Authors:
Aleksey Pavlovich Anisimov Volgograd Institute of Business, 400081, Volgograd, Sofia Kovalevskaya Street, 17 B, Russian Federation

Search for other papers by Aleksey Pavlovich Anisimov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Anatoliy Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov Civil and Entrepreneurial Law of the Kalmyk State University, 400001, Volgograd, Kanunnikova Street, 9–17, Russian Federation

Search for other papers by Anatoliy Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

This article is devoted to research of philosophical discussions about animal rights which have affected on content of international law and national legal systems. This has manifested itself in the gradually recognition of the rights of wild and domestic animals. The authors provide classification of these rights and, according to criteria of their scope, distinguish three groups of wild animals and seven groups of domestic animals (companions, circus, agricultural, sport, experimental, zoo and service animals). Domestic animals have both vested rights (protection against cruelty and to a favorable environment) and, to a different extent, the right to good treatment, choice of owner, good health (veterinary care), adequate burial and comfortable transfer – these mainly dependent on the owner’s goodwill. The article includes evidences that the current situation with a different scope of subjective rights of different groups of animals resembles the situation with a different scope of rights of certain groups of population in the age of feudal fragmentation. The authors also comment about gradual change and future of the situation.

  • Appellate Decision of Altai Krai Court of 04.12.2013 No. 33-9800-13. Legal Reference System “Consultant Plus” accessed 27 May 2016.

  • Benthall, J. , ‘Animal Liberation and Rights’ (2007) 23-2 Anthropology Today 13.

  • Bocharov, E.V. , Criminal Liability for Cruelty to Animals (Candidate thesis, Moscow State Linguistic University 2014).

  • Branham A. , ‘Detailed Discussion of Philosophy and Animals’ (Fall edn, 2005) <https://www.animallaw.info/article/detailed-discussion-philosophy-and-animals> accessed 27 May 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brophy, B. , ‘The Rights of Animals’ (1965) Sunday Times, 10th October. City cemetery for animals <http://городскоекладбищеживотных.рф/reglament/> accessed 27 May 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Descartes, R. , Meditations on First Philosophy with Selections from the Objections and Replies (Cambridge University Press 1996).

  • De Waal, F. , ‘We the People (and Other Animals)’ (1999) New York Times, 20th August.

  • Cottingham J. , ‘A Brute to the Brutes? Descartes’ Treatment of Animals’ (1978) 53–206 Philosophy 5519.

  • Favre, D. , ‘Judicial Recognition of the Interests of Animals. A New Tort’ (2005) 333 Michigan State Law Review 33466.

  • Frazer, J. , Folklore in the Old Testament (Varda Books 2001).

  • Garrison, J. , ‘A Call to Attorneys: Brainstorming to Help Captive Elephants’ (1998) 16 Pace Environmental Law Review 1338.

  • Batyr, A.I. (ed), ‘General History of State and Law’ (Bylina 1995).

  • Gibson, H. , ‘Detailed Discussion of Dog Fighting’ (Fall edn, 2005) <https://www.animallaw.info/article/detailed-discussion-dog-fighting> accessed 27 May 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grech, K.S. , ‘Detailed Discussion of the Laws Affecting Zoos’ (Fall edn, 2004) <https://www.animallaw.info/article/detailed-discussion-laws-affecting-zoos> accessed 27 May 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haas, A. , ‘Interpreting “Enhancement of survival” in Granting Section 10 Endangered Species Act Exemptions to Animal Exhibitors’ (2005) 32 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 95660.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hilden, J. , ‘A Contractarian View of Animal Rights: Insuring against the Possibility of Being a Nonhuman Animal’ (2007) 14 Animal Law 528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hume, D. , A Treatise of Human Nature (first published 1738–40, Hard Press 2006).

  • Kanaev, S.G. , History of State and Law. Frankish State: Lecture (Siberian Law Institute of the Ministries of Internal Affairs of Russia 2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kant, I. , Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (first published 1798, Southern Illinois University Press 1978).

  • Kant, I. , Lectures on Ethics (first published 1924, Republic 2000).

  • Lovvorn, J.R. , ‘Animal Law in Action: the Law, Public Perception, and the Limits of Animal Rights Theory as a Basis for Legal Reform’ (2006) 12 Animal law 13349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neumann, J. , ‘Redefining the Modern Circus: a Comparative Look at the Regulations Governing Circus Animal Treatment and America’s Neglect of Circus Animal Welfare’ (2014) 36 Whittier L. Rev. 16794.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Order of the State Committee for Environmental Protection of the Russian Federation of 19.12.1997 No. 569 (revised on 28.04.2011) “On Approval of Lists of Objects of Fauna Listed in the Red Data Book of the Russian Federation and Excluded from the Red Data Book of the Russian Federation”. Legal Reference System “Consultant Plus” accessed 27 May 2016.

  • Petukhova E.P. , Constitutional Legal Regime of Natural Resources (Candidate thesis, National Research University “Higher School of Economics” 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Skazkina, S.L. (ed), ‘Reading Book on History of the Middle Ages. Early Middle Ages’ (Publishing house of social and economic literature 1961).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Regan, T. , The Case for Animal Rights (3rd edn, U. Cal. Press 2004).

  • Regan, T. , ‘The Day May Come: Legal Rights for Animals’ (2004) 10 Animal Law 1124.

  • Satz, A.B. , ‘Animals as Vulnerable Subjects: Beyond Interest-convergence, Hierarchy, and Property’ (2009) 16 Animal law 65122.

  • Sætra, H. , ‘The State of no Nature – Thomas Hobbes and the Natural World’ (2014) 8 Ecology & Safety 17793.

  • Scheiner, C. , ‘“Cruelty to Police dog” Laws Update’ (2001) 7 Animal law 1414.

  • Singer, P. , Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals (New York Review/Random House 1975).

  • Thomas, B.L. , ‘Antimony: The Use, Rights, and Regulation of Laboratory Animals’ (Fall edn, 1986). <https://www.animallaw.info/article/antimony-use-rights-and-regulation-laboratory-animals> accessed 27 May 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vinokurova, A.V. , ‘Issue of “the Last Villainage” in England of the XVI Century in Russian Historiography’ (2009) 9-1.

  • Wise, S. , Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals (Perseus Books 2000).

  • Wise, S. , Drawing the Line: Science and the Case for Animal Rights (Perseus Books 2002).

  • World Charter for Nature. Adopted by Resolution No. 37/7 of the UNGeneral Assembly of October 28, 1982. <http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/charter_for_nature.shtml> accessed 27 May 2016.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
The author instructions are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE

 

Senior editors

Editor-in-Chief: 

  • Éva JAKAB (Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Department of Civil Law and Roman Law, head of Doctoral School of Political Science and Law, Hungary)

Editors:

  • Fruzsina GÁRDOS-OROSZ (HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Institute for Legal Studies, Hungary; Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Law, Hungary)
  • Miklós KÖNCZÖL (HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Institute for Legal Studies, Hungary; Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Hungary)
  • Viktor LŐRINCZ (HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Institute for Legal Studies, Hungary)
  • Tamás HOFFMANN (HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Institute for Legal Studies, HU; Corvinus University of Budapest, Institute of International, Political and Regional Studies / Department of International Relations, Hungary)
  • Eszter KOVÁCS SZITKAY (HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Institute for Legal Studies, HUNGARY; Ludovika University of Public Service, Doctoral School of Law Enforcement, Hungary)

Editorial Board

  • Attila BADÓ (University of Szeged, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Hungary)
  • Mátyás BÓDIG (University of Aberdeen, King's College, School of Law, United Kingdom)
  • Zoltán CSEHI (Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Law, Hungary; Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Hungary)
  • Péter CSERNE (University of Aberdeen, King's College, School of Law, United Kingdom)
  • Balázs GELLÉR (Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Law, Hungary)
  • András JAKAB (Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg, Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Austria)
  • Miodrag JOVANOVIĆ (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Serbia)
  • Miklós KIRÁLY (Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Law, Hungary)
  • György KISS (National University of Public Service, Faculty of Public Governance and International Studies, HUNGARY; University of Pécs, Faculty of Law, Hungary)
  • Jan KUDRNA (Charles University, Faculty of Law, Czech Republic)
  • Herbert KÜPPER (Institut für Ostrecht, DE; Andrássy Universität, Chair of European Public Law, Hungary)
  • Konrad LACHMAYER (Sigmund Freud University, Faculty of Law, Austria)
  • Andzrej Stanislaw MĄCZYŃSKI (Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration, Poland)
  • Guido PFEIFER (Goethe University, Faculty of Law, Germany)
  • Miklós SZABÓ (University of Miskolc, Faculty of Law, Hungary)
  • Zoltán SZENTE (HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Institute for Legal Studies, Hungary)
  • G.J.J. Heerma VAN VOSS (Leiden University, Institute of Public Law; Labour Law and Social Security, Netherlands)
  • Bernd WAAS (Goethe University, Faculty of Law, Germany)
  • Fryderyk ZOLL (University of Osnabrück, European Legal Studies Institute, Germany)

Advisory Board

  • Péter ERDŐ
  • Gábor HAMZA
  • Attila HARMATHY
  • László KECSKÉS
  • Tibor KIRÁLY
  • László KORINEK
  • László SÓLYOM
  • Lajos VÉKÁS
  • Imre VÖRÖS

Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies
P.O. Box 25
HU–1250 Budapest,Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 355 7384
Fax. (36 1) 375 7858
E-mail: acta.juridica@tk.mta.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Information technology and the Law
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
  • SCOPUS
  • Cabell's Directories
  • HeinOnline

 

2023  
Scopus  
CiteScore 1.2
CiteScore rank Q2 (Law)
SNIP 1.024
Scimago  
SJR index 0.204
SJR Q rank Q3

Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 572 EUR / 628 USD
Print + online subscription: 648 EUR / 712 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2016 (1959)
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2498-5473 (Print)
ISSN 2560-1067 (Online)