View More View Less
  • 1 University of Tokyo
Full access

This article presents a new theory of simplex numerals that incorporates a slight revision of Chomsky’s (2008) set-theoretic conception of natural number, which assumes that the notion of natural number is innate. The new theory makes it possible to account for the behavior of numerals in counting as well as the developmental stages that children go through in learning numerals. The key idea is that set-theoretic objects corresponding to natural number notions are subject to operations that apply when a syntactic object is converted to phonological form. These operations provide a crucial link that connects the meaning of a numeral with the count list consisting of numerals. A notable feature of the proposed analysis is that the Cardinal Principle is derived by recruiting linguistic computation and therefore is no longer stipulated as such.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Almoammer, Alhanouf, Jessica Sullivan, Chirs Donlan, Franc Marušic, Rok Žaucer, Timothy O’Donnell and David Barner. 2013. Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110. 1844818453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barner, David, Amanda Libenson, Pierina Cheung and Mayu Takasaki. 2009. Crosslinguistic relations between quantifiers and numerals in language acquisition: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 103. 421440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bell, Eric Temple. 1937. Men of mathematics. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • Benacerraf, Paul. 1965. What numbers could not be. Philosophical Review 74. 4773.

  • Carey, S. 2009. The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cheng, Lisa and Rint Sybesma. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In G. Cinque and R. S. Kayne (eds.) The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 259292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cheung, Pierina, Miriam Rubenson and David Barner. 2017. To infinity and beyond: Children generalize the successor function to all possible numbers years after learning to count. Cognitive Psychology 92. 2236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.) Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 134166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.) Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research. Vol. 1. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 506569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chrisomalis, S. 2010. Numerical notation: A comparative history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cohen Kadosh, Roi and Ann Dowker (eds.). 2015. Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Dehaene, Stanislas. 1997. The number sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • É. Kiss 2010. Structural focus and exhaustivity. In M. Zimmermann and C. Féry (eds.) Information structure. Theoretical, typological and experimental perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 6488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feigenson, Lisa, Stanislas Dehaene and Elizabeth Spelke. 2004. Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8. 307314.

  • Frank, Michael C., Daniel L. Everett, Evelina Fedorenko and Edward Gibson. 2008. Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition 108. 819824.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fuson, Karen C. 1988. Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer- Verlag.

  • Gelman, Rochel and Charles Randy Gallistel. 1978. The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • George, Alexander and Daniel J. Velleman. 2002. Philosophies of mathematics. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Giaquinto, Marcus. 2015. Philosophy of number. In Cohen Kadosh & Dowker (2015, 17–31).

  • Gunderson, Elizabeth A. and Susan Levine. 2011. Some types of parent number talk count more than others: Relations between parents’ input and children’s cardinal-number knowledge. Developmental Science 14. 10211032.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gunderson, Elizabeth A., Elizabet Spaenen, Dominic Gibson, Susan Goldin-Meadow and Susan C. Levine. 2015. Gesture as a window onto children’s number knowledge. Cognition 144. 1428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hilbert, David. 1983. On the infinite. In P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.) Philosophy of mathematics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 183201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hiraiwa, Ken. 2016. The faculty of language and core systems of number. Manuscript. Meiji Gakuin University/MIT.

  • Huang, Yi Ting, Elizabeth Spelke and Jesse Snedeker. 2013. What exactly do numbers mean? Language Learning and Development 9. 105129.

  • Hurford, James R. 1975. The linguistic theory of numerals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hurford, James R. 2001. Languages treat 1–4 specially. Mind and Language 16. 6975.

  • Ito, Junko and Armin Mester. 2015. Sino-Japanese phonology. In H. Kubozono (ed.) Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 289312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Kayne, Richard S. 2010. Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kayne, Richard S. 2013. Why are there no directionality parameters? Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34. 337.

  • Kayne, Richard S. 2016. Some thoughts on one and two and other numerals. Manuscript. New York University.

  • Kennedy, Christpher. 2013. A scalar semantics for scalar readings of number words. In I. Caponigro and C. Cecchetto (eds.) From grammar to meaning: The spontaneous logicality of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 172200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Le Corre, Mathieu and Susan Carey. 2007. One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition 105. 395438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Le Corre, Mathieu, Peggy Li, Becky H. Huang, Gisela Jia and Susan Carey. 2016. Numerical morphology supports early number word learning: Evidence from a comparison of young Mandarin and English learners. Cognitive Psychology 88. 162186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Le Corre, Mathieu, Gretchen Van de Walle, Elizabeth M. Brannon and Susan Carey. 2006. Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology 52. 130169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lipton, Jennifier S. and Elizabeth S. Spelke. 2006. Preschool children master the logic of number word meanings. Cognition 98. B57B66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Menninger, Karl. 1969. Number words and number symbols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 661738.

  • Nieder, Andreas. 2016. Representing something out of nothing: The dawning of zero. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20. 830842.

  • Okamoto, Yukari. 2015. Mathematics learning in the USA and Japan. In Cohen Kadosh & Dowker (2015, 415–429).

  • Overmann, Karenleigh A., Thomas Wynne and Frederick L. Coolidge. 2011. The prehistory of number concept. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34. 142144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piantadosi, Steven T., Julian Jara-Ettinger and Edward Gibson. 2014. Children’s learning of number words in an indigenous farming-foraging group. Developmental Science 17. 553563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piantadosi, Steven T., Joshua B. Tenebaum and Noah D. Goodman. 2012. Bootstrapping in a language of thought: A formal model of numerical concept learning. Cognition 123. 199217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollmann, Thijs. 2003. Some principles involved in the acquisition of number words. Language Acquisition 11. 131.

  • Rips, Lance J., Amber Bloomfield and Jennifer Asmuth. 2008. From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31. 623642.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sarnecka, Barbara W. to appear. Learning to represent exact numbers. Synthese.

  • Sarnecka, Barbara W., Valentina G. Kamenskaya, Yuko Yamana, Tamiko Ogura and Yulia B. Yudovina. 2007. From grammatical number to exact numbers: Early meanings of ‘one’, ‘two’, and ‘three’ in English, Russian, and Japanese. Cognitive Psychology 55. 136168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thornton, Rosalind. 2010. Verb phrase ellipsis in children’s answers to questions. Language Learning and Development 6. 131.

  • Wagner, Katie, Katherine Kimura, Pierina Cheung and David Barner. 2015. Why is number word learning hard? Evidence from bilingual learners. Cognitive Psychology 83. 121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Watanabe, Akira. 2010. Vague quantity, numerals, and natural numbers. Syntax 13. 3777.

  • Watanabe, Akira. 2014. 1-deletion: Measure nouns vs. classifiers. Proceedings of Japanese/ Korean Linguistics 22. 245260.

  • Wynn, Karen. 1990. Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition 36. 155193.

  • Wynn, Karen. 1992. Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology 24. 220251.

  • Yamamoto, Kasumi. 2005. The acquisition of numeral classifiers: The case of Japanese children. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Zhang, Niina Ning. 2014. Expressing number productively in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 52. 134.

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
May 2020 0 15 12
Jun 2020 0 7 6
Jul 2020 3 0 0
Aug 2020 0 6 6
Sep 2020 0 7 6
Oct 2020 0 1 1
Nov 2020 0 0 0