View More View Less
  • 1 Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg (iASK), Kőszeg, Hungary
Open access
Anikó Magasházi (2021). Singapore Globally Entangled. Lessons for Central Europe? Kőszeg: Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg (iASK), 310, ISBN 978-615-5742-15-6

Anikó Magasházi’s monograph provides an analysis that is embedded in a thorough and well-constructed discussion of the major and salient features of Singapore. The novelty of the topic is as evident today as it was evaluated by the author already as early as 1988 in her doctoral thesis. It still resonates particularly well today as developing countries search for alternative models of economic and social development in an increasingly turbulent and uncertain world. In some ways, the example of Singapore shines a light on what could happen in the best of all possible worlds; and the analysis explores new perspectives for emerging open and small countries, like Hungary.

The author states: “As a small open economy strongly embedded in the world economy, Singapore proceeded, while interacting closely with the activities of transnational corporations (TNCs), from the so-called ‘third economy towards the first,’ and it had transformed from a developing to a developed economy by the 1990s” (p. 19). Of particular relevance to Hungary is “the fact that today Hungary matches countries in the East Asian region such as Singapore or Malaysia in terms of vertical integration, its coupling with global value chains and production networks” yet this, she states “is hardly recognized” (p. 21); and “The role of home and host countries which shape the operation and investment environment to ensure their own competitiveness is an important factor for the competitive advantage and success of firms” (p. 33).

Chapter 2 provides an excellent synthesis of the major theories on TNC operation and includes important conclusions like “the role of institutions within particular nations and their social capital comprised a critical factor that distinguished faster growers from slower ones” (p. 29). Altogether this section shows the thorough grasp of concepts and their application to the study in hand by the author and is to be commended. The chapter also places Global Value Chains (GVC), Global Production Markets (GPM), and Global Innovation Networks (GIN) concretely in the context of Southeast Asia. Analysis and application of all three require an interdisciplinary approach which is clearly reflected here.

When innovation is addressed, the author shows that Aa shift in the geographical locations for innovation […] in the twentieth century takes place in Asia, especially in the last decades” (p. 54). This has major implications for all Western economies in Europe and the US and is related to the fact that this is mainly due to the region’s high density of TNC global production networks.

The success of regional development in Southeast Asia provides another critical lesson for Hungary and East and Central Europe, namely that “accelerated globalization rendered this region as the most significant site of competition not only among the macro-regions of North America, Western Europe and Southeast Asia, the so-called ‘Triad’ or ‘motors’ of the global economy (Yeung, 2008: 3) but smaller border regions and regions within a country too” (p. 67). One important conclusion from this chapter is the assertion that “ […] studies have pointed out that regional institutions may mobilize their specific assets […] to bargain with the lead firms of GPNs when ‘their region-specific assets are highly complementary to the strategic needs of lead firms’ (Coe and Yeung, 2015: 21)” (p. 67). This approach to regional development and cooperation could certainly enhance development in the region of Central Europe as well.

The interesting and comprehensive historical development of Singapore’s economy in Chapter 4 provides comparative and interdisciplinary analyses, especially the section on “Politics, Culture and Identity” that I found particularly engaging. The statistics and quantitative research analysis clarified the arguments considerably about the particularities of Singapore’s development track and strategic decision-making in terms of its economy and the role of the supportive institutional system which is the centerpiece of the book as a whole. This supportive institutional system can also be labeled as an “enabling state” or an “adaptive” state in other literature.

I also need to mention the important conclusions of the discussions in this chapter, because they have exceptional relevance. They can be summarized in five points:

  1. medium-term development planning, in the form of recommendations, and the drafting of an economic strategy and performing innovative measures of industrial policy are required to provide “organized assistance” for the public sector in overcoming its competitive disadvantage;
  2. the formation and implementation of economic policy goals needs to be ensured by an efficient and corruption-free public sphere that employs highly qualified and well-paid professionals, and an extensive institutional system;
  3. active industrial policy, that encourages firms to participate in the state’s industrialization program through designated target sectors with the deployment of financial incentives and tax allowances;
  4. direct state participation in capital accumulation can occur by offering credits and ensuring industrial areas that lead to the close integration of the financial and production spheres; this mandatory scheme in Singapore created resources for societal investments, enabling capital accumulation through budget surpluses from the very beginning;
  5. more direct intervention into the economy through the sizeable public sector that nonetheless operates under market economy conditions is required.

These conclusions fit with my own multi-stakeholder approach that encompasses states, markets and societies (or the prince, the merchant and the citizen). The success of such a multi-stakeholder approach is also evident in other aspects of the book’s analysis.

What follows in the book is a detailed and extensive analysis of the educational, research and development, and science and industrial parks sectors (or clusters). This, once again, highlights the valuable interdisciplinarity exhibited in the study.

The comprehensive evaluation of business sectors provides the needed substantive examples that underpin the earlier theoretical and methodological analyses, as well as the placement of Singapore in the regional and global contexts.

I would like to finish by re-stating one of Dr. Magasházi’s important conclusions: “The conscious and prescient organization of education through establishing new universities and adapting the best practices of world-famous universities to local conditions and upgrading existing institutions continuously advanced in tandem with future-oriented economic strategy goals, constitutes part of an integrated planning system” (p. 254); and one of the key components of this strategy for long-term development “ […] is to attract top scientists and professionals […] rather than to draw foreign investments at any price” (p. 255).

This is the challenge for science and education today as we hopefully move to non-carbon-based economies before it is too late, but time is running out. Old institutional structures of states, economies and societies need to adapt quickly to changing conditions and change fundamentally or they will fail future generations and we will be to blame for that.

Many lessons for Central Europe can be found in these pages, and addressing how the current COVID-19 crisis has been successfully managed in Singapore at the state and society levels offers exceptional insight for the countries in our region and beyond.

REFERENCES

  • Coe, N.Yeung, H. W. (eds) (2015): Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an International World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yeung, H. W. (2008): Industrial Clusters and Production Network in Southeast Asia. A Global Production Network Approach. In: Production Netwroks and Industrial Clusters. Integrating Economies in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. https://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/geoywc/publication/2008%201CE-ISEAS_Final.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coe, N.Yeung, H. W. (eds) (2015): Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an International World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yeung, H. W. (2008): Industrial Clusters and Production Network in Southeast Asia. A Global Production Network Approach. In: Production Netwroks and Industrial Clusters. Integrating Economies in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. https://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/geoywc/publication/2008%201CE-ISEAS_Final.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.
 
The Open Access statement together with the description of the Copyright and License Policy are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

Editor-in-chief: Balázs SZENT-IVÁNYI

Co-Editors:

  • Péter MARTON (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • István KÓNYA (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • László SAJTOS (The University of Auckland)
  • Gábor VIRÁG (University of Toronto)

Associate Editors:

  • Tamás BOKOR (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • Sándor BOZÓKI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Bronwyn HOWELL (Victoria University of Wellington)
  • Hintea CALIN (Babeş-Bolyai University)
  • Christian EWERHART (University of Zürich)
  • Clemens PUPPE (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • Zsolt DARVAS (Bruegel)
  • Szabina FODOR (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Sándor GALLAI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László GULÁCSI (Óbuda University)
  • Dóra GYŐRFFY (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • György HAJNAL (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Krisztina KOLOS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Alexandra KÖVES (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Lacina LUBOR (Mendel University in Brno)
  • Péter MEDVEGYEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Miroslava RAJČÁNIOVÁ (Slovak University of Agriculture)
  • Ariel MITEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Éva PERPÉK (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Petrus H. POTGIETER (University of South Africa)
  • Sergei IZMALKOV (MIT Economics)
  • Anita SZŰCS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László TRAUTMANN (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Trenton G. SMITH (University of Otago)
  • György WALTER (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán CSEDŐ (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán LŐRINCZI (Ministry of Human Capacities)

Society and Economy
Institute: Corvinus University of Budapest
Address: Fővám tér 8. H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 482 5406
E-mail: balazs.szentivanyi@uni-corvinus.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • DOAJ
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • International Political Science Abstracts
  • JSTOR
  • SCOPUS
  • RePEc
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,157
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q4
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q4
Industrial Relations Q4
Public Administration Q4
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
103/117=0,9
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 305/399 (Q4)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 137/243 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 40/54 (Q3)
Public Administration 116/165 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 665/1269 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 351/440 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,171
Scopus
Cites
157
Scopus
Documents
24
Days from submission to acceptance 148
Days from acceptance to publication 50

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,228
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q3
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q3
Industrial Relations Q3
Public Administration Q3
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
87/110=0,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 286/394 (Q3)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 125/228 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 38/58 (Q3)
Public Administration 114/157 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 645/1243 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 330/427 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,308
Scopus
Cites
132
Scopus
Documents
22

 

Society and Economy
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Sufficient number of full waiver available. Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access
Purchase per Title  

Society and Economy
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1972
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 43
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-1093 Budapest, Hungary Fővám tér 8.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1588-9726 (Print)
ISSN 1588-970X (Online)