Semanticists often assume an ontology for natural language that includes not only ordinary objects, but also events, and other sorts of entities. We link this ontology to how speakers represent static and dynamic entities. Specifically, we test how speakers determine whether an entity counts as “atomic” by using count vs. mass (e.g., some gleebs, some gleeb) and distributive vs. non-distributive descriptions (e.g., gleeb every second or so, gleeb around a little). We then seek evidence for atomic representation in a non-linguistic task. Ultimately we suggest that natural language ontology reveals properties of language-independent conceptualization.
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, Emmnon. 1986a. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9. 5–16.
Bach, Emmon. 1986b. Natural language metaphysics. In R. B. Marcus, G. J. W. Dorn and P. Weingartner (eds.) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science VII. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 573–595.
Bach, Emmon and Wynn Chao. 2012. The metaphysics of natural language(s). In R. Kempson, T. Fernando and N. Asher (eds.) Handbook of philosophy of science. Volume 14: Philosophy of linguistics. London: Elsevier. 175–196.
Barner, David and Jesse Snedeker. 2006. Children’s early understanding of mass-count syntax: Individuation, lexical content, and the number asymmetry hypothesis. Language Learning and Development 2. 163–194.
Barner, David, Laura Wagner and Jesse Snedeker. 2008. Events and the ontology of individuals: Verbs as a source of individuating mass and count nouns. Cognition 106. 805–832.
Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers and Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68. 255–278.
Boolos, George. 1981. For every A there is a B. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 465–467.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Casati, Roberto and Achille C. Varzi. 2008. Event concepts. In T. Shipley and J. Zacks (eds.) Understanding events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 31–53.
Champollion, Lucas. 2017. Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Champollion, Lucas and Manfred Krifka. 2016. Mereology. In M. Aloni and P. Dekker (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of formal semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 512–541.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In S. Rothstein (ed.) Events and grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 53–103.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher (ed.) The logic of decision and action. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. 81–95.
Davidson, Donald. 1985. Adverbs of action. In B. Vermazen and M. B. Hintikka (eds.) Essays on Davidson: Actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 230–241.
Ferry, Alissa, Susan J. Hespos and Dedre Gentner. 2015. Prelinguistic relational concepts: Investigating analogical processing in infants. Child Development 86. 1386–1405.
Gillon, Brendan S. 1992. Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 15. 597–639.
Gillon, Brendan S. 2012. Mass terms. Philosophy Compass 7. 712–730.
Grimm, Scott. 2012. Number and individuation. Doctoral dissertation. Stanford University.
Henderson, Robert. 2013. Ways of pluralizing events. University of california, santa cruz. Doctoral dissertation.
Hespos, Susan J., Alissa Ferry and Lance Rips. 2009a. Five-month-old infants have different expectations for solids and liquids. Psychological Science 20. 603–611.
Hespos, Susan J., Stacy Grossman and Megan M. Saylor. 2010. Infants’ ability to parse continuous action series: Further evidence. Neural Networks 23. 1026–1032.
Hespos, Susan J., Megan M. Saylor and Stacy Grossman. 2009b. Infants’ ability to parse continuous actions. Developmental Psychology 45. 575–585.
Hespos, Susan J. and Elizabeth S. Spelke. 2004. Conceptual precursors to spatial language. Nature 430. 453–456.
Hoepelman, Jakob and Christian Rohrer. 1980. On the mass count distinction and the French imparfait and passé simple. In C. Rohrer (ed.) Time, tense and aspect. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 629–664.
Koslicki, Katherin. 1997. Isolation and non-arbitrary division: Frege’s two criteria for counting. Synthese 112. 403–430.
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem and P. van Emde Boas (eds.) Semantics and contextual expression. Dordrecht: Foris. 75–115.
Lewis, David. 1970. General semantics. Synthese 22. 18–67.
Lidz, Jeffrey, Justin Halberda, Paul Pietroski and Tim Hunter. 2011. Interface transparency and the psychosemantics of most. Natural Language Semantics 6. 227–256.
Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.) Meaning, use and interpretation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 303–323.
Mathieu, Éric. 2012. Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry 43. 650–667.
Montague, Richard. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik and P. Suppes (eds.) Approach to natural languages. Proceedings of the 1970. Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 221–247.
Mourelatos, Alexander. 1978. Events, processes, and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 2. 415–434.
Nosofsky, Robert M. 1984. Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10. 104–114.
Ojeda, Almerindo. 2005. The paradox of mass plurals. In S. S. Mufwene, E. J. Francis and R. Wheeler (eds.) Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley’s legacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 389–410.
Partee, Barbara H. 1979. Semantics – mathematics or psychology? In R. Bäuerle, U. Egli and A. von Stechow (eds.) Semantics from different points of view (Springer Series in Language and Communication 6). Berlin & New York: Springer-Verlag. 1–14.
Pelletier, Francis J. 2011. Descriptive metaphysics, natural language metaphysics, Sapir–Whorf, and all that stuff: Evidence from the mass-count distinction. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6. 1–46.
Pietroski, Paul. 2010. Concepts, meanings, and truth: First nature, second nature, and hard work. Mind & Language 25. 247–278.
Pietroski, Paul. 2015. Framing event variables. Erkenntnis 80. 31–60.
Pietroski, Paul, Jeffrey Lidz, Tim Hunter and Justin Halberda. 2009. The meaning of most: Semantics, numerosity, and psychology. Mind & Language 24. 554–585.
Prasada, Sandeep, Krag Ferenz and Todd Haskell. 2002. Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff. Cognition 83. 141–165.
Rips, Lance and Susan J. Hespos. 2015. Divisions of the physical world: Concepts of objects and substances. Psychological Bulletin 141. 786–811.
Rothstein, Susan. 1995. Adverbial quantification over events. Natural Language Semantics 3. 1–31.
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring events. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
Rothstein, Susan. 2010. Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 27. 343–397.
Rothstein, Susan. 2017. Semantics for counting and measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shepard, Roger N. 1962. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function Part I. Psychometrika 27. 125–140.
Shepard, Roger N. 1964. Attention and the metric structure of stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1. 54–87.
Sloman, Steven A. and Lance Rips. 1998. Similarity as an explanatory concept. Cognition 65. 87–101.
Tversky, Amos. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological review 84. 327–352.
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66. 143–160.
Vogel, Christopher A., Alexis Wellwood, Rachel Dudley and J. Brendan Ritchie. 2014. Talking about causing events. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic, and Communication 9. 1–22.
Wellwood, Alexis. 2014. Measuring predicates. Doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park.
Wellwood, Alexis, Susan J. Hespos and Lance Rips. 2018. The object : substance :: event : process analogy. In T. Lombrozo, J. Knobe and S. Nichols (eds.) Oxford studies in experimental philosophy. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 183–212.
Zacks, Jeff M. and Barbara Tversky. 2001. Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin 127. 3–21.
Zucchi, Sandro and Michael White. 2001. Twigs, sequences and the temporal constitution of predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 24. 223–270.