Anderson, Catherine. 2004. The structure and real-time comprehension of quantifier scope ambiguity. Doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston.

Anderson, Catherine. 2004. The structure and real-time comprehension of quantifier scope ambiguity. Doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Antonyuk-Yudina, Svitlana. 2011. Abstract. Linguistic Society of America, Annual Meeting, Pittsburg. Why prosody matters.

Antonyuk-Yudina, Svitlana. 2011. Abstract. Linguistic Society of America, Annual Meeting, Pittsburg. Why prosody matters.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Baltazani, Mary. 2002. The prosodic structure of quantificational sentences in Greek. In Papers from the Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting Vol. 38. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. 63–78.

Baltazani, Mary. 2002. The prosodic structure of quantificational sentences in Greek. In Papers from the Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting Vol. 38. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. 63–78.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Baltazani, Mary. 2002.. Quantifier scope and the role of intonation in Greek. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.

Baltazani, Mary. 2006. Intonation and pragmatic interpretation of negation in Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 1658–1676.

Baltazani, Mary. 2006. Intonation and pragmatic interpretation of negation in Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 1658–1676.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Beckman, Mary E. 1996. The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes 11. 17–68.

Beckman, Mary E. 1996. The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes 11. 17–68.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Beghelli, Filippo and Tim Stowell. 1997. The syntax of distributivity and negation. In Szabolcsi (1997b, 71–10).

Błaszczak, Joanna and Hans-Martin Gärtner. 2005. Intonational phrasing, discontinuity, and the scope of negation. Syntax 8. 1–22.

Błaszczak, Joanna and Hans-Martin Gärtner. 2005. Intonational phrasing, discontinuity, and the scope of negation. Syntax 8. 1–22.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5. 341–345.

Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5. 341–345.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1965. Forms of English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1965. Forms of English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bott, Oliver and Janina Radó. 2007. Quantifying quantifier scope: A cross-methodological comparison. In S. Featherson and W. Sternefeld (eds.) Roots – Linguistics in search of its evidential base (Studies in Generative Grammar 96). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 53–74.

Bott, Oliver and Janina Radó. 2007. Quantifying quantifier scope: A cross-methodological comparison. In S. Featherson and W. Sternefeld (eds.) Roots – Linguistics in search of its evidential base (Studies in Generative Grammar 96). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 53–74.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bott, Oliver and Janina Radó. 2009. How to provide exactly one interpretation for every sentence, or what eye movements reveal about quantifier scope. In S. Featherson and S. Winkle (eds.) The fruits of empirical linguistics. Volume 1: Process (Studies in Generative Grammar 101). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 25–46.

Bott, Oliver and Janina Radó. 2009. How to provide exactly one interpretation for every sentence, or what eye movements reveal about quantifier scope. In S. Featherson and S. Winkle (eds.) The fruits of empirical linguistics. Volume 1: Process (Studies in Generative Grammar 101). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 25–46.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Büring, Daniel. 1997. The great scope inversion conspiracy. Linguistics and Philosophy 20. 175–94.

Büring, Daniel. 1997. The great scope inversion conspiracy. Linguistics and Philosophy 20. 175–94.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cohen, Ariel and Nomi Erteschik-Shir. 2002. Topic, focus and the interpretation of bare plurals. Natural Language Semantics 10. 125–165.

Cohen, Ariel and Nomi Erteschik-Shir. 2002. Topic, focus and the interpretation of bare plurals. Natural Language Semantics 10. 125–165.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cresti, Diana. 1995. Indefinite topics. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

Deguchi, Masanori and Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2002. Prosody and wh-questions. In M. Hirotani (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. 73–92.

Deguchi, Masanori and Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2002. Prosody and wh-questions. In M. Hirotani (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. 73–92.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74. 245–273.

É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74. 245–273.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

É. Kiss, Katalin. 2010. An adjunction analysis of quantifiers and adverbials in the Hungarian sentence. Lingua 120. 506–526.

É. Kiss, Katalin. 2010. An adjunction analysis of quantifiers and adverbials in the Hungarian sentence. Lingua 120. 506–526.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ebert, Christian and Cornelia Endriss. 2004. Topic interpretation and wide scope indefinites. In K. Moulton and M. Wolf (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. 203–14.

Ebert, Christian and Cornelia Endriss. 2004. Topic interpretation and wide scope indefinites. In K. Moulton and M. Wolf (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. 203–14.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Féry, Caroline. 1993. German intonational patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Féry, Caroline. 1993. German intonational patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Filik, Ruth, Kevin B. Paterson and Simon P. Liversedge. 2004. Processing doubly quantified sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11. 953–959.

Filik, Ruth, Kevin B. Paterson and Simon P. Liversedge. 2004. Processing doubly quantified sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11. 953–959.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Fodor, Janet Dean. 1982. The mental representation of quantifiers. In S. Peters and E. Saarinen (eds.) Processes, beliefs, and questons. Dordrecht: Reidel. 29–164.

Fodor, Janet Dean. 1982. The mental representation of quantifiers. In S. Peters and E. Saarinen (eds.) Processes, beliefs, and questons. Dordrecht: Reidel. 29–164.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Genzel, Susanne, Shinichiro Ishihara and Balázs Surányi. 2015. The prosodic expression of focus, contrast and givenness: A production study of Hungarian. Lingua 165. 183–204.

Genzel, Susanne, Shinichiro Ishihara and Balázs Surányi. 2015. The prosodic expression of focus, contrast and givenness: A production study of Hungarian. Lingua 165. 183–204.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Gorman, Kyle, Jonathan Howell and Michael Wagner. 2011. Prosodylab-aligner: A tool for forced alignment of laboratory speech. Canadian Acoustics 39. 192–193.

Gorman, Kyle, Jonathan Howell and Michael Wagner. 2011. Prosodylab-aligner: A tool for forced alignment of laboratory speech. Canadian Acoustics 39. 192–193.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Gyuris, Beáta and ScottJackson. under review. Factors affecting scope in Hungarian. Glossa.

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 2). Journal of Linguistics 3. 199–244.

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 2). Journal of Linguistics 3. 199–244.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hirotani, Masako. 2004. Prosody and LF: Processing Japanese wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Hirotani, Masako. 2004. Prosody and LF: Processing Japanese wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hunyadi, László. 1981. Remarks on the syntax and semantics of topic and focus in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 31. 107–136.

Hunyadi, László. 1981. Remarks on the syntax and semantics of topic and focus in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 31. 107–136.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hunyadi, László. 1999. The outlines of a metrical syntax of Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46. 69–94.

Hunyadi, László. 1999. The outlines of a metrical syntax of Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46. 69–94.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hunyadi, László. 2002. Hungarian sentence prosody and Universal Grammar: On the prosody–syntax interface. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Hunyadi, László. 2002. Hungarian sentence prosody and Universal Grammar: On the prosody–syntax interface. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ionin, Tania. 2003. The one girl who was kissed by every boy: Scope, scrambling and discourse function in Russian. In M. V. Koppen, J. Sio and M. de Vos (eds.) Proceedings of ConSole X. Leiden: Leiden University. 79–94.

Ionin, Tania. 2003. The one girl who was kissed by every boy: Scope, scrambling and discourse function in Russian. In M. V. Koppen, J. Sio and M. de Vos (eds.) Proceedings of ConSole X. Leiden: Leiden University. 79–94.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ionin, Tania and Tatiana Luchkina. 2015. One reading for every word order: Revisiting Russian scope. In U. Steindl (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirty-second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 21–30.

Ionin, Tania and Tatiana Luchkina. 2015. One reading for every word order: Revisiting Russian scope. In U. Steindl (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirty-second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 21–30.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ioup, Georgette. 1975. Some universals for quantifier scope. In J. P. Kimball (ed.) Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press. 37–5.

Ioup, Georgette. 1975. Some universals for quantifier scope. In J. P. Kimball (ed.) Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press. 37–5.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2002. Invisible but audible wh-scope marking: Wh-constructions and deaccenting in Japanese. In L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-first West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 180–193.

Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2002. Invisible but audible wh-scope marking: Wh-constructions and deaccenting in Japanese. In L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-first West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 180–193.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Prosodic typology. In S.-A. Jun (ed.) Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 430–458.

Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Prosodic typology. In S.-A. Jun (ed.) Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 430–458.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Jun, Sun-Ah. 2014. Prosodic typology, By prominence type, word prosody, and macrorhythm. In S.-A. Jun (ed.) Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 520–539.

Jun, Sun-Ah. 2014. Prosodic typology, By prominence type, word prosody, and macrorhythm. In S.-A. Jun (ed.) Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 520–539.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kadmon, Nirit and Craige Roberts. 1986. Prosody and scope: The role of discourse structure. In A. M. Farley, P. T. Farley and K.-E. McCullough (eds.) Proceeding from the Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society [Part 2]: Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. 16–28.

Kadmon, Nirit and Craige Roberts. 1986. Prosody and scope: The role of discourse structure. In A. M. Farley, P. T. Farley and K.-E. McCullough (eds.) Proceeding from the Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society [Part 2]: Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. 16–28.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kálmán, László. 1985. Word order in non-neutral sentences. In I. Kenesei (ed.) Approaches to Hungarian 1: Data and descriptions. Szeged: JATE. 25–37.

Kálmán, László. 1985. Word order in non-neutral sentences. In I. Kenesei (ed.) Approaches to Hungarian 1: Data and descriptions. Szeged: JATE. 25–37.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kálmán, László and Ádám Nádasdy. 1994. A hangsúly [Stress]. In F. Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 2: Fonológia [A structural grammar of Hungarian 2: Phonology]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 393–467.

Kálmán, László and Ádám Nádasdy. 1994. A hangsúly [Stress]. In F. Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 2: Fonológia [A structural grammar of Hungarian 2: Phonology]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 393–467.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kempson, Ruth Margaret and Annabel Cormack. 1981. Ambiguity and quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 4. 259–309.

Kempson, Ruth Margaret and Annabel Cormack. 1981. Ambiguity and quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 4. 259–309.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1994. Shells, yolks, and scrambled e.g.s. In M. Gonzàlez (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusett. 221–239.

Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1994. Shells, yolks, and scrambled e.g.s. In M. Gonzàlez (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusett. 221–239.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (eds.) The generic book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 125–175.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (eds.) The generic book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 125–175.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Krifka, Manfred. 2001. Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics 9. 1–40.

Krifka, Manfred. 2001. Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics 9. 1–40.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kuno, Susumo. 1982. The Focus of the Question and the Focus of the Answer. In R. Schneider, K. Tuite and R. Chametzky (eds.) Papers from the parasession on nondeclaratives. Chicago: CLS. 276–337.

Kuno, Susumo. 1982. The Focus of the Question and the Focus of the Answer. In R. Schneider, K. Tuite and R. Chametzky (eds.) Papers from the parasession on nondeclaratives. Chicago: CLS. 276–337.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kuno, Susumu. 1991. Remarks on quantifier scope. In H. Nakajima (ed.) Current English linguistics in Japan. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 261–287.

Kuno, Susumu. 1991. Remarks on quantifier scope. In H. Nakajima (ed.) Current English linguistics in Japan. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 261–287.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kurtzman, Howard S. and Maryellen MacDonald. 1993. Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition 48. 273–279.

Kurtzman, Howard S. and Maryellen MacDonald. 1993. Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition 48. 273–279.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ladd, D. Robert. 1980. The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ladd, D. Robert. 1980. The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Liu, Feng-hsi. 1997. Scope and specificity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Liu, Feng-hsi. 1997. Scope and specificity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mády, Katalin. 2012. A fókusz prozódiai jelölése felolvasásban és spontán beszédben [Prosodic marking of focus in read and spontaneous speech]. In M. Gósy (ed.) Beszéd, adatbázis, kutatások [Speech, database, research]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 91–107.

Mády, Katalin. 2012. A fókusz prozódiai jelölése felolvasásban és spontán beszédben [Prosodic marking of focus in read and spontaneous speech]. In M. Gósy (ed.) Beszéd, adatbázis, kutatások [Speech, database, research]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 91–107.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mády, Katalin. 2015. Prosodic (non-)realisation of broad, narrow and contrastive focus in Hungarian: A production and perception study. In Interspeech 2015. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Dresden: ISCA. 948–952.

Mády, Katalin. 2015. Prosodic (non-)realisation of broad, narrow and contrastive focus in Hungarian: A production and perception study. In Interspeech 2015. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Dresden: ISCA. 948–952.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mády, Katalin and Felicitas Kleber. 2010. Variation of pitch accent patterns in Hungarian. Paper presented at the 5th Speech Prosody Conference, Chicago.

May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

May, Robert. 1988. Ambiguities of quantification and wh: A reply to Williams. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 118–135.

May, Robert. 1988. Ambiguities of quantification and wh: A reply to Williams. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 118–135.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Neeleman, Ad and Hans van de Koot. 2008. Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 112. 137–189.

Neeleman, Ad and Hans van de Koot. 2008. Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 112. 137–189.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Olaszy, Gábor. 2000. The prosody structure of dialogue components in Hungarian. International Journal of Speech Technology 3. 165–176.

Olaszy, Gábor. 2000. The prosody structure of dialogue components in Hungarian. International Journal of Speech Technology 3. 165–176.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Pafel, Jürgen. 2006. Quantifier scope in German. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Pafel, Jürgen. 2006. Quantifier scope in German. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Paterson, Kevin B., Ruth Filik and Simon P. Liversedge. 2008. Competition during processing of quantifier scope ambiguities: Evidence from eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61. 459–473.

Paterson, Kevin B., Ruth Filik and Simon P. Liversedge. 2008. Competition during processing of quantifier scope ambiguities: Evidence from eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61. 459–473.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Portner, Paul and Katsuhiko Yabushita. 2001. Specific indefinites and the information structure theory of topics. Journal of Semantics 18. 271–297.

Portner, Paul and Katsuhiko Yabushita. 2001. Specific indefinites and the information structure theory of topics. Journal of Semantics 18. 271–297.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

R Development Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing.

R Development Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Radó, Janina and Oliver Bott. 2012. Underspecified representations of quantifier scope? In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Sassoon, K. Schulz and M. Westera (eds.) Logic, language and meaning. 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011. Revised selected papers. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. 180–189.

Radó, Janina and Oliver Bott. 2012. Underspecified representations of quantifier scope? In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Sassoon, K. Schulz and M. Westera (eds.) Logic, language and meaning. 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011. Revised selected papers. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. 180–189.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Radó, Janina and Oliver Bott. accepted. What do speaker judgments tell us about theories of quantifier scope in German? Glossa.

Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.

Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 281–337.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 281–337.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Roberts, Craige. 2012. Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5. 1–69.

Roberts, Craige. 2012. Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5. 1–69.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Sauerland, Uli and Oliver Bott. 2002. Prosody and scope in German inverse linking constructions. In B. Bel and I. Marlien (eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2020.conference, 11–13 April. 2002. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage. 623–628.

Sauerland, Uli and Oliver Bott. 2002. Prosody and scope in German inverse linking constructions. In B. Bel and I. Marlien (eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2020.conference, 11–13 April. 2002. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage. 623–628.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 2011. The syntax–phonology interface. In J. A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle and A. C. L. Yu (eds.) The handbook of phonological theory (Second edition). Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 435–484.

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 2011. The syntax–phonology interface. In J. A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle and A. C. L. Yu (eds.) The handbook of phonological theory (Second edition). Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 435–484.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Sluijter, Agatha Martha Cornelia. 1995. Phonetic correlates of stress and accent. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

Sluijter, Agatha Martha Cornelia. 1995. Phonetic correlates of stress and accent. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Sluijter, Agatha Martha Cornelia and Vincent J. van Heuven. 1996. Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. In ICSLP–1996. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, October 3–6, 1996. Philadelphia: IEEE. 630–633.

Sluijter, Agatha Martha Cornelia and Vincent J. van Heuven. 1996. Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. In ICSLP–1996. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, October 3–6, 1996. Philadelphia: IEEE. 630–633.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Surányi, Balázs. 2002. Multiple operator movements in Hungarian. Doctoral dissertation. LOT, Utrecht.

Surányi, Balázs, Shinichiro Ishihara and Fabian Schubö. 2012. Syntax–prosody mapping, topic–comment structure and stress–focus correspondence in Hungarian. In G. E. Alcibar and P. Prieto (eds.) Prosody and meaning. Berlin & New York: Amsterdam & Philadelphia. 35–71.

Surányi, Balázs, Shinichiro Ishihara and Fabian Schubö. 2012. Syntax–prosody mapping, topic–comment structure and stress–focus correspondence in Hungarian. In G. E. Alcibar and P. Prieto (eds.) Prosody and meaning. Berlin & New York: Amsterdam & Philadelphia. 35–71.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Surányi, Balázs and Gergő Turi. 2017. Focus and quantifier scope – An experimental study in Hungarian. In A. Lipták and H. van der Hulst (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 15: Papers from the 2016. Leiden conference. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 209–238.

Surányi, Balázs and Gergő Turi. 2017. Focus and quantifier scope – An experimental study in Hungarian. In A. Lipták and H. van der Hulst (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 15: Papers from the 2016. Leiden conference. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 209–238.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1981. The semantics of topic–focus articulation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.) Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centre. 503–540.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1981. The semantics of topic–focus articulation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.) Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centre. 503–540.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1997a. Strategies for scope taking. In Szabolcsi (1997b, 109–154).

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1997a. Strategies for scope taking. In Szabolcsi (1997b, 109–154).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Szabolcsi, Anna (ed.). 1997b. Ways of scope taking (SLAP 65). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Szabolcsi, Anna (ed.). 1997b. Ways of scope taking (SLAP 65). Dordrecht: Kluwer.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Varga, László. 1975. A contrastive analysis of English and Hungarian sentence prosody. (The Hungarian–English Contrastive Linguistics Project Working Papers No. 6). Budapest & Arlington, VA: Linguistics Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences & Center for Applied Linguistics.

Varga, László. 1975. A contrastive analysis of English and Hungarian sentence prosody. (The Hungarian–English Contrastive Linguistics Project Working Papers No. 6). Budapest & Arlington, VA: Linguistics Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences & Center for Applied Linguistics.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Varga, László. 2002. Intonation and stress: Evidence from Hungarian. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Varga, László. 2002. Intonation and stress: Evidence from Hungarian. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Vogel, Irene, Angeliki Athanasopoulou and Nadya Pincus. 2015. Acoustic properties of prominence in Hungarian and the Functional Load Hypothesis. In K. É. Kiss, B. Surányi and É. Dékány (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 14: Papers from the 2013. Piliscsaba conference. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 267–292.

Vogel, Irene, Angeliki Athanasopoulou and Nadya Pincus. 2015. Acoustic properties of prominence in Hungarian and the Functional Load Hypothesis. In K. É. Kiss, B. Surányi and É. Dékány (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 14: Papers from the 2013. Piliscsaba conference. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 267–292.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Vogel, Irene and István Kenesei. 1987. The interface between phonology and other components of the grammar: The case of Hungarian. Phonology Yearbook 4. 243–263.

Vogel, Irene and István Kenesei. 1987. The interface between phonology and other components of the grammar: The case of Hungarian. Phonology Yearbook 4. 243–263.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ward, Gregory and Julia Hirschberg. 1985. Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language 61. 747–776.

Ward, Gregory and Julia Hirschberg. 1985. Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language 61. 747–776.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Williams, Edwin. 1988. Is LF distinct from S-structure. A reply to May. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 135–146.

Williams, Edwin. 1988. Is LF distinct from S-structure. A reply to May. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 135–146.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation