View More View Less
  • 1 Natural Environment Centre, P.O. Box 413, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
  • 2 University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
  • 3 Freshwater Centre, P.O. Box 413, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
Full access

Modern biodiversity research focuses on multiple diversity facets because different indices may describe different ecological and environmental processes, as well as the effects of varied disturbances of natural and anthropogenic origins. We investigated littoral macroinvertebrate diversity in a large boreal lake system and specifically explored congruence of indices within and between the three diversity facets: species diversity, functional diversity and taxonomic distinctness. First, we found that the indices of taxonomic distinctness were the most sensitive indicators of eutrophication. Second, we observed that most correlations between the indices within the same diversity facet, and between the indices of functional and species diversity, were relatively strong. However, the indices of taxonomic distinctness (Δ+ and Λ+) were weakly associated with other metrics of diversity, emphasising the importance of taxonomic distinctness as a complementary dimension of biodiversity. Therefore, our observations support the importance to examine multiple facets for mapping biodiversity or for assessing the effects of anthropogenic disturbances on biological communities.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abellán, P., Bilton, D.T., Millán, A., Sánchez-Fernández, D. and Ramsay, P.M. 2006. Can taxonomic distinctness assess anthropogenic impacts in inland waters? A case study from a Mediterranean river basin. Freshwater Biol. 51: 17441756.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716723.

  • Bady, P., Dolédec, S., Fesl, C., Gayraud, S., Bacchi, M. and Schöll, F. 2005. Use of invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of European large rivers: the effects of sampling effort on genus richness and functional diversity. Freshwater Biol. 50: 159173.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benke, A.C., Huryn, A.D., Smock, L.A. and Wallace, J.B. 1999. Length-mass relationships for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to the southeastern United States. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 18: 308343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bonada, N., Prat, N., Resh, V.H. and Statzner, B. 2006. Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51: 495523.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chase, J.M. and Leibold, M.A. 2002. Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature 416: 427430.

  • Chase, J.M. and Ryberg, W.A. 2004. Connectivity, scale-dependence, and the productivity-diversity relationship. Ecol. Lett. 7: 676683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. 1998. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 523531.

  • Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. 2001. A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Marine Ecology Progress Series 216: 265278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. 2006. Primer v6: User Manual/Tutorial. Primer-E Ltd. 190 pp.

  • Devictor, V., Mouillot, D., Meynard, C., Jiquet, F., Thuiller, W. and Mouquet, N. 2010. Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecol. Lett. 13: 10301040.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dodson, S.I., Arnott, S.E. and Cottingham, K.L. 2000. The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness. Ecology 81: 26622679.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Folt, C.L., Chen, C.Y., Moore, M.V. and Burnaford, J. 1999. Synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44: 864873.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fore, L.S., Karr, J.R. and Wisseman, R.W. 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: evaluating alternative approaches. J. North Am. Benthological Soc. 15: 212231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friberg, N., Bonada, N., Bradley, D.C., Dunbar, M.J., Edwards, F.K., Grey, J., Hayes, R.B., Hildrew, A.G., Lamouroux, N., Trimmer, M. and Woodward, G. 2011. Biomonitoring of human impacts in freshwater ecosystems: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Adv. Ecol. Res. 44: 168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gallardo, B., Gascón, S., Quintana, X. and Comín, F.A. 2011. How to choose a biodiversity indicator — redundancy and complementarity of biodiversity metrics in a freshwater ecosystem. Ecol.Indic. 11: 11771184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gascón, S., Boix, D. and Sala, J. 2009. Are different biodiversity metrics related to the same factors? A case study from Mediterranean wetlands. Biol. Conserv. 142: 26022612.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guerold, F., Boudot, J-P. Jacquemin, G., Vein, D., Merlet, D. and Rouiller, J. 2000. Macroinvertebrate community loss as a result of headwater stream acidification in the Vosges Mountains (N-E France). Biodivers. Conserv. 9: 767783.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heino, J. 2008. Patterns of functional biodiversity and function-environment relationships in lake macroinvertebrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53: 14461455.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heino, J., Alahuhta, J. and Fattorini, S. 2015. Phylogenetic diversity of regional beetle faunas at high latitudes: patterns, drivers and chance along ecological gradients. Biodivers. Conserv. 24: 27512767.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heino, J., Mykrä, H. and Kotanen, J. 2008. Weak relationships between landscape characteristics and multiple facets of stream macroinvertebrate biodiversity in a boreal drainage basin. Lands. Ecol. 23: 417426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heino, J., Mykrä, H., Hämäläinen, H., Aroviita, J. and Muotka, T. 2007. Responses of taxonomic distinctness and species diversity indices to anthropogenic impacts and natural environmental gradients in stream macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 52: 18461861.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jeppesen, E., Jensen, J.P., Søndergaard, M., Lauridsen, T. and Landkildehus, F. 2000. Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient. Freshwater Biol. 45: 201218.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnston, E.L. and Roberts, D.A. 2009. Contaminants reduce the richness and evenness of marine communities: a review and meta-analysis. Environ. Pollution 157: 17451752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kankaala, P., Hellsten S. and Alasaarela, E. 1984. Primary production of phytoplankton in the oligohumic Kitka lakes in northern Finland. Aqua Fennica 14: 6578.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klemm, D.J., Blocksom, K.A., Thoeny, W.T., Fulk, F.A., Herlihy, A.T., Kaufmann, P.R. and Cormier, S.M. 2002. Methods development and use of macroinvertebrates as indicators of ecological conditions for streams in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands Region. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 78: 169212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Korhonen, J.J., Wang J. and Soininen, J. 2011. Productivity-diversity relationships in lake plankton communities. PLos ONE 6: e22041.

  • Leira, M., Chen, G., Dalton, C. Irvine, K. and Taylor, D. 2009. Patterns in freshwater diatom taxonomic distinctness along an eutrophication gradient. Freshwater Biol. 54: 114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leonard, D.R.P., Clarke, K.R., Somerfield, P.J. and Warwick, R.M. 2006. The application of an indicator based on taxonomic distinctness for UK marine biodiversity assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 78: 5262.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Litchman, E. and Klausmeier, C.A. 2008. Trait-based community ecology of phytoplankton. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39: 615639.

  • Ludsin, S.A., Kershner, M.W., Blocksom, K.A., Knight, R.L. and Stein, R.A. 2001. Life after death in Lake Erie: nutrient controls drive fish species richness, rehabilitation. Ecol. Appl. 11: 731746.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lyashevska, O. and Farnsworth, K.D. 2012. How many dimensions of biodiversity do we need? Ecol. Indic. 18: 485492.

  • Matthaei, C.D., Weller, F., Kelly, D.W. and Townsend, C.R. 2006. Impacts of fine sediment addition to tussock, pasture, dairy and deer farming streams in New Zealand. Freshwater Biol. 51: 21542172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mérigot, B., Bertrand, J.A., Gaertner, J-C., Durbec, J-P., Mazouni, N. and Manté, C. 2007. The multi-component structuration of the species diversity of groundfish assemblages of the east coast of Corsica (Mediterranean Sea): variation according to the bathymetric strata. Fish. Res. 88: 120132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merritt, R.W. and Cummins, K.W. 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. 862 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, E. 1989. The relationship between body length parameters and dry mass in running water invertebrates. Archiv für. Hydrobiologie 117: 191203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mittelbach, G.G., Steiner, C.F., Scheiner, S.M., Gross, K.L., Reynolds, H.L., Waide, R.B., Willig, M.R., Dodson, S.I. and Gough, L. 2001. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82: 23812396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monnet, A-C., Jiguet, F., Meynard, C.N., Mouillot, D., Mouquet, N., Thuiller, W. and Devictor, V. 2014. Asynchrony of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity in birds. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 23: 780788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Naeem, S., Duffy, J.E. and Zavaleta, E. 2012. The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinction. Science 336: 14011406.

  • Penning, W.E., Dudley, B., Mjelde, M., Hellsten, S., Hanganu, J., Kolada, A., van den Berg, M., Maemets, H., Poikane, S., Phillips, G., Willby, N. and Ecke, F. 2008. Using aquatic macrophyte community indices to define the ecological status of European lakes. Aquat. Ecol. 42: 253264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pielou, E.C. 1966. Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. J. Theoret. Biol. 10: 370383.

  • Purschke, O., Schmid, B.C., Sykes, M.T., Poschlod, P., Michalski, S.G., Durka, W., Kühn, I., Winter, M. and Prentice, H.C. 2013. Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long-term succession: insights into assembly processes. J. Ecol. 101: 857866.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasmussen, J.B. 1993. Patterns in the size structure of littoral zone macroinvertebrate communities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 21922207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shannon, C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical J. 27: 379423.

  • Smock, L.A. 1980. Relationships between body size and biomass of aquatic insects. Freshwater Biol. 10: 375383.

  • Tachet, H., Richoux, B., Bournaud, M. and Usseglio-Polatera, P. 2010. Invertébrés d’eau douce. CNRS editions.

  • Tolonen, K.T., Vilmi, A., Karjalainen, S.M., Hellsten, S., Sutela, T. and Heino, J. 2017. Ignoring spatial effects results in inadequate models for variation in littoral macroinvertebrate diversity. Oikos. DOI: 10.1111/oik.03587

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van den Brink, P.J., Alexander, A.C., Desrosiers, M., Goedkoop, W., Goethals, P.L.M., Liess, M. and Dyer, S.D. 2011. Trait-based approaches in bioassessment and ecological risk assessment: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Integrated Environ. Assess. Manage. 7: 198208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vilmi, A., Karjalainen, S.M. Landeiro, V.L. and Heino, J. 2015. Freshwater diatoms as environmental indicators: evaluating the effects of eutrophication using species morphology and biological indices. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 187: 243252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warwick, R.M. and Clarke, K.R. 1995. New ‘biodiversity’ measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Marine Ecology Progress Series 129: 301305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warwick, R.M. and Clarke, K.R. 1998. Taxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment. J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 532543.

  • Wilsey, B.J., Chalcraft, D.R., Bowles, C.M. and Willig, M.R. 2005. Relationships among indices suggest that richness is an incomplete surrogate for grassland biodiversity. Ecology 86: 11781184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Winter, M., Devictor V. and Schweiger, O. 2013. Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 199204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Witman, J.D., Cusson, M., Archambault, P., Pershing, A.J. and Mieszkowska, N. 2008. The relation between productivity and species diversity in temperate-arctic marine ecosystems. Ecology 89: S66S80.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Impact Factor (2018): 0.746
  • Ecology SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q2
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q3
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.428
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 25

Language: English

Founded in 2000
Publication: One volume of two issues annually
Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 21.
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Biology & Environmental Sciences
  • Elsevier/Geo Abstracts
  • Science Citation Index Expanded
  • SCOPUS
  • Zoological Abstracts

 

Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Podani, János

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jordán, Ferenc

Honorary Editor(s): Orlóci, László

Editorial Board

  • Madhur Anand, CAN (forest ecology, computational ecology, and ecological complexity)
  • S. Bagella, ITA (temporal dynamics, including succession, community level patterns of species richness and diversity, experimental studies of plant, animal and microbial communities, plant communities of the Mediterranean)
  • P. Batáry, HUN (landscape ecology, agroecology, ecosystem services)
  • P. A. V. Borges, PRT (community level patterns of species richness and diversity, sampling in theory and practice)
  • A. Davis, GER (supervised learning, multitrophic interactions, food webs, multivariate analysis, ecological statistics, experimental design, fractals, parasitoids, species diversity, community assembly, ticks, biodiversity, climate change, biological networks, cranes, olfactometry, evolution)
  • Z. Elek, HUN (insect ecology, invertebrate conservation, population dynamics, especially of long-term field studies, insect sampling)
  • T. Kalapos, HUN (community level plant ecophysiology, grassland ecology, vegetation-soil relationship)
  • G. M. Kovács, HUN (microbial ecology, plant-fungus interactions, mycorrhizas)
  • W. C. Liu,TWN (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, temporal dynamics, including succession, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment)
  • L. Mucina, AUS (vegetation survey, syntaxonomy, evolutionary community ecology, assembly rules, global vegetation patterns, mediterranean ecology)
  • P. Ódor, HUN (plant communities, bryophyte ecology, numerical methods)
  • F. Rigal, FRA (island biogeography, macroecology, functional diversity, arthropod ecology)
  • D. Rocchini, ITA (biodiversity, multiple scales, spatial scales, species distribution, spatial ecology, remote sensing, ecological informatics, computational ecology)
  • F. Samu, HUN (landscape ecology, biological control, generalist predators, spiders, arthropods, conservation biology, sampling methods)
  • U. Scharler, ZAF (ecological networks, food webs, estuaries, marine, mangroves, stoichiometry, temperate, subtropical)
  • D. Schmera, HUN (aquatic communities, functional diversity, ecological theory)
  • M. Scotti, GER (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment, ecological networks)
  • B. Tóthmérész, HUN (biodiversity, soil zoology, spatial models, macroecology, ecological modeling)
  • S. Wollrab, GER (aquatic ecology, food web dynamics, plankton ecology, predator-prey interactions)

 

Advisory Board

  • S. Bartha, HUN
  • S.L. Collins, USA
  • T. Czárán, HUN
  • E. Feoli, ITA
  • N. Kenkel, CAN
  • J. Lepš, CZE
  • S. Mazzoleni, ITA
  • Cs. Moskát, HUN
  • B. Oborny, HUN
  • M.W. Palmer, USA
  • G.P. Patil, USA
  • V. de Patta Pillar, BRA
  • C. Ricotta, ITA
  • Á. Szentesi, HUN

PODANI, JÁNOS
E-mail: podani@ludens.elte.hu


JORDÁN, FERENC
E-mail: jordan.ferenc@gmail.com

Click HERE for submission guidelines.


Manuscript submission: COMEC Manuscript Submission