View More View Less
  • 1 Szent István University Department of Ecology, Faculty of Veterinary Science Rottenbiller st. 50 H-1077 Budapest Hungary
Full access

The importance of accurate species databases is debated in the recent literature of biodiversity assessment, considering that limited resources for conservation could be better allocated to assessment based on cost effective biodiversity features. I aimed to provide an understanding of sampling bias and provide practical advice to minimize bias either before or after data collection. I used 10×10 km 2 UTM grid data for 121 land snail species to account for geographic and taxonomic sampling bias in Hungary. Sampling intensity corrected for species richness varied significantly among regions, although regions were not good predictors of sampling intensity. Residuals were significantly autocorrelated in 15 km distance, indicating small scale heterogeneity in sampling intensity compared to species richness. Sampling coverage and intensity were higher close to human settlements and sampling intensity was higher within protected areas than outside. Commonness of species was positively associated with sampling intensity, while some rare species were over-represented in the records. Sampling intensity of microsnails (<3 mm) was significantly lower than that of the more detectable large species (>15 mm). Systematic effects of the collecting methods used in malacological research may be responsible for these differences. Understanding causes of sampling bias may help to reduce its effects in ecological, biogeographical and conservation biological applications, and help to guide future research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bank, R. 2004. Fauna europaea: mollusca, gastropoda. Fauna Europaea version 1.2 , http://www.faunaeur.org . Accessed: January, 2006

  • Benjamini, Y., D. Drai, G. Elmer, N. Kafkafi, and I. Golani. 2001. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behavioural Brain Research 125:279–284.

    Golani I. , 'Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research ' (2001 ) 125 Behavioural Brain Research : 279 -284.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bini, L.M., J.A.F. Diniz-Filho, T.F.L.V.B. Rangel, R.P. Bastos and M.P. Pinto. 2006. Challenging Wallacean and Llinnean short-falls: knowledge gradients and conservation planning in a biodiversity hotspot. Diversity and Distributions 12:475–482.

    Pinto M.P. , 'Challenging Wallacean and Llinnean short-falls: knowledge gradients and conservation planning in a biodiversity hotspot ' (2006 ) 12 Diversity and Distributions : 475 -482.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bivand, R. (with contributions by many authors). 2007. sdep: Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package version 0.4-9. URL: http://cran.r-project.org

  • Bomhard, B., D.M. Richardson, J.S. Donaldson, G.O. Hughes, G.F. Midgley, D.C. Raimondo, A.G. Rebelo, M. Rouget and W. Thuiller. 2005. Potential impacts of future land use and climate change on the red list status of the Proteaceae in the Cape floristic region, South Africa. Global Change Biology 11:1452–1468.

    Thuiller W. , 'Potential impacts of future land use and climate change on the red list status of the Proteaceae in the Cape floristic region, South Africa ' (2005 ) 11 Global Change Biology : 1452 -1468.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Brooks, T.M., G.A.B. Da Fonseca and A.S.L. Rodrigues. 2004. Protected areas and species. Conservation Biology 18:616–618.

    Rodrigues A.S.L. , 'Protected areas and species ' (2004 ) 18 Conservation Biology : 616 -618.

  • Brown, J.H. and M.V. Lomolino. 1998. Biogeography . Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Lomolino M.V. , '', in Biogeography , (1998 ) -.

  • Cameron, R.A.D. and B.M. Pokryszko. 2005. Estimating the species richness and composition of land mollusc communities: problems, consequences and practical advice. Journal of Conchology 38:529–547.

    Pokryszko B.M. , 'Estimating the species richness and composition of land mollusc communities: problems, consequences and practical advice ' (2005 ) 38 Journal of Conchology : 529 -547.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Cowling, R.M., A.T. Knight, D.F. Faith, S. Ferrier, A.T. Lombard, A. Driver, M. Rouget, K. Maze and P.G. Desmet. 2004. Nature conservation requires more than a passion for species. Conservation Biology 18:1674–1676.

    Desmet P.G. , 'Nature conservation requires more than a passion for species ' (2004 ) 18 Conservation Biology : 1674 -1676.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Dévai, G. and M. Miskolczi. 1987. Javaslat egy új környezetminősítő értékelési cljárásra a szitakötők hálótérképek szerinti clőfordulási adatai alapján. (Proposal for a new method of environmental quality evaluation on the basis of grid maps of distribution data of dragonflies). Acta Biologica Debrecina 19:33–54.

    Miskolczi M. , 'Javaslat egy új környezetminősítő értékelési cljárásra a szitakötők hálótérképek szerinti clőfordulási adatai alapján ' (1987 ) 19 Acta Biologica Debrecina : 33 -54.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Fehér, Z. and A. Gubányi. 2001. The distribution of Hungarian molluscs. The Catalogue of the Mollusca Collection of the Hungarian Natural History Museum . Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest.

    Gubányi A. , '', in The distribution of Hungarian molluscs. The Catalogue of the Mollusca Collection of the Hungarian Natural History Museum , (2001 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Fehér, Z., G. Majoros and A. Varga. 2006. A scoring method for the assessment of rarity and conservation value of the aquatic molluscs in Hungary. Heldia 6:101–114.

    Varga A. , 'A scoring method for the assessment of rarity and conservation value of the aquatic molluscs in Hungary ' (2006 ) 6 Heldia : 101 -114.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Freitag, S. and A.S. Van Jaarsveld. 1998. Sensitivity of selection procedures for priority conservation areas to survey extent, survey intensity and taxonomic knowledge. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 265:1475–1482.

    Jaarsveld A.S. , 'Sensitivity of selection procedures for priority conservation areas to survey extent, survey intensity and taxonomic knowledge ' (1998 ) 265 Proceedings of the Royal Society B : 1475 -1482.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gaston, K.J. 1994. Rarity . Chapman and Hall, London.

    Gaston K.J. , '', in Rarity , (1994 ) -.

  • Hungarian Central Statistical Office (KSH) 2001. A Magyar Köztársaság helységnévtára. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal, URL: http://helynevtar.ksh.hu/

  • Kerney, M.P., R.A.D. Cameron and J.H. Jungbluth. 1983. Die Landschnecken Nord-und Mitteleuropas . P. Parey, Hamburg-Berlin.

    Jungbluth J.H. , '', in Die Landschnecken Nord-und Mitteleuropas , (1983 ) -.

  • Kirchner, C., R. Krätzner and F.W. Welter-Schultes. 1997. Flying snails — how far can Truncatellina (Pulmonata: Vertiginidae) be blown over the sea? Journal of Molluscan Studies 63:479–487.

    Welter-Schultes F.W. , 'Flying snails — how far can Truncatellina (Pulmonata: Vertiginidae) be blown over the sea? ' (1997 ) 63 Journal of Molluscan Studies : 479 -487.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kühn, I., R. Brandl and S. Klotz. 2004. The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6:749–764.

    Klotz S. , 'The flora of German cities is naturally species rich ' (2004 ) 6 Evolutionary Ecology Research : 749 -764.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lomolino, M.V. 2004. Conservation biogeography. In: M.V. Lomolino and L.R. Heaney (eds), Frontiers of Biogeography: New Directions in the Geography of Nature . Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. pp. 293–296.

    Lomolino M.V. , '', in Frontiers of Biogeography: New Directions in the Geography of Nature , (2004 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Miskolczi, M., G. Dévai, G. Kertész and Á. Bajza. 1997. A magyarországi hclységek kódjcgyzćke az UTM rendszerű 10×10 km beosztású hálótérkép szerint. (Coding list of Hungarian settlements according to a 10×10 km scale grid map of the UTM system.) Acta Biologica Debrecina 8:43–194.

    Bajza , 'A magyarországi hclységek kódjcgyzćke az UTM rendszerű 10×10 km beosztású hálótérkép szerint ' (1997 ) 8 Acta Biologica Debrecina : 43 -194.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Nelson, B.W., C.A.C. Ferreira, M.F.D. Silva and M.L. Kawasaki. 1990. Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brasilian Amazonia. Nature 345:714–716.

    Kawasaki M.L. , 'Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brasilian Amazonia ' (1990 ) 345 Nature : 714 -716.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Patten, M.A. and R.A. Erickson. 2001. Conservation value and rankings of exotic species. Conservation Biology 15:817–818.

    Erickson R.A. , 'Conservation value and rankings of exotic species ' (2001 ) 15 Conservation Biology : 817 -818.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pintér, I. 1981. A malakológiai felkutatottság mértékének kiszámítása becsléssel. (Estimating the status of malacological inventories.) Soosiana 9:29–32.

    Pintér I. , 'A malakológiai felkutatottság mértékének kiszámítása becsléssel ' (1981 ) 9 Soosiana : 29 -32.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pintér, I. 1985. Tájćkoztató a magyarországi recens puhatestűck kutatásának eddigi credményéről. (Information on the results of studying recent molluscs of Hungary.) Malacological Newsletter 5:23–28.

    Pintér I. , 'Tájćkoztató a magyarországi recens puhatestűck kutatásának eddigi credményéről ' (1985 ) 5 Malacological Newsletter : 23 -28.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pintér, L. and A.S. Szigethy. 1979. Die Verbereitung der rezenten Mollusken Ungarns: neunachweise und berichtigungen, I. Soosiana 7:97–108.

    Szigethy A.S. , 'Die Verbereitung der rezenten Mollusken Ungarns: neunachweise und berichtigungen, I ' (1979 ) 7 Soosiana : 97 -108.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pintér, L. and A.S. Szigethy. 1980. Die Verbereitung der rezenten Mollusken Ungarns: neunachweise und berichtigungen, II. Soosiana 8:65–80.

    Szigethy A.S. , 'Die Verbereitung der rezenten Mollusken Ungarns: neunachweise und berichtigungen, II ' (1980 ) 8 Soosiana : 65 -80.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pintér, L., A. Richnovszky and A.S. Szigethy. 1979. Distribution of the Recent Mollusca of Hungary . Budapest. Soosiana Suppl. 1 .

  • Ponder, W.F., G.A. Carter, P. Flemons and R.R. Chapman, 2001. Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment. Conservation Biology 15:648–657.

    Chapman R.R. , 'Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment ' (2001 ) 15 Conservation Biology : 648 -657.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Potvin, C. and D.A. Roff. 1993. Distribution-free and robust statistical methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics. Ecology 74:1617–1628.

    Roff D.A. , 'Distribution-free and robust statistical methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics ' (1993 ) 74 Ecology : 1617 -1628.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Prendergast, J.R., S.N. Wood, J.H. Lawton and B.C. Eversham. 1993. Correcting for variation in recording effort in analyses of diversity hotspots. Biodiversity Letters 1:39–53.

    Eversham B.C. , 'Correcting for variation in recording effort in analyses of diversity hotspots ' (1993 ) 1 Biodiversity Letters : 39 -53.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pressey, R.L. 2004. Conservation planning and biodiversity: assembling the best data for the job. Conservation Biology 18:1677–1681.

    Pressey R.L. , 'Conservation planning and biodiversity: assembling the best data for the job ' (2004 ) 18 Conservation Biology : 1677 -1681.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • R Development Core Team. 2007. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org

  • Ramsey, R.D. and L. Shultz. 2004. Evaluating the geographical distribution of plants in Utah from the atlas of vascular plants of Utah. Western North American Naturalist 64:421–432.

    Shultz L. , 'Evaluating the geographical distribution of plants in Utah from the atlas of vascular plants of Utah ' (2004 ) 64 Western North American Naturalist : 421 -432.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Reddy, S. and L.M. Dávalos. 2003. Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. Journal of Biogeography 30:1719–1727.

    Dávalos L.M. , 'Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa ' (2003 ) 30 Journal of Biogeography : 1719 -1727.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Rundell, R.J. and R.H. Cowie. 2003. Preservation of species diversity and abundances in Pacific island land snail death assemblages. Journal of Conchology 38:155–170.

    Cowie R.H. , 'Preservation of species diversity and abundances in Pacific island land snail death assemblages ' (2003 ) 38 Journal of Conchology : 155 -170.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Soberón, J.M. and J.B. Llorente. 1993. The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conservation Biology 7:480–488.

    Llorente J.B. , 'The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness ' (1993 ) 7 Conservation Biology : 480 -488.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry . Freeman and Co, New York.

    Rohlf F.J. , '', in Biometry , (1995 ) -.

  • Sólymos, P. 2007. Are current protections of land snails in Hungary relevant to conservation? Biodiversity and Conservation 16:347–356.

    Sólymos P. , 'Are current protections of land snails in Hungary relevant to conservation? ' (2007 ) 16 Biodiversity and Conservation : 347 -356.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Sólymos, P. and Z. Fehér. 2005. Conservation prioritization using land snail distribution data in Hungary. Conservation Biology 19:1084–1094.

    Fehér Z. , 'Conservation prioritization using land snail distribution data in Hungary ' (2005 ) 19 Conservation Biology : 1084 -1094.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Sólymos, P., I. Czentye and B. Tutkovics. 2007. A comparison of soil sampling and direct search in malacological field inventories. In: K. Tajovský, J. Schlaghamerský and V. Pizl (eds), Contributions to Soil Zoology in Central Europe, II . České Budéjovice. pp. 161–163.

  • Stohlgren, T.J., J. F. Quinn and G. S. Waggoner. 1995. Status of biotic inventories in US national parks. Biological Conservation 71:97–106.

    Waggoner G. S. , 'Status of biotic inventories in US national parks ' (1995 ) 71 Biological Conservation : 97 -106.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Vágvölgyi, J. 1975. Body size, aerial dispersal, and origin of the Pacific land snail fauna. Systematic Zoology 24:465–488.

    Vágvölgyi J. , 'Body size, aerial dispersal, and origin of the Pacific land snail fauna ' (1975 ) 24 Systematic Zoology : 465 -488.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Whittaker, R.J., M.B. Araújo, P. Jepson, R.J. Ladle, J.E.M. Watson and K.J. Willis. 2005. Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions 11:3–23.

    Willis K.J. , 'Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect ' (2005 ) 11 Diversity and Distributions : 3 -23.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Williams, P., D. Gibbons, C. Margules, A. Rebelo, C. Humphries and R. Pressey. 1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10:155–174.

    Pressey R. , 'A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds ' (1996 ) 10 Conservation Biology : 155 -174.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Williams, P.H., C.R. Margules and D.W. Hilbert. 2002. Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection. Journal of Biosciences 27:327–338.

    Hilbert D.W. , 'Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection ' (2002 ) 27 Journal of Biosciences : 327 -338.

    • Search Google Scholar

  • Impact Factor (2018): 0.746
  • Ecology SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q2
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q3
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.428
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 25

Language: English

Founded in 2000
Publication: One volume of two issues annually
Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 21.
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Biology & Environmental Sciences
  • Elsevier/Geo Abstracts
  • Science Citation Index Expanded
  • SCOPUS
  • Zoological Abstracts

 

Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Podani, János

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jordán, Ferenc

Honorary Editor(s): Orlóci, László

Editorial Board

  • Madhur Anand, CAN (forest ecology, computational ecology, and ecological complexity)
  • S. Bagella, ITA (temporal dynamics, including succession, community level patterns of species richness and diversity, experimental studies of plant, animal and microbial communities, plant communities of the Mediterranean)
  • P. Batáry, HUN (landscape ecology, agroecology, ecosystem services)
  • P. A. V. Borges, PRT (community level patterns of species richness and diversity, sampling in theory and practice)
  • A. Davis, GER (supervised learning, multitrophic interactions, food webs, multivariate analysis, ecological statistics, experimental design, fractals, parasitoids, species diversity, community assembly, ticks, biodiversity, climate change, biological networks, cranes, olfactometry, evolution)
  • Z. Elek, HUN (insect ecology, invertebrate conservation, population dynamics, especially of long-term field studies, insect sampling)
  • T. Kalapos, HUN (community level plant ecophysiology, grassland ecology, vegetation-soil relationship)
  • G. M. Kovács, HUN (microbial ecology, plant-fungus interactions, mycorrhizas)
  • W. C. Liu,TWN (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, temporal dynamics, including succession, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment)
  • L. Mucina, AUS (vegetation survey, syntaxonomy, evolutionary community ecology, assembly rules, global vegetation patterns, mediterranean ecology)
  • P. Ódor, HUN (plant communities, bryophyte ecology, numerical methods)
  • F. Rigal, FRA (island biogeography, macroecology, functional diversity, arthropod ecology)
  • D. Rocchini, ITA (biodiversity, multiple scales, spatial scales, species distribution, spatial ecology, remote sensing, ecological informatics, computational ecology)
  • F. Samu, HUN (landscape ecology, biological control, generalist predators, spiders, arthropods, conservation biology, sampling methods)
  • U. Scharler, ZAF (ecological networks, food webs, estuaries, marine, mangroves, stoichiometry, temperate, subtropical)
  • D. Schmera, HUN (aquatic communities, functional diversity, ecological theory)
  • M. Scotti, GER (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment, ecological networks)
  • B. Tóthmérész, HUN (biodiversity, soil zoology, spatial models, macroecology, ecological modeling)
  • S. Wollrab, GER (aquatic ecology, food web dynamics, plankton ecology, predator-prey interactions)

 

Advisory Board

  • S. Bartha, HUN
  • S.L. Collins, USA
  • T. Czárán, HUN
  • E. Feoli, ITA
  • N. Kenkel, CAN
  • J. Lepš, CZE
  • S. Mazzoleni, ITA
  • Cs. Moskát, HUN
  • B. Oborny, HUN
  • M.W. Palmer, USA
  • G.P. Patil, USA
  • V. de Patta Pillar, BRA
  • C. Ricotta, ITA
  • Á. Szentesi, HUN

PODANI, JÁNOS
E-mail: podani@ludens.elte.hu


JORDÁN, FERENC
E-mail: jordan.ferenc@gmail.com

Click HERE for submission guidelines.


Manuscript submission: COMEC Manuscript Submission