View More View Less
  • 1 UKM Bangi, 4300 Selangor, Malaysia
Open access

Providing quality requirements in Software Engineering is vital to ensure the product developed is able to deploy and function to meet the operational objectives. Software Requirement Engineering is the most complex process because it involves the integration of human, logics and process. Extracting or capturing what customers need and want is called Requirement Elicitation (RE) and it is the most crucial process in requirement engineering. If handled poorly, the cost of the failures would be very expensive. Most of the software projects that failed were due to poor requirements which occurred at RE phase. Thus, enhancing and optimizing the RE methods have been subject to a long research debate to ensure quality requirements are captured. Recently, Lean Six Sigma (LSS) had emerged as part of a continuous improvement in Software Development Life Cycles (SDLC). LSS is known for a systematic and structure business improvement successfully deployed in many fields of industry that contributes a significant gain not only in quality of products and services but also in operational costs and delivery. The objective of the research is to develop an integrated conceptual framework of LSS principles with Software Requirement Engineering methodology to optimize RE process. The article will produce conceptual framework as the comprehensive guidelines to capture quality software requirements.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1]

    Khan M. N. A. , Khalid M., ul Haq S. (2013), Review of requirements management issues in software development. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., 5(1), 2127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    Khan S. , Dulloo A. B., Verma M. (2014), Systematic review of requirement elicitation techniques. Int. J. Inf. Comput. Technol., 4(2), 133138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    Razali F. A. , Razali R. (2012), A practical guide to requirements elicitation techniques selection – An empirical study. Middle-East J. Sci. Res., 11(8), 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]

    Al Mrayat O. , Norwawi N., Basir N. (2013), Requirements elicitation techniques: Comparative study. Ijrdet. Com., 1(3), 110.

  • [5]

    Tiwari S. , Rathore S. S. (2017), A Methodology for the Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques.

  • [6]

    Pan Z. , Park H., Baik J., Choi H. (2007), A six sigma framework for software process improvements and its implementation. 14th Asia-Pacific Softw. Eng. Conf., 1(3), 446453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    Nicolaescu S. , Kifor C. V., Lobonţ L. (2015), Design for six sigma applied on software development projects from automotive industry. Acad. J. Manuf. Eng., 12(4), 7683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    Pillai A. K. R. , Pundir A. K., Ganapathy L. (2012), Implementing integrated lean six sigma for software development: A flexibility framework for managing the continuity: Change dichotomy. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag., 13(2), 107116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [9]

    Pawar R. P. (2015), A comparative study of agile software development methodology and traditional waterfall model. IOSR J. Comput. Eng., pp. 18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [10]

    Kumar M. , Shukla M., Agarwal S. (2013), A hybrid approach of requirement engineering in agile software development. In: 2013 International Conference on Machine Intelligence and Research Advancement, pp. 515519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [11]

    Bormane L. , Gržibovska J., Bērziša S., Grabis J. (2016), Impact of requirements elicitation processes on success of information system development projects. Inf. Technol. Manag. Sci., 19(1), 5764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [12]

    Tiwari S. , Rathore S. S., Gupta A. (2012), Selecting requirement elicitation techniques for software projects. In: 2012 CSI Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering (CONSEG), pp. 110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [13]

    Egas R. (2015), Requirements elicitation, which method in which situation? Open Univ. Netherlands, p. 70.

  • [14]

    Bennaceur A. , et al. (2018), Requirements engineering to cite this version: HAL Id: hal-01758502.

  • [15]

    Nicoletti B. (2015), Optimizing innovation with the lean and digitize innovation process. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev., March, pp. 2938.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [16]

    Drohomeretski E. , Gouvea Da Costa S. E., Pinheiro De Lima E., Garbuio P. A. D. R. (2014), Lean, six sigma and lean six sigma: An analysis based on operations strategy. Int. J. Prod. Res., 52(3), 804824.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [17]

    Mirela A. , Munteanu C. (2017), Comparative analysis between lean, six sigma and lean six sigma concepts. J. Manag. Econ., 2(1), 7889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [18]

    Antony J. , Setijono D., Dahlgaard J. J. (2014), Total quality management & business excellence lean six sigma and innovation – An exploratory study among UK organisations. 27 (December), 3741.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [19]

    Panat R. , Dimitrova V., Selvy Selvamuniandy T., Ishiko K., Sun D. (2014), The application of lean six sigma to the configuration control in intel's manufacturing R&D environment. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, 5(4), 444459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [20]

    Reijns T. (2010), The advantages and limitations of lean six sigma in process (re)design. June, p. 32.

  • [21]

    Ben Ruben R. , Vinodh S., Asokan P. (2017), Implementation of lean six sigma framework with environmental considerations in an Indian automotive component manufacturing firm: A case study. Prod. Plan. Control, 28(15), 11931211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [22]

    Swarnakar V. , Vinodh S. (2016), Deploying lean six sigma framework in an automotive component manufacturing organization. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, 7(3), 267293.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [23]

    Tenera A. , Pinto L. C. (2014), A Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project management improvement model. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., 119, 912920.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [24]

    ArunKumar G. , Dillibabu R. (2016), Design and application of new quality improvement model: Kano lean six sigma for software maintenance project. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 41(3), 9971014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [25]

    Girmanová L. , Šolc M., Kliment J., Divoková A., Mikloš V. (2017), Application of six sigma using DMAIC methodology in the process of product quality control in metallurgical operation. Acta Technol. Agric., 20(4), 104109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [26]

    Almakadmeh M. , Abran A., Supérieure É. D. T., Québec U. (2017), The ISBSG software project repository: An analysis from six sigma measurement perspective for software defect estimation. pp. 693720.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [27]

    Alkinaidri A. , Alsulami H. (2018), Improving healthcare referral system using lean six sigma. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag., 8(2), 193206.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [28]

    Hassan M. K. (2013), Applying lean six sigma for waste reduction in a manufacturing environment. Am. J. Ind. Eng., 1(2), 2835.

  • [29]

    Li L. , He S. G., Qi E. S. (2009), On software requirement metrics based on six-sigma. In: 2008 IEEE Symposium on Advanced Management of Information for Globalized Enterprises, AMIGE 2008 - Proceedings, pp. 295297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [30]

    ur Rehman T. , Khan M. N. A., Riaz N. (2013), Analysis of requirement engineering processes, tools/techniques and methodologies. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., 5(3), 4048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [31]

    Mohamed D. , Jintian Y. (2017), A Decision Making Aid Model for Project Management: A Strategic Decision Process.

  • Engineering (miscellaneous) SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q3
  • Environmental Engineering SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.131
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 2

Language: English

Founded in 2010
Publication: One volume of three issues annually: Online Only
Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 11.
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Google Scholar
  • ProQuest
  • SCOPUS
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory

Senior editors

Editor-in-Chief: Ákos, Lakatos

Founder, former Editor-in-Chief (2011-2020): Ferenc Kalmár

Founding Editor: György Csomós

Associate Editor: Derek Clements Croome

Associate Editor: Dezső Beke

Editorial Board

  • M. N. Ahmad, Institute of Visual Informatics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • M. Bakirov, Center for Materials and Lifetime Management Ltd., Moscow, Russia
  • N. Balc, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • I. Bodnár, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • F. Botsali, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
  • I. Budai, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • C. Bungau, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
  • M. De Carli, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • Gy. Csomós, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • T. Csoknyai, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
  • G. Eugen, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
  • J. Finta, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
  • A. Gacsadi, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
  • E. A. Grulke, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States
  • J. Grum, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • G. Husi, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • G. A. Husseini, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • N. Ivanov, Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia
  • A. Járai, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
  • G. Jóhannesson, The National Energy Authority of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  • L. Kajtár, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
  • F. Kalmár, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • M. Kalousek, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republik
  • I. Kocsis, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • I. Kovács, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • Á. Lakatos, Univesity of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • T. Mankovits, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • M. Molinari, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
  • H. Moravicka, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • P. Mukhophadyaya, University of Victoria, Canada
  • H. S. Najm, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, United States
  • J. Nyers, Subotica Tech - College of Applied Sciences, Subotica, Serbia
  • B. W. Olesen, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
  • S. Oniga, North University of Baia Mare, Baia Mare, Romania
  • J. N. Pires, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • L. Pokorádi, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
  • A. Puhl, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • R. Rabenseifer, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republik
  • M. Salah, Hashemite University, Zarqua, Jordan
  • D. Schmidt, Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology IWES, Kassel, Germany
  • L. Szabó, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • Cs. Szász, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • J. Száva, Transylvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
  • P. Szemes, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • E. Szűcs, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • R. Tarca, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
  • Zs. Tiba, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • L. Tóth, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • I. Uzmay, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
  • T. Vesselényi, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
  • N. S. Vyas, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India
  • D. White, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
  • S. Yildirim, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering
Address of the institute: Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen
H-4028 Debrecen, Ótemető u. 2-4. Hungary
Email: irase@eng.unideb.hu