View More View Less
  • 1 Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Műegyetem rakpart 3–9, Hungary

It is a prime aim to ensure a suitable comfort level in case of office buildings. The productivity of office employees is directly influenced by the comfort. Thermal discomfort and poor indoor air quality deteriorate the intensity and quality of human work. We investigated the comfort in office buildings with on-site measurements during the summer season. The office buildings were operating with different HVAC (Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning) systems: ducted fan-coil with suspended ceiling, installation, non-ducted fan-coil with floor-mounted installation, active chilled beam with fresh air supply.

We evaluated the thermal comfort under PMV (Predicted Mean Vote), PPD (Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied), the local discomfort based on DR (Draught Rate) and the IAQ (Indoor Air Quality) based on carbon dioxide concentration. The comfort measurements were evaluated. The measurements were evaluated with scientific research methods, comfort categories based on the requirements of CR 1752. The results of this comparison were presented in this article.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1]

    Fanger P. O. (1967), Calculation of thermal comfort: introduction of a basic comfort equation. ASHRAE Trans. 73, III.4.1III.4.20.

  • [2]

    Croome D. J. , Gan G., Awbi H. B. (1993), Thermal comfort and air quality in offices. Indoor Air, Helsinki, 6, 3742.

  • [3]

    Kosonen R. , Tan F. (2004), Assessment of productivity loss in air-conditioned buildings using PMV index. Energy and Buildings, 36(10 spec. iss.), 987993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]

    Lan L. , Wargocki P., Lian Z. (2011), Quantitative measurement of productivity loss due to thermal discomfort. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 43(5 spec. iss.), 10571062.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    Erdősi I. , Kajtár L., Bánhidi L. (1997), Thermal comfort in climatized office buildings. Washington, USA. Healthy Buildings Conference. Proceedings Vol. 2, pp. 207213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [6]

    Erdősi I. , Kajtár L., Bánhidi L. (1998), Thermal comfort in climatized office building in winter. Atlanta, USA. Design, Construction and Operation of Healthy Building/ ASHRAE, pp. 179185.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    Kajtár L. , Leitner A. (2007), High Quality Thermal Environment by Chilled Ceiling in Office Building. 9th REHVA World Congress Clima “Well-Being Indoors”, Helsinki, 6 p.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    van Hoof J. (2008), Fourty years of Fanger’s model of thermal comfort: comfort for all. Indoor Air Journal, 18, 182201.

  • [9]

    Howell W. C. , Kennedy P. A. (1979), Field validation of the Fanger thermal comfort model. Hum. Factors, 21, 229239.

  • [10]

    van Hoof J. , Hensen J. M. L. (2007), Quantifying of relevance of adaptive thermal comfort models in moderate thermal climate zones. Building and Environment, 42, 156170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [11]

    CR 1752 (1999), Ventilation for buildings – Design criteria for the indoor environment Bruxelles: European Committee for Standardisation.

  • [12]

    CEN Standard EN 15251 (2007), Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics Bruxelles: European Committee for Standardisation.

  • [13]

    ISO 7730:2005(E), Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Geneva: International Standards Organization, 2005.

  • [14]

    ASHRAE Standard 55-04 (2004), Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, Atlanta, American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers.

  • [15]

    CIBSE (2006), CIBSE Guide A chapter 1: Environmental criteria for design. London, Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.

  • [16]

    Kajtár L. , Bánhidi L., Bakó-Bíró Zs. (2001), Thermal and air quality comfort in the Hungarian office buildings. Miami Beach, USA. Proceedings of the Second NSF International Conference on Indoor Air Health, pp. 270278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [17]

    Nyers J. , Pek Z. (2014), Mathematical Model of Heat Pumps’ Coaxial Evaporator with Distributed Parameters. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(10), 4154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation