View More View Less

The paper highlights the various aspects of the electronisation of judicial and extra-judicial dispute resolution in the Slovak Republic. The author concludes that arbitration as a form of dispute settlement process may take an electronic form in Slovakia, with the exception of issuing the arbitration decisions which must always take a paper form – for the sake of legal certainty. An alternative dispute resolution in consumer disputes, taking the form of mediation is a novelty in Slovakia and was only introduced in 2016, under the respective EU Regulation. This also foresaw an electronic platform to facilitate online cross-border consumer dispute resolution. Finally, the recently introduced new rules on civil judicial procedure in Slovakia (1st July 2016) also brought about some enhancements with regard to electronisation of dispute resolution. In addition to the possibilities of filing electronic submissions, hearings can also take place with the use of electronic means; public notices must be published on a website of a court or relevant authority and the delivery of court documents was also widely electronised based on a recent Act on e-Government.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abdel Wahab , Mohamed S., ‘ODR and e-Arbitration Trends & Challenges’ in Abdel Wahab, Mohamed S., Katsh, Ethan and Rainey, Daniel (eds), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice: A Treatise on Technology and Dispute Resolution (Eleven 2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abdel Wahab , Mohamed S., Katsh, Ethan and Rainey, Daniel (eds), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice: A Treatise on Technology and Dispute Resolution (Eleven 2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Albornoz, Maria M. and González Martín, Nuria, ‘Feasibility Analysis of Online Dispute Resolution in Developing Countries’ (2012) 1 The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 3961.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brand, Ronald A., ‘Party Autonomy and Access to Justice in the UNCITRAL Online Dispute Resolution Project’ (2012–2013) 10 Loy. U. Chi. Int’l L. Rev. 1136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Breaux, Paul W., ‘Online Dispute Resolution: A Modern ADR Approach’ (2015) 5 The Computer & Internet Lawyer 17881.

  • Cortés, Pablo, ‘Developing Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the EU: A Proposal for the Regulation of Accredited Providers’ (2010) 1 International Journal of Law and Information Technology 128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cortés, Pablo, Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the European Union (Routledge 2011).

  • Fogh Knudsen, Laine and Balina, Signe, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems Across the European Union, Iceland and Norway’ (2014) 109 Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 94448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, Louise L., ‘Emerging Technology and Client Confidentiality: How Changing Technology Brings Ethical Dilemmas’ (2010) 16 BUJ Sci. & Tech. L 157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hörnle, Julia, Cross-Border Internet Dispute Resolution (CUP 2009).

  • Katsh, Ethan and Rifkin, Janet, Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace (Jossey-Bass 2001).

  • Knapp, Viktor, O možnosti použití kybernetických metod v právu (On the possibilities of using cybernetic methods in law) (Vydavatelství Československé akademie věd 1963).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lodder, Arno R. and Zeleznikow, John, Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology (CUP 2010).

  • Poblet, Marta, Mobile Technologies for Conflict Management: Online Dispute Resolution, Governance, Participation (Springer 2011).

  • Polčák, Radim, Internet a proměny práva (Internet and changes in law) (Auditorium 2012).

  • Svantesson, Dan Jerker B., Private International Law and the Internet (Wolters Kluwer 2012).