Labour standards are more and more framed as open norms at a higher level of abstraction. A considerable share of these open norms set standards of conduct for employers in order to inspire socially responsible corporate behaviour. Nonetheless, concerns are often raised about the uncertain, un-measurable, possibly insufficient implementation of these open standards.
The present paper examines one illustrative Hungarian regulatory case-study in order to be able to reflect on the chance of implementation of open norms in a more general context. This regulatory case study is the principle of ‘equitable assessment’ from the new Hungarian Labour Code. According to this ‘employers shall take into account the interests of workers under the principle of equitable assessment; where the mode of performance is defined by unilateral act, it shall be done so as not to cause unreasonable disadvantage to the worker affected’ (Section 6, Subs. 3 of Act 1 of 2012 on the Labour Code). The principle of ‘equitable assessment’ institutionalizes one form of the proportionality-test, as a limitation on employers, into the architecture of Hungarian labour law as a general standard.
One of the main assumptions of the paper is that ‘essence’ i.e. the goal, aim, relevance, ‘marketing’, uptake, infrastructure etc, of a given open norm is the truly important factor for its total effect and success, not solely its judicial practice.
In summary, the principle of ‘equitable assessment’ does not fulfil its intended most important functions and, for the time being, it cannot unfold its inherent multifaceted potential. In this context, the study examines the reasons why this standard is struggling with a form of functional deficiency and aims to demonstrate how this particularly important provision could be more effectively operationalized, dynamized, and ‘breathed into life’.
Alon-Shenker, Pnina and Davidov, Guy, ‘Applying the Principle of Proportionality in Employment and Labour Law Contexts’ (2013) 2 McGill LJ 375–423.
Cabrelli, David , ‘Rules and Standards in the Workplace: A Perspective from the Field of Labour Law’ (2011a) 1 Legal Studies 21–41.
Cabrelli, David , ‘The Hierarchy of Differing Behavioural Standards of Review in Labour Law’ (2011b) 2 Ind LJ 146–80.
Davidov, Guy , A Purposive Approach to Labour Law (Oxford University Press 2016).
Deakin, Simon , ‘Legal Origin, Juridical Form and Industrialisation in Historical Perspective: The Case of the Employment Contract and the Joint-Stock Company’ (2008) 36 Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy. Research Paper 1–39.
Doorey, David J. , ‘A Model of Responsive Workplace Law’ (2012) 1 Osgoode Hall LJ 47–91.
Kajtár, Edit , ‘A munkáltatói utasítás helye a 21. század munkajogában’ (The role of the employer’s instruction in the labour law of the 21st century) (2014) 2 Jura 214–24.
Kozma, Anna, Lorincz, György, Pál, Lajos, Petho, Róbert A munka törvénykönyvének magyarázata (Commentary of the Labour Code) (Budapest, HVG–Orac, 2016)
Kübra, Dogan Yenisey ‘The Reasons Behind Resorting Fundamental Rights in Employment Law’ Report: International Society for Labour and Social Security Law XIX World Congress, 1–4 September 2009, Sydney, Australia.
Kun, Attila , ‘Az új munka törvénykönyve’ (The new Labour Code) in Jakab, András and Gajduschek, György (eds.), A magyar jogrendszer állapota (MTA Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont, Jogtudományi Intézet, 2016) 385–414.
Kun, Attila , ‘How to Operationalize Open Norms in Hard and Soft Laws: Reflections Based on Two Distinct Regulatory Examples’ (2018) 1 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 23–52.
Lehoczkyné Kollonay, Csilla , ‘Génmanipulált újszülött – Új munkatörvény az autoriter és neoliberális munkajogi rendszerek határán’ (Gene-manipulated newborn – New Labour Code on the edge of authoritarian and neoliberal labour law systems) in Kun, Attila (ed), ‘Az új munka törvénykönyve dilemmái címu tudományos konferencia utókiadványa’ (KRE ÁJK 2013) 24–56.
Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna , (2014): ‘Do the Right Thing: Indirect Remedies in Private Law’ (2014) 1 Boston University Law Review 55–103.
Román, László , ‘A munkáltatói utasítás érvényessége és hatályossága’ (The validity and effectiveness of the employer’s instruction) (Akadémiai Kiadó 1977)
Twining, William and Miers, David, ‘How to Do Things with Rules: A Primer of Interpretation’ (5th edn, Cambridge University Press 2010)
Van Bever, Aline , ‘Open norms and the foundations of employment law: a legal examination of hidden patterns in employment relationships’ (2012) 2/3 Eur. Lab. LJ 173–86.
Van Bever, Aline , ‘Open Norms and the Psychological Dimension of Employment Relationships’ (2011) 3/2 Eur. Lab. LJ 225–68.