Survey-based studies often fail to take into account the predictive value of a test, in other words, the probability of a person having (or not having) the disease when scoring positive (or negative) on the given screening test.
We re-visited the theory and basic calculations of diagnostic accuracy.
In general, the lower the prevalence the worse the predictive value is. When the disorder is relatively rare, a positive test finding is typically not useful in confirming its presence given the high proportion of false positive cases. For example, using the Compulsive Buying Scale (Faber & O’Guinn, 1992) three in four people classified as having compulsive buying disorder will in fact not have the disorder.
Screening tests are limited to serve as an early detection “gate” and only clinical (interview-based) studies are suitable to claim that a certain behaviour is truly “pathological”.
Atroszko, P. A., Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D, & Pallesen, S. (2015). Study addiction - A new area of psychological study: Conceptualization, assessment, and preliminary empirical findings. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 75–84.
Billieux, J., Schimmenti, A., Khazaal, Y., Maurage, P, & Heeren, A. (2015). Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. Journal of BehavioralAddictionss, 4, 119–123.
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E, Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D. & de Vet, H. C. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 41(1), 68–73.
Faber, R. J, & O’Guinn, T. C. (1992). A clinical screener for compulsive buying. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 459–469.
Glaros, A. G. & Kline, R. B. (1988). Understanding the accuracy of tests with cutting scores: The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(6), 1013–1023.
Kourosh, A. S., Harrington, C. R. & Adinoff, B. (2010). Tanning as a behavioral addiction. The American Journal of Drug andAlcohol Abuse, 36(5), 284–290.
Maraz, A., Griffiths, M. D. & Demetrovics, Z. (2015). The prevalence of compulsive buying: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Meehl, P. E. & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and theefficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52(3), 194.
Müller, K. W., Beutel, M. E. & Wölfling, K. (2014). A contribution to the clinical characterization of Internet Addiction in a sample of treatment seekers: Validity of assessment, severity of psychopathology and type of co-morbidity. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(4), 770–777.
Müller, K. W., Glaesmer, H., Brähler, E., Woelfling, K. & Beutel, M. E. (2014). Prevalence of Internet addiction in the general population: Results from a German population-based survey. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(7), 757–766.
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Diagnosing tests: Using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81(3), 209–219.
Targhetta, R., Nalpas, B. & Perney, P. (2013). Argentine tango: Another behavioral addiction? Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(3), 179–186.