This paper aims to examine the role of (im)politeness and alignment in public monologues. Linguistic politeness theory has predominantly focused on the interpersonal aspect of (im)politeness, and we know relatively little about forms of (im)politeness that do not serve a direct interpersonal function but rather aim to form a sense of alignment with an indefinite group of recipients. We define such form of pragmatic behaviour as ‘alignment’, to distinguish it from politeness as an interpersonal form of interaction. Forms of alignment may operate in a duality with interpersonal (im)politeness, and they represent the default mode of relational involvement in public discourses – in particular, in public monologues. We argue that forms of alignment cannot be ignored in politeness research due to their prevalence in certain genres/modes of communication, and also because their operation can be intriguingly complex from a politeness theoretical point of view, considering their dual relationship with (im)politeness. We use data drawn from Chinese political discourse as a case study to illustrate this dual relationship.
Agha, Asif . 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Agha, Asif . 2015. Tropes of slang. Signs and Society 3. 306–330.
Bhatia, Aditi . 2006. Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences. Discourse & Society 17. 173–203.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary . 2009. From stance to style: Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In A. Jaffe (ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 146–170.
Bull, Peter and Anita Fetzer. 2010. Face, facework and political discourse. Revue internationale de psichologie sociale 23. 155–185.
Chen, Guo-Ming . 2000. The impact of harmony on Chinese conflict management. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association (Seattle, November 9–12, 2000). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED456490.pdf
Chen, Xinren . 2017. Extensions of the Chinese passive construction: A memetic account. East Asian Pragmatics 2. 59–74.
Cooren, François . 2008. Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1–16.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Leyla Marti, Meilian Mei, Minna Nevala and Schauer, Gila. 2010. Cross-cultural variation in the perception of impoliteness: A study of impoliteness events reported by students in England, China, Finland, Germany and Turkey. Intercultural Pragmatics 7. 597–624.
Eelen, Gino . 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St Jerome.
Flowerdrew, John . 1999. Face in cross-cultural political discourse. Text 19. 3–23.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar . 2010. A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2. 46–94.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar . 2013. Introduction: Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9. 1–33.
Goffman, Erving . 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, Charles . 2007. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18. 53–73.
Graham, Sage . 2007. Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 742–759.
Harold, Christine . 2007. Pranking rhetoric: ‘culture jamming’ as media activism. Critical Studies in Media Communication 21. 189–211.
Harris, Sandra, Karen Grainger and Louise Mullany. 2006. The pragmatics of political apologies. Discourse & Society 17. 717–736.
He, Ziran and Wei Ren. 2016. Current address behaviour in China. East Asian Pragmatics 1. 163–180.
Huckin, Thomas . 2002. Critical discourse analysis and the discourse of condescension. In: E. Barton and G. Stygall (eds.) Discourse studies in composition. Cresskill, NJ.: Hampton Press.
Jiang, Xiangying . 2006. Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: The case of the North Korea Nuclear crisis. Discourse & Society 17. 237–257.
Johnson, Sarah . 2017. Agency, accountability and affect: Kindergarten children's orchestration of reading with a friend. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 12. 15–31.
Jong, Markus de, Mariët Theune and Dennis Hofs. 2008. Politeness and alignment in dialogues with a virtual guide. Aamas ’08: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conferences On Autonomous Agents And Multiagent Systems 1. 207–214. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1402416
Kádár, Dániel Z . 2017. Politeness, impoliteness and ritual: Maintaining the moral order of interpersonal interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z . 2019. Introduction: Advancing linguistic politeness theory by using Chinese data. Acta Linguistica Academica 66. 149–164.
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Jonathan Culpeper. 2010. Historical (im)politeness: An introduction. In J. Culpeper and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) Historical (im)politeness. Berne: Peter Lang. 9–35.
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Sen Zhang. 2019. Intersubjectivity and implicitness in Chinese political discourses: A case-study of the 2018 vaccine scandal’. Journal of Language and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18053.kad
Kollias, Christos, Stephanos Papadamou and Psarianos, Iacovos. 2014. Rogue state behaviour and markets: The financial fallout of North Korean nuclear tests. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 20. 267–292.
Leech, Geoffrey . 2008. Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. London: Taylor & Francis.
Liu, Fengguang and Wenrui Shi. 2019. Political advice in Chinese political discourse (s). Acta Linguistica Academica 66. 209–228.
Locher, Miriam . 2006. Polite behaviour within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, Miriam and Richard Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 9–33.
Roche, Jennifer, Rick Dale and Gina Caucci. 2010. Doubling up on double meaning: Pragmatic alignment. Language and Cognitive Processes 27. 1–24.
Schafer, John C . 1981. The linguistic analysis of spoken and written texts. In: B. M. Crall and R. J. Vann (eds.), Exploring speaking-writing relationships: Connections and contrasts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. 1–31.
Schermerhorn, John and Michael Bond. 1997. Cross-cultural leadership dynamics in collectivism and high power distance settings, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 18. 187–193.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen (ed.). 2000. Culturally speaking. London: Continuum.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Vladimir Žegerac. 2017. Power, solidarity and (im)politeness. In: J. Culpeper, M. Haugh and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 119–141.
Tanaka, Hideki, Stephen Nightingale, Hideki Kashioka, Kenji Matsumoto, Masamchi Nishiwaki, Tadashi Kumano and Maruyama, Takehiko. 2002. Speech to speech translation system for monologues-data driven approach. ICSLP-2002. 1717–1720.
Tracy, Karen . 2017. Facework and (im)politeness in political exchanges. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 739–757.
Watts, Richard . 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yang, Mayfair . 1997. Mass media and transnational subjectivity in Shanghai: Notes on (re)cosmopolitanism in a Chinese metropolis. In A. Ong and D. Nonini (eds.) Ungrounded empires: The cultural politics of modern Chinese transnationalism. New York: Routledge. 287–321.