Abstract
Background
Altered large-scale brain systems, including structural alterations and resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) changes, have been demonstrated as effective system-level biomarkers for revealing potential neural mechanism of multiple brain disorders. However, identifying consistent abnormalities of large-scale brain systems in behavioral addictions (BA) is challenging due to varying methods and inconsistent results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the significantly abnormal large-scale brain systems in BA.
Method
PubMed, OVID Embase, OVID Medline, and Web of Science were searched with relevant keywords to identify potential studies. A total of 52 studies including 35 rs-FC studies and 17 structural studies were examined by extracting the coordinates of seeds and target brain regions. The seeds were then categorized into predefined seven networks by their locations based on previous parcellations in rs-FC studies, followed by pooling the results in those networks.
Results
The rs-FC findings illustrated that BA were characterized as abnormal networks in response to inhibition, salience attribution, self-referential mental process, and reward-driven behaviors. Meanwhile, meta-analysis of structural studies showed decreased gray matter volume in the anterior cingulate cortex, extending to the middle cingulate cortex and the superior frontal gyrus. Importantly, overlapping regions in the cingulate cortex and anterior thalamus projections extending to caudate regions exhibited both dysfunctions in structure and rs-FC.
Conclusions
This study highlighted substantial dysconnectivity in BA, which might result in impaired response to inhibition and salience attribution. Therefore, this study might provide novel insights of neural biomarkers for clinical diagnoses and treatment targets for BA.
Introduction
Behavioral addictions (BA) are characterized by repetitive and compulsive addictive behaviors despite the presence of disadvantageous consequences (Derevensky, Hayman, & Lynette, 2019; Petry, Zajac, & Ginley, 2018). Those addictive behaviors include pathological gambling (PG), internet gaming disorder (IGD), mobile phone addiction, shopping addictions, and sex addiction, among others. Although numerous similarities exist between substance use disorder (SUD) and BA, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V (DSM-5) workgroup maintains that neurobiological basis of BA is independent of that of SUD, based on growing neuroscientific evidence (Derevensky et al., 2019). More importantly, prevalence rates of BA have been profoundly increasing over the past ten years, with rates for IGD increasing from 2.38% to 3.91% and rates for PG increasing from 0.1% to 6.0% (Abbott, 2020; Stevens, Dorstyn, Delfabbro, & King, 2021). BA is associated with a set of explicit symptoms, including addictive activities, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, conflict with other things, relapse, and a tendency of suffering from psychiatric disorders (Derevensky, 2019). In addition, BA is also associated with impaired cognitive functions, such as sensation seeking, inhibitory control, attentional bias, and intertemporal choice (Gao, Jia, Zhao, & Zhang, 2019; Morris & Voon, 2016; Müller, Dreier, Beutel, & Wölfling, 2016; Weinstein, Abu, Timor, & Mama, 2016). These altered symptoms or cognitive impairments have been clearly linked to abnormal large-scale brain systems. Those systems are demonstrated by distinct brain regions (i.e., nodes) and inter-regional connectivity (i.e., edges) (Park & Friston, 2013). In particular, it is essential to examine disrupted large-scale brain systems including structural alterations and functional connectivity changes, which can serve as an effective systems-level biomarker to fully understand neural mechanisms of BA. Therefore, significantly abnormal large-scale brain systems in BA will be inspected in present work by using a multi-modal meta-analysis approach based on the presently available results.
More interestingly, with the advancement of neuroimaging tools and advanced analysis methods, abnormalities in physiology, structure, functional connectivity could be revealed at both microscopic and macroscopic levels (Buchbinder, 2016; Zeng, 2018). In particular, combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) has been broadly accepted to detect alterations in gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) associated with various brain disorders (Nemoto, 2017). For example, Han, Lyoo, and Renshaw (2012); Jin et al. (2016); Lin, Dong, Wang, and Du (2015); Seok and Sohn (2018) have identified decreased gray matter volume (GMV) in the left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), right supplementary motor area (SMA), temporal gyri, and occipital gyrus in BA. Meanwhile, Ko et al. (2015); Lin et al. (2015); Zhou et al. (2011) also demonstrated increased GMV in the right ventral striatum, right prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus, and amygdala. Additionally, Qin et al. (2020) investigated brain GMV alterations in BA, demonstrating decreased GMV in the left ACC, right putamen, and right SMA. Despite of discrepancy between decreased and increased GMV, those subcortical nuclei and PFC are considered as crucial and dominant regions responsible for disrupted brain structures and functions in individuals with BA.
It is important to note that while neural correlates of BA and SUD share similarities, there are also distinct differences between BA and SUD. Unlike SUD, some brain regions of BA were not directly altered by the specific neurotoxic profiles and neurotransmitter systems of consumed substance, such as thalamus (Pando-Naude et al., 2021). However, the neural underpinnings of BA share three core similarities with SUD, including: 1) the ventral striatum engaged in compulsive seeking sensation and impaired reward circuity, 2) the PFC involved in unstoppable control behaviors, and 3) the amygdala associated with negative stressful emotions.
Resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) denotes another crucial aspect of large-scale networks that quantifies brain activity of different brain areas at rest. Therefore, rs-FC has been widely adopted to reveal difference in large-scale intrinsic functional connectivity associated with various brain disorders (Briley et al., 2022; Lv et al., 2018). In particular, seed-based connectivity analysis is the most commonly used rs-FC analysis method, which measures the correlations between time series of region-of-interest (ROIs) and target regions (Smitha et al., 2017). Interestingly, findings from rs-FC studies have illustrated multiple altered functional connectivity networks within BA, including the default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal networks (FPN), affective networks (AN), and their connections with other networks (Bae, Han, Jung, Nam, & Renshaw, 2017; Kim et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2018). However, findings on BA's functional connectivity at rest are still mixed. For example, some studies have identified strong functional connectivity within the DMN (Chen et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2013), while others have reported the opposite pattern (Zhang et al., 2015). Additionally, the locations, sizes, and properties of seed ROIs in previous rs-FC studies have been inconsistent, and the confounding effects of factors have varied across studies, such as age, gender ratio, addiction type, and sample size. For instance, previous studies have found age is negatively correlated with functional connectivity of orbital frontal cortex (OFC) among BA (Chen et al., 2020), and gender ratio might also have an impact on brain functions of BA (Zeng et al., 2021). Consequently, it is challenging to comprehensively depict and characterize the functional connectivity and structural information alterations associated with BA. To date, no meta-analysis has been carried out to inspect the dysfunctions of rs-FC and structural changes in patients with BA.
In this study, seed ROIs were categorized into the fitted functional network based on their locations (Kaiser, Andrews-Hanna, Wager, & Pizzagalli, 2015; Radua et al., 2012). And then meta-analysis was performed based on the parcellated functional networks in both positive and negative directions. Several functional networks that might exhibit abnormalities in addictions were examined (Buckner, Krienen, Castellanos, Diaz, & Yeo, 2011; Choi, Yeo, & Buckner, 2012; Yeo et al., 2011), including the DMN, FPN, ventral attention network (VAN), dorsal attention network (DAN), AN, somatosensory network (SSN), and visual network. In particular, to gain a better understanding of large-scale brain system, anisotropic effect-size version of seed-based mapping (AES-SDM) and multi-model analysis were adopted for the present work by converting the seed-based functional connectivity into consistent patterns of impairments among predefined networks (Radua & Mataix-Cols, 2012). To the best of our knowledge, this study is among the largest and first meta-analysis studies to: 1) explore the rs-FC changes in patients with BA as compared to those of health controls (HC), 2) examine the joint alterations from both rs-FC and GMV, and 3) inspect the relationships between brain network dysfunctions and relevant demographic (age, gender) and clinical variables (depression, anxiety, severity degree of BA, sub-types of BA) in patients with BA.
Methods
This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2009).
Search strategies
A comprehensive search was carried out to identify studies exploring the rs-FC networks or GMV in individual with BA, which were published in English up to June 2021 in four electronic databases including PubMed, OVID Embase, OVID Medline, and Web of Science. The keywords were set as BA (“behavioral addiction” OR “internet gaming disorder” OR “pathological gambling”) and structural or functional MRI (“magnetic resonance imaging” AND “resting-state” OR “functional connectivity” OR “grey matter” OR “voxel-based morphometry” OR “VBM”). The full search strategy was presented in Supplementary Materials and additional meta-analysis databases, such as Brainmap and Neurosynth, were also provided as supplements. Besides, reference lists of studies contained in the final full-text paper consensus list were thoroughly reviewed for additional relevant studies.
Inclusion criteria and study selection
Studies included in this meta-analysis were original case-control MRI studies adopting seed-based rs-FC or VBM to make comparisons between BA patient groups (diagnosed according to the DSM-5, or ICD-10 criteria) and HC with reported coordinates in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space or Talairach space (TAL). Studies should be excluded if they used samples with the same seed ROIs as other studies (Gao, Shuai, et al., 2019). In particular, publications that included the same sample yet adopted different seed ROIs were coded as separate datasets. Two researchers (ZX and HX) reviewed studies independently based on aforementioned criteria and reached a consensus in the end. In cases where conflicts arose between the two researchers during study selection, they resolved them through discussion and consensus, with a third-party arbiter's (ZY) consultancy in rare cases when disagreements persisted.
Data extraction
Relevant variables were extracted from eligible studies, including the coordinates of the center of each seed ROI mass, peak effect in fMRI studies, coordinates of GMV alterations in VBM studies, participant characteristics (e.g., sample size, age, gender), clinical measurements (e.g., depression, anxiety, severity of addiction), and parameters of MRI acquisition. In particular, the seed ROIs in fMRI studies were categorized into seven predefined resting-state functional networks, which included the DMN, FPN, VAN, DAN, AN, SSN, and visual network, according to their corresponding MNI or TAL coordinates (Buckner et al., 2011; Choi et al., 2012; Yeo et al., 2011). Meanwhile, the strengths of connectivity between seed ROIs and target brain regions were categorized into hyperconnectivity and hypoconnectivity conditions based on the connectivity analysis results. Hyperconnectivity was denoted as increased positive or decreased negative connectivity of rs-FC of BA group compared to HC, whereas hypoconnectivity was defined as decreased positive and increased negative connectivity of rs-FC. Besides, findings that did not show significant differences in seed-to-whole brain rs-FC between BA and HC groups were also included in the meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis
Separate meta-analysis in VBM and fMRI were respectively performed via an anisotropic effect-size version of signed differential mapping software package (AES-SDM, 5.15 version, https://www.sdmproject.com/software/). Firstly, the coordinates and statistics (T, Z, and p values were converted to T values) of the cluster peaks were selected and prepared. And then effect-size maps in structural and functional neuroimaging alterations in BA group were recreated respectively for each study via an anisotropic unnormalized Gaussian kernel, such that voxels were assigned a high value if they were close to the peak coordinates (Radua et al., 2014). Further, meta-analytic computation was applied to each individual map, which was influenced by sample size, intra-study variance, and inter-study heterogeneity (Salimi-Khorshidi, Smith, Keltner, Wager, & Nichols, 2009). In addition, to reduce false positive rate (FDR), a more conservative threshold was chosen, in which only abnormality with a voxel-level (height) threshold of p < 0.001 with peak Z > 1 and a cluster-level (extent) threshold of 100 voxels was able to be reported (Radua et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2018). The effect networks were also categorized based on the spatial correlation between the clusters of meta-analysis results and predefined seven networks mentioned above. To improve accuracy of network classification, the networks from previous studies (Shirer, Ryali, Rykhlevskaia, Menon, & Greicius, 2012; Smith et al., 2009) were also offered to compare the clusters from meta-analysis with their predefined networks as supplements.
More importantly, a conjunction analysis was conducted to examine the regions of shared abnormalities across structures and rs-FC in BA group as compared to those in HC group. The p values of union alterations were calculated using the two probability maps of separated meta-analysis in each group within each voxel: pUNION = prs-FC + pVBM-prs-FC*pVBM. To account for noise in the estimation of meta-analytic p values, the voxel level threshold was decreased to 0.0001 and the cluster level threshold was set to 100 voxels (Radua, Romeo, Mataix-Cols, & Fusar-Poli, 2013).
Control analysis
To assess the reliability, robustness, and potential confounding moderators of results, six complementary analyses were respectively carried out for each seed-based network. 1) Subgroup analysis: to explore the alterations of large-scale brain systems among sub-types of BA, a subgroup analysis of IGD was conducted, as this subtype had a sufficient number of studies. 2) Heterogeneity: inter-study heterogeneity was calculated by using Q value. Clusters were considered as heterogeneous if the studies showed significant heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) when the results were extracted for comprehensive meta-analysis. 3) Meta-regression: The potential effects of several demographical (age, gender) and clinical data (depression, anxiety, impulsivity, severity degree) on large-scale brain systems were explored by meta-regression. The meta-regression analyses were done respectively if more than eight studies had reported those variables (Radua & Mataix-Cols, 2009). Considering the significant difference among various scales, the normalized score was adopted to recalculate the scales according to the lowest and highest scores (Rogers & De Brito, 2016). The normalized score = (primary score – the minimum score)/(the maximum score – the minimum score). Still, to reduce FDR, the voxel-level threshold of p < 0.0001 and cluster-level threshold of 100 voxels were chosen. 4) Potential bias from MRI parameters: to examine this effect, a contrasting analysis was adopted with p < 0.0001 and cluster-level over 100 voxels exhibiting group difference. 5) Reliability of all analyses: jackknife sensitivity analysis was used to examine the reliability of all analyses (Radua & Mataix-Cols, 2009). The results would be replicable if previous significant findings still remained keeping significant in all combinations of studies or with one or two exceptions. 6) Publication bias: the bias associated with studies with positive outcomes being more likely to be published, as compared to those reporting negative outcomes, was tested by using Egger's test with a threshold of p < 0.05.
Results
Search results and characteristics of included studies
The initial electronic search yielded 1,067 studies from the four datasets, which were reduced to 721 studies after removing 346 duplicates. Additional 669 studies were screened out based on titles, abstracts, and full-texts, resulting in 35 rs-FC studies and 17 GMV studies for formal analysis (Fig. 1). The rs-FC studies consisted of 39 datasets comparing the differences between BA and HC groups, while four studies included comparisons of three groups. A total of 1,143 patients and 1014 HC participants were included in the rs-FC studies, with an average age of 22.14 and 22.03 years old, respectively. The GMV studies included 423 patients and 481 HC participants, with an average age of 28.43 and 28.88 years old, respectively. There were no significant differences in age or gender ratio between BA and HC groups in rs-FC and GMV studies (Table S2 and Table S3).
In addition, 66 seed ROIs were extracted from the 39 BA datasets for further meta-analysis (Table S1), with DMN involving 21 seeds, FPN 16 seeds, AN 24 seeds, and VAN 13 seeds. The MRI acquisition parameters in rs-FC and GMV analysis were listed in supplementary tables (Table S4 and Table S5), which showed overall satisfactory consistency.
Rs-FC alterations in BA
Relative to the HC group, the BA group exhibited hyperconnectivity within the FPN and between the FPN seeds and the right SFG. Meanwhile, the AN showed increased connectivity with the FPN and VAN, whose cluster centers were located along the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and corpus callosum, respectively. Additionally, hyperconnectivity was identified within the VAN, which showed the highest connectivity strength on the right rolandic operculum cluster and the left median cingulate cluster. Interestingly, BA was also linked to hypoconnectivity between the FPN seeds and areas of the posterior cingulate cortex, which was distributed within the DMN. Further, decreased connectivity between the VAN seeds and the left supplementary motor area was also revealed within VAN (Table 1 and Fig. 2 Panel A).
Meta-analysis of aberrant intrinsic functional connectivity in BA compared to HC
Seed network | Effect anatomy | Effect network | MNI coordinate | Voxels | SDM Z-value | p value | Breakdown (Main clusters) |
BA > HC | |||||||
FPN | Right SFG | FPN | 20,18,56 | 142 | 2.158 | <0.0001 | Right SFG (91) |
AN | Right IFG | FPN | 54,12,26 | 835 | 2.740 | <0.0001 | Right IFG (502) |
Right precentral gyrus (95) | |||||||
Corpus callosum | VAN | −48,2,22 | 214 | 2.109 | <0.0001 | Left IFG, BA44 (62) | |
Left FAT (35) | |||||||
Left SLF (27) | |||||||
Corpus callosum (26) | |||||||
VAN | Left MCC | VAN | −12,−14,38 | 265 | 2.469 | <0.0001 | Left MCC (147) |
Left SLF (40) | |||||||
Right RO | VAN | 50,−30,22 | 131 | 2.396 | 0.0005 | Right STG, BA42 (58) | |
Right supramarginal gyrus (30) | |||||||
Right RO (15) | |||||||
BA < HC | |||||||
FPN | Corpus callosum | DMN | −2,−32,24 | 176 | −1.892 | <0.0001 | Left PCG (28) |
Left median network (28) | |||||||
Corpus callosum (28) | |||||||
VAN | Left SMA | VAN | 0,20,48 | 1184 | −1.850 | <0.0001 | Left MCC (297) |
Left SFG (167) | |||||||
Left SMA (167) |
FAT: frontal aslant tract; IFG: inferior frontal gyrus; MCC: median cingulate cortex; PCC: posterior cingulate cortex; RO: rolandic operculum; SFG: superior frontal gyrus; SLF: superior longitudinal fasciculus; SMA: supplementary motor area; STG: superior temporal gyrus.
GMV alterations in BA
BA group showed decreased GMV on the left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), extending to the median cingulate cortex (MCC) and SFG as compared to HC group. No brain regions with increased GMV were detected (Table 2 and Fig. 2 Panel B).
Meta-analysis of GMV in BA
Anatomy | MNI coordinate | SDM Z-value | p value | Voxel | Breakdown (Main cluster) |
Left ACC | −2,42,14 | −3.338 | <0.0001 | 1780 | Left ACC (600) |
Right ACC (351) | |||||
Left SFG (270) | |||||
Left MCC (120) | |||||
Left median network (83) | |||||
Right MCC (84) | |||||
Right median network (47) |
ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; MCC: median cingulate cortex; SFG: superior frontal gyrus.
Conjunction analysis in BA
Cluster of the left anterior thalamic projections to the caudate demonstrated increased GMV and decreased rs-FC with the FPN. By contrast, most brain regions exhibited decreased GMV and altered rs-FC patterns jointly for the BA group as compared to those from the HC group. In addition, the cluster of the left ACC, as part of the DMN, showed decreased GMV and reduced hypoconnectivity with the DMN seeds in BA. Meanwhile, the VAN seeds showed hypoconnectivity with the cluster of the MCC extending to the SFG and ACC, and concurrently reduced GMV (Table 3 and Fig. 2 Panel C).
Conjunction analysis of rs-FC and VBM in BA
Anatomy | MNI coordinate | Effect network | Direction | Voxel | Breakdown (Main cluster) |
DMN | |||||
Left ACC | −2,48,6 | DMN | VBM decrease and rs-FC increase | 159 | Left ACC (130) |
FPN | |||||
Left ATP | −8,6,4 | DMN | VBM increase and rs-FC decrease | 252 | Left ATP (152) |
Left caudate (50) | |||||
VAN | |||||
Left MCC | 0,20,34 | VAN, FPN | VBM decrease and rs-FC decrease | 1485 | Left MCC (203) |
Right MCC (256) | |||||
Left SFG (347) | |||||
Right SFG (167) | |||||
Left ACC (134) | |||||
Right SMA (112) | |||||
Left SMA (174) | |||||
Right ACC (53) |
ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; ATP: anterior thalamic projections; MCC: median cingulate cortex; SFG: superior frontal gyrus; SMA: supplementary motor area.
Control analysis
Subgroup analyses of 34 IGD datasets in rs-FC revealed that the results of rs-FC alterations remained largely unchanged (Table S7). Moreover, one additional significant cluster was found where IGD was linked to decreased functional connectivity between FPN seeds and the left putamen. Subgroup analyses of 11 IGD datasets in GMV also revealed that the IGD showed decreased GMV in the ACC cluster, while IGD also showed decreased GMV in the SMA and increased GMV in the left caudate nucleus (Table S8).
The results of control analysis suggested that the findings from the meta-analysis have high replicability and reliability according to the jackknife sensitivity analysis. Specifically, all related brain regions from meta-analysis were preserved for all combinations, except for the corpus callosum cluster and the right rolandic operculum cluster which remained significant for the most cases except one combination of datasets (Table S6).
As for the heterogeneity test, most studies showed low heterogeneity with I2 < 10%, except for the cluster of the left ACC in GMV analysis (I2 = 16.216%), the left MCC (with I2 = 20.8), and the left SMA (with I2 = 31.14) in rs-FC analysis, implicating moderate heterogeneity.
In addition, all clusters showed no significant publication bias, based on Egger's test (p > 0.05), except for the right IFG in BA vs. HC group comparison (p = 0.019) (Supplementary figures S1–8). Furthermore, the model of scanner, impact of closed eyes, and duration of resting state were also inspected, and no difference was found between the subgroups.
More importantly, the results of the present analysis demonstrated that factors including mean age, male proportion, depression, anxiety, and impulsivity were irrelevant to the rs-FC for BA group (Fig. 3). The meta-regression analysis showed that the addiction severity degrees was positively correlated with the left insula (peak coordinate: −30, −6, 12; Z = 3.875; p < 0.0001; 263 voxels) and VAN as compared to those from the HC group. In particular, the severity of BA was also positively linked to GMV reduction in the right SMA (peak coordinate = 6, 4, 60; Z = 3.048; p < 0.0001; 494 voxels) and left ACC (peak coordinate = −4, 34, 18; z = 2.605; p < 0.0001; 341 voxels).
Discussion
The present multi-modal meta-analysis is among the first meta-analysis that examined the large-scale brain system impairments of BA regarding the structure information and functional connectivity as well as their abnormal interactions. Our rs-FC findings were consistent with those of the impaired response inhibition and salience attribution (iRISA) model, demonstrating the deficient core functions of VAN and FPN. The VAN plays an essential role in addiction-related cues, whereas the FPN is responsible for uncontrolled repetitive behaviors. Meanwhile, VBM results exhibited decreased GMV in the ACC, extending to the SFG and MCC. Besides, the conjunction analysis from both the brain structure and rs-FC illustrated the key brain region alterations associated with modality-general and modality-specific abnormalities, thereby suggesting the large-scale brain system biomarkers for BA.
Similar to studies on SUD (Zilverstand, Huang, Alia-Klein, & Goldstein, 2018), our study found that BA exhibited dysconnectivity within the VAN and decreased connectivity between the VAN and FPN. In addition, our study also found that the severity degrees of BA exhibited positive correlation with VAN alterations. VAN as the salience network consists of temporo-parietal junction, anterior insula, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), which are engaged in stimulus-driven attentional control, according to previous findings (Vossel, Geng, & Fink, 2014). Specifically, the insula plays a vital role in integrating external stimulus and interoceptive information, mediating dynamic interactions between other large-scale brain networks involved in externally oriented attention, internally oriented self-related mental processes, and emotional feeling (Menon, 2011; Naqvi, Gaznick, Tranel, & Bechara, 2014). In addition, the dACC and inferior parietal lobe constitute a core area in the allocation of attentional control governed by the FPN (Zhao et al., 2020; Zilverstand et al., 2018). Interestingly, previous studies have found that the activation of the VAN in SUD was correlated with self-rated craving and urgency for intaking substance, indicating an important role of redirecting attentional resources in addiction (Kühn & Gallinat, 2011; Naqvi & Bechara, 2009). Similar phenomenon is also found in BA, in which the repeated excessive addictive behaviors are able to activate the VAN to focus on addiction-related cues, such as internet gaming and gambling dice. This might indicate the altered functions of the VAN. For example, a meta-analysis revealed the hypoactivation of the VAN when BA patients were taking part in response inhibition tasks (Qiu & Wang, 2021). In addition, the VAN also exhibited the same alterations in risky decision making (Lee, Lee, Yoon, Kee, & Jung, 2016) and cue-reactive task in neutral cues (Noori, Cosa Linan, & Spanagel, 2016). These findings demonstrated that BA might be automatically oriented to some salient stimuli even though they did not voluntarily intend to do so. Therefore, being overly focused on addiction-related cues might result in increased interactions between networks relevant to addictive cues (like AN, gaining reward) and blunt response to neutral cues, thus resulting in a vicious circle (Noori et al., 2016; Tsurumi, Aso, Kawada, Murai, & Takahashi, 2020).
More importantly, the FPN comprising the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and lateral posterior parietal cortex, plays a primary role in the representation and maintenance of goals during motivated behavior, thereby supporting the selection of behavioral responses based on external and internal information (Marek & Dosenbach, 2018). Importantly, the DLPFC is the core node of the FPN, taking a crucial part in complex cognitive tasks such as decision making, conflict-induced behavioral adjustment, attention, working memory, and inhibitory control (Ge et al., 2017). Besides, the function of FPN is related to making rational decisions that link present sensory experiences to memory of past experiences. However, overloaded and long-lasting reward stimulus might impair the restraining ability of the FPN to the VAN (insula mainly), causing enhanced hypoconnectivity between the VAN and FPN, with BA being impulsive to addictive behaviors with a long time (Cousijn et al., 2012; Lv et al., 2016; Menon, 2011; Zilverstand et al., 2018). For example, during a cue reaction task, IGD exhibited higher engagement in the FPN in response to addiction-related cues as compared to that from neutral cues, implicating high attention allocation to gaming-related stimuli (Ko et al., 2009; Ko, Liu, Yen, Chen, et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2017). It was also found that through the effective intervention in six weeks, the FPN showed decreased activation in gaming-related stimuli (Han, Kim, Lee, & Renshaw, 2012). Besides the potential de-attenuated restraining role in the VAN, the FPN demonstrated the dysfunctions during cognitive control tasks and abnormal activation during response inhibition tasks. For example, in Go/No-go task, the BA group exhibited similar accuracy yet significantly slower reaction time and demonstrated hypoactivation in DLPFC as compared to HC group, indicating a compensatory brain activity to achieve similar performance in response inhibition (van Holst, van Holstein, van den Brink, Veltman, & Goudriaan, 2012), which also provided evidence for the hyperconnectivity within FPN. In addition, BA group manifested impaired learning ability and tended to make more intuitive and risky decisions, which was associated with the hypoactivation in the FPN (Fujino et al., 2018; Trotzke, Starcke, Pedersen, Müller, & Brand, 2015). Taken together, the addictive behaviors induced more activation in the FPN for processing the information from the VAN and compensating to achieve better performance. However, these hyper-active patterns might damage the functions of the FPN and result in deficient connectivity between the FPN and VAN and hyperconnectivity within the FPN, causing reduced self-control and higher risk-taking behaviors among BA (Pyeon et al., 2021).
Moreover, the VAN plays a crucial role in mediating the trade-off between the DMN and FPN. Studies have shown that the DMN is deactivated during tasks, suggesting involvement in self-monitoring, attention, and introspective thoughts, whereas the FPN is more activated in cognitive control task (Menon, 2011; Sutherland et al., 2013). The conjunction of VBM and rs-FC meta-analysis results revealed increased rs-FC within the DMN (located in the left ACC), showing good agreement with previous studies (Tsurumi et al., 2020). The combined hypoconnectivity between the FPN, VAN, and DMN illustrated that their dynamic switching is impaired, which is in line with the classic triple-network dysfunction model (Menon, 2011). The triple-network dysfunction model proposed that the collection of the DMN, FPN, and VAN plays a unique role in identifying extremely wide range of cognitive tasks and changing responses proportionally according to the task demands. Addictive events detected by the VAN can disrupt the normal engagement of the FPN and DMN. This is because the DMN is responsible for internal mental processes, which can make it harder to focus on external stimuli that are important for the task at hand. As a result, cognitive resources may become impaired. Additionally, hyperconnectivity within the DMN might lead to excessive rumination, a phenomenon observed in individuals with BA who become immersed in addictive scenery they experienced or imagined (Tsurumi et al., 2020). Overly focusing on internal world is more likely to be suffered from psychiatric diseases like depression (Tsurumi et al., 2020). Individuals with IGD and depression had stronger connections within the DMN compared to those with IGD alone or HC (Lee, Lee, Namkoong, & Jung, 2018). Furthermore, the deactivated DMN is related to high task performance (Anticevic et al., 2012), whereas the hyperactivations of DMN are recognized to be related to brain regions in tasks, leading to cognitive dysfunction in addiction (Sutherland et al., 2013).
Likewise, our findings demonstrated increased connectivity between the AN and the IFG regions within the FPN. The AN, mainly including nucleus accumbens (NACC), amygdala, and OFC, is primarily involved in reward, emotion, and motivation processes (Li et al., 2018). The enhanced rs-FC between the AN and the IFG regions implicates the increased synchronization of two systems and the reward-driven behaviors for BA, consistent with previous findings (Contreras-Rodriguez et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2021; Koehler et al., 2013). Additionally, hyperactivation in the AN is responsive to addiction-related stimulus (Golec, Draps, Stark, Pluta, & Gola, 2021; Ma et al., 2019). This brain pattern might suggest a more efficient and convenient activation of reward in BA. Adopting a decision-making task, Wang et al. (2021) found the IGD exhibited riskier behaviors and exaggerated brain activity in AN (located in the NACC and caudate). In particular, it was also suggested that compared to IGD, PG exhibited enhanced resting-state connectivity between the amygdala and dorsal striatum, demonstrating that the AN was significantly correlated with strong sensation and instant feedbacks (Bae et al., 2017).
Further, consistent with previous studies (Jin et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2015), BA exhibited significantly decreased GMV in the ACC, extending to the MCC and SFG. Meanwhile, the degree of BA severity was found to be positively correlated with the decreased GMV in the SMA and ACC cluster. The ACC serves as a key node of brain structure connecting the PCC, PFC, amygdala, striatum, thalamus, and SMA (Rolls, 2019). The ACC consists of the dACC and ventral ACC (vACC). Specifically, the dACC is involved in attention and incentive salience governed by the FPN, whereas the vACC is responsible for emotional, rewarding, and motivational processing, as well as communicating with the DMN and AN (Zhao et al., 2020). In addition, the vACC is the core component of the midline DMN that plays an important role in valuation system, integrating relevant information to evaluate personal relevance and facilitate self-related decision making (Zhang & Volkow, 2019). Given its vital role in addiction, the altered structure of ACC might induce dysfunctions of BA for addictive cue detection, response inhibition, and self-referential process both at rest and during tasks (Dong, Hu, Lin, & Lu, 2013; Ko, Liu, Yen, Yen, et al., 2013; Limbrick-Oldfield et al., 2017).
In our meta-regression analysis, we found that only the degree of BA severity was positively correlated with large-scale brain system alterations, while no other demographic or clinical data showed significant correlations. Structural alterations of the ACC and rs-FC alterations of the VAN were related to stimulus-driven attentional control. Likewise, previous studies have also shown that prolonged addictive behavior leads to continuous brain alterations in VAN during rest and task performance (Hendrick, Luo, Zhang, & Li, 2012). SMA is vitally important in voluntary action and response inhibition (Wolpe, Hezemans, Rae, Zhang, & Rowe, 2022). The positive correlation between reduced SMA and the degree of addiction suggests impaired response inhibition in addiction progression. We did not find any age or gender effect on large-scale brain system alterations when setting age and gender ratio as regressors. This null effect was mainly due to the fact that age variation was not significant (at young ages) in these samples while males constituted the majority of all studies. In addition, we found no significant correlations between alterations in brain and clinical data such as anxiety, depression, and impulsivity. This is mainly due to that the degrees of anxiety, depression, and impulsivity reported in the majority of the included studies were not severe enough to cause significant alterations in the brain. More importantly, the number of included studies reporting demographic data and clinical data was relatively small, and a more conservative threshold was chosen to reduce the FDR.
Several limitations need to be considered in the present meta-analysis. Firstly, only seed-based rs-FC studies were included, whereas other analytic methods were excluded like independent component analysis due to their limited usage to date. As the seeds in the current study focused on the DMN, FPN, VAN, and AN, it is rather impractical to integrate these seeds into the DAN, SSN, and visual network. With more development in these areas, future meta-analyses could test the abnormality of DAN, SSN, and visual network with adequate studies by seed-based or other methods. Meanwhile, future work can also examine the replicability of rs-FC abnormalities across different analytical methods. Secondly, there is no consensus about the standard protocol of rs-FC analysis. Parameters in data acquisition and processing varied across studies, such as differing size, shapes of seed ROIs, motion correction method, or even instructions for rest (e.g., eyes open vs closed). These factors might generate bias and confounding effects. The present study tested the impact of closed eyes and the duration of resting-state, while it is still impossible to examine the moderating effects of all other variables. Thirdly, there were different parcellations of networks across studies, which might mix some overlapping brain regions in different parcellations ways. Critically, some regions might play a more important role within the same networks. It is therefore important to test the replicability of rs-FC abnormalities across network parcellations with weights. Forth, different types of BA might have their distinct alterations of large-scale brain system. We have found the similarity between IGD and BA is high while there still exists discrepancy. Moreover, due to the limited numbers of studies in other different types of BA, it is difficult to comprehensively explore the impact of BA type. More importantly, there is no unified and widely used scales to measure the severity of different types of BA, thus making it difficult to explore the relations between severity of addiction and large-scale brain system alterations.
Conclusion
This is the first meta-analysis concurrently inspecting the structural and rs-FC patterns of BA. A consistent model of impaired response inhibition, salience attribution, self-referential mental process, and reward-driven behaviors were detected for BA. Therefore, this meta-analysis paves a new avenue for fully understanding the mechanisms of addictive behaviors, and also offers new insight for the recovery and abstention from BA by illustrating the specific function of networks and the effect of network communications.
Funding sources
This work was supported by the University of Macau (MYRG2022-00054-FHS, MYRG 2020-00067-FHS, MYRG2019-00082-FHS, CRG2020-00001-ICI), the Macao Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT 0020/2019/AMJ and FDCT 0048/2021/AGJ), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (EF017/FHS-YZ/2021/GDSTCRSKTO), Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Innovation Project of Guangdong Province (2022A0505020023), and Education Fund of Macao SAR Government (CP-UMAC-2020-01).
Authors’ contribution
X.Z designed the study; X.Z and X.H searched and screened the literature; X.Z, and Y.H collected the required data for meta-analysis; X.Z and F.G conducted meta-analysis; X.Z write the manuscript; Z.Y and F.G revised the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Supplementary material
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2023.00025.
References
Abbott, M. W. (2020). The changing epidemiology of gambling disorder and gambling-related harm: Public health implications. Public Health, 184, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.003.
Anticevic, A., Cole, M. W., Murray, J. D., Corlett, P. R., Wang, X. J., & Krystal, J. H. (2012). The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 584–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.008.
Bae, S., Han, D. H., Jung, J., Nam, K. C., & Renshaw, P. F. (2017). Comparison of brain connectivity between internet gambling disorder and internet gaming disorder: A preliminary study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(4), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.061.
Briley, P. M., Webster, L., Boutry, C., Cottam, W. J., Auer, D. P., Liddle, P. F., & Morriss, R. (2022). Resting-state functional connectivity correlates of anxiety co-morbidity in major depressive disorder. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 138, 104701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104701.
Buchbinder, B. R. (2016). Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 135, 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53485-9.00004-0.
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C., & Yeo, B. T. (2011). The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(5), 2322–2345. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00339.2011.
Chen, J., Li, X., Zhang, Q., Zhou, Y., Wang, R., Tian, C., & Xiang, H. (2020). Impulsivity and response inhibition related brain networks in adolescents with internet gaming disorder: A preliminary study utilizing resting-state fMRI. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 618319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.618319.
Chen, X., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., Sun, Y., Ding, W., Zhuang, Z., … Du, Y. (2014). Different resting-state functional connectivity alterations in smokers and nonsmokers with Internet gaming addiction. Biomed Research International, 2014, 825787. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/825787.
Choi, E. Y., Yeo, B. T., & Buckner, R. L. (2012). The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(8), 2242–2263. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00270.2012.
Contreras-Rodriguez, O., Albein-Urios, N., Vilar-Lopez, R., Perales, J. C., Martinez-Gonzalez, J. M., Fernandez-Serrano, M. J., … Verdejo-Garcia, A. (2016). Increased corticolimbic connectivity in cocaine dependence versus pathological gambling is associated with drug severity and emotion-related impulsivity. Addiction Biology, 21(3), 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12242.
Cousijn, J., Goudriaan, A. E., Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Wiers, R. W. (2012). Approach-bias predicts development of cannabis problem severity in heavy cannabis users: Results from a prospective FMRI study. Plos One, 7(9), e42394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042394.
Derevensky, J. L. (2019). Behavioral addictions: Some developmental considerations. Current Addiction Reports, 6(3), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00257-z.
Derevensky, J. L., Hayman, V., & Lynette, G. (2019). Behavioral addictions: Excessive gambling, gaming, internet, and smartphone use among children and adolescents. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 66(6), 1163–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2019.08.008.
Ding, W. N., Sun, J. H., Sun, Y. W., Zhou, Y., Li, L., Xu, J. R., & Du, Y. S. (2013). Altered default network resting-state functional connectivity in adolescents with Internet gaming addiction. Plos One, 8(3), e59902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059902.
Dong, G., Hu, Y., Lin, X., & Lu, Q. (2013). What makes internet addicts continue playing online even when faced by severe negative consequences? Possible explanations from an fMRI study. Biological Psychology, 94(2), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.07.009.
Fujino, J., Kawada, R., Tsurumi, K., Takeuchi, H., Murao, T., Takemura, A., … Takahashi, H. (2018). An fMRI study of decision-making under sunk costs in gambling disorder. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 28(12), 1371–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.09.006.
Gao, Q., Jia, G., Zhao, J., & Zhang, D. (2019). Inhibitory control in excessive social networking users: Evidence from an event-related potential-based go-nogo task. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1810). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01810.
Gao, Y., Shuai, D., Bu, X., Hu, X., Tang, S., Zhang, L., … Huang, X. (2019). Impairments of large-scale functional networks in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. Psychological Medicine, 49(15), 2475–2485. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329171900237x.
Ge, X., Sun, Y., Han, X., Wang, Y., Ding, W., Cao, M., … Zhou, Y. (2017). Difference in the functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex between smokers with nicotine dependence and individuals with internet gaming disorder. BMC Neuroscience, 18(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-017-0375-y.
Golec, K., Draps, M., Stark, R., Pluta, A., & Gola, M. (2021). Aberrant orbitofrontal cortex reactivity to erotic cues in Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(3), 646–656. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00051.
Han, D. H., Kim, S. M., Lee, Y. S., & Renshaw, P. F. (2012). The effect of family therapy on the changes in the severity of on-line game play and brain activity in adolescents with on-line game addiction. Journal of psychiatric research, 202(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.02.011.
Han, D. H., Lyoo, I. K., & Renshaw, P. F. (2012). Differential regional gray matter volumes in patients with on-line game addiction and professional gamers. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 46(4), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.004.
Hendrick, O. M., Luo, X., Zhang, S., & Li, C.-S. R. (2012). Saliency processing and obesity: A preliminary imaging study of the stop signal task. Obesity, 20(9), 1796–1802. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.180.
van Holst, R. J., van Holstein, M., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2012). Response inhibition during cue reactivity in problem gamblers: An fMRI study. Plos One, 7(3), e30909. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030909.
Jin, C., Zhang, T., Cai, C., Bi, Y., Li, Y., Yu, D., … Yuan, K. (2016). Abnormal prefrontal cortex resting state functional connectivity and severity of internet gaming disorder. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10(3), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9439-8.
Kaiser, R. H., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Wager, T. D., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2015). Large-scale network dysfunction in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(6), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0071.
Kim, S. J., Kim, M. K., Shin, Y. B., Kim, H. E., Kwon, J. H., & Kim, J. J. (2021). Differences in resting-state functional connectivity according to the level of impulsiveness in patients with internet gaming disorder. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00005.
Koehler, S., Ovadia-Caro, S., van der Meer, E., Villringer, A., Heinz, A., Romanczuk-Seiferth, N., & Margulies, D. S. (2013). Increased functional connectivity between prefrontal cortex and reward system in pathological gambling. Plos One, 8(12), e84565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084565.
Ko, C. H., Hsieh, T. J., Wang, P. W., Lin, W. C., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., & Yen, J. Y. (2015). Altered gray matter density and disrupted functional connectivity of the amygdala in adults with Internet gaming disorder. Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 57, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.11.003.
Ko, C. H., Liu, G. C., Hsiao, S., Yen, J. Y., Yang, M. J., Lin, W. C., … Chen, C. S. (2009). Brain activities associated with gaming urge of online gaming addiction. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(7), 739–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.09.012.
Ko, C. H., Liu, G. C., Yen, J. Y., Chen, C. Y., Yen, C. F., & Chen, C. S. (2013). Brain correlates of craving for online gaming under cue exposure in subjects with Internet gaming addiction and in remitted subjects. Addiction Biology, 18(3), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00405.x.
Ko, C. H., Liu, G. C., Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., & Lin, W. C. (2013). The brain activations for both cue-induced gaming urge and smoking craving among subjects comorbid with Internet gaming addiction and nicotine dependence. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47(4), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.11.008.
Kühn, S., & Gallinat, J. (2011). Common biology of craving across legal and illegal drugs - a quantitative meta-analysis of cue-reactivity brain response. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 33(7), 1318–1326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07590.x.
Lee, D., Lee, J., Namkoong, K., & Jung, Y. C. (2018). Subregions of the anterior cingulate cortex form distinct functional connectivity patterns in young males with internet gaming disorder with comorbid depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00380.
Lee, D., Lee, J., Yoon, K. J., Kee, N., & Jung, Y. C. (2016). Impaired anterior insular activation during risky decision making in young adults with internet gaming disorder. Neuroreport, 27(8), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0000000000000584.
Li, B. J., Friston, K., Mody, M., Wang, H. N., Lu, H. B., & Hu, D. W. (2018). A brain network model for depression: From symptom understanding to disease intervention. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 24(11), 1004–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12998.
Limbrick-Oldfield, E. H., Mick, I., Cocks, R. E., McGonigle, J., Sharman, S. P., Goldstone, A. P., … Clark, L. (2017). Neural substrates of cue reactivity and craving in gambling disorder. Translational Psychiatry, 7(1), e992. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.256.
Lin, X., Dong, G., Wang, Q., & Du, X. (2015). Abnormal gray matter and white matter volume in ‘Internet gaming addicts'. Addictive Behaviors, 40, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.09.010.
Liu, L., Xu, R., Li, L., Li, B., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2018). Correlation and in vitro mechanism of bactericidal activity on E. coli with whey protein isolate during ultrasonic treatment. Microbial Pathogenesis, 115, 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.12.062.
Liu, L., Yip, S. W., Zhang, J. T., Wang, L. J., Shen, Z. J., Liu, B., … Fang, X. Y. (2017). Activation of the ventral and dorsal striatum during cue reactivity in Internet gaming disorder. Addiction Biology, 22(3), 791–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12338.
Lv, H., Wang, Z., Tong, E., Williams, L. M., Zaharchuk, G., Zeineh, M., … Wintermark, M. (2018). Resting-state functional MRI: Everything that nonexperts have always wanted to know. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 39(8), 1390–1399. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5527.
Lv, W., Wu, Q., Liu, X., Chen, Y., Song, H., Yang, L., & Zhang, X. (2016). Cue reactivity in nicotine and alcohol addiction: A cross-cultural view. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01335.
Marek, S., & Dosenbach, N. U. F. (2018). The frontoparietal network: Function, electrophysiology, and importance of individual precision mapping. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 20(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.2/smarek.
Ma, S. S., Worhunsky, P. D., Xu, J. S., Yip, S. W., Zhou, N., Zhang, J. T., … Fang, X. Y. (2019). Alterations in functional networks during cue-reactivity in Internet gaming disorder. Addictive Behaviors, 8(2), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.25.
Menon, V. (2011). Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: A unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Plos Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Morris, L. S., & Voon, V. (2016). Dimensionality of cognitions in behavioral addiction. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 3, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-016-0068-3.
Müller, K. W., Dreier, M., Beutel, M. E., & Wölfling, K. (2016). Is sensation seeking a correlate of excessive behaviors and behavioral addictions? A detailed examination of patients with gambling disorder and internet addiction. Psychiatry Research, 242, 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.004.
Naqvi, N. H., & Bechara, A. (2009). The hidden island of addiction: The insula. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.009.
Naqvi, N. H., Gaznick, N., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A. (2014). The insula: A critical neural substrate for craving and drug seeking under conflict and risk. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12415.
Nemoto, K. (2017). [Understanding voxel-based morphometry]. Brain Nerve, 69(5), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1416200776.
Noori, H. R., Cosa Linan, A., & Spanagel, R. (2016). Largely overlapping neuronal substrates of reactivity to drug, gambling, food and sexual cues: A comprehensive meta-analysis. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(9), 1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.06.013.
Pando-Naude, V., Toxto, S., Fernandez-Lozano, S., Parsons, C. E., Alcauter, S., & Garza-Villarreal, E. A. (2021). Gray and white matter morphology in substance use disorders: A neuroimaging systematic review and meta-analysis. Translational Psychiatry, 11(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01128-2.
Park, H. J., & Friston, K. (2013). Structural and functional brain networks: From connections to cognition. Science, 342(6158). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238411.
Petry, N. M., Zajac, K., & Ginley, M. K. (2018). Behavioral addictions as mental disorders: To Be or not to Be? Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045120.
Pyeon, A., Choi, J., Cho, H., Kim, J. Y., Choi, I. Y., Ahn, K. J., … Kim, D. J. (2021). Altered connectivity in the right inferior frontal gyrus associated with self-control in adolescents exhibiting problematic smartphone use: A fMRI study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(4), 1048–1060. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00085.
Qin, K., Zhang, F., Chen, T., Li, L., Li, W., Suo, X., … Gong, Q. (2020). Shared gray matter alterations in individuals with diverse behavioral addictions: A voxel-wise meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00006.
Qiu, Z., & Wang, J. (2021). Altered neural activities during response inhibition in adults with addiction: A voxel-wise meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 51(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000362.
Radua, J., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2009). Voxel-wise meta-analysis of grey matter changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry: the Journal of Mental Science, 195(5), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.108.055046.
Radua, J., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2012). Meta-analytic methods for neuroimaging data explained. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 2, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-5380-2-6.
Radua, J., Mataix-Cols, D., Phillips, M. L., El-Hage, W., Kronhaus, D. M., Cardoner, N., & Surguladze, S. (2012). A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps. European Psychiatry: the Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 27(8), 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.04.001.
Radua, J., Romeo, M., Mataix-Cols, D., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2013). A general approach for combining voxel-based meta-analyses conducted in different neuroimaging modalities. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 20(3), 462–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986713804870828.
Radua, J., Rubia, K., Canales-Rodríguez, E. J., Pomarol-Clotet, E., Fusar-Poli, P., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2014). Anisotropic kernels for coordinate-based meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00013.
Rogers, J. C., & De Brito, S. A. (2016). Cortical and subcortical gray matter volume in youths with conduct problems: A meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2423.
Rolls, E. T. (2019). The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for action, emotion, and memory. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 166, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-64196-0.00002-9.
Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Smith, S. M., Keltner, J. R., Wager, T. D., & Nichols, T. E. (2009). Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A comparison of image-based and coordinate-based pooling of studies. Neuroimage, 45(3), 810–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.039.
Seok, J. W., & Sohn, J. H. (2018). Gray matter deficits and altered resting-state connectivity in the superior temporal gyrus among individuals with problematic hypersexual behavior. Brain Research, 1684, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.035.
Shirer, W. R., Ryali, S., Rykhlevskaia, E., Menon, V., & Greicius, M. D. (2012). Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cerebral Cortex, 22(1), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr099.
Smitha, K. A., Akhil Raja, K., Arun, K. M., Rajesh, P. G., Thomas, B., Kapilamoorthy, T. R., & Kesavadas, C. (2017). Resting state fMRI: A review on methods in resting state connectivity analysis and resting state networks. The Neuroradiology Journal, 30(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400917697342.
Smith, S. M., Fox, P. T., Miller, K. L., Glahn, D. C., Fox, P. M., Mackay, C. E., … Beckmann, C. F. (2009). Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(31), 13040–13045. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905267106.
Stevens, M. W., Dorstyn, D., Delfabbro, P. H., & King, D. L. (2021). Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 55(6), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867420962851.
Sutherland, M. T., Carroll, A. J., Salmeron, B. J., Ross, T. J., Hong, L. E., & Stein, E. A. (2013). Down-regulation of amygdala and insula functional circuits by varenicline and nicotine in abstinent cigarette smokers. Biological Psychiatry, 74(7), 538–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.035.
Tang, S., Lu, L., Zhang, L., Hu, X., Bu, X., Li, H., … Huang, X. (2018). Abnormal amygdala resting-state functional connectivity in adults and adolescents with major depressive disorder: A comparative meta-analysis. EBioMedicine, 36, 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.09.010.
Trotzke, P., Starcke, K., Pedersen, A., Müller, A., & Brand, M. (2015). Impaired decision making under ambiguity but not under risk in individuals with pathological buying-behavioral and psychophysiological evidence. Psychiatry Research, 229(1–2), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.043.
Tsurumi, K., Aso, T., Kawada, R., Murai, T., & Takahashi, H. (2020). A positive shift in resting-state functional connectivity between the insula and default mode network regions reflects the duration of illness in gambling disorder patients without lifetime substance abuse. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 295, 111018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.111018.
Vossel, S., Geng, J. J., & Fink, G. R. (2014). Dorsal and ventral attention systems: Distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. Neuroscientist, 20(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858413494269.
Wang, L., Yang, G., Zheng, Y., Li, Z., Qi, Y., Li, Q., & Liu, X. (2021). Enhanced neural responses in specific phases of reward processing in individuals with Internet gaming disorder. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00003.
Weinstein, A., Abu, H. B., Timor, A., & Mama, Y. (2016). Delay discounting, risk-taking, and rejection sensitivity among individuals with Internet and Video Gaming Disorders. Addictive Behaviors, 5(4), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.081.
Wolpe, N., Hezemans, F. H., Rae, C. L., Zhang, J., & Rowe, J. B. (2022). The pre-supplementary motor area achieves inhibitory control by modulating response thresholds. Cortex, 152, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.018.
Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., … Buckner, R. L. (2011). The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(3), 1125–1165. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00338.2011.
Zeng, H. (2018). Mesoscale connectomics. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 50, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.03.003.
Zeng, N., Wang, M., Zheng, H., Zhang, J., Dong, H., Potenza, M. N., & Dong, G. H. (2021). Gender-related differences in frontal-parietal modular segregation and altered effective connectivity in internet gaming disorder. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00015.
Zhang, J. T., Ma, S. S., Yip, S. W., Wang, L. J., Chen, C., Yan, C. G., … Fang, X. Y. (2015). Decreased functional connectivity between ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens in internet gaming disorder: Evidence from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Behavioral and Brain Functions: BBF, 11(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12993-015-0082-8.
Zhang, R., & Volkow, N. D. (2019). Brain default-mode network dysfunction in addiction. Neuroimage, 200, 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.036.
Zhao, Y., Sallie, S. N., Cui, H., Zeng, N., Du, J., Yuan, T., … Zhang, C. (2020). Anterior cingulate cortex in addiction: New insights for neuromodulation. Neuromodulation. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13291.
Zhou, Y., Lin, F. C., Du, Y. S., Qin, L. D., Zhao, Z. M., Xu, J. R., & Lei, H. (2011). Gray matter abnormalities in internet addiction: A voxel-based morphometry study. European Journal of Radiology, 79(1), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.025.
Zilverstand, A., Huang, A. S., Alia-Klein, N., & Goldstein, R. Z. (2018). Neuroimaging impaired response inhibition and salience attribution in human drug addiction: A systematic review. Neuron, 98(5), 886–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.048.