This central topic for this article is a CJEU decision that allows for the study of the application of the principle of mutual trust and a child’s right to be heard in the enforcement of a decision ordering the return of a child wrongfully taken abroad. The article also looks at the jurisdiction of a requested court being able to refuse the enforcement the above-mentioned decision by reference to violation of its own constitutional principles or to the grave violation of the basic rights of the child. In the Zarraga case, in connection with the facts of the wrongful removal of a child, the CJEU came to face the issue of how to reconcile EU principles such as the principle of mutual trust with principles of procedure within the area of fundamental human rights, such as the child’s right to be heard.
Blutmann, L. , The Law of the European Union in Practice (HVG-Orac 2010).
Dienes-Oehm, E., Erdos, I., Király, M., Martonyi, J., Somssich, R., Szabados, T., Economic Law of the European Union I (ELTE Eötvös Press 2010).
Dutta, A., Schulz, A., ‘First Cornerstones of the Rules on Cross-Border Child Cases: the Jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the Brussels IIa Regulation from C to Health Service Executive’ (2014) 1 Journal of Private International Law 28–29.
Holliday, J. , ‘Case Comment: Aguirre Zarraga v Simone Pelz; Jan-Jaap Kuipers: The (Non) Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights for Return of a Child’ (2012) 4 European Human Rights Law Review 397–412.
Kramberger Skerl, J. , ‘European Public Policy (with an Emphasis on Exequatur Proceedings)’ (2011) 3 Journal of Private International Law 461–490.
Kramer, X. E. , ‘Cross-border Enforcement in the EU: Mutual Trust versus Fair Trial? Towards Principles of European Procedure’ (2011) 2 Journal of Procedure Law 202–230.
Raffai, K. , ‘The (planned) total abolishment of the exequatur and its ramifications for public policy’ (2012) 9 Magyar Jog 547–554.