Abstract
Aronia melanocarpa, a main constituent of black chokeberry, provides a rich source of bioactive molecules including polyphenols, flavonoids, and anthocyanins and has been used for long in traditional medicine due to its various health-promoting and disease-alleviating properties. The aim of our literature survey was to provide an actual update of evidence regarding the antibacterial activities exerted by Aronia melanocarpa and its potential application for the treatment of human bacterial pathogenic including food-borne infections. Our survey revealed that distinct ingredients in Aronia melanocarpa do not only inhibit growth of Gram-positive and to a lesser extent of Gram-negative bacteria, but also biofilm formation that is even more pronounced upon combined application. Furthermore, the anti-microbial effects against food-spoiling bacteria underscores the application of defined Aronia-derived molecules in food preservation decreasing the risk for transmission of food-borne pathogens and thereby, improving food safety. Notably, in vivo studies revealed that prophylactic Aronia juice application alleviated murine Listeria monocytogenes-induced enteritis, dampened growth of streptococci involved in dental caries development, and decreased the incidence of urinary tract infections in nursing home residents. In conclusion, Aronia-derived bioactive molecules exhibit promising anti-bacterial and disease-alleviating effects that should be further elucidated in clinical studies.
1 Introduction
Antibiotic compounds have been used to treat bacterial infections since Paul Ehrlich's discovery of Arsphenamine (Salvarsan®) in 1909, which is considered as one of the most significant turning points in the history of medicine [1]. Often regarded as a wonder medication, antibiotics have transformed medicine, saved countless lives, and given doctors new tools in their arsenal to combat potentially fatal illnesses. In the past decades, antibiotic usage has increased on a global scale. For example, between 2000 and 2010, the use of antibiotic medications rose by 35%, with Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) contributing with 76% to this increase [2]. Furthermore in agriculture and veterinary care, antibiotic use was tentatively predicted to be 63,151 (±1,560) tons in 2010; by 2030, it is expected to climb by 67% to 105,596 (±3,605) tons, with a doubling in each of the BRICS countries [3]. Selection pressure brought about by this increasing (ab)use of antibiotics forces the evolution of drug-resistant bacterial species [2, 3]. As a result, the prevalence of diseases brought on by bacterial pathogens that are multidrug-resistant (MDR) is increasing, which leads to the prescription of last resort antibiotics including carbapenems and polymyxins [4]. However, the prevalence of infectious diseases caused by MDR bacterial strains is growing faster than the development of novel potent synthetic antibiotic classes, mounting in nearly 1.27 million deaths due to infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria reported in 2019 [5]. This potentially fatal scenario prompted Kwon and Powderly recently to hypothesize that the post-antibiotic era has already begun [6]. According to this viewpoint, even common surgical or chemotherapy procedures could be harmful due to the lack of medications available to treat or prevent bacterial infections. Therefore, it is pivotal to seek for novel, alternative approaches of anti-microbial treatment. Natural products, such as phytochemicals with anti-bacterial and/or immune-modulatory qualities, might be promising options as adjuncts or alternatives to tackle bacterial infectious diseases.
The black chokeberry or Aronia melanocarpia (Michx.) Elliott (Rosaceae) constitutes a shrub native to eastern parts of North America and has gained increasing popularity in recent years since it is considered as powerful “superfood” by health-conscious consumers [7]. The bitter tasting Aronia berries are processed by the food industry to produce fruit teas, juices, jams, syrups, wine and even liquor and can also be found in food supplements [8, 9]. The Aronia berries have been shown to contain relatively high concentrations of biologically active polyphenols such as pyocyanidins, anthocyanins, phenolic acids, and flavols, for instance, that are considered to contribute to the pleiotropic health-beneficial properties [10]. Among these, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-tumor, anti-platelet, anti-atherosclerotic as well as anti-microbial effects have been described to date as recently reviewed [11]. This prompted us to perform a literature search on the anti-bacterial properties of Aronia melanocarpia providing potential perspectives for an antibiotics-independent application in the combat of bacterial infectious diseases.
2 Methods
For this survey on the anti-bacterial effects of Aronia, the MEDLINE database PubMed was used. First, MeSH Terms for every main term and definition of the topic were searched on the Pubmed MeSH term database. Then, the same terms were searched using the syntax “Title/Abstract” and “All fields” to also include studies containing the search terms that were not available in the Pubmed MeSH term Database. Each term related to the Aronia plant was added to the search using the operator “OR” and repeated for the terms related to the anti-bacterial activity. Both collections of terms were combined with the operator “AND” and form the first rather specific part of the search.
The final search “Anti-Bacterial Agents”[MeSH Terms] OR “Anti-Bacterial Agents”[Pharmacological Action] OR “antibiotic effect*”[Title/Abstract]) AND (“Photinia”[MeSH Terms] OR “aronia*”[Title/Abstract] OR “chokeberry*”[All Fields]) OR “Aronia AND Antibacterial” resulted in 29 hits. Then, two reviews were excluded, and after carefully reading of all studies, another 13 were excluded as they addressed other topics and did not fit to the scope of this survey.
3 Results
3.1 In vitro studies on the anti-bacterial effects of Aronia melanocarpa
In their study, Nowak et al. [12] evaluated the anti-microbial activities of distinct fruit juices including black chokeberry juice. Following neutralization, the analysis of the black chokeberry juice by the diffusion assay revealed a moderate anti-microbial activity against distinct strains of Gram-positive bacterial species, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria innocua, and Bacillus cereus, as opposed to Enterococcus faecalis and Clostridium perfringens. In contrast, no anti-microbial activity could be assessed against the tested strains of Gram-negative bacterial species, namely Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Pseudomonas fluorescens. The authors suggested that black chokeberry juice among other fruit juices might be considered as promising natural food preservative given its anti-microbial effects directed against Gram-positive food-poisoning bacterial species such as Listeria or B. cereus [12].
Raudsepp et al. [13] tested the anti-bacterial effects of black chokeberries against food-spoiling bacteria. The analyses of 20% and 96% ethanolic plant infusions directed against Gram-positive species applying the agar diffusion assay revealed anti-microbial effects against the B. cereus reference strain ATCC 11778 even at 1:20 and 1:40 dilutions. However, only 96% ethanolic infusions were effective against Bacillus pumilus CV 607, Kocuria rhizophila, and L. monocytogenes ATCC 13929. Interestingly, anti-bacterial activities could also be detected against distinct Gram-negative isolates of S. Enteritidis ATCC 13076, and E. coli NCCB 100282 (for 96% ethanolic infusions), whereas the black chokeberry extract at both ethanolic concentrations resulted in growth inhibition of Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 33291. Hence, ethanolic black chokeberry infusion did not only exert anti-microbial activities against distinct Gram-positive, but also Gram-negative food-spoiling bacterial species [13].
The anti-bacterial effects of Aronia melanocarpa anthocyanins (AMA) against E. coli 0157:H7 were studied by Deng and colleagues [14]. To elucidate the mechanism underlying potential anti-bacterial effects of AMAs directed against E. coli 0157:H7 at the protein level, the authors applied the tandem mass tag quantitative proteomics approach in combinations with multiple reaction monitoring. The findings demonstrated that 628 of the 1739 proteins (262 of which were down-regulated and 366 of which up-regulated) were changed in E. coli upon AMA treatment. In depth bioinformatics analysis further revealed that these differentially expressed proteins interacted in distinct biochemical pathways involved in oxidative stress response, peptidoglycan production, DNA replication and repair, as well as E. coli protein biosynthesis and homeostasis. In consequence, AMA challenge exerts bactericidal effects leading to distinct morphological alterations of the bacterial cells ultimately resulting in cell death as evidenced by electron microscopy [14].
In another study, the same research group [15] discovered compelling reactions of bacterial mechanosensitive channels when exposed to AMA. The authors observed that the activation of small-conductivity mechanosensitive channels (MscL) and of low conduct mechanosensitive channels (YnaI) in E. coli 0157:H7 cells decreased upon AMA challenge, suggesting a protective reaction of the bacterial cells that facilitated cell entry of AMA resulting in elevated intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Furthermore, AMA exposure down-regulated the expression of heat shock proteins and chaperons like Hs1R, Hs1sO, HtpX, HtpG, which could lead to a compromized stress response of the bacterial cells mounting in cell death [15].
In their study, Bräunlich et al. [16] tested the anti-biofilm-forming activity of defined Aronia melanocarpa constituents against both, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, B. cereus 407 and E. coli K12 JM109 as well as the uropathogenic E. coli ATCC 700928 strain, respectively, were incubated with distinct crude Aronia extracts, sub-fractions, and compounds at concentrations of 1 mg mL−1 each in a microtiter plate assay. The incubation time for B. cereus and E. coli were 48 h and 24 h, respectively, to assure maximum biofilm production. Overall, most of the Aronia samples exhibited biofilm inhibition against B. cereus of differing activities, but to a much lesser extent against the E. coli strains. When defined Aronia melanocarpa constituents were studied for their inhibitory activity on biofilm formation, it was observed that epicatechin and cyanidin 3-xyloside showed the highest activity against biofilm formation by E. coli K12 JM109, whereas epicatechin displayed no such inhibitory effect at all in case of the tested B. cereus 407 strain. When 1.0 mg of 50% ethanolic Aronia berry extract was tested for its anti-bacterial activity against B. cereus 407, however, the growth of the Gram-positive strain could be inhibited (with a median inhibition zone diameter of 10.2 ± 0.8 mm), which was, however, still less effective if compared to a control culture exposed to 10 µg gentamicin resulting in an inhibition zone diameter of 20.5 ± 0.7 mm. Interestingly, the anthocyanin cyanidin 3-xyloside resulted in a 50% decrease of B. cereus 407 biofilm formation, whereas the other anthocyanins, such as cyanidin 3-galactoside, cyanidin 3-glucoside, and cyanidin 3-arabinioside even enhanced the biofilm production by more than 350%. Nevertheless, the growth of the E. coli K12 JM109 and the uropathogenic E. coli ATCC 700928 strains was not compromised upon challenge with respective Aronia compounds [16].
Another study [17] tested extracts of Aronia leaves (in 80% ethanolic infusion) against Gram-positive bacteria such as B. cereus ATCC 14579 and L. innocua KTCC 506 and Gram-negative bacteria including E. coli 0157:H7 43895 and S. Typhimurium DT 104. The Aronia leaves used for the extraction of cultivars were gathered at three different growth states (namely, young, harvest, and old) and were examined by the disk diffusion test and spot-on-the-lawn method. The results showed that only cultivars from two of the old Aronia leaf extracts displayed anti-bacterial activities exclusively against B. cereus. When assessing the growth curves in liquid media, B. cereus showed a lag time of approximately 2 h and grew up to 5.74 log10 colony-forming units (CFU) per mL after 6 h in the control culture without extract. Upon co-incubation with the two extract cultivars in the liquid media, less bacterial growth of the Gram-positive bacteria could be assessed in both cases, whereas one cultivar even did not show any growth after 5 h of co-incubation. Notably, none of the cultivars of all different harvest states exerted anti-bacterial activity against L. innocua and the Gram-negative strains E. coli O157:H7 and S. Typhimurium [17].
Efenberger-Szmechtyk et al. [18] examined the anti-bacterial effects of Aronia melanocarpa leaf extracts directed against typical meat spoiling bacteria. The analyses revealed that the leaf extracts were able to both, decrease the growth rate and lengthen the lag phase of the tested Gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus and Brochotrix thermospacta, whereas the tested L. monocytogenes ATCC 13992 bacteria were resistant. The Aronia melanocarpa leaf extract was also effective against Gram-negative bacteria as shown for a Salmonella enterica isolate from chicken meat [18].
In a follow-up study by the same research group [19], the authors explored the mechanisms underlying the anti-bacterial effects of Aronia melanocarpa leaf extracts against food spoilage bacteria. Overall, the bacterial viability compromising effects of the leaf extracts occurred in a concentration dependent manner after 24 h and 48 h of coincubation. The study further confirmed the anti-microbial activity of Aronia melanocarpa leaf extract against Gram-negative bacterial species such as S. enterica, given that the bacterial growth could be decreased by approximately 65.5 ± 9.6% within 48 h post incubation at an extract concentration of 10% if compared to the control sample without any extract [19]. Interestingly, the same extract also exerted enhanced activity against the E. coli ATCC 10536 strain with a decrease of about 93% after a 48-h incubation period. Under the same conditions, the leaf extracts of Aronia melanocarpa were able to reduce the growth of the tested Gram-negative bacteria Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas fragi by approximately 93% and 98%, respectively, whereas growth of the Gram-positive B. thermosphacta could be decreased by 87%, and in case of S. aureus only by approximately 32%. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopic examinations revealed that the S. aureus cells showed pores resulting in destruction of the bacterial cell wall and subsequent cell death. Although the assessed morphological changes could not be observed for the E. coli bacteria, there was a significant decrease of the outer membrane permeability detected in all tested Gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli. Furthermore, Aronia melanocarpa leaf extract was able to decrease the E. coli DNA gyrase activity. Given that the E. coli DNA gyrase usually contributes to ensure the structural integrity of the DNA molecule by supercoiling the DNA, the authors hypothesized that this might lead to bacterial cell death upon inhibition [19].
A good host for Aronia fruit extract is presented by silica-type matrices, which have a large surface area, voluminous pores, a good capacity for external molecules and yet remain stable towards mechanical and thermal stress [20]. It was observed that the black chokeberry extract embedded in a silica-type matrix preserved its anti-bacterial as well as anti-oxidant activities. Interestingly, the Aronia-embedded matrix had an anti-microbial effect on the tested Gram-positive bacterial strains, whereas the Gram-negative bacteria remained unaffected. The most prominent anti-bacterial effect could be determined against the Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615 strain with a MIC of 1 mg mL−1, followed by the Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 strain as well as the S. aureus ATCC 25923 strain both with a MIC and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 2 mg mL−1. A slightly improved effect could be observed when the extract was encapsulated into a silica-type matrix, enriched with zinc oxide nanoparticles, compared to the free extract, which the authors related to a zinc oxide associated synergistic effect [20].
3.2 Studies on the application of Aronia melanocarpa in food packaging
Given the pronounced anti-bacterial activity of Aronia melanocarpa extracts directed against meat spoilage pathogens [18, 19], further studies addressed how to transfer this knowledge into practical application in order to prevent food products from spoilage and thus, to enhance food safety. Oun et al. [21] tested the anti-microbial activity of Aronia extract in a polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan-based (PVA/CS) composite film in vitro. This PVA/CS-Aronia film showed high anti-microbial activity against E. coli, given that the bacteria could be entirely eradicated after 9 h of incubation, which was also the case when tested against L. monocytogenes within a 6-h incubation period [21].
Furthermore, Lee et al. [22] tested the application of Aronia juice processing by-products for bioelastomer fabrication in food packaging. Therefore, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was used for the fabrication of the bioelastomer, mixed with either 50% or 25% by-products from Aronia juice processing for the verum group and whole fruit freeze-dried extract in the control group. The PDMS polymers had been obtained from cocoa shell waste by-products and could offer a natural and sustainable alternative to conventional petrochemical-based films. When 50% Aronia juice by-product powder was used, the mechanical condition of the bioelastomer became crude and unstable and was therefore not suitable for use. Anti-microbial tests revealed that the bioelastomer exerted growth-inhibiting activities directed against Gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus, but not against Gram-negative species including E. coli [22]. Whereas the anti-oxidant effects of the bioelastomer was approximately 1.4-times lower if compared to the control group, its anti-bacterial effect was about 1.5-fold higher [22].
3.3 In vivo studies in mice and men
The in vitro efficacy of black chokeberry against L. monocytogenes has already been described [12]. In order to investigate its potential in vivo activity, Gajic et al. [23] studied the effect of chokeberry fruit extract against L. monocytogenes in mice. Therefore, mice from the verum group were orally challenged with chokeberry extract (50 mg per kg body weight) for 7 days and infected with L. monocytogenes on day 8 by orogastric gavage, while the control group received vehicle instead. After the L. monocytogenes infection, the control mice showed a significant weight loss compared to the verum group that did not exhibit any decrease of body weight if compared to the initial state. After 48 h of infection, the L. monocytogenes burden in the spleen was measured by enumerating CFUs and revealed that the mice pre-treated with chokeberry extract displayed significantly lower splenic bacterial numbers than control mice. In addition, higher ratios of activated macrophages to cytotoxic T cells could be detected in the spleen as well as the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) of pre-treated versus control mice that were accompanied by more abundant ROS producing cells in Peyer's patches isolated from the former versus the latter. Hence, prophylactic chokeberry fruit extract application activated gut-associated myeloid cell function and resulted in enhanced clearance of L. monocytogenes in infected mice [23].
Notably, studies investigating the anti-bacterial activity of Aronia melanocarpa in human trials are very limited. Lee et al. [24] studied the anti-biofilm-forming effects of Aronia juice directed against Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus that comprise bacterial strains of the oral cavity known to be involved in dental caries development. Performing an in vitro biofilm formation assay first, the results showed that after 1 min of exposure to the 1:10-diluted Aronia juice, the streptococcal biofilm formation could be reduced by approximately 25–30%. Moreover, even pre-formed streptococcal biofilm could be reduced by up to 72%, whereas a decrease of streptococcal CFUs could not be observed under the same experimental conditions suggesting that the Aronia juice did not affect streptococcal growth. Interestingly, the oral rinsing with diluted Aronia juice led to a significant decrease of streptococcal numbers in the saliva if compared to the individuals from the control group that gargled with tap water. Furthermore, the authors showed that Aronia juice could counteract biofilm formation by decomposing extracellular RNA given that the experimental Aronia juice sample could completely degrade streptococcal RNA. In summary, the diluted Aroni juice did not affect the S. mutans and S. sobrinus growth in vitro but showed a significant decrease of streptococcal CFUs after oral rinsing in humans in vivo, whereas it could exert potent bacterial RNA-degrading activity [24].
Given that urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections in primary health care, Handeland et al. [25] tested the impact of black chokeberry juice consumption on the incidences of UTIs among residents of 6 nursing homes in Norway. Therefore, a 6-month crossover intervention study was performed, in which participants were enrolled into two groups (i.e., group A (n = 110) and group B (n = 126)) and offered a daily intake of black chokeberry juice between 90 and 160 mL. Group A received a placebo for the first three months followed by black chokeberry juice for the next period of three months and vice versa in group B. Medical treatments of infections during the study periods were documented by the nurses and revealed that each participant received an average of 1.51 antibiotic treatments, of which 55% were UTI indicated. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of infections treated during the intervention period compared to the control period before the treatment. Whereas in group A there was a 55% decrease in antibiotic treated UTIs in the post-treatment period compared to the intervention period, in group B, a decrease of 38% UTIs in the period after treatment could be observed. There was no effect noticeable on infectious diseases other than UTIs. According to the authors, the results underscore a long-term impact on the prevention of UTIs after consuming black chokeberry juice, which was detected for the first three months following the treatment period but was not evident thereafter [25].
4 Discussion
The results of our literature survey summarized in Table 1 revealed that Aronia melanocarpa exerts anti-bacterial effects per se that are overall more pronounced against Gram-positive than Gram-negative bacterial species [12, 13, 20]. One reason could be that the cell walls of Gram-negative bacteria are covered by a lipophilic outer membrane, which presents a natural barrier for hydrophilic substances. Nevertheless, Efenberger-Smechtyk et al. [19] observed that, irrespective of the bacterial cell wall composition, application of Aronia melanocarpa leaf extract could decrease the bacterial growth rate and prolong the lag phase in both, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. These results are in contrast to observations that the former were in general more susceptible to Aronia melanocarpa or distinct polyphenolic constituents if compared to the latter [18]. Among distinct Gram-negative bacterial species there were discrepant results regarding the anti-bacterial activity of Aronia melanocarpa as shown for E. coli depending on the applied analytic methodology. When black chokeberry juice was tested against a set of Gram-negative bacteria including E. coli by diffusion assays, for instance, no anti-microbial activity was observed at all [12]. Application of ultrastructural analysis such as electron microscopy and proteomic tools including tandem mass tag method with in vitro isotop labelling, however, could provide more in-depth mechanistic insights into potential anti-microbial effects of the applied Aronia compound. In fact, the anthocyanin extract from the stems and leaves of Aronia melanocarpa extracted with 0.1% HCl-acidified ethanol showed to exert damage to the bacterial cell membrane in E. coli O157:H7, whereas differently expressed proteins involved in stress response, DNA repair, bacterial protein synthesis, and homeostasis, for instance, could more comprehensively elucidate the impact of the Aronia anthocyanin extracts on the overall cellular metabolism and the fate of the E. coli bacteria [14, 15]. Besides its direct bacterial cell growth inhibiting effects, defined Aronia melanocarpia constituents were also shown to inhibit biofilm formation by both, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [16]. Furthermore, it is highly likely that the different ingredients of the Aronia plant are acting in synergy while each of them alone might result in a different and probably less pronounced effect. For example, the Aronia melanocarpa anthocyanins cyanidin-3-galactoside, cyanidin-3-glucoside, and cyanidin-3-xyloside that are particularly known for their potent anti-oxidative activities were able to inhibit biofilm formation by B. cereus by more than three-fold when applied in combination if compared to individual use [16]. Hence, a promising approach to enhance such synergetic anti-bacterial effects might be to mix different plant extracts. Oun et al. [21], for instance, combined the extract from Aronia melanocarpa and grapefruit seeds in their preparation of multi-functional PVA/CS-CGA films to test for anti-bacterial effects directed against L. monocytogenes and E. coli, respectively. This PVA/CS-CGA film presented a more effective anti-microbial activity than the extracts alone against the Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains and was able to eradicate the bacteria after 3 h, which was the effect of the grapefruit seed extract (GSE) in combination with the Aronia extract in the presence of chitosan. Furthermore, one needs to take into consideration that also the particular solvent of Aronia plays an important role given that applying 50% ethanolic solvent alone already resulted in a reduction of B. cereus growth of around 80% [16]. Both, the anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm-forming activities of Arnonia derivatives against food-spoilage bacteria support these molecules as promising candidates for application in food production to enhance food safety [16–22].
Summary of results
Reference | Methods | Compounds | Bacteria strains (effect) | Effects, Comments |
Nowak et al. [12] | In vitro, anti-bacterial (agar diffusion) | Aronia juice | Staphylococcus aureus (+) | Moderate effect against distinct Gram-positive strains. No effect against Gram-negative strains. |
Listeria monocytogenes (+) | ||||
Listeria innocua (+) | ||||
Bacillus cereus (+) | ||||
Enterococcus faecalis (−) | ||||
Clostridium perfringens (−) | ||||
Salmonella Typhimurium (−) | ||||
Salmonella Enteritidis (−) | ||||
Escherichia coli (−) | ||||
Klebsiella pneumoniae (−) | ||||
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (−) | ||||
Pseudomonas fluorescens (−) | ||||
Raudsepp et al. [13] | In vitro, anti-bacterial (agar diffusion) | Ethanolic Aronia infusions | Bacillus cereus (+) | Effects against distinct Gram-positive, but also Gram-negative species (depending on ethanol concentration) |
Bacillus pumilus (+) | ||||
Kocuria rhizophila (+) | ||||
Listeria monocytogenes (+) | ||||
Salmonella Enteritidis (+) | ||||
Escherichia coli (+) | ||||
Campylobacter jejuni (+) | ||||
Deng et al. [14] | In vitro, anti-bacterial (proteomics, electron microscopy) | Aronia melanocarpa anthocyanins (AMA) | Escherichia coli 0157:H7 | Distinct bacterial proteins regulated by AMA (oxidative stress response, peptidoglycan production, DNA replication pathways,…). Distinct morphological alterations, bacterial cell death |
Deng et al. [15] | In vitro, (activation of conductivity channels, proteomics) | Aronia melanocarpa anthocyanins (AMA) | Escherichia coli 0157:H7 | Decreased activation of bacterial mechanosensitive channels Down-regulation of the expression of heat shock proteins and chaperons Compromized stress response of the bacterial cells, cell death |
Bräunlich et al. [16] | In vitro (biofilm assay; anti-bacterial) | Ethanolic Aronia berry extract Defined Aronia melanocarpa constituents | Bacillus cereus | Biofilm inhibition against B. cereus, less distinctly against E. coli. No bacterial growth inhibition. |
Escherichia coli K12 | ||||
Escherichia coli (uropathogenic) | ||||
Kim et al. [17] | In vitro (anti-bacterial: (liquid media, growth curves) | Aronia melanocarpa leaf extract (ethanolic) | Bacillus cereus (+) | Antibacterial activities against B. cereus only. |
Listeria innocua (−) | ||||
Escherichia coli 0157:H7 (−) | ||||
Salmonella Typhimurium (−) | ||||
Efenberger-Szmechtyk et al. [18] | In vitro (anti-bacterial: liquid media, growth curves) | Aronia melanocarpa leaf extract | Staphylococcus aureus (+) | Decreased growth rates and lengthen the lag phase in all tested strains (except Listeria monocytogenes) |
Brochotrix thermospacta (+) | ||||
Listeria monocytogenes (−) | ||||
Salmonella enterica (+) | ||||
Efenberger-Szmechtyk et al. [19] | In vitro (anti-bacterial: liquid media, growth curves; electron microscopy) | Aronia melanocarpa leaf extract | Brochotrix thermosphacta (+) | Decreased bacterial growth Destructed S. aureus cell wall, cell death Decreased E. coli DNA gyrase activity |
S. aureus (+) | ||||
Salmonella enterica (+) | ||||
Escherichia coli (+) | ||||
Acinetobacter baumanii (+) | ||||
Pseudomonas fragi (+) | ||||
Buda et al. [20] | In vitro (anti-bacterial: microdilution) | Aronia extract embedded in silica-type matrix | Streptococcus pyogenes (+) | Antibacterial against Gram-positive, but not Gram-negative strains |
Streptococcus pneumoniae (+) | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus (+) | ||||
Escherichia coli (−) | ||||
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (−) | ||||
Salmonella Typhimurium (−) | ||||
Shigella flexneri (−) | ||||
Oun et al. [21] | In vitro (anti-bacterial) | Aronia extract (PVA/CS-based composite film) | Listeria monocytogenes (+) | Antibacterial against Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. |
Escherichia coli (+) | ||||
Lee et al. [22] | In vitro (anti-bacterial) | By-products from Aronia melanocarpa juice (for bioelastomer fabrication) | Staphylococcus aureus (+) | Antibacterial against Gram-positive but not Gram-negative strains |
Escherichia coli K12 (−) | ||||
Gajic et al. [23] | In vivo mouse | Aronia fruit extract (prophylaxis) | Listeria monocytogenes | Better clinical outcome Decreased splenic bacterial numbers Enhanced phagocytosis and bacterial clearance |
Lee et al. [24] | In vitro (biofilm assay) In vivo (human trial) | Aronia juice | Streptococcus mutans | No effects on S. mutans and S. sobrinus growth (in vitro); Potent bacterial RNA-degrading activity (in vitro) Decreased streptococcal growth after oral rinsing (in vivo) |
Streptococcus sobrinus | ||||
Handeland et al. [25] | In vivo human oral intake | Aronia juice | Urinary tract infections (UTIs) | Decreased incidence of antibiotic treated UTIs in post-treatment period; No effect on other infectious diseases Potential prevention of UTIs after consuming Aronia juice |
(+), anti-bacterial effect; (−), no anti-bacterial effect; AMA, Aronia melanocarpa anthocyanins; GALT, gut-associated lymphoid tissues; PVA/CS, polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan; UTI, urinary tract infection
Interestingly, the observed anti-bacterial activities of Aronia melanocarpa were depending on plant growing conditions, such as watering and sun exposure, the harvest state of the plant and the mechanism of extraction. In fact, Sang-Soon Kim et al. [17] were able to show that only the older leaves displayed potent anti-bacterial effects against B. cereus.
Our literature survey revealed only three in vivo studies showing promising results regarding future clinical application. In fact, oral Aronia juice prophylaxis could alleviate L. monocytogenes induced disease in mice and enhanced pathogen clearance [23]. In humans, oral rinsing with diluted Aronia juice effectively reduced numbers of streptococci involved in dental caries development [24], whereas black chokeberry juice application for three months was shown to decrease the incidences of UTIs in residents of nursing homes in Norway [24].
5 Limitations
This review's objective was to examine the anti-bacterial properties of Aronia melanocarpa. It is critical to emphasize the diversity of the experimental settings, which included various bacterial strains, applied methodologies, and derivatives of the Aronia berries. Given these heterogeneities, it is thus rather challenging to directly compare the acquired results. Furthermore, just three of the included 14 papers were performed in vivo including experiments with mice and men. Finally, even though the search strategy was carried out with the utmost care, research errors cannot be ruled out since the literature survey was performed by a single investigator.
6 Conclusion and outlook
Altogether, our literature search underlines the effectiveness of extracts, compounds, and distinct molecules derived from Aronia melanocarpa in inhibiting activity and growth of distinct bacteria in vitro. In line with the possibility to combine Aronia melanocarpa phytochemicals among each other and in addition, with synthetic antibiotics, the safety profile of Aronia melanocarpa further presents an interesting opportunity to reduce antibiotic usage without inducing bacterial resistance. This aspect also offers potential use for food-packaging and reducing the transmission of foodborne pathogens in meat consumption. Given the scarcity of in vivo studies to date further trials addressing the clinical potential of Aronia melanocarpa in the combat of bacterial infection are warranted, as black chokeberry does not only have anti-bacterial activity but also shows immunomodulatory effects supporting the immunological fitness of the host.
Ethics statement
Not applicable (literature survey).
Conflict of interests
SB and MMH are members of the Editorial Board of the journal, therefore they did not take part in the review process in any capacity and the submission was handled by a different member of the editorial board. The submission was subject to the same process as any other manuscript and editorial board membership had no influence on editorial consideration and the final decision.
Authors' contributions
SAG conceived and designed the survey, wrote the paper. SM co-edited the paper. SB provided critical advice in design of the survey, co-edited paper. MMH supervised the survey, co-wrote the paper.
List of abbreviations:
AMA | Aronia melanocarpa anthocyanins |
BRICS | Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa |
CFU | colony-forming units |
GALT | gut-associated lymphoid tissue |
GSE | grapefruit seed extract |
MBC | minimum bactericidal concentration |
MDR | multi-drug resistant |
MIC | minimum inhibitory concentration |
MscL | small-conductivity mechanosensitive channels |
PDMS | polydimethylsiloxane |
PVA/CS | polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan |
ROS | reactive oxygen species |
UTI | urinary tract infection |
Ynal | low-conduct mechanosensitive channels |
References
- 1.↑
Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74(3):417–33.
- 2.↑
Van Boeckel TP, Gandra S, Ashok A, Caudron Q, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, et al. Global antibiotic consumption 2000 to 2010: an analysis of national pharmaceutical sales data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(8):742–50.
- 3.↑
Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(18):5649–54.
- 4.↑
Laxminarayan R, Matsoso P, Pant S, Brower C, Røttingen JA, Klugman K, et al. Access to effective antimicrobials: a worldwide challenge. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):168–75.
- 5.↑
Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55.
- 7.↑
Kokotkiewicz A, Jaremicz Z, Luczkiewicz M. Aronia plants: a review of traditional use, biological activities, and perspectives for modern medicine. J Med Food. 2010;13(2):255–69.
- 8.↑
Sidor A, Drożdżyńska A, Gramza-Michałowska A. Black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) and its products as potential health-promoting factors-An overview. Trends Food Sci & Technology. 2019;89:45–60.
- 9.↑
Yang S, Wang D, Gao Y. Advances in studies on the function and application of Aronia melanocarpa. Food Res Dev. 2021;42:206–13.
- 10.↑
Jurendić T, Ščetar M. Aronia melanocarpa products and by-products for health and nutrition: a review. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;10(7).
- 11.↑
Ren Y, Frank T, Meyer G, Lei J, Grebenc JR, Slaughter R, et al. Potential benefits of black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) fruits and their constituents in improving human health. Molecules. 2022;27(22).
- 12.↑
Nowak D, Gośliński M, Kłębukowska L. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of selected fruit juices. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2022;77(3):427–35.
- 13.↑
Raudsepp P, Koskar J, Anton D, Meremäe K, Kapp K, Laurson P, et al. Antibacterial and antioxidative properties of different parts of garden rhubarb, blackcurrant, chokeberry and blue honeysuckle. J Sci Food Agric. 2019;99(5):2311–20.
- 14.↑
Deng H, Xue B, Wang M, Tong Y, Tan C, Wan M, et al. TMT-based quantitative proteomics analyses reveal the antibacterial mechanisms of anthocyanins from aronia melanocarpa against Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70(26):8032–42.
- 15.↑
Deng H, Kong Y, Zhu J, Jiao X, Tong Y, Wan M, et al. Proteomic analyses revealed the antibacterial mechanism of Aronia melanocarpa isolated anthocyanins against Escherichia coli O157: H7. Curr Res Food Sci. 2022;5:1559–69.
- 16.↑
Bräunlich M, Økstad OA, Slimestad R, Wangensteen H, Malterud KE, Barsett H. Effects of Aronia melanocarpa constituents on biofilm formation of Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus. Molecules. 2013;18(12):14989–99.
- 17.↑
Kim SS, Shin Y. Antibacterial and in vitro antidementia effects of aronia (Aronia melanocarpa) leaf extracts. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2020;29(9):1295–300.
- 18.↑
Efenberger-Szmechtyk M, Nowak A, Czyżowska A, Kucharska AZ, Fecka I. Composition and antibacterial activity of Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Elliot, Cornus mas L. and Chaenomeles superba Lindl. Leaf extracts. Molecules. 2020;25(9).
- 19.↑
Efenberger-Szmechtyk M, Nowak A, Czyżowska A, Śniadowska M, Otlewska A, Żyżelewicz D. Antibacterial mechanisms of Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.), Chaenomeles superba Lindl. and Cornus mas L. leaf extracts. Food Chem. 2021;350:129218.
- 20.↑
Buda V, Brezoiu AM, Berger D, Pavel IZ, Muntean D, Minda D, et al. Biological evaluation of black chokeberry extract free and embedded in two mesoporous silica-type matrices. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(9).
- 21.↑
Oun AA, Shin GH, Kim JT. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, and pH-sensitive polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan-based composite films with aronia extract, cellulose nanocrystals, and grapefruit seed extract. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;213:381–93.
- 22.↑
Lee KH, Chun Y, Jang YW, Lee SK, Kim HR, Lee JH, et al. Fabrication of functional bioelastomer for food packaging from aronia (Aronia melanocarpa) juice processing by-products. Foods. 2020;9(11).
- 23.↑
Gajić D, Saksida T, Koprivica I, Šenerović L, Morić I, Šavikin K, et al. Immunomodulatory activity and protective effects of chokeberry fruit extract on Listeria monocytogenes infection in mice. Food Funct. 2020;11(9):7793–803.
- 24.↑
Lee HJ, Oh SY, Hong SH. Inhibition of streptococcal biofilm formation by Aronia by extracellular RNA degradation. J Sci Food Agric. 2020;100(4):1806–11.
- 25.↑
Handeland M, Grude N, Torp T, Slimestad R. Black chokeberry juice (Aronia melanocarpa) reduces incidences of urinary tract infection among nursing home residents in the long term--a pilot study. Nutr Res. 2014;34(6):518–25.