.8) as running buffer, 17.5 kV applied potential, and detection wavelength 260 nm. The two xanthones were well separated in 9.0 min, with Gaussian peak shapes. The repeatability of the MEKC method (expressed as RSD) for X1 and X2 was 0.9 and 1.1%, respectively, for migration time, and 3.1 and 1.4% for peak area. The limits of detection (S/N = 3) were 0.41 μg mL−1 for X1 and 0.82 μg mL−1 for X2. The recovery of the MEKC method for the two xanthones was also satisfactory.

  • [1]. T.N. He 1988 Flora of China Science Press Beijing 294297.

  • [2]. B.Z. Guo 1987 Medicinal Plants of Qinghai Province Qinghai People's Publishing House Xining 458.

  • [3]. Z.P. Li C.H. Huo X.L. Zheng 2003 Chin. J. Mod. Appl. Pharm. 20 24.

  • [4]. H.D. Wang C.Y. Tan Y.G. Du X.F. Bai H.F. Lu 2004 Chin. J. Chin. Mater. Med. 29 1055.

  • [5]. H.D. Wang C.Y. Tan Y.G. Du X.F. Bai B.C. Lin 2005 Chin. Pharm. J. 40 1059.

  • [6]. Q. Mi C.N. Cao Z.X. Zhao L.Y. Tu 2005 J. Qinghai Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2 64.

  • [7]. H.D. Wang C.Y. Tan X.F. Bai Y.G. Du B.C. Lin 2006 J. Ethnopharmacol. 105 114.

  • [8]. Jiangsu Institute of Botany 1988 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Kunming Institute of Botany, Xinhua Bencao Gangyao Shanghai Science and Technology Press Shanghai 292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [9]. H.D. Wang C.Y. Tan X.F. Bai Y.G. Du B.C. Lin 2005 Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 17 598.

  • [10]. Y.Y. Zong C.Y. Xu 1982 Yaoxue Tongbao 17 206.

  • [11]. H.D. Wang C.Y. Tan J.M. Zhao X.F. Bai Y.G. Du B.C. Lin 2007 Chin. J. Pharm. Anal. 27 421.

  • [12]. M. Jing J.W. Li Q. Fan X. Shi 2008 Chin. J. Inform. Trad. Chin. Med. 15 43.

  • [13]. T. Bo Y.F. Huang X.D. Yang K.A. Li H.W. Liu L.Z. Xu 2003 J. Chromatogr. Sci. 41 182.

  • [14]. X.M. Wu S.X. Gong T. Bo Y.P. Liao H.W. Liu 2004 J. Chromatogr. A 1061 217.

  • [15]. T. Bo X.D. Yang K.A. Li L.Z. Xu H.W. Liu 2003 J. Sep. Sci. 26 133136.

  • [16]. T. Bo X.D. Yang F. Liu K.A. Li L.Z. Xiu H.W. Liu 2002 Anal. Chim. Acta 474 37.

  • [17]. Y.F. Yang Z.X. Liao L. Cuo Y. Chen 2003 J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 26 1219.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sajewicz, Mieczyslaw, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

Editors(s)

  • Danica Agbaba, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Łukasz Komsta, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  • Ivana Stanimirova-Daszykowska, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  • Monika Waksmundzka-Hajnos, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

Editorial Board

  • Ravi Bhushan, The Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
  • Jacek Bojarski, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
  • Bezhan Chankvetadze, State University of Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
  • Michał Daszykowski, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  • Tadeusz H. Dzido, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  • Attila Felinger, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
  • Kazimierz Glowniak, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  • Bronisław Glód, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland
  • Anna Gumieniczek, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  • Urszula Hubicka, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
  • Krzysztof Kaczmarski, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszów, Poland
  • Huba Kalász, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • Katarina Karljiković Rajić, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Imre Klebovich, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • Angelika Koch, Private Pharmacy, Hamburg, Germany
  • Piotr Kus, Univerity of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  • Debby Mangelings, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
  • Emil Mincsovics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
  • Ágnes M. Móricz, Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary
  • Gertrud Morlock, Giessen University, Giessen, Germany
  • Anna Petruczynik, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  • Robert Skibiński, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  • Bernd Spangenberg, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany
  • Tomasz Tuzimski, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  • Adam Voelkel, Poznań University of Technology, Poznań, Poland
  • Beata Walczak, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  • Wiesław Wasiak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
  • Igor G. Zenkevich, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

 

SAJEWICZ, MIECZYSLAW
E-mail:mieczyslaw.sajewicz@us.edu.pl

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Science Citation Index
  • Sci Search
  • Research Alert
  • Chemistry Citation Index and Current Content/Physical
  • Chemical and Earth Sciences
  • SCOPUS
  • GoogleScholar
  • Index Copernicus
  • CABI
  • CABELLS Journalytics

2023  
Web of Science  
Journal Impact Factor 1.7
Rank by Impact Factor Q3 (Chemistry, Analytical)
Journal Citation Indicator 0.43
Scopus  
CiteScore 4.0
CiteScore rank Q2 (General Chemistry)
SNIP 0.706
Scimago  
SJR index 0.344
SJR Q rank Q3

Acta Chromatographica
Publication Model Online only
Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 400 EUR/article
Effective from  1st Feb 2025:
700 EUR/article
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access
Purchase per Title  

Acta Chromatographica
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
1988
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Institute of Chemistry, University of Silesia
Founder's
Address
PL-40-007 Katowice, Poland, Bankowa 12
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2083-5736 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Jun 2024 0 18 3
Jul 2024 0 3 2
Aug 2024 0 26 9
Sep 2024 0 53 2
Oct 2024 0 89 1
Nov 2024 0 60 3
Dec 2024 0 36 0