Authors:
Bence Marosi South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary
School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 26., H-1085, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Bence Marosi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Béla Kádár South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Béla Kádár in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anna Bruzsa South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Anna Bruzsa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laura Kocsis South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Laura Kocsis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Katalin Kamotsay South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Katalin Kamotsay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
János Sinkó South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary
Departmental Group of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by János Sinkó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bálint Gergely Szabó South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary
School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 26., H-1085, Budapest, Hungary
Departmental Group of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Bálint Gergely Szabó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1775-1356
, and
Botond Lakatos South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary
School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 26., H-1085, Budapest, Hungary
Departmental Group of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., H-1097, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Botond Lakatos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

Abstract

Introduction

Over the past decade, enterococcal bloodstream infection (BSI) shows increasing incidence globally among the elderly and in patients with comorbidities. In this study, we aimed to assess microbiological and clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of BSIs caused by Enterococcus spp. in adult patients with and without active onco-hematological malignancies hospitalized at a national referral institute.

Methods

A prospective analysis of consecutive enterococcal BSI cases was conducted in the National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases (Budapest, Hungary) between December 2019 and April 2022. We compared characteristics and outcomes at 30-days and 1 year after diagnosis among patients with and without onco-hematological malignancies.

Results

In total, 141 patients were included (median age 68 ± 21 years, female sex 36.9%), 37% (52/141) had active onco-hematological malignancies. The distribution of species was as follows: 50.4% Enterococcus faecalis, 46.1% Enterococcus faecium, 1.4% Enterococcus avium and Enterococcus gallinarum, and 0.7% Enterococcus raffinosus. No statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality rates were observed between patient subgroups at 30 days (32.7 vs. 28.1%; P = 0.57) and 1 year (75.0 vs. 60.7%; P = 0.09).

Conclusion

Enterococcal bloodstream infections yielded a relevant burden of morbidity, but with no statistical difference in long-term outcomes of adult patients with and without active onco-hematological malignancies.

Abstract

Introduction

Over the past decade, enterococcal bloodstream infection (BSI) shows increasing incidence globally among the elderly and in patients with comorbidities. In this study, we aimed to assess microbiological and clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of BSIs caused by Enterococcus spp. in adult patients with and without active onco-hematological malignancies hospitalized at a national referral institute.

Methods

A prospective analysis of consecutive enterococcal BSI cases was conducted in the National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases (Budapest, Hungary) between December 2019 and April 2022. We compared characteristics and outcomes at 30-days and 1 year after diagnosis among patients with and without onco-hematological malignancies.

Results

In total, 141 patients were included (median age 68 ± 21 years, female sex 36.9%), 37% (52/141) had active onco-hematological malignancies. The distribution of species was as follows: 50.4% Enterococcus faecalis, 46.1% Enterococcus faecium, 1.4% Enterococcus avium and Enterococcus gallinarum, and 0.7% Enterococcus raffinosus. No statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality rates were observed between patient subgroups at 30 days (32.7 vs. 28.1%; P = 0.57) and 1 year (75.0 vs. 60.7%; P = 0.09).

Conclusion

Enterococcal bloodstream infections yielded a relevant burden of morbidity, but with no statistical difference in long-term outcomes of adult patients with and without active onco-hematological malignancies.

Introduction

A bloodstream infection (BSI) constitutes a clinical phenomenon characterized by alterations in clinical, hemodynamic, and biochemical parameters, concomitant with the presence of pathogenic bacteria and/or fungi in the blood [1, 2]. Signifying a substantial healthcare burden, BSI accounts for approximately 2 million cases in adults, contributing to an estimated 250,000 annual fatalities in North America and Europe [3, 4]. The epidemiological landscape of BSI has undergone notable transformations in recent decades, owing to the advancing age of affected individuals and the integration of biotechnological innovations of medicine, particularly within the fields of oncology and hematology. In addition to BSI cases attributable to Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, Gram-positive pathogens, such as coagulase-negative staphylococci, enterococci, and Staphylococcus aureus, are assumed to have a prominent role in nosocomial infections [3, 5].

Enterococci, ranking as the second most prevalent causative agents of bloodstream infections due to Gram-positive bacteria in both Europe and the United States of America, exhibit an associated in-hospital mortality rate of up to 68% [6]. The management of enterococcaemia poses significant challenges, given the susceptibilities and acquired antibiotic resistances observed in certain enterococal species, often necessitating prolonged or combination antibiotic regimens, thereby indirectly contributing to hospitalization and heightened healthcare costs [7–10]. Notably, enterococci feature prominently as causative agents of infective endocarditis, constituting the third most prevalent pathogen group in high-income countries, where advanced age and complex comorbidities serve as established risk factors for this type of infection [11, 12]. Prompt recognition of enterococcaemia and the administration of appropriate antimicrobials are assumed to be of critical significance, as delayed or inadequate therapy correlates with adverse outcomes and increased mortality rates. A recent study has identified inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy in BSIs caused by Enterococcus spp. as an independent predictor of 30-day all-cause mortality, particularly among elderly patients [12].

In light of the existing literature, a preference for additional evidence is lacking, particularly concerning the follow-up of BSIs attributable to Enterococcus spp., especially within the context of Hungary. Therefore the present study aims to assess the microbiological and clinical characteristics, as well as long-term outcomes, of bloodstream infections caused by Enterococcus species among adult patients, with a specific focus on those with active onco-hematological malignancies.

Methods

Study design and settings

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study by enrolling consecutive adult patients admitted to South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases (Budapest, Hungary), during the period between December 2019 and April 2022. The study center operates within a national enrollment area with >500 beds.

Patient identification and selection

Throughout the study duration, all hospitalized patients were considered potentially eligible for inclusion if a bloodstream infection caused by Enterococcus spp. was microbiologically confirmed during their hospitalization. For inclusion, a query from the electronic archiving system of our microbiology laboratory for E. spp. isolated from blood cultures during the study period was performed. The definition of a bloodstream infection required the isolation of E. spp. from at least one blood culture bottle aligning with a clinically congruent presentation. Pre-specified exclusion criteria comprised of: 1) unavailability of patient records in the hospital electronic filing system, 2) incongruence of the clinical case review with a bloodstream infection caused by E. spp., or 3) the microbiological specimen was gathered at a different hospital. All microbiological analyses were conducted at the Core Microbiology Laboratory of our institution, employing standard culture methods with Columbia +5% sheep blood agar (bioMérieux, Budapest Hungary), Chocolate PolyViteX agar (bioMérieux, Budapest Hungary) and CHROMID vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) agar (bioMérieux, Budapest Hungary) for bacterial isolation, and VITEK-MS (bioMérieux, Budapest Hungary) for identification. For in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing, we adhered to the current European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations by using Mueller Hinton E agar (bioMérieux, Budapest Hungary), Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (Oxoid, Basingstoke United Kingdom) and VITEK-2 Compact dilution methods (bioMérieux, Budapest Hungary).

Data collection

Relevant data from the included cases were entered into an electronic data collection chart in an anonymized manner, by using a case report format standardized by the study group. The entirety of the hospitalization period was tracked through the electronic archiving system, while post-discharge long-term follow-up extended until patient demise or the last available outpatient/hospital care, utilizing data sourced from the social security database (National eHealth Infrastructure) of Hungary. The collected parameters encompassed: 1) age at diagnosis, gender; 2) comorbidities (essential hypertension, chronic heart, lung, kidney, liver, and cerebrovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, active onco-hematologic malignancy, systemic autoimmune disease, systemic glucocorticosteroid use, tobacco and alcohol abuse) and Charlson index; 3) presence of intravascular/intracardial devices or artificial valves; 4) identified pathogens; 5) clinical outcomes; 6) long-term survival. Stratification of included patients into subcohorts was based on the presence or absence of active onco-hematological malignancy.

Clinical and microbiological outcomes

The primary and secondary clinical outcomes were defined as 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality after BSI diagnosis, respectively. Microbiological outcomes encompassed the species distribution and in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Enterococcus spp. isolated from blood cultures.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as median ± interquartile range (IQR) with minimum–maximum values, while categorical variables are expressed as absolute values (n) and relative proportions (%). The Mann-Whitney U-test or Fisher's exact test were performed for statistical comparisons, dependent upon variable distribution. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A two-sided P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests. Statistical analyses were conducted using MedCalc 22, with data collection executed through Microsoft Office Excel 2016.

Ethics

Approval for the study protocol was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases (IKEB 37/2016). Given the nature of this study, informed consent from participants was deemed unnecessary. The study personnel adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

Demographic and comorbidity characteristics

During the study period, 158 cases were investigated, of which 141 (89.2%) met study inclusion criteria. The demographic and comorbidity characteristics of the enrolled patients are presented in Table 1. The median age within the cohort was 68 ± 21 years, and 36.9% (52/141) of the patients were female. 37% (52/141) had active onco-hematological malignancies. The median Charlson index was 5 ± 4, with essential hypertension (59.6%, 84/141) and chronic cardiovascular diseases (33.3%, 47/141) emerging as the predominant comorbidities. Significant differences were only observed in the use of systemic use of glucocorticoids (0 vs. 3 P = 0.04) and in the incidence of chronic cerebrovascular disease (19 vs. 3 P = 0.01) between the groups. A minority of patients (2.1%, 3/141) had intracardiac devices, artificial valves were present in 2.8% (4/141) of cases. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography were conducted in 16.3% (23/141) and 0.7% (1/141) of cases during hospitalization, respectively, resulting in a solitary case with the final diagnosis for infective endocarditis. The median duration of hospital stay was 28 ± 28.0 days.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical parameters of adult patients with and without onco-hematological malignancies diagnosed with Enterococcus spp. bloodstream infection

ParameterTotal (n = 141)Non-onco-hematological (n = 89)Onco-hematological (n = 52)P value
Age (year, median ± IQR, min–max)68.0 ± 21 (22–101)70.0 ± 20 (28–90)64.5 ± 21 (23–101)0.01
Female sex (n, %)52 (36.9)33 (38.4)19 (52.8)1.0
Comorbidities (n, %)
  1. -Essential hypertension
84 (59.6)57 (64.0)27 (51.9)0.21
  1. -Chronic heart disease
47 (33.3)35 (39.3)12 (23.1)0.06
  1. -Chronic vascular disease
27 (19.1)20 (22.5)7 (13.5)0.26
  1. -Chronic lung disease
18 (12.8)13 (14.6)5 (9.6)0.44
  1. -Chronic kidney disease
12 (8.5)10 (11.2)2 (3.8)0.21
  1. -Chronic liver disease
6 (4.3)6 (6.7)0 (0.0)0.08
  1. -Chronic cerebrovascular disease
22 (15.6)19 (21.3)3 (5.8)0.01
  1. -Diabetes mellitus
36 (25.5)27 (30.3)9 (17.3)0.11
  1. -Active oncological malignancy
17 (12.1)0 (0.0)17 (12.1)n.a.
  1. -Active hematological malignancy
36 (25.5)0 (0.0)36 (25.5)n.a.
  1. -Systemic autoimmune disease
1 (0.7)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)0.36
  1. -Systemic use of glucocorticosteroids
3 (2.1)0 (0.0)3 (2.1)0.04
  1. -Alcohol abuse
13 (9.2)9 (10.1)4 (7.7)0.76
  1. -Tobacco use
5 (3.5)3 (3.4)2 (3.8)1.00
Charlson index (median ± IQR, min–max)5.0 ± 4 (0–11)5.0 ± 4 (0–10)6.0 ± 4 (2–11)0.17
Number of comorbidities per person (median ± IQR, min–max)3.1 ± 3 (0–8)3.0 ± 3 (0–7)3.0 ± 3 (1–8)0.06
Hospital length of stay (day, median ± IQR, min–max)28 ± 28 (1–198)26 ± 28 (1–88)29 ± 34 (1–198)0.36
Number of patients admitted to the ICU (n, %)77 (54.6)52 (58.4)25 (69.4)0.29
30-day all-cause mortality (n, %)42 (29.7)25 (28.1)17 (32.7)0.57
1-year all-cause mortality (n, %)93 (66.0)54 (60.7)39 (75.0)0.09

ICU: intensive care unit, IQR: interquartile range, n.a.: not applicable.

Clinical outcomes

The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 29.8% (42/141), as outlined in Table 1. Among the deceased, 53.8% (50/93) were males, 40.5% (17/42) had active onco-hematological disease, and a substantial majority (79.2%, 33/42) died during intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. Community-acquired enterococcemia accounted for 4.7% (2/42) of the reported deaths. Only one case without any documented chronic disease ended in death. There was no significant statistical difference in all-cause mortality between the groups. The median follow-up duration extended to 300 ± 23 days, with 34.0% (48/141) of patients surviving at the end of the follow-up period. Of the total deaths, 45.2% (42/93) occurred within 30 days, with the subsequent distribution of 40.9% (38/93) within 2 months, 7.5% (7/93) within 6 months, and 6.5% (6/93) within one year. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the 30-day and 1-year survival distributions did not reveal statistically significant distinctions between the two subcohorts (please refer to Figs 1 and 2).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

30-day Kaplan–Meier survival distributions with numbers of at-risk patients with and without onco-hematological malignancies diagnosed with Enterococcus spp. bloodstream infection. Survival curves (thick lines) are depicted along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (colored regions outlined by thin lines)

Citation: European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology 14, 2; 10.1556/1886.2024.00011

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

1-year Kaplan–Meier survival distributions with numbers of at-risk patients with and without onco-hematological malignancies diagnosed with Enterococcus spp. bloodstream infection. Survival curves (thick lines) are depicted along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (colored regions outlined by thin lines)

Citation: European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology 14, 2; 10.1556/1886.2024.00011

Microbiological characteristics

The distribution of E. spp. isolates and their in vitro antibiotic susceptibility profiles are depicted in Table 2. Species distribution was led by Enterococcus faecalis (50.4% of all isolates), followed by Enterococcus faecium (46.1%), Enterococcus avium, Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus raffinosus (1.4, 1.4, and 0.7%), respectively. E. faecalis isolates showed susceptibility to gentamicin in 59.2%, while susceptibility rates of E. faecium were lower, with 9.2, 50.8, 52.3 and 58.5% to ampicillin, teicoplanin, vancomycin and gentamicin, respectively. Other enterococcal isolates showed species specific resistance profiles. Polymicrobial bloodstream infections involving bacteria other than enterococci were documented in 26.9% (38/141) of cases. Notably, 54.8% of all cases were of nosocomial origin. Four out of five patients with non-faecalis and non-faecium enterococcal strains had an underlying immuncompromising condition. Demographic and clinical parameters of adult patients with E. faecalis and E. faecium bloodstream infections are depicted in Table 3. Significant differences were only observed in hematological malignancies (10 vs. 26 P = 0.001) and chronic cerebrovascular diseases (17 vs. 4 P = 0.04).

Table 2.

Results of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testings of Enterococcus sp. strains isolated from blood cultures of adult patients with and without onco-hematological malignancies

SpeciesNumber of isolates (n)Number of isolates showing in vitro susceptibility to the tested antibiotics (n, %)*
AmpicillinGentamicinImipenem/cilastatinLinezolidPiperacillin/tazobactamTeicoplaninTigecyclineVancomycin
E. faecalis7171 (100)42 (59.2)71 (100)71 (100)71 (100)71 (100)71 (100)71 (100)
E. faecium656 (9.2)38 (58.5)6 (9.2)65 (100)6 (9.2)33 (50.8)65 (100)34 (52.3)
E. avium22 (100)02 (100)n.d.2 (100)n.d.n.d.2 (100)
E. gallinarum22 (100)2 (100)1 (50)2 (100)1 (50)2 (100)2 (100)0
E. raffinosus101 (100)01 (100)001 (100)0
TOTAL14181 (57.5)83 (58.9)80 (56.7)141 (100)80 (56.7)106 (78.7)141 (100)107 (75.9)

* Percentages are reported in proportion to the number of isolates of the given species.

n.d.: no data.

Table 3.

Demographic and clinical parameters of adult patients with Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections

ParameterE. faecalis (n = 71)E. faecium (n = 52)P value
Age (year, median ± IQR, min–max)70.0 ± 15 (28–90)64.0 ± 24 (23–93)0.08
Female sex (n, %)27 (38.0)23 (35.4)0.75
Comorbidities (n, %)
  1. -Essential hypertension
46 (64.8)35 (53.8)0.19
  1. -Chronic heart disease
27 (38.0)20 (30.8)0.37
  1. -Chronic vascular disease
18 (25.4)9 (13.8)0.09
  1. -Chronic lung disease
9 (12.7)9 (13.8)0.84
  1. -Chronic kidney disease
8 (11.3)3 (4.6)0.16
  1. -Chronic liver disease
4 (5.6)1 (1.5)0.21
  1. -Chronic cerebrovascular disease
17 (23.9)4 (6.2)0.04
  1. -Diabetes mellitus
20 (28.2)16 (24.6)0.63
  1. -Active oncological malignancy
8 (11.3)7 (10.8)0.93
  1. -Active hematological malignancy
10 (14.1)26 (40.0)0.001
  1. -Systemic autoimmune disease
1 (1.4)0 (0.0)0.95
  1. -Systemic use of glucocorticosteroids
0 (0.0)3 (4.6)0.27
  1. -Alcohol abuse
8 (11.3)4 (6.2)0.29
  1. -Tobacco use
3 (4.2)2 (3.1)0.72
Charlson index (median ± IQR, min–max)6.0 ± 4 (0–11)5.0 ± 4 (0–11)0.220
Number of comorbidities per person (median ± IQR, min–max)3.0 ± 3 (0–7)3.0 ± 3 (0–8)0.39
Hospital length of stay (day, median ± IQR, min–max)26 ± 25 (2–198)31 ± 34 (2–133)0.34
Number of patients admitted to the ICU (n, %)41 (57.7)34 (52.3)0.52
Proportion of sepsis (n, %)35 (49.3)32 (49.2)0.99
30-day all-cause mortality (n, %)22 (31.0)17 (26.2)0.53
1-year all-cause mortality (n, %)47 (66.2)43 (66.2)0.99

ICU: intensive care unit, IQR: interquartile range.

Discussion

Key findings of our study

The primary aim of our study was to compare the outcomes associated with bloodstream infections attributed to E. spp. in adult patients with and without active onco-hematological malignancies, in a national center over a 2.5-year long period. Our study revealed enterococcaemia as a clinical entity characterized by a pronounced mortality rate, with 45% of patients succumbing within the initial 30 days. Moreover, a substantial proportion of these fatalities occurred among individuals under intensive care suffering from active onco-hematological malignancies. Polymicrobial infections were identified in approximately a quarter of, and nosocomial origin was documented in nearly half of all cases. The incidence of confirmed infective endocarditis was notably low, potentially attributable to the limited utilization of cardiac imaging procedures. Intriguingly, the frequency of intensive care admissions was elevated (54.6%), a trend which has been potentially influenced, at least in part, by the prevailing SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2) pandemic during the study period. Altough these findings are clinically relevant for all patients, we did not find statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between our patient groups. The only baseline differences were in the proportion of cerebrovascular diseases (21.3 vs 5.8% P = 0.01), and the use of systemic glucocorticoids (0.0 vs 2.1% P = 0.04).

Previous findings from the literature

Our main findings mostly align with global data, as documented in international literature. Enterococcal bloodstream infections consistently exhibit elevated in-hospital mortality rates [7, 13]. Predisposing factors, including chronic cardiovascular and renal diseases, as well as underlying active solid organ and hematological malignancies, have been identified as risk factors for the development of enterococcaemia [9, 14]. A recent Japanese study also revealed male gender as an additional risk factor for severe infections [15]. This can be partially reflected in our study, as 53.8% of deceased patients were males. Notably, nosocomial acquisitions constitute the predominant mode of infection among adult patients with a compromised immune status and a substantial comorbidity burden, which are risk factors for early mortality. While certain studies question the reported impact of enterococci on overall mortality, others identified a significant excess mortality of 31% in similarly vulnerable patients afflicted by Enterococcus spp. [16–19].

A particularly vulnerable group are adults with underlying active hematological malignancies, as they exhibit a susceptibility to strains demonstrating in vitro resistance to antibiotics due to prolonged hospitalizations and antimicrobial treatments, thereby amplifying the risk of in-hospital mortality [20–22]. A study conducted by Billington et al. found 11% increased relative risk for enterococcal bloodstream infections for any type of malignancies and 33.4% increased relative risk for hematological malignancies [9]. As the proportion of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria in BSI was notably stable during recent years, the incidence and outcomes of infections with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remain the main focus of interest in the literature [23]. In a study done in Pakistan, the authors found that even though VRE incidence decreased over their study period, the 30-day mortaity related to VRE infections increased to 44.8% [23].

A study conducted by Cho et al. showed that the in vitro antimicobial resistance profiles of E. faecium species were different among hematology patients, compared to non-hematology patients. The authors attributed the differences to the widespread use of fluoroquinolones, as these antibiotics are commonly administered as chemoprophylaxis for these patients [24]. Moreover, fecal VRE growth is known to be predisposed by chemotherapy and certain antibiotics, such as third-generation cephalosporins, vancomycin and metronidazole, also commonly administered among onco-hematology patients [25]. A heightened risk for BSIs is also accountable in the gastrointestinal colonization with E. faecium, as this step usually precedes BSI [25]. These factors alltogether predispose for poorer clinical outcomes, as patients with hematological diseases have significantly lower 30-day overall mortality due to VRE bloodstream infections, compared with non-VRE strains [26]. Finally, colonisation with non-faecalis and non-faecium enterococcal strains might also be more prevalent among immunocompromised cohorts [27].

We have two possible explanations for the lack of statistically significant differences between clinical outcomes of our study subgroups. A recent study about enterococcal bloodstream infections performed in Qatar documented higher mortality among patients with malignant diseases. As for patients with non-malignant diseases, chronic kidney disease resulted in increased mortality, while elderly male patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease were at higher risk for acquiring enterococcal BSIs [28]. In our study, both subgroups exhibited a high proportion of elderly patients with diabetes mellitus and comorbidities. Other not shown comorbidities included mostly thyorid diseases which are not a known risk factors for severe enterococcal disease. In another study, coinfections were also associated with higher mortality, which is also a plausible explanation [29]. In a Japanese study, one of the main predictive factors for mortality was the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), as a CCI of 3–4 had an adjusted odds ratio of 8.79, while a CCI ≥5 showed an adjusted odds ratio of 17.6 for mortality [30]. This may also partially explain why there was no statistically significant difference of mortality between subgroups, as both groups had a CCI ≥5. Another factor that may have impacted our results is the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic during the study period. The pandemic has ushered in an escalation of nosocomial infections, particularly bloodstream infections, with a marked surge of enterococcaemias [31, 32]. Recent studies, such as that conducted by Giacobbe et al., have calculated a 18 and 9% relative incidence of E. faecalis and E. faecium bloodstream infections among patients treated in ICUs for SARS-CoV-2, positioning them as the second and fourth most common pathogens, respectively [33]. Similarly, in Italy, the incidence of bloodstream infections caused by Enterococcus spp. demonstrated a high prevalence of 55.8% among adults requiring intensive care unit admission [34]. The COVID-19 pandemic also escalated the usage of systemic corticosteroids, immunomodulatory therapies and probably cephalosporins, and immunosuppression and inappropiate antibiotic therapies are documented risk factors for a fatal enterococcal BSI [35]. A higher number of severe comorbidities may also increase mortality in these infections [36]. We hypothesize that these circumstances may have contributed to the differences described in our study, as compared to international data.

Finally, several studies within the literature focused on the imperative of mitigating in-hospital mortality associated with bloodstream infections caused by Enterococcus spp. Timely and appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy, coupled with infectious disease consultations and the risk stratification of vulnerable patient groups, may emerge as pivotal measures to reduce early mortality [13, 37, 38].

Limitations

While we feel that our study contributes valuable insights, its single-center and retrospective nature renders it susceptible to observational bias. Potential limitations also arise from the subjectivity shaping diagnostic and therapeutic decisions by attending physicians. Due to insufficient case numbers no comparison could be done in microbiological characteristics in our subgroups. Additionally, the relatively modest sample size and conceivable data heterogeneity may limit the generalisability of our findings.

Summary

In conclusion, bloodstream infections caused by E. spp. showed high rates of short- and long-term mortality. Our study did not reveal differences in the long-term mortality of adult patients with and without active onco-hematological malignancies due to bloodstream infections caused by E. spp.

Funding sources

BGSz received the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (BO/00105/23/5) and a research grant from the “OTKA” Postdoctoral Excellence Programme 2023 of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (PD-147276). The article itself did not receive any external funding.

Authors' contributions

BM: data collection, data analysis and preparation of the manuscript; BK: data collection, preparation of study protocol, process, isolation and characterisation of samples, AB: process, isolation and characterisation of samples LK: data collection, preparation of study protocol, process, isolation and characterisation of samples, KK: preparation of study protocol, process, isolation and characterisation of samples, JS: preparation of study protocol, BGSz: data analysis, preparation of study protocol, and preparation and review of the manuscript; BL: preparation of study protocol, review of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BSI

bloodstream infection

CRP

C-reactive protein

ICU

intensive care unit

LOS

length of stay

PCT

procalcitonin

SARS-CoV-2

severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2

TEE

transoesophageal echocardiography

TTE

transthoracic echocardiography

VRE

vancomycin-resistant enterococci

References

  • 1.

    Diekema DJ, Hsueh P-R, Mendes RE, Pfaller MA., Rolston KV, Sader HS, et al. The microbiology of bloodstream infection: 20-year trends from the SENTRY antimicrobial Surveillance program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e0035519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Viscoli C. Bloodstream infections: the peak of the iceberg. Virulence. 2016;7:24851.

  • 3.

    Verway M, Brown KA, Marchand-Austin A, Diong C, Lee S, Langford B, et al. Prevalence and mortality associated with bloodstream organisms: a population-wide retrospective cohort study. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60:e0242921.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:154654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Woodford N, Livermore DM. Infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria: a review of the global challenge. J Infect. 2009;59(Suppl 1):S416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Dougherty SH, Flohr AB, Simmons RL. Breakthrough' enterococcal septicemia in surgical patients. 19 cases and a review of the literature. Arch Surg. 1983;118:2328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Lupia T, Roberto G, Scaglione L, Shbaklo N, Benedetto I, Scabini S, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of bloodstream infections caused by Enterococcus spp. within internal medicine wards: a two-year single-centre experience. Intern Emerg Med. 2022;17:11291137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Cahill TJ, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. Lancet. 2016;387:88293.

  • 9.

    Billington EO, Phang SH, Gregson DB, Pitout JDD, Ross T, Church DL, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for Enterococcus spp. blood stream infections: a population-based study. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;26:7682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Caballero-Granado FJ, Becerril B, Cuberos L, Bernabeu M, Cisneros JM, Pachón J. Attributable mortality rate and duration of hospital stay associated with enterococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:58794.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Pericàs JM, Llopis J, Muñoz P, Gálvez-Acebal J, Kestler M, Valerio M, et al. A contemporary picture of enterococcal endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:482494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Giovannenze F, Murri R, Palazzolo C, Taccari F, Camici M, Spanu T, et al. Predictors of mortality among adult, old and the oldest old patients with bloodstream infections: an age comparison. Eur J Intern Med. 2021;86:6672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Lee RA, Vo DT, Zurko JC, Griffin RL, Rodriguez JM, Camins BC. Infectious diseases consultation is associated with decreased mortality in enterococcal bloodstream infections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Gray J, Marsh PJ, Stewart D, Pedler SJ. Enterococcal bacteraemia: a prospective study of 125 episodes. J Hosp Infect. 1994;27:179186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Kajihara T, Nakamura S, Iwanaga N, Oshima K, Takazono T, Miyazaki T, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of enterococcal infections in Nagasaki, Japan: a retrospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    McBride SJ, Upton A, Roberts SA. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia—a five-year retrospective review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:107114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Noskin GA, Peterson LR, Warren JR. Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia: acquisition and outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:296301.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Linden P, Miller C. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci: the clinical effect of a common nosocomial pathogen. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;33:113120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Landry SL, Kaiser DL, Wenzel RP. Hospital stay and mortality attributed to nosocomial enterococcal bacteremia: a controlled study. Am J Infect Control. 1989;17:323329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Chen S, Lin K, Li Q, Luo X, Xiao M, Chen M, et al. A practical update on the epidemiology and risk factors for the emergence and mortality of bloodstream infections from real-world data of 3014 hematological malignancy patients receiving chemotherapy. J Cancer. 2021;12:54945505.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Vydra J, Shanley RM, George I, Ustun C, Smith AR, Weisdorf DJ, et al. Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with increased risk of mortality in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:764770.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Papanicolaou GA, Ustun C, Young J-AH, Chen M, Kim S, Ahn KW, et al. Bloodstream infection due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus is associated with increased mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:17711779.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Rafey A, Nizamuddin S, Qureshi W, Anjum A, Parveen A. Trends of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus infections in cancer patients. Cureus 2022;14:e31335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Cho SY, Park Y-J, Cho H, Park DJ, Yu JK, Oak HC, et al. Comparison of Enterococcus faecium bacteremic isolates from hematologic and non-hematologic patients: differences in antimicrobial resistance and molecular characteristics. Ann Lab Med. 2018;38:226234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Zwielehner J, Lassl C, Hippe B, Pointner A, Switzeny OJ, Remely M, et al. Changes in human fecal microbiota due to chemotherapy analyzed by TaqMan-PCR, 454 sequencing and PCR-DGGE fingerprinting. Plos One. 2011;6:e28654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Weber S, Hogardt M, Reinheimer C, Wichelhaus TA, Kempf VAJ, Kessel J, et al. Bloodstream infections with vancomycin-resistant enterococci are associated with a decreased survival in patients with hematological diseases. Ann Hematol. 2019;98:763773.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Axell-House DB, Egge SL, Tran C, Shelburne SA, Arias CA. 1521. Non-faecium Non-faecalis enterococcal bloodstream infections in patients with cancer. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(Supplement_2).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Ali GA, Goravey W, Najim MS, Shunnar KM, Ibrahim SI, Daghfal J, et al. Epidemiology, microbiological and clinical characteristics of Enterococcus species bloodstream infections: a 10-year retrospective cohort study from Qatar. Ann Med Surg. 2022;80:104258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Kirkizlar TA, Akalin H, Kirkizlar O, Ozkalemkas F, Ozkocaman V, Kazak E, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection and predisposing factors for infection and mortality in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia. Leuk Res. 2020;99:106463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Suzuki H, Hase R, Otsuka Y, Hosokawa N. A 10-year profile of enterococcal bloodstream infections at a tertiary-care hospital in Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2017;23:390393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Baker MA, Sands KE, Huang SS, Kleinman K, Septimus EJ, Varma N, et al. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74:17481754.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Sturm LK, Saake K, Roberts PB, Masoudi FA, Fakih MG. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hospital onset bloodstream infections (HOBSI) at a large health system. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50:245249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Giacobbe DR, Battaglini D, Ball L, Brunetti I, Bruzzone B, Codda G, et al. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50:e13319.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Bonazzetti C, Morena V, Giacomelli A, Oreni L, Casalini G, Galimberti LR, et al. Unexpectedly high frequency of enterococcal bloodstream infections in coronavirus disease 2019 patients admitted to an Italian ICU: an observational study. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:e31e40.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Cheah AAY, Spelman T, Liew D, Peel T, Howden BP, Spelman D, et al. Enterococcal bacteraemia: factors influencing mortality, length of stay and costs of hospitalization. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:E181E189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Wu Y, Li H, Zhang Z, Liang W, Zhang T, Tong Z, et al. Risk factors for mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients during the early outbreak of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:50695083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Webb BJ, Healy R, Majers J, Burr Z, Gazdik M, Lopansri B, et al. Prediction of bloodstream infection due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in patients undergoing leukemia induction or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:17531759.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Suppli M, Aabenhus R, Harboe ZB, Andersen LP, Tvede M, Jensen J-US, et al. Mortality in enterococcal bloodstream infections increases with inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:107883.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1.

    Diekema DJ, Hsueh P-R, Mendes RE, Pfaller MA., Rolston KV, Sader HS, et al. The microbiology of bloodstream infection: 20-year trends from the SENTRY antimicrobial Surveillance program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e0035519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Viscoli C. Bloodstream infections: the peak of the iceberg. Virulence. 2016;7:24851.

  • 3.

    Verway M, Brown KA, Marchand-Austin A, Diong C, Lee S, Langford B, et al. Prevalence and mortality associated with bloodstream organisms: a population-wide retrospective cohort study. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60:e0242921.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:154654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Woodford N, Livermore DM. Infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria: a review of the global challenge. J Infect. 2009;59(Suppl 1):S416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Dougherty SH, Flohr AB, Simmons RL. Breakthrough' enterococcal septicemia in surgical patients. 19 cases and a review of the literature. Arch Surg. 1983;118:2328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Lupia T, Roberto G, Scaglione L, Shbaklo N, Benedetto I, Scabini S, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of bloodstream infections caused by Enterococcus spp. within internal medicine wards: a two-year single-centre experience. Intern Emerg Med. 2022;17:11291137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Cahill TJ, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. Lancet. 2016;387:88293.

  • 9.

    Billington EO, Phang SH, Gregson DB, Pitout JDD, Ross T, Church DL, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for Enterococcus spp. blood stream infections: a population-based study. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;26:7682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Caballero-Granado FJ, Becerril B, Cuberos L, Bernabeu M, Cisneros JM, Pachón J. Attributable mortality rate and duration of hospital stay associated with enterococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:58794.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Pericàs JM, Llopis J, Muñoz P, Gálvez-Acebal J, Kestler M, Valerio M, et al. A contemporary picture of enterococcal endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:482494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Giovannenze F, Murri R, Palazzolo C, Taccari F, Camici M, Spanu T, et al. Predictors of mortality among adult, old and the oldest old patients with bloodstream infections: an age comparison. Eur J Intern Med. 2021;86:6672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Lee RA, Vo DT, Zurko JC, Griffin RL, Rodriguez JM, Camins BC. Infectious diseases consultation is associated with decreased mortality in enterococcal bloodstream infections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Gray J, Marsh PJ, Stewart D, Pedler SJ. Enterococcal bacteraemia: a prospective study of 125 episodes. J Hosp Infect. 1994;27:179186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Kajihara T, Nakamura S, Iwanaga N, Oshima K, Takazono T, Miyazaki T, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of enterococcal infections in Nagasaki, Japan: a retrospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    McBride SJ, Upton A, Roberts SA. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia—a five-year retrospective review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:107114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Noskin GA, Peterson LR, Warren JR. Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia: acquisition and outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:296301.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Linden P, Miller C. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci: the clinical effect of a common nosocomial pathogen. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;33:113120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Landry SL, Kaiser DL, Wenzel RP. Hospital stay and mortality attributed to nosocomial enterococcal bacteremia: a controlled study. Am J Infect Control. 1989;17:323329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Chen S, Lin K, Li Q, Luo X, Xiao M, Chen M, et al. A practical update on the epidemiology and risk factors for the emergence and mortality of bloodstream infections from real-world data of 3014 hematological malignancy patients receiving chemotherapy. J Cancer. 2021;12:54945505.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Vydra J, Shanley RM, George I, Ustun C, Smith AR, Weisdorf DJ, et al. Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with increased risk of mortality in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:764770.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Papanicolaou GA, Ustun C, Young J-AH, Chen M, Kim S, Ahn KW, et al. Bloodstream infection due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus is associated with increased mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:17711779.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Rafey A, Nizamuddin S, Qureshi W, Anjum A, Parveen A. Trends of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus infections in cancer patients. Cureus 2022;14:e31335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Cho SY, Park Y-J, Cho H, Park DJ, Yu JK, Oak HC, et al. Comparison of Enterococcus faecium bacteremic isolates from hematologic and non-hematologic patients: differences in antimicrobial resistance and molecular characteristics. Ann Lab Med. 2018;38:226234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Zwielehner J, Lassl C, Hippe B, Pointner A, Switzeny OJ, Remely M, et al. Changes in human fecal microbiota due to chemotherapy analyzed by TaqMan-PCR, 454 sequencing and PCR-DGGE fingerprinting. Plos One. 2011;6:e28654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Weber S, Hogardt M, Reinheimer C, Wichelhaus TA, Kempf VAJ, Kessel J, et al. Bloodstream infections with vancomycin-resistant enterococci are associated with a decreased survival in patients with hematological diseases. Ann Hematol. 2019;98:763773.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Axell-House DB, Egge SL, Tran C, Shelburne SA, Arias CA. 1521. Non-faecium Non-faecalis enterococcal bloodstream infections in patients with cancer. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(Supplement_2).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Ali GA, Goravey W, Najim MS, Shunnar KM, Ibrahim SI, Daghfal J, et al. Epidemiology, microbiological and clinical characteristics of Enterococcus species bloodstream infections: a 10-year retrospective cohort study from Qatar. Ann Med Surg. 2022;80:104258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Kirkizlar TA, Akalin H, Kirkizlar O, Ozkalemkas F, Ozkocaman V, Kazak E, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection and predisposing factors for infection and mortality in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia. Leuk Res. 2020;99:106463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Suzuki H, Hase R, Otsuka Y, Hosokawa N. A 10-year profile of enterococcal bloodstream infections at a tertiary-care hospital in Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2017;23:390393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Baker MA, Sands KE, Huang SS, Kleinman K, Septimus EJ, Varma N, et al. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74:17481754.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Sturm LK, Saake K, Roberts PB, Masoudi FA, Fakih MG. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hospital onset bloodstream infections (HOBSI) at a large health system. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50:245249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Giacobbe DR, Battaglini D, Ball L, Brunetti I, Bruzzone B, Codda G, et al. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50:e13319.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Bonazzetti C, Morena V, Giacomelli A, Oreni L, Casalini G, Galimberti LR, et al. Unexpectedly high frequency of enterococcal bloodstream infections in coronavirus disease 2019 patients admitted to an Italian ICU: an observational study. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:e31e40.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Cheah AAY, Spelman T, Liew D, Peel T, Howden BP, Spelman D, et al. Enterococcal bacteraemia: factors influencing mortality, length of stay and costs of hospitalization. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:E181E189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Wu Y, Li H, Zhang Z, Liang W, Zhang T, Tong Z, et al. Risk factors for mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients during the early outbreak of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:50695083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Webb BJ, Healy R, Majers J, Burr Z, Gazdik M, Lopansri B, et al. Prediction of bloodstream infection due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in patients undergoing leukemia induction or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:17531759.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Suppli M, Aabenhus R, Harboe ZB, Andersen LP, Tvede M, Jensen J-US, et al. Mortality in enterococcal bloodstream infections increases with inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:107883.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dunay, Ildiko Rita, Prof. Dr. Pharm, Dr. rer. nat., University of Magdeburg, Germany

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Heimesaat, Markus M., Prof. Dr. med., Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany

Editorial Board

  • Berit Bangoura, Dr. DVM. PhD,  University of Wyoming, USA
  • Stefan Bereswill, Prof. Dr. rer. nat., Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
  • Dunja Bruder, Prof. Dr. rer. nat., University of Magdeburg, Germany
  • Jan Buer, Prof. Dr. med., University of Duisburg, Germany
  • Edit Buzas, Prof. Dr. med., Semmelweis University, Hungary
  • Renato Damatta, Prof. PhD, UENF, Brazil
  • Maria Deli, MD, PhD, DSc, Biological Research Center, HAS, Hungary
  • Olgica Djurković-Djaković, Prof. Phd, University of Belgrade, Serbia
  • Jean-Dennis Docquier, Prof. Dr. med., University of Siena, Italy
  • Zsuzsanna Fabry, Prof. Phd, University of Washington, USA
  • Ralf Ignatius, Prof. Dr. med., Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
  • Achim Kaasch, Prof. Dr. med., Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
  • Oliver Liesenfeld, Prof. Dr. med., Inflammatix, USA
  • Matyas Sandor, Prof. PhD, University of Wisconsin, USA
  • Ulrich Steinhoff, Prof. PhD, University of Marburg, Germany
  • Michal Toborek, Prof. PhD, University of Miami, USA
  • Susanne A. Wolf, PhD, MDC-Berlin, Germany

 

Dr. Dunay, Ildiko Rita
Magdeburg, Germany
E-mail: ildiko.dunay@med.ovgu.de

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • PubMed Central
  • Scopus
  • ESCI
  • CABI
  • CABELLS Journalytics

 

2023  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
674
Journal Impact Factor 3.3
Rank by Impact Factor

Q2

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
3.1
5 Year
Impact Factor
3.2
Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
15
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.601
Scimago Quartile Score Microbiology (medical) (Q2)
Microbiology (Q3)
Immunology and Allergy (Q3)
Immunology (Q3)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
5.0
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Microbiology (medical) Q2
Scopus
SNIP
0.832

 

European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Online only
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 600 EUR/article
Effective from 1st Feb 2025:
900 EUR/article
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access
Purchase per Title  

European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2011
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2062-509X (Print)
ISSN 2062-8633 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Aug 2024 0 136 36
Sep 2024 0 98 29
Oct 2024 0 234 20
Nov 2024 0 395 35
Dec 2024 0 364 18
Jan 2025 0 111 16
Feb 2025 0 0 0