View More View Less
  • 1 Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary
Open access

Many papers have analyzed the effects of foreign acquisition on firm productivity, articulating its positive impacts. However, an important issue remains: is there a general foreign acquisition effect, or is there any heterogeneity in the effects? This paper reports on the analysis of over 3,400 majority foreign acquisitions in Hungary. The main result (which exists in a propensity score matching sample as well) of the difference-in-differences analysis is that only acquirers from higher income countries foster labor productivity significantly — and this effect increases with the income gap between Hungary and the country of origin -, while acquirers from lower income countries do not induce statistically significant effects.

  • Arnold, J. M.Javorcik, B. S. (2009): Gifted Kids or Pushy Parents? Foreign Direct Investment and Plant Productivity in Indonesia. Journal of International Economics 79 (1): 4253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balsvik, R.Haller, S. A. (2010): Picking “Lemons” or Picking “Cherries”? Domestic and Foreign Acquisitions in Norwegian Manufacturing. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 112 (2): 361387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benacek, V.Gronicki, M.Holland, D.Sass, M. (2000): The Determinants and Impact of FDI in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparison of Survey and Econometric Evidence. Transnational Corporations 9 (3): 163212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borensztein, E.De Gregorio, J.Lee, J-W. (1998): How does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics 45 (1): 115135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chari, A.Chen, W.Dominguez, K. M. E. (2012): Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance: Emerging-Market Acquisitions in the United States. IMF Economic Review 60 (1): 142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, W. (2011): The Effect of Investor Origin on Firm Performance: Domestic and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States. Journal of International Economics 83 (2): 219228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Choe, J. I. (2003): Do Foreign Direct Investment and Gross Domestic Investment Promote Economic Growth? Review of Development Economics 7 (1): 4457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Conyon, M. J.Girma, S.Thompson, S.Wright, P. W. (2002): The Productivity and Wage Effects of Foreign Acquisition in the United Kingdom. The Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (1): 85102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Criscuolo, CMartin, R. (2009): Multinationals and U.S. Productivity Leadership: Evidence from Great Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (2): 263281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Mello, L. R. (1999): Foreign Direct Investment-Led Growth: Evidence from Time Series and Panel Data. Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1): 133151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Earle, J. S.Telegdy, Á.Antal, G. (2017): Foreign Ownership and Wages: Evidence from Hungary, 1986–2008. ILR Review 71 (2): 458191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Faeth, I. (2009): Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment – A Tale of Nine Theoretical Models. Journal of Economic Surveys 23 (1): 165196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Girma, S.Kneller, R.Pisu, M. (2007): Do Exporters Have Anything to Learn from Foreign Multinationals? European Economic Review 51 (4): 981998.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Globerman, S.Ries, J.Vertinsky, I. (1994): The Economic Performance of Foreign Affiliates in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics 27 (1): 143156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goni, E.Maloney, W. F. (2014): Why don't Poor Countries Do R&D? Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 6811, Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Görg, H.Greenaway, D. (2004): Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? The World Bank Research Observer 19 (2): 171197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Griffith, R. (1999): Productivity and Foreign Ownership in the UK Car Industry. The Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Paper W99/11.

  • Howenstine, N. G.Zeile, W. J. (1994): Characteristics of Foreign-Owned U.S. Manufacturing Establishments. Survey of Current Business 74 (1): 3459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Imbens, G. W.Wooldridge, J. M. (2009): Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47 (1): 586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Javorcik, B. S. (2004): Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages. American Economic Review 94 (3): 605627.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jovanovic, B.Nyarko, Y. (1996): Learning by Doing and the Choice of Technology. Econometrica 64 (6): 12991310.

  • Kamal, F. (2015): Origin of Foreign Direct Investment and Firm Performance: Evidence from Foreign Acquisitions of Chinese Domestic Firms. The World Economy 38 (2): 286314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leung, D.Meh, C.Terajima, Y. (2008): Firms Size and Productivity. Bank of Canada Working Paper 2008–2045.

  • Leuven, E.Sianesi, B. (2003): PSMATCH2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing. Statistical Software Components S432001, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 01 Feb 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nelson, R. R. (1964): Aggregate Production Functions and Medium-Range Growth Projections. The American Economic Review 54 (5): 575606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petkova, N. (2009): Essays on Firm Ownership, Performance and Value. A dissertation paper, University of Michigan, https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/62412/npetkova_1.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 16/02/2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenbaum, P. R.Rubin, D. B. (1983): The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 70 (1): 4155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenthal, S. S.Strange, W. C. (2004): Evidence on the Nature and Sources of Agglomeration Economies. In: Henderson, J. V.Thiesse, J. F. (eds): Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics Vol. 4. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schiffbauer, M.Siedschlag, I.Ruane, F. (2017): Do Foreign Mergers and Acquisitions Boost Firm Productivity? International Business Review 26 (6): 11241140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner, J. (2006): Exports, Foreign Direct Investment, and Productivity: Evidence from German Firm Level Data. Applied Economics Letters 13 (6): 347349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.
 
The Open Access statement together with the description of the Copyright and License Policy are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

Editor-in-chief: Balázs SZENT-IVÁNYI

Co-Editors:

  • Péter MARTON (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • István KÓNYA (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • László SAJTOS (The University of Auckland)
  • Gábor VIRÁG (University of Toronto)

Associate Editors:

  • Tamás BOKOR (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • Sándor BOZÓKI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Bronwyn HOWELL (Victoria University of Wellington)
  • Hintea CALIN (Babeş-Bolyai University)
  • Christian EWERHART (University of Zürich)
  • Clemens PUPPE (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • Zsolt DARVAS (Bruegel)
  • Szabina FODOR (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Sándor GALLAI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László GULÁCSI (Óbuda University)
  • Dóra GYŐRFFY (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • György HAJNAL (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Krisztina KOLOS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Alexandra KÖVES (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Lacina LUBOR (Mendel University in Brno)
  • Péter MEDVEGYEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Miroslava RAJČÁNIOVÁ (Slovak University of Agriculture)
  • Ariel MITEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Éva PERPÉK (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Petrus H. POTGIETER (University of South Africa)
  • Sergei IZMALKOV (MIT Economics)
  • Anita SZŰCS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László TRAUTMANN (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Trenton G. SMITH (University of Otago)
  • György WALTER (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán CSEDŐ (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán LŐRINCZI (Ministry of Human Capacities)

Society and Economy
Institute: Corvinus University of Budapest
Address: Fővám tér 8. H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 482 5406
E-mail: balazs.szentivanyi@uni-corvinus.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • DOAJ
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • International Political Science Abstracts
  • JSTOR
  • SCOPUS
  • RePEc
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,157
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q4
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q4
Industrial Relations Q4
Public Administration Q4
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
103/117=0,9
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 305/399 (Q4)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 137/243 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 40/54 (Q3)
Public Administration 116/165 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 665/1269 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 351/440 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,171
Scopus
Cites
157
Scopus
Documents
24
Days from submission to acceptance 148
Days from acceptance to publication 50

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,228
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q3
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q3
Industrial Relations Q3
Public Administration Q3
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
87/110=0,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 286/394 (Q3)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 125/228 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 38/58 (Q3)
Public Administration 114/157 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 645/1243 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 330/427 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,308
Scopus
Cites
132
Scopus
Documents
22

 

Society and Economy
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Sufficient number of full waiver available. Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access
Purchase per Title  

Society and Economy
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1972
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 43
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-1093 Budapest, Hungary Fővám tér 8.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1588-9726 (Print)
ISSN 1588-970X (Online)