Authors:
Ivan Rogic Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia

Search for other papers by Ivan Rogic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4276-5429
,
Mateja Rubic Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia

Search for other papers by Mateja Rubic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Drazen Huic Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia
School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

Search for other papers by Drazen Huic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

Abstract

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (Gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography) is an established molecular imaging technique for identifying the spread of prostate cancer in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and for initial staging. Penile metastases from prostate cancer are very rare and can be easily misdiagnosed as noncancerous nodules as part of Peyronie's disease. Most cases of penile metastases occur in patients with disseminated disease and are typically diagnosed at advanced stages. In this case, a 74-year-old patient with prostate cancer underwent a successful prostatectomy, ADT, and radiation therapy to the prostate bed, achieving a PSAnadir of 0.01 ng mL−1. Three and a half years after surgery, biochemical recurrence occurred, and the patient was referred to our clinic for a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan. PET/CT revealed pathological PSMA expression in a proximal part of the penile root, later confirmed by pathohistological analysis as prostate cancer metastasis. Notably, our patient had a PSA value of only 0.53 ng mL−1, one of the lowest serum PSA values reported in the literature for penile metastasis. This case underscores the critical role of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in differentiating benign conditions like Peyronie's disease from metastatic lesions and in detecting rare and unusual metastatic sites.

Abstract

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (Gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography) is an established molecular imaging technique for identifying the spread of prostate cancer in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and for initial staging. Penile metastases from prostate cancer are very rare and can be easily misdiagnosed as noncancerous nodules as part of Peyronie's disease. Most cases of penile metastases occur in patients with disseminated disease and are typically diagnosed at advanced stages. In this case, a 74-year-old patient with prostate cancer underwent a successful prostatectomy, ADT, and radiation therapy to the prostate bed, achieving a PSAnadir of 0.01 ng mL−1. Three and a half years after surgery, biochemical recurrence occurred, and the patient was referred to our clinic for a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan. PET/CT revealed pathological PSMA expression in a proximal part of the penile root, later confirmed by pathohistological analysis as prostate cancer metastasis. Notably, our patient had a PSA value of only 0.53 ng mL−1, one of the lowest serum PSA values reported in the literature for penile metastasis. This case underscores the critical role of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in differentiating benign conditions like Peyronie's disease from metastatic lesions and in detecting rare and unusual metastatic sites.

Introduction

According to World Cancer Research, prostate cancer ranks as the second most common cancer in men globally and the fourth most common overall [1]. The most common sites of metastases from prostate cancer are lymph nodes, bones, lungs, and liver [2]. Penile metastases of prostate cancer are extremely rare, and only a handful of case reports exist in the literature in patients with low PSA values [3–7]. Cancer usually spreads to the penis retrogradely via the venous or lymphatic route. Common indicators of penile metastasis include pain, detectable nodules, priapism, ulceration, and symptoms related to invasion of the urethra such as urinary retention, hematuria, and dysuria. Definitive diagnosis is set with needle core biopsy [6, 7].

Therapy options for metastatic prostate cancer depend on the stage of the disease. In cases of oligometastatic disease, a combination of systemic therapies (ADT) and metastasis-directed treatment, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), is usually used. In patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (HSPC), the main therapeutic option is ADT, and depending on metastatic spread radiation therapy. For aggressive disease, ADT combined with chemotherapy (docetaxel) is recommended, while ADT + ART may also be considered. In patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRPC), therapeutic options include ART, chemotherapy (docetaxel and cabazitaxel), PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy, Ra-223, and immunotherapy [4].

Peyronie's disease is a noncancerous, benign condition characterised by the development and spread of fibrous scar tissue in the form of plaques. Build-up over time can grow from palpable nodules to causing deformation to curvature of the penis, priapism, flaccidity, and pain during erection. The onset of this condition is gradual, and its symptoms can vary in severity [8]. Differentiating Peyronie's disease from penile metastasis can be challenging due to the overlapping clinical signs.

With the recent increased availability of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in both biochemical recurrence and initial staging, more attention should be given to rare metastatic manifestation sites of PC. Our case highlights a patient with a biochemical recurrence of PC, and to the best of our knowledge, one of the lowest serum PSA values associated with penile metastasis described in the literature.

Case presentation

A 74-year-old patient with biochemical recurrence of PC was referred to our clinic for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. In April 2019, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was done because of prostate hyperplasia and urine retention. Initial PSA was 4.02 ng mL−1. Subsequent pathological examination revealed the presence of prostate cancer in 24 out of 400 tissue samples, accounting for approximately 0.6% of available tissue. A radical prostatectomy performed three months after TURP indicated tumour tissue in both lobes with an aggressive Gleason score of 9 (4 + 5), ISUP/WHO group 5 and pTNM classification: pT3b, pN0, pMx. The PSA value after prostatectomy was 0.02 ng mL−1 (PSAnadir). In the following months, the value of PSA slowly increased. A year and a half after surgery (early 2021), at a PSA value of 0.27 ng mL−1 the oncologist decided to administer a short course of hormonal therapy (ADT) and conduct salvage radiotherapy of the prostate bed. Following both treatments, the patient recovered well, maintaining an ECOG performance status of 0 during follow-ups, with a PSA nadir of 0.01 ng mL−1. Last year, the patient's PSA levels started to rise again, and at the PSA level of 0.53 ng mL−1, he was referred to a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan (Fig. 1 demonstrates the patient's progression up until PET/CT scan). Before the scan, the patient sought an evaluation from a urologist for a palpable lump under the skin of his penis, clinically consistent with an early stage of Peyronie's disease. At that time, his PSA level was 0.38 ng mL−1.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Patient's progression and PSA levels from diagnosis up until [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (iPSA – initial value of PSA; TURP – transurethral resection of the prostate; RP – radical prostatectomy)

Citation: Imaging 2025; 10.1556/1647.2025.00275

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan revealed pathological PSMA expression in one non-enlarged lymph node in the external iliac lymph node group. Pathological [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake was also seen in the proximal part of the penis, correlating with a palpable lump (Fig. 2), with SUVmax value of 7.9. For a definitive diagnosis, the patient was referred for a biopsy. Histology revealed pseudoglandular formations lined with atypical epithelial cells that are immunohistochemically positive for PSA, PSAP, and NKX3.1. The finding corresponded to metastasis of prostate cancer. Following consultation with an oncology multidisciplinary team, it was decided to initiate treatment with a long-lasting LHRH agonist.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT sagittal, transversal fused images and maximum intensity projection (MIP) image showing pathological [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in the root of the penis (SUVmax 7,9). The physiological urethral activity of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is seen caudal of metastasis, usually occurring in patients with a history of TURP and can mask or mimic disease recurrence. (PET Hot body colour scale; threshold 0 – 10 SUV-bw)

Citation: Imaging 2025; 10.1556/1647.2025.00275

Discussion

Penile tissue metastases are exceedingly rare, despite the rich and intricate vascularization of the corpus cavernosum [3]. The earliest case of penile metastasis was reported by Eberth in 1870 [5]. A Japanese scientific review in 1997 described only 110 cases, with prostate cancer metastases accounting for 25 (23%) of them [6]. A comprehensive review conducted by Zhang et al. compiled 480 cases of penile metastases, with 143 cases of prostate cancer metastases (29.8%) [7].

In a retrospective study done by Tatkovic et al. out of 4,860 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT studies reported, that the incidence of PC penile metastases was 0.1% [9]. This was the first case of PSMA-avid lesion detected in the penis at our clinic with more than 300 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans done. Most literature describes these cases in patients with late-stage disseminated PC and being linked to poor prognosis. The survival time for patients with penile metastases varies widely from one to twenty-four months [6], averaging no longer than 1 year [7].

Both Peyronie's disease and prostate cancer metastases can have similar symptoms, including penile pain, palpable nodules, painful erections, and erectile dysfunction [6–11]. This underscores the need for clinicians to consider the possibility of penile metastases in older patients, particularly those with a history of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer where serum PSA levels remain measurable.

Our case is exceptionally uncommon since penile metastasis developed over three and a half years after radical prostatectomy as part of an oligometastatic presentation of the disease. At the time of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan, the PSA level was 0.58 ng mL−1 and even lower when the palpable nodule first appeared – 0.38 ng mL−1.

Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and penile metastases are categorized as stage M1c, representing an advanced stage associated with reduced survival rates. In this instance, the patient presented with oligometastatic disease characterized by a single PSMA-positive pelvic lymph node and penile metastasis, without indication of further disease spread. However, as penile metastasis is considered visceral, the patient was classified as M1c stage, and systemic therapy with long-lasting ADT was started.

Landen et al. [11] conducted a systematic review that revealed the lack of consensus on treatment approaches for patients with penile metastases. According to European Association of Urology guidelines, systemic therapy accompanied by long-lasting androgen deprivation therapy is the most commonly used treatment for these patients [4]. In the literature there are described cases of local excision, partial or complete penectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and penile denervation, all depending on disease progression and clinical symptoms [11]. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy should also be very useful in the future, as most of the patients with penile metastasis have disseminated metastatic PC.

Conclusion

Our case affirms the importance of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in evaluating patients with prostate cancer, as it enables the detection of rare and unusual metastases. In patients with biochemical recurrence irrespective of PSA levels, or in those with a risk of undiagnosed cancer when clinical suspicion arises for Peyronie's disease, it is crucial to consider the differential diagnosis of penile metastasis.

Authors' contribution

Ivan Rogic: Conceptualization, methodology, writing and analysis; Mateja Rubic: Conceptualization and supervision; Drazen Huic: Validation and supervision.

Funding sources

This research did not receive any specific funding.

Conflict of interests

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical statement

The study protocol and content adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Abbreviations

ADT

androgen deprivation therapy

ART

adjuvant radiation therapy

BCR

biochemical recurrence

ECOG

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score

iPSA

initial value of PSA

ISUP/WHO

International Society of Urological Pathology/World health organisation

LHRH

luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone

MIP

maximum intensity projection

NKx3.1

homeobox protein/prostatic tumour suppressor gene

PSA

prostate-specific antigen

PSMA

prostate-specific membrane antigen

PSAP

prostatic specific acid phosphatase

pTNM

Pathological tumour-node-metastasis

RP

radical prostatectomy

SUVmax

maximum standardized uptake value

TURP

transurethral resection of the prostate

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT

Gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen – 11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography

References

  • [1]

    Wang L, Lu B, He M, Wang Y, Wang Z, Du L: Prostate cancer incidence and mortality: global status and temporal trends in 89 countries from 2000 to 2019. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 811044.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    Gandaglia G, Abdollah F, Schiffmann J, Trudeau V, Shariat SF, Kim SP, et al.: M. Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: a population-based analysis. Prostate 2014; 74(2): 210216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    Osther PJ, Løntoft E: Metastasis to the penis. Case reports and review of the literature. Int Urol Nephrol 1991; 23(2): 161167.

  • [4]

    European Association of Urology Guidelines. Paris: EAU annual congress 2024: https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full-guideline/EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG-Guidelines-on-Prostate-Cancer-2024_2024-04-09-132035_ypmy_2024-04-16-122605_lqpk.pdf [Last accessed 1.8.2024].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    Eberth CJ: Krebsmetastasen des corpus cavernosum penis. (Cancer metastases of the corpus cavernosum of penis) Virchows Arch 1870; 51: 145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [6]

    Fiaschetti V, Liberto V, Claroni G, Loreni G, Formica V, Roselli M, et al.: Relevance of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for penile metastasis after prostatectomy: Uncommon case report and brief review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep 2016; 11(3): 255259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    Zhang K, Da J, Yao HJ, Zheng DC, Cai ZK, Jiang YQ, et al.: Metastatic tumors of the penis: A report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94(1): e132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    Ziegelmann MJ, Bajic P, Levine LA: Peyronie’s disease: contemporary evaluation and management. Int J Urol 2020; 27: 504516.

  • [9]

    Tatkovic A, McBean R, Schoeman J, Wong, D: Prostate penile metastasis: incidence and imaging pattern on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64: 499504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [10]

    Dai Y, Shi B-L, Zhang J, Liu S-N, Jia Y-T: Penile metastasis from prostate cancer misdiagnosed as Peyronie disease: A case report. Sexual Med 2023; 11(1).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [11]

    Landen L, Devos G, Joniau S, Albersen M: Penile metastasis in prostate cancer patients: two case reports, surgical excision technique, and literature review. Curr Urol 2023; 17(3): 165172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [1]

    Wang L, Lu B, He M, Wang Y, Wang Z, Du L: Prostate cancer incidence and mortality: global status and temporal trends in 89 countries from 2000 to 2019. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 811044.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    Gandaglia G, Abdollah F, Schiffmann J, Trudeau V, Shariat SF, Kim SP, et al.: M. Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: a population-based analysis. Prostate 2014; 74(2): 210216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    Osther PJ, Løntoft E: Metastasis to the penis. Case reports and review of the literature. Int Urol Nephrol 1991; 23(2): 161167.

  • [4]

    European Association of Urology Guidelines. Paris: EAU annual congress 2024: https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full-guideline/EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG-Guidelines-on-Prostate-Cancer-2024_2024-04-09-132035_ypmy_2024-04-16-122605_lqpk.pdf [Last accessed 1.8.2024].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    Eberth CJ: Krebsmetastasen des corpus cavernosum penis. (Cancer metastases of the corpus cavernosum of penis) Virchows Arch 1870; 51: 145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [6]

    Fiaschetti V, Liberto V, Claroni G, Loreni G, Formica V, Roselli M, et al.: Relevance of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for penile metastasis after prostatectomy: Uncommon case report and brief review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep 2016; 11(3): 255259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    Zhang K, Da J, Yao HJ, Zheng DC, Cai ZK, Jiang YQ, et al.: Metastatic tumors of the penis: A report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94(1): e132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    Ziegelmann MJ, Bajic P, Levine LA: Peyronie’s disease: contemporary evaluation and management. Int J Urol 2020; 27: 504516.

  • [9]

    Tatkovic A, McBean R, Schoeman J, Wong, D: Prostate penile metastasis: incidence and imaging pattern on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64: 499504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [10]

    Dai Y, Shi B-L, Zhang J, Liu S-N, Jia Y-T: Penile metastasis from prostate cancer misdiagnosed as Peyronie disease: A case report. Sexual Med 2023; 11(1).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [11]

    Landen L, Devos G, Joniau S, Albersen M: Penile metastasis in prostate cancer patients: two case reports, surgical excision technique, and literature review. Curr Urol 2023; 17(3): 165172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Chair of the Editorial Board:
Béla MERKELY (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Editor-in-Chief:
Pál MAUROVICH-HORVAT (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Deputy Editor-in-Chief:
Viktor BÉRCZI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Executive Editor:
Charles S. WHITE (University of Maryland, USA)

Deputy Editors:
Gianluca PONTONE (Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy)
Michelle WILLIAMS (University of Edinburgh, UK)

Senior Associate Editors:
Tamás Zsigmond KINCSES (University of Szeged, Hungary)
Hildo LAMB (Leiden University, The Netherlands)
Denisa MURARU (Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy)
Ronak RAJANI (Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK)

Associate Editors:
Andrea BAGGIANO (Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy)
Fabian BAMBERG (Department of Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany)
Péter BARSI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Theodora BENEDEK (University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania)
Ronny BÜCHEL (University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland)
Filippo CADEMARTIRI (SDN IRCCS, Naples, Italy) Matteo CAMELI (University of Siena, Italy)
Csilla CELENG (University of Utrecht, The Netherlands)
Edit DÓSA (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Tilman EMRICH (University Hospital Mainz, Germany)

Marco FRANCONE (La Sapienza University of Rome, Italy)
Viktor GÁL (OrthoPred Ltd., Győr, Hungary)
Alessia GIMELLI (Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy)
Tamás GYÖRKE (Semmelweis Unversity, Budapest)
Fabian HYAFIL (European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France)
György JERMENDY (Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Hospital, Budapest, Hungary)
Pál KAPOSI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Mihaly KÁROLYI (University of Zürich, Switzerland)
Lajos KOZÁK (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Mariusz KRUK (Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland)
Zsuzsa LÉNARD (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Erica MAFFEI (ASUR Marche, Urbino, Marche, Italy)
Robert MANKA (University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland)
Saima MUSHTAQ (Cardiology Center Monzino (IRCCS), Milan, Italy)
Gábor RUDAS (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Balázs RUZSICS (Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, UK)
Christopher L SCHLETT (Unievrsity Hospital Freiburg, Germany)
Bálint SZILVESZTER (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Richard TAKX (University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands)
Ádám TÁRNOKI (National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary)
Dávid TÁRNOKI (National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary)
Ákos VARGA-SZEMES (Medical University of South Carolina, USA)
Hajnalka VÁGÓ (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Jiayin ZHANG (Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China)

International Editorial Board:

Gergely ÁGOSTON (University of Szeged, Hungary)
Anna BARITUSSIO (University of Padova, Italy)
Bostjan BERLOT (University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
Edoardo CONTE (Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan)
Réka FALUDI (University of Szeged, Hungary)
Andrea Igoren GUARICCI (University of Bari, Italy)
Marco GUGLIELMO (Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy)
Kristóf HISRCHBERG (University of Heidelberg, Germany)
Dénes HORVÁTHY (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Julia KARADY (Harvard Unversity, MA, USA)
Attila KOVÁCS (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Riccardo LIGA (Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy)
Máté MAGYAR (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Giuseppe MUSCOGIURI (Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy)
Anikó I NAGY (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Liliána SZABÓ (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
Özge TOK (Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey)
Márton TOKODI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Managing Editor:
Anikó HEGEDÜS (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Pál Maurovich-Horvat, MD, PhD, MPH, Editor-in-Chief

Semmelweis University, Medical Imaging Centre
2 Korányi Sándor utca, Budapest, H-1083, Hungary
Tel: +36-20-663-2485
E-mail: maurovich-horvat.pal@med.semmelweis-univ.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • WoS Emerging Science Citation Index
  • Scopus
  • DOAJ

2024  
Scopus  
CiteScore  
CiteScore rank  
SNIP  
Scimago  
SJR index 0.178
SJR Q rank Q4

2023  
Web of Science  
Journal Impact Factor 0.7
Rank by Impact Factor Q3 (Medicine, General & Internal)
Journal Citation Indicator 0.09
Scopus  
CiteScore 0.7
CiteScore rank Q4 (Medicine miscellaneous)
SNIP 0.151
Scimago  
SJR index 0.181
SJR Q rank Q4

Imaging
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge none
Subscription Information Gold Open Access

Imaging
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2020 (2009)
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
2
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2732-0960 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Nov 2024 0 0 0
Dec 2024 0 0 0
Jan 2025 0 0 0
Feb 2025 0 3825 54
Mar 2025 0 4149 30
Apr 2025 0 903 20
May 2025 0 0 0