Croatia is faced with a low response to cancer-screening programs, especially the national cervical cancer screening program, which ultimately resulted in its suspension. If judged solely on the basis of revealed preferences, such a poor response would imply that the population assigns a low social value to preventive screening programs. However, the question arises as to whether revealed preferences (the population's response), in the case of the absence of response to a preventive program, provide insight into its value (utility). Therefore, the objective of this paper is to determine the value that respondents assign to different attributes of cervical screening and, in a broader sense, to decide whether the best-worst scaling (BWS) approach is appropriate for determining the marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for public health programs. The MWTP for certain attributes of cervical cancer screening is derived from the results of a BWS study conducted in Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Croatia. The cost function was estimated by regressing the conditional logit coefficients (level of utility) of three levels of the cost attribute on its corresponding values, that is, the hypothetical price. Because the sum of the MWTP corresponds with the market price of a gynecological examination in private practice, we conclude that the results obtained by the BWS confirm the revealed preferences (the market value of the service).
Arons, A. M. – Krabbe, P. F. (2013): Probabilistic Choice Models in Health-State Valuation Research: Background, Theories, Assumptions and Applications. Expert Review Pharmacoeconics and Outcomes Research 13 (1): 93–108.
Arrow, K. J. – Debreu, G. (1954): Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica 22 (3): 265–290.
Atanasova, E. – Pavlova, M. – Moutafova, E. – Kostadinova, T. – Groot, W. (2012): Patient Payments and the Empirical Analysis of Consumer Demand for Hospital Services: An Application for Bulgaria. Society and Economy 34 (2): 313–338.
Baji, P. – Pavlova, M. – Gulácsi, L. – Groot, W. (2012): Preferences of Hungarian Consumers for Quality, Access and Price Attributes of Health Care Services – Result of a Discrete Choice Experiment. Society and Economy 34 (2): 293–311.
Busse, R. – Blümel, M. – Scheller-Kreinsen, D. – Zentner, A. (2010): Tackling Chronic Disease in Europe: Strategies, Interventions and Challenges. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Coltman, T. – Devinney, T. M. – Keating, B. (2011): Best-Worst Scaling Approach to Predict Customer Choice for 3pl Services. Journal of Business Logistics 32 (2): 139–152.
Dukić, N. (2014): Vrednovanje izrečenih preferencija u funkciji poboljšanja preventivnih programa javne zdravstvene zaštite [Improvement of the Public Health Care Preventive Programs through Stated Preference Valuation]. PhD Dissertation. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.
Dukić, N. – Blecich Arbula, A. – Cerovic, Lj. (2013): Economic Implications of Insufficient Health Literacy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 26 (S1): 117–132.
Dukić, N. – TomasŽiković, I. – Žiković, S. (2015): Ekonomsko vrednovanje na strani ponude i potražnje – ključ alokacije resursa u javnom zdravstvu [Valuation of Supply and Demand - Key to Public Health Care Resource Allocation]. Ekonomski pregled 66 (2): 177–200.
Flynn, T. – Marley, A. J. (2012): Best Worst Scaling: Theory and Methods. Centre for the Study of Choice Working Paper WP12–002.
Flynn, T. – Louviere, J. J. – Peters, T. J. – Coast J. (2008): Estimating Preferences for a Dermatology Consultation Using Best-Worst Scaling: Comparison of Various Methods of Analysis. BCM Medical Research Methodology 8: 76.
Hicks, J. R. (1939): Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hurley, J. (2000): An Overview of the Normative Economics of the Health Sector. In: Culyer A. J. – Newhouse J. P. (eds): Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Johansson, P.-O. (1991): An Introduction to Modern Welfare Economics. Cambridge University Press.
Koutsoyiannis, A. (1996): Moderna mikroekonomika [Modern Microeconomics]. Zagreb: Mate.
Lancsar, E. – Louviere, J. J. – Donaldson, C. – Currie, G. – Burgess, L. (2013): Best Worst Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: Methods and an Application. Social Science and Medicine 76: 74–82.
Louviere, J. J. – Fiebig, D. G. (2010): Benefit Assessment for Cost-Benefit Analysis Studies in Health Care Using Discrete Experiments: Estimating Welfare in a Health Care Setting. In: McIntosh, E. – Clarke, P. M. – Frew, E. J. – Louviere, J. J. (eds): Applied Methods of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Louviere, J. J. – Islam, T. (2008): A Comparison of Importance Weights and Willingness-to-Pay Measures Derived from Choice-Based Conjoint, Constant sum Scales and Best–Worst Scaling. Journal of Business Research 61 (9): 903–911.
Louviere, J. J. – Woodworth, G. (1983): Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data. Journal of Marketing Research 20 (4): 350–367.
Marley, A. – Louviere, J. J. (2005): Some Probabilistic Models of Best, Worst and Best-Worst Choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 49 (6): 464–480.
McGuire, A. (2001): Theoretical Concepts in the Economic Evaluation of Health Care. In: Drummond, M. – McGuire, A. (eds): Economic Evaluation in Health Care: Merging Theory with Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McIntosh, E. S. (2003): Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value the Benefits of Health Care. PhD Dissertation. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen.
Merino-Castello, A. (2003): Eliciting Consumers Preferences Using Stated Preference Discrete Choice Models: Contingent Ranking versus Choice Experiment. UPF Economics and Business Working Paper No. 705.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991): Measurement and Control of Response Bias. In: Robinson J. P. – Shaver P. R. – Wrightsman L. S. (eds): Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitude, Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.
Orme, B. K. (2006): Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research, Madison, Wisconsin: Research Publishers LLC.