Combined anatomical and functional evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) using computed tomography (CT) has recently emerged as an accurate, robust and non-invasive tool for the evaluation of ischemic heart disease. Cardiac CT has become a one-stop-shop imaging modality that allows the simultaneous depiction, characterization and quantification of coronary atherosclerosis and the assessment of myocardial ischemia. Advancements in scanner technology (improvements in spatial and temporal resolution, dual-energy imaging, wide detector panels) and the implementation of iterative reconstruction algorithms enables the detection of myocardial ischemia in both qualitative and quantitative fashion using low-dose scanning protocols. The addition of CT perfusion (CTP) to standard coronary CT angiography is a reliable tool to improve diagnostic accuracy. CTP using static first-pass imaging enables qualitative assessment of the myocardial tissue, whereas dynamic perfusion imaging can also provide quantitative information on myocardial blood flow. Myocardial tissue assessment by CTP holds the potential to refine risk in stable chest pain or microvascular dysfunction. CTP can aid the detection of residual ischemia after coronary intervention. Comprehensive evaluation of CAD using CTP might therefore improve the selection of patients for aggressive secondary prevention therapy or coronary revascularization with high diagnostic certainty. In addition, prognostic information provided by perfusion CT imaging could improve patient outcomes by quantifying the ischemic burden of the left ventricle. The current review focuses on the clinical value of myocardial perfusion imaging by CT, current status of CTP imaging and the use of myocardial CTP in various patient populations for the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease.
Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(10):886.
Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, Voros S, Merkely B, Hoffmann U. Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(7):390.
Yang L, Zhou T, Zhang R, Xu L, Peng Z, Ding J, Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG gating based on step-and-shoot, Flash and volume modes for detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(10):2345.
Shaw LJ, Hausleiter J, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(20):2103.
Moss AJ, Williams MC, Newby DE, Nicol ED. The Updated NICE Guidelines: Cardiac CT as the First-Line Test for Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2017;10(5):15.
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2019;41(3):407.
Investigators S-H, Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C, Boon NA, Dweck MR, Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(10):924.
Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Mark DB, Al-Khalidi HR, Cavanaugh B, Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1291.
Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Udelson JE, Picard MH, Truong QA, Patel MR, Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation. 2017;135(24):2320.
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213.
Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, O'Brien SM, Boden WE, Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1395.
Iwasaki K. Myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of stable coronary artery disease. World Journal of Cardiology. 2014;6(4):130.
Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;55(25):2816.
De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991.
Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503.
Curzen N, Rana O, Nicholas Z, Golledge P, Zaman A, Oldroyd K, Does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain?: the RIPCORD study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(2):248.
Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(12):2508.
Seitun S, De Lorenzi C, Cademartiri F, Buscaglia A, Travaglio N, Balbi M, CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A New Frontier in Cardiac Imaging. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7295460.
Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2900.
Seitun S, Castiglione Morelli M, Budaj I, Boccalini S, Galletto Pregliasco A, Valbusa A, Stress Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A New Topic in Cardiology. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69(2):188.
Techasith T, Cury RC. Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(8):905.
Baxa J, Hromadka M, Sedivy J, Stepankova L, Molacek J, Schmidt B, Regadenoson-Stress Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Improves Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography in Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis in Asymptomatic Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:105629.
Bischoff B, Bamberg F, Marcus R, Schwarz F, Becker HC, Becker A, Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(2):435.
Cademartiri F, Seitun S, Clemente A, La Grutta L, Toia P, Runza G, Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7(2):129.
Arnoldi E, Lee YS, Ruzsics B, Weininger M, Spears JR, Rowley CP, CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5(6):421.
George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, Kitagawa K, Bluemke DA, Lima JA, Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2007;42(12):815.
Danad I, Szymonifka J, Schulman-Marcus J, Min JK. Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(8):836.
Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion With a Whole-Heart Coverage Scanner in Addition to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Derived. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(12):2460.
Rossi A, Dharampal A, Wragg A, Davies LC, van Geuns RJ, Anagnostopoulos C, Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(1):85.
Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A, Hildebrandt K, Bauner K, Schwarz F, Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(3):267.
Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Marcus RP, Greif M, von Ziegler F, Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2011;260(3):689.
Coenen A, Rossi A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, Kono AK, Chelu RG, Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(7):760.
Kono AK, Coenen A, Lubbers M, Kurata A, Rossi A, Dharampal A, Relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic computed tomographic perfusion imaging predicts hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis better than absolute blood flow. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(12):801.
Rossi A, Wragg A, Klotz E, Pirro F, Moon JC, Nieman K, Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Comparison of Clinical Analysis Methods for the Detection of Vessel-Specific Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(4).
Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bamberg F, Tittus J, Schwarz F, D'Anastasi M, CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR. Heart. 2013;99(14):1004.
Brusen R, Branch K. Myocardial CT Perfusion: A Review of Current Modalities, Technology, and Clinical Performance. Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports. 2017;10(8):25.
Patel AR, Bamberg F, Branch K, Carrascosa P, Chen M, Cury RC, Society of cardiovascular computed tomography expert consensus document on myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14(1):87.
Kikuchi Y, Oyama-Manabe N, Naya M, Manabe O, Tomiyama Y, Sasaki T, Quantification of myocardial blood flow using dynamic 320-row multi-detector CT as compared with (1)(5)O-H(2)O PET. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1547.
Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Ferreira N, Sampaio F, Pires-Morais G, Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;61(10):1099.
Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Leung M, Antonis PR, Nasis A, Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(1):67.
Tamarappoo BK, Gutstein A, Cheng VY, Nakazato R, Gransar H, Dey D, Assessment of the relationship between stenosis severity and distribution of coronary artery stenoses on multislice computed tomographic angiography and myocardial ischemia detected by single photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17(5):791.
George RT, Mehra VC, Chen MY, Kitagawa K, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Myocardial CT perfusion imaging and SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a head-to-head comparison from the CORE320 multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology. 2014;272(2):407.
Cury RC, Kitt TM, Feaheny K, Blankstein R, Ghoshhajra BB, Budoff MJ, A randomized, multicenter, multivendor study of myocardial perfusion imaging with regadenoson CT perfusion vs single photon emission CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9(2):103.
Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(1).
Sorgaard MH, Kofoed KF, Linde JJ, George RT, Rochitte CE, Feuchtner G, Diagnostic accuracy of static CT perfusion for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10(6):450.
Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(8 Pt 1):1487.
Baggiano A, Fusini L, Del Torto A, Vivona P, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, Sequential Strategy Including FFRCT Plus Stress-CTP Impacts on Management of Patients with Stable Chest Pain: The Stress-CTP RIPCORD Study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(7).
Lubbers M, Coenen A, Kofflard M, Bruning T, Kietselaer B, Galema T, Comprehensive Cardiac CT With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Functional Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The Multicenter, Randomized CRESCENT-II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(11):1625.
Yu M, Shen C, Dai X, Lu Z, Wang Y, Lu B, Clinical Outcomes of Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Combined With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Guided Strategy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(1):e009775.
van Rosendael AR, Dimitriu-Leen AC, de Graaf MA, van Zwet EW, Jukema JW, Bax JJ, Impact of computed tomography myocardial perfusion following computed tomography coronary angiography on downstream referral for invasive coronary angiography, revascularization and, outcome at 12 months. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(9):969.
Sharma RK, Arbab-Zadeh A, Kishi S, Chen MY, Magalhaes TA, George RT, Incremental diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over coronary angiography stratified by pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary artery calcification: The CORE320 study. Int J Cardiol. 2015;201:570.
Nakamura S, Kitagawa K, Goto Y, Omori T, Kurita T, Yamada A, Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantified With Stress Dynamic Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(7 Pt 2):1379.
van Assen M, De Cecco CN, Eid M, von Knebel Doeberitz P, Scarabello M, Lavra F, Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019;13(3):26.
Meinel FG, Pugliese F, Schoepf UJ, Ebersberger U, Wichmann JL, Lo GG, Prognostic Value of Stress Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT in a Multicenter Population With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(4):761.
Pontone G, De Cecco C, Baggiano A, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Leiner T, Design of CTP-PRO study (impact of stress Cardiac computed Tomography myocardial Perfusion on downstream resources and PROgnosis in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: A multicenter international study). Int J Cardiol. 2019;292:253.
Ho KT, Ong HY, Tan G, Yong QW. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion measurements of resting and hyperaemic blood flow in low-risk subjects with 128-slice dual-source CT. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(3):300.
Yu M, Chen X, Dai X, Pan J, Wang Y, Lu B, The Value of Low-Dose Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT for Accurate Evaluation of Microvascular Obstruction in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2019;213(4):798.
Schuijf JD, Matheson MB, Ostovaneh MR, Arbab-Zadeh A, Kofoed KF, Scholte A, Ischemia and No Obstructive Stenosis (INOCA) at CT Angiography, CT Myocardial Perfusion, Invasive Coronary Angiography, and SPECT: The CORE320 Study. Radiology. 2020;294(1):61.
Rief M, Zimmermann E, Stenzel F, Martus P, Stangl K, Greupner J, Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;62(16):1476.
Linde JJ, Hove JD, Sorgaard M, Kelbaek H, Jensen GB, Kuhl JT, Long-Term Clinical Impact of Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Recent Acute-Onset Chest Pain: The Randomized Controlled CATCH Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(12):1404.
Sorgaard MH, Linde JJ, Kuhl JT, Kelbaek H, Hove JD, Fornitz GG, Value of Myocardial Perfusion Assessment With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients With Recent Acute-Onset Chest Pain. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(11):1611.
Linde JJ, Sorgaard M, Kuhl JT, Hove JD, Kelbaek H, Nielsen WB, Prediction of clinical outcome by myocardial CT perfusion in patients with low-risk unstable angina pectoris. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33(2):261.
Han R, Sun K, Lu B, Zhao R, Li K, Yang X. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography combined with dual-energy myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of myocardial infarction. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(1):207.
Nakauchi Y, Iwanaga Y, Ikuta S, Kudo M, Kobuke K, Murakami T, Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis using multi-row detector CT in acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2012;98(7):566.
Pan J, Yuan M, Yu M, Gao Y, Shen C, Wang Y, Myocardial Blood Flow Quantified by Low-Dose Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Is Associated with Peak Troponin Level and Impaired Left Ventricle Function in Patients with ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(5):709.
Meinel FG, Ebersberger U, Schoepf UJ, Lo GG, Choe YH, Wang Y, Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT: feasibility in a multicenter patient population. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2014;203(2):W174.
Meinel FG, Wichmann JL, Schoepf UJ, Pugliese F, Ebersberger U, Lo GG, Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT imaging: Prognostic value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(1):16.
Vliegenthart R, De Cecco CN, Wichmann JL, Meinel FG, Pelgrim GJ, Tesche C, Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10(4):301.
Tomizawa N, Fujino Y, Kamitani M, Chou S, Yamamoto K, Inoh S, Longer diabetes duration reduces myocardial blood flow in remote myocardium assessed by dynamic myocardial CT perfusion. J Diabetes Complications. 2018;32(6):609.
Bettencourt N, Ferreira ND, Leite D, Carvalho M, Ferreira WDS, Schuster A, CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(10):1062.
Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Miller JM, Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(17):1120.
Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, Conte E, Collet C, Sonck J, CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(3):732.
Delgado C, Vazquez M, Oca R, Vilar M, Trinidad C, Sanmartin M. Myocardial ischemia evaluation with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013;66(11):864.
Meinel FG, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, Nance JW, Jr., Silverman JR, Flowers BA, First-arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT. Radiology. 2014;270(3):708.
Kim SM, Chang SA, Shin W, Choe YH. Dual-energy CT perfusion during pharmacologic stress for the assessment of myocardial perfusion defects using a second-generation dual-source CT: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38(1):44.
Ko SM, Park JH, Hwang HK, Song MG. Direct comparison of stress- and rest-dual-energy computed tomography for detection of myocardial perfusion defect. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30 Suppl 1:41.
Delgado Sanchez-Gracian C, Oca Pernas R, Trinidad Lopez C, Santos Armentia E, Vaamonde Liste A, Vazquez Caamano M, Quantitative myocardial perfusion with stress dual-energy CT: iodine concentration differences between normal and ischemic or necrotic myocardium. Initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(9):3199.
Nishiyama H, Tanabe Y, Kido T, Kurata A, Uetani T, Kido T, Incremental diagnostic value of whole-heart dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. J Cardiol. 2019;73(5):425.
Yi Y, Xu C, Wu W, Wang Y, Li YM, Shen ZJ, Myocardial blood flow analysis of stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion for hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease diagnosis: The clinical value of relative parameter optimization. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14(4):314.
Yang J, Dou G, He B, Jin Q, Chen Z, Jing J, Stress Myocardial Blood Flow Ratio by Dynamic CT Perfusion Identifies Hemodynamically Significant CAD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(4):966.
Alessio AM, Bindschadler M, Busey JM, Shuman WP, Caldwell JH, Branch KR. Accuracy of Myocardial Blood Flow Estimation From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac CT Compared With PET. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(6):e008323.
Yi Y, Xu C, Wu W, Wang Y, Li YM, Ge YQ, Stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion for symptomatic patients with intermediate- or high-risk of coronary artery disease: Optimization and incremental improvement between the absolute and relative myocardial blood flow analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14(5):437.
Li Y, Dai X, Lu Z, Shen C, Zhang J. Diagnostic performance of quantitative, semi-quantitative, and visual analysis of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: a validation study with invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur Radiol. 2020.