Aziz. (2012). EWCA Crim 1063.
Boire, R. G. (2000). On cognitive liberty (part 1). Cognitive Liberty, 1(1), 7–13. Retrieved from http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/1jcl/1jclcontents.htm
Davies, M. (2015, October 2). Incense not to fall under ban on ‘legal highs’. Church Times.
Doyle, R. (2011). Darwin’s pharmacy: Sex, plants, and the evolution of the noosphere. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Dunn, J. (2016, January 14). ‘It was kill or be killed’: Canadian who stabbed British friend to death during ‘bad trip’ at Peruvian jungle retreat speaks for the first time about what happened. Mail Online.
EMCDDA. (2016). New psychoactive substances in Europe: Legislation and prosecution – Current challenges and solutions. Lisbon, Portugal: EMCDDA.
Fisher, H. (2016). High hopes. Retrieved August 14, from http://volteface.me/features/high-hopes-psychoactive-substances-act/
Gibson, M. (2010). Rastafari and cannabis: Framing a criminal law exemption. Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 12(3), 324–344. doi:10.1017/S0956618X10000384
Haden, M., Emerson, B., & Tupper, K. (2016). A public-health-based vision for the management and regulation of psychedelics. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 48(4), 243–252. doi:10.1080/02791072.2016.1202459
Home Office. (2015). Impact assessment: Creation of a blanket ban on new psychoactive substances in the UK. London, UK: Home Office.
ICEERS. (2012). More about Ayahuasca. Retrieved August 14, 2017, from www.iceers.org/more-about-ayahuasca.php
International Narcotics Control Board. (2011). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2010. New York, NY: United Nations.
Labate, B. C. (Ed.). (2014). Ayahuasca shamanism in the Amazon and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Labate, B. C., & Cavnar, C. (Eds.). (2014a). Prohibition, religious freedom, and human rights: Regulating traditional drug use. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Labate, B. C., Cavnar, C., &, Gearin, A. (Eds.). (2017). The world ayahuasca diaspora: Reinventions and controversies. London, UK: Routledge.
New Psychoactive Substances Review Expert Panel. (2014). New psychoactive substances review: Report of the expert panel. London, UK: Home Office.
Nutt, D., King, L., & Phillips, L. (2010). Drugs harms in the UK: A multicriteria decision analysis. The Lancet, 376(9752), 1558–1565. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61462-6
R. (on the application of H.) v Mental Health Review Tribunal for North and East London Region. (2001). EWCA Civ. 415.
R. (Williamson & Others) v Secretary of State for Education and Employment. (2005). UKHL 15.
Reuter, P., & Pardo, B. (2017). New psychoactive substances: Are there any good options for regulating new psychoactive substances? International Journal of Drug Policy, 40, 117–122. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.020
Sanchez, C., & Bouso, J. C. (2015). Ayahuasca: From the Amazon to the global village. Barcelona, Spain/Washington, DC: ICEERS/TNI.
Sette . (2007). Kingston Crown Court, unreported.
Swain, F. (2016a, February 6). Opinion. New Scientist, p. 1287.
Swain, F. (2016b, April 2). Opinion. New Scientist, p. 1296.
Talin, P., & Sanabria, E. (2017). Ayahuasca’s entwined efficacy: An ethnographic study of ritual healing from ‘addiction’. International Journal of Drug Policy, 44, 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.02.017
Taylor. (2001). EWCA Crim 2263.
Walsh, C. (2010). Drugs and human rights: Private palliatives, sacramental freedoms and cognitive liberty. International Journal of Human Rights, 14(3), 425–441. doi:10.1080/13642980802704270
Walsh, C. (2016). Psychedelics and cognitive liberty: Reimagining drug policy through the prism of human rights. International Journal of Drug Policy, 29, 80–87. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.025
Walsh, C. (2017). Ayahusaca in the English courts: Legal entanglements with the jungle vine. In B. C. Labate, C. Cavnar, & A. Gearin (Eds.), The world ayahuasca diaspora: Reinventions and controversies (pp. 243–260). London, UK: Routledge.