View More View Less
  • 1 Dalian University of Foreign Languages
  • 2 North China Electric Power University

Abstract

This paper investigates cases in which people who are perceived to have violated a major communal and/or social norm are humiliated in public in a ritual way. As a case study we examine online videos drawn from the Chinese videosharing site Youku. Humiliation as a form of punishment has been thoroughly studied in sociology (see e.g., the seminal work of Foucault 1977). This interest is not coincidental, considering that studying humiliation may provide insight into the operation of shame as a punitive phenomenon, as well as the role of publicity and complex participation structures when shame is inflicted on others. Yet, punitive humiliation has been understudied in pragmatics; in particular, little research has been done on cases in which it is not an institutionally/socially ratified person (e.g., a judge) but the members of the public who inflict humilation. The study of this phenomenon contributes to the present Special Issue as it demonstrates that pragmatics provides a powerful tool to model the dynamics of (language) behaviour such as humiliation that might be difficult to capture by using more conventional linguistic approaches. We demonstrate that while ritual public communal humiliation tends to be highly aggressive, it also shows noteworthy recurrent (meta)pragmatic similarities with institutionalised forms of punishment.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Al-Ameerdy, Riyadh. 2012. Promise and threat in English and Arabic religious texts: A pragmatic study. Al-Ameed Journal. 1. 9104.

  • Arnovick, Leslie. 1999. Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven case studies in English Illocutionary development. Amsterdam & Philadelpia: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baumgartner, Mary Pat 1988. The moral order of a suburb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bax, Marcel. 2010. Rituals. In: A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen (eds) Handbook of pragmatics, Vol. 8: Historical pragmatics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 483519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bedford, Olwen and Hwang Kwang-Kuo. 2003. Guilt and shame in Chinese culture: A cross-cultural framework from the perspective of morality and identity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 33. 127144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Birrell, Susan. 1981. Sport as ritual: Interpretations from Durkheim to Goffman. Social Forces. 60. 354376.

  • Chapman, Richard. 2010. Naming or shaming? Presentations of the self in specialised weblog discourse. Iperstoria. 10. 4554.

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cunningham, Michael R., Alan R. Roberts, Anita P. Barbee, Perri B. Druen and Cheng-Huan Wu. 1995. “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68. 261279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of prison. New York: Pantheon.

  • Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadeplhia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1999. Moral Consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The moral mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. London: Penguin.

  • Handel, Warren. 2016. Pragmatic conventions: A frame for a theory of action and interaction. The Sociological Quarterly. 44. 133157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haslam, Nick, Steve Loughnan and Pamela Sun. 2011. Beastly: What makes animal metaphors offensive? Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 30. 311325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jacobsen, Bente. 2008. Interactional pragmatics and court interpreting: The analysis of face. Interpreting. 10. 128158.

  • Kádár, Dániel Z. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kádár, Dániel Z. and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kádár, Dániel Z. and Rosina Márquez-Reiter. 2015. (Im)politeness and (im)morality: Insights from intervention. Journal of Politeness Research. 10. 239260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kádár, Dániel Z., Puyu Ning and Yongping Ran. 2018. Ritual public apology: A case study of Chinese. Discourse, Context & Media. 26. 2131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klinken, Gerry van. 2007. Communal violence and democratization in Indonesia – Small town wars. London: Routledge.

  • Kohlberg, Lawrance and Richard. Hersh. 1977. Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory Into Practice. 16. 5359.

  • Lankenau, Stephen E. 1990. Stronger than dirt: Public humiliation and status enhancement among panhandlers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 28. 288318.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liao, Yuan and Michael Bond. 2011. The dynamics of face-loss following interpersonal harm for Chinese and Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 42. 2538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Márquez-Reiter, Rosina. 2000. Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive study of requests and apologies. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mullen, Brian. 1986. Atrocity as a function of lynch mob composition: A self-attention perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 12. 187197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pearce, W. Barnett and Stephen W. Littlejohn. 1997. Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. New York: Sage.

  • Perlemutter, Renee. 2015. Shaming, group face, and identity construction in a Russian virtual community for women. In: M. Terkourafi (ed.) Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 149180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Santamaría García, Carmen. 2000. Teasing and shaming routines in adult-children interaction. In: M. Pilar Navarro Errasti et al. (eds.) Transcultural communication: Pragmalinguistic aspects. Zaragoza: Anubar Ediciones. 235242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shafer-Landau, Russ. 1997. Moral rules. Ethics. 107. 584611.

  • Smith, Richard, Matthew Webster, Gerrod Parrott and Heidi Eyre. 2002. The role of public exposure in moral and non-moral shame and guild. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83. 138159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spierenburg, Pieter. 2004. Punishment, power, and history: Foucault and Elias. Social Science History. 28. 607636.

  • Wang, Kailun. 2009. The deviant: Examining the relationship between foxes and humans in Chinese literature. Sino-Platonic Papers. 193. 415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Beavin Bevelas and Don D. Jackson. 2011. Pragmatics of Human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Sep 2020 0 13 91
Oct 2020 0 13 75
Nov 2020 0 30 91
Dec 2020 0 6 103
Jan 2021 0 3 89
Feb 2021 0 30 72
Mar 2021 0 0 2