View More View Less
  • 1 University of Wrocław
  • 2 Constance University
  • 3 University of Wrocław
  • 4 University of Wrocław
Full access

This paper is a contribution to a long-standing discussion related to the domain of aspectual interpretation. More precisely, it focuses on the impact of the degree of specificity and morphological complexity on the time course of processing of perfective (prefixed perfective and semelfactive perfective) and imperfective (simple imperfective and iterative imperfective) verbs in Polish. In two experiments, eye-tracking during reading and self-paced reading, we tested a hypothesis based on Frisson & Pickering (1999), Pickering & Frisson (2001), and Frisson (2009) that the interpretation of semantically underspecified verbs should be delayed to the end of a sentence. As predicted, in both of the reported experiments significantly longer reading measures were observed for aspectually underspecified simple imperfective verbs as compared to aspectually more specific perfective verbs in the sentence-final region. Our second major prediction was that morphological complexity of aspectual forms should cause computational cost directly on the verbal region. As predicted, significantly longer reading times were observed on morphologically complex (prefixed) perfective verbs and (suffixed) semelfactive perfective verbs as compared to their morphologically simple imperfective counterparts in the eye-tracking experiment. This effect was not confirmed in the self-paced reading experiment. This difference between the results in the two reported experiments is attributed to the differences between the methods used.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Robert M. W. Dixon. 1998. Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language 74. 5680.

  • Alexiadou, Artemis, Monika Rathert and Armin von Stechow (eds.). 2003. Perfect explorations. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Bach, Emmnon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9. 516.

  • Bacz, Barbara. 2012. Reflections on semelfactivity in Polish. Studies in Polish Linguistics 7. 107128.

  • Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker and Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixedeffects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battistella, Edwin L. 1990. Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  • Biały, Adam. 2012. The multilayer analysis of prefixes in Polish. In J. Błaszczak, B. Rozwadowska and W. Witkowski (eds.) Current issues in generative linguistics syntax, semantics, and phonology (Generative Linguistics in Wrocław 2). Wrocław: Center for General and Comparative Linguistics. 124139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Błaszczak, Joanna and Dorota Klimek-Jankowska. 2013. Futures, futurates, plans and forces. In U. Junghanns, D. Fehrmann, D. Lenertová and H. Pitsch (eds.) Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Ninth Conference. Proceedings of FDSL 9, Göttingen 2011.(Linguistik International 28). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 935.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Błaszczak, Joanna and Dorota Klimek-Jankowska. 2016. Aspectual coercion versus blocking: Experimental evidence from an ERP study on Polish converbs. In J. Błaszczak, A. Giannakidou, D. Klimek-Jankowska and K. Migdalski (eds.) Mood, aspect, modality revisited. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. 381435.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bogusławski, Andrzej. 1963. Czasowniki dokonane i niedokonane i ich stosunki wzajemne [Perfective and imperfective verbs and their mutual relations]. In W. Doroszewski (ed.) Z polskich studiów slawistycznych [From Polish studies on Slavic languages]. Warszawa: Polska Akademia Nauk. 153159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borik, Olga. 2002. Aspect and reference time (LOT Dissertation Series 64). Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.

  • Bott, Oliver. 2010. The processing of events. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Bott, Oliver and Fritz Hamm. 2014. Cross-linguistic variation in the processing of aspect. In B. Hemforth, B. Mertins and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds.) Psycholinguistic approaches to meaning and understanding across languages (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 44). Cham & Heidelberg: Springer. 83109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bozic, Mirjana and William Marslen-Wilson. 2010. Neurocognitive contexts for morphological complexity: Dissociating inflection and derivation. Language and Linguistic Compass 4. 10631073.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, eventuality types and nominal reference. New York: Garland.

  • Filip, Hana. 2003. Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11. 55101.

  • Filip, Hana. 2017. The semantics of perfectivity. Italian Journal of Linguistics 29. 167200.

  • Filip, Hana and Susan Rothstein. 2006. Telicity as a semantic parameter. In J. Lavine, S. Franks, M. Tasseva-Kurktchieva and H. Filip (eds.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 14: The Princeton meeting. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications. 139156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frisson, Steven. 2009. Semantic underspecification in language processing. Language and Linguistic Compass 3. 111127.

  • Frisson, Steven and Martin J. Pickering. 1999. The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25. 13661383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grzegorczykowa, Renata. 1997. Nowe spojrzenie na kategorię aspektu w perspektywie semantyki kognitywnej [A new approach to the category of aspect from a cognitive semantics perspective]. In R. Grzegorczykowa and Z. Zaron (eds.) Semantyczna struktura słownictwa i wypowiedzi [The semantic structure of vocabulary and utterance]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. 2538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Husband, Matthew and Linnaea Stockall. 2014. Building aspectual interpretation online. In R. G. de Almeida and C. Manouilidou (eds.) Cognitive science perspectives on verb representation and processing. Cham & Heidelberg: Springer. 157186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hyönä, Jukka, Matti Laine and Jussi Niemi. 1995. Effects of a word’s morphological complexity on readers’ eye fixation patterns. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker and R. W. Kentridge (eds.) Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes, and applications (Studies in Visual Information Processing 6). Amsterdam: North-Holland. 445452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klein, Wolfgang. 1995. A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71. 669695.

  • Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota. 2012. Imperfective and perfective habituals in Polish: A bidirectional OT account of variation and ambiguity. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21. 3152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koops van ’t Jagt, Ruth, John C. J. Hoeks, Gillis J. Dorleijn and Petra Hendriks. 2014. Look before you leap: How enjambment affects the processing of poetry. Scientific Study of Literature 4. 324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laine, Matti, Juha O. Rinne, Bernd J. Krause, Mika Teräs and Hannu Sipilä. 1999. Left hemisphere activation during processing morphologically complex forms in adults. Neuroscience Letters 271. 8588.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magliano, Joseph P., Arthur C. Graesser, Levy A. Eymard, Karl Haberlandt and Barry Gholson. 1993. Locus of interpretive and inference processes during text comprehension: A comparison of gaze durations and word reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19. 704709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marslen-Wilson, William D. and Lorraine K. Tyler. 2005. The lexicon, grammar, and the past tense: Dissociation revisited. In M. Tomasello and D. I. Slobin (eds.) Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honour of Elizabeth Bates. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 263279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merkman, Vita. 2008. On Slavic semelfactives and secondary imperfectives: Implications for the split ‘AspP’. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 253268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mędak, Stanisław. 2013. Słownik form koniugacyjnych czasowników polskich [A dictionary of conjugation forms of Polish verbs]. Kraków: Universitas.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nagórko, Alicja. 1998. Zarys gramatyki polskiej (ze słowotwórstwem) [An outline of Polish grammar (with word-formation)]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PWN.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Niemi, Jussi, Matti Laine and Juhani Tuominen. 1994. Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language & Cognitive Processes 9. 423446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paczynski, Martin, Ray Jackendoff and Kuperberg Gina. 2014. When events change their nature: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26. 19051917.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pancheva, Roumyana. 2003. The aspectual makeup of perfect participles and the interpretations of the perfect. In Alexiadou et al. (2003, 277–306).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paslawska, Alla and Arnim von Stechow. 2003. Perfect readings in Russian. In Alexiadou et al. (2003, 307–362).

  • Pęzik, Piotr. 2012. Wyszukiwarka PELCRA dla danych NKJP [The PELCRA search engine for the National Corpus of Polish (NKJP)]. In A. Przepiórkowski, M. Bańko, R. L. Górski and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.) Narodowy korpus języka polskiego [National Corpus of Polish]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. 253279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pickering, Martin J. and Steven Frisson. 2001. Processing ambiguous verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27. 556573.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pickering, Martin J., Brian McElree, Steven Frisson, Lillian Chen and Matthew J. Traxler. 2006. Underspecification and aspectual coercion. Discourse Processes 42. 131155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piernikarski, Cezary. 1969. Typy opozycji aspektowych czasownika polskiego na tle słowiańskim [Types of aspectual oppositions of a Polish verb against the Slavic background]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piñango, Maria M., Aaron Winnick, Rashad Ullah and Edgar Zurif. 2006. Time-course of semantic composition: The case of aspectual coercion. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35. 233244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piñango, Maria M., Edgar Zurif and Ray Jackendoff. 1999. Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax–semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28. 395414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing.

  • Ripley, Brian, Bill Venables, Douglas M. Bates, Kurt Hornik, Albrecht Gebhardt and David Firth. 2017. Mass: Functions and datasets to support Venables and Ripley, Modern applied statistics with S (4th edition, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rothstein, Susan. 2008. Telicity and atomicity In S. Rothstein (ed.) Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspects. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 4378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rothstein, Susan. 2015. Some contrasts between aspectual operators in English and Slavic. Paper presented at the workshop Grammaticalization and language change, Formal Description of Slavic Languages (FDSL) 11, Potsdam, December 2–4, 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rozwadowska, Bożena. 2012. On the onset of psych eventualities. In E. Cyran, H. Kardela and B. Szymanek (eds.) Sound, structure and sense. Studies in memory of Edmund Gussmann. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL. 533554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schuster, Swetlana, Mathias Scharinger, Colin Brooks, Aditi Lahiri and Gesa Hartwigsen. 2018. The neural correlates of morphological complexity processing: Detecting structure of pseudowords. Human Brain Mapping 39. 23172328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slabakova, Roumyana. 1997. Bulgarian preverbs: Aspect in phrase structure. Linguistics 35. 673704.

  • Slabakova, Roumyana. 2003. Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars. Second Language Research 19. 4275.

  • Slabakova, Roumyana. 2005. What is so difficult about telicity marking in L2 Russian? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8. 6377.

  • Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The parmeter of aspect (Second edition). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Swart, Henriëtte de. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 347385.

  • Śmiech, Witold. 1971. Funkcje aspektów czasownikowych we współczesnym języku ogólnopolskim [Functions of verbal aspects in contemporary Polish]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Szwedek, Alexander. 1998. English resultant, affected and eventive objects in Polish grammar. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 33. 411419.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Todorova, Marina, Kathy Straub, William Badecker and Robert Frank. 2000. Aspectual coercion and the online computation of sentential aspect. In L. R. Gleitman and A. K. Joshi (eds.) Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tremblay, Antoine and Johannes Ransijn. 2015. LMERConvenienceFunctions: Model selection and post-hoc analysis for (G)LMER models. R Package Version 2. 10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tyler, Lorraine K., Paul deMornay Davies, Rebekah Anokhina, Catherine Longworth, Billi Randall and William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2002. Dissociations in processing past tense morphology: Neuropathology and behavioural studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14. 7994.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vartiainen, Johanna, Silvia Aggujaro, Minna Lehtonen, Annika Hultén, Matti Laine and Riitta Salmelin. 2009. Neural dynamics of reading morphologically complex words. Neuroimage 47. 20642072.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66. 143160.

  • Wickham, Hadley. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1967. On the semantics of verbal aspect in Polish. In To honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventhieth birthday. The Hague: Mouton. 22312249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willand, Bartosz. 2012. Prefix stacking, syncretism and the syntactic hierarchy. In M. Ziková and M. Dočekal (eds.) Slavic languages in formal grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010.(Linguistik International 26). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 307324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willim, Ewa. 2006. Event, individuation and countability. A study with special reference to English and Polish. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wróbel, Henryk. 1999. Czasownik [The verb]. In R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski and H. Wróbel (eds.) Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego [The grammar of contemporary Polish]. Volume 2: Morfologia [Morphology]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. 536584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wróbel, Henryk. 2001. Gramatyka języka polskiego [The grammar of Polish]. Kraków: Od Nowa.