Extra-curricular lessons at school and out-of-school provide important insights into the phenomenon of shadow education, although not fully covering it. Data from the National Assessment of Basic Competencies show that as the age progresses, the emphasis on school activities (tutoring, specializing, sports activities) is gradually shifting towards extra-curricular out-of-school activities, and there is a gradual decline in the proportion of arts and sports activities as well. The research paper explores the underlying causes of these phenomena, including the background factors of students participating in the different types of activities.
Andor M. & Liskó I. (1999) Iskolaválasztás és mobilitás. Budapest, Iskolakultúra.
Bourdieu, P. (1978) A társadalmi egyenlőtlenségek újratermelődése. Budapest, Gondolat.
Bray, M. (1999) The Shadow Education System. Private Tutoring and Its Implications for Planners. Paris, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Bray, M. (2007) Confronting the Shadow Education System. What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring? Paris, IIEP Policy Forum. UNESCO Publishing.
Bray, M. & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2014) Measurement Issues in Research on Shadow Education: Challenges and Pitfalls Encountered in TIMSS and PISA. Comparative Education Review, Vol. 58. No. 4. pp. 590–620.
Breen, R. & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997) Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory. Rationality and Society, Vol. 9. No. 3. pp. 275–305.
Ceglédi T. & Szabó A. É. (2014) Középiskolások és hallgatók az árnyékoktatásban. In: Ceglédi T., Gál A. & Nagy Z. (eds) Határtalan oktatáskutatás. Tanulmányok a 75 éves Kozma Tamás tiszteletére. Debrecen, Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ. pp. 257–274.
Collas, T. & Jacobs, A. (2013) Users of Private Tutoring in France: Varieties of Scholastic Support and Family Shaping of Education. Revue Française de Sociologie (English Edition), Vol. 54. No. 3. pp. 463–502.
Entrich, S. R. (2014) Effects of Investments in Out-of-school Education in Germany and Japan. Contemporary Japan, Vol. 26. No. 1. pp. 71–102.
Entrich, S. R. (2015) The Decision for Shadow Education in Japan: Students’ Choice or Parents’ Pressure? Social Science Japan Journal, Vol. 18. No. 2. pp 193–216.
Erikson, R. & Jonsson, J. O. (1996) Explaining Class Inequality in Education: The Swedish Test Case. In: R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (eds) Can Education Be Equalised? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, Westview Press. pp. 1–63.
Hörich B. (2019) Tanulási utak a társadalmi háttér függvényében. Educatio, Vol. 28. No. 4. pp. 659–682.
Lareau, A. (2000) Social Class and the Daily Lives of Children. A Study from the United States. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, Vol. 7. No. 2. pp. 155–171.
Park, H., Byun, S. & Kim, K. (2011) Parental Involvement and Students’ Cognitive Outcomes in Korea. Focusing on Private Tutoring. Sociology of Education, Vol. 84. No. 1. pp. 3–22.
Reay, D. (2004) Education and Cultural Capital: The Implications of Changing Trends in Education Policies. Cultural Trends, Vol. 13. No. 2. pp. 73–86.
Reay, D. & Ball, S. J. (1997) ‚Spoilt for Choice’: The Working Classes and Educational Markets. Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 23. No. 1. pp. 89–101.
Safarzyńska, K. (2013) Socio-economic Determinants of Demand for Private Tutoring. European Sociological Review, Vol. 29. No. 2. pp. 139–154.
Silova, I. (2010) Private Tutoring in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Policy Choices and Implications. Compare, Vol. 40. No. 3. pp. 327–344. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/48140047_Private_tutoring_in_Eastern_Europe_and_Central_Asia_Policy_choices_and_implications [Letöltve: 2020. 05. 21.]
Szemerszki M. (2015) A tanulói eredményesség dimenziói és háttértényezői. In: Szemerszki M. (ed.) Eredményesség az oktatásban. Dimenziók és megközelítések. Budapest, OFI. pp. 52–87.
Szemerszki M. (2016) A tanulói továbbhaladás egyéni és intézményi jellemzői. In: Szemerszki M. (ed.) Hátrányos helyzet és iskolai eredményesség. Budapest, OFI. pp. 29–51.