Authors:
E Burgettiné Böszörményi Semmelweis University, Hungary

Search for other papers by E Burgettiné Böszörményi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S Németh Semmelweis University, Hungary

Search for other papers by S Németh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A Fodor University of Szeged, Hungary

Search for other papers by A Fodor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
K Bélafiné Bakó University of Pannonia, Hungary

Search for other papers by K Bélafiné Bakó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D Vozik University of Pannonia, Hungary

Search for other papers by D Vozik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Z Csima Semmelweis University, Hungary

Search for other papers by Z Csima in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
I Barcs Semmelweis University, Hungary

Search for other papers by I Barcs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

Introduction

The prevalence of invasive fungal diseases shows an increasing trend. Due to the frequent but unprofessional usage of antifungal medications, the fungi show decreasing susceptibility towards these agents and this trend may lead to the emergence of resistant pathogens. There is a great need to develop antifungal medications with new mechanisms. One of these options is to apply proteins with natural antifungal effects. The objective was to measure the antifungal efficacy of Xenorhabdus budapestensis in vitro on clinical Candida species (Candida albicans, Candida lusitaniae, Candida krusei, Candida kefyr, Candida tropicalis, and Candida glabrata). Materials and methods: We defined the sensitivity of the Candida species towards antibiotics. We conducted agar diffusion tests with the cleaned biopreparation of X. budapestensis (100%) and its dilutions (80%, 60%, 40%, and 20%). Zones of inhibition were measured after 24, 48, and 96 hr.

Results

Most of the tested Candida species have shown sensitivity to the biopreparation and its 40% dilution. The area of the zones of inhibition did not decrease after several days. The most sensitive species was C. lusitaniae and the least sensitive was C. krusei.

Conclusion

We assume that the proteins produced by X. budapestensis have antifungal effect, as the area of the zones of inhibition did not change.

Abstract

Introduction

The prevalence of invasive fungal diseases shows an increasing trend. Due to the frequent but unprofessional usage of antifungal medications, the fungi show decreasing susceptibility towards these agents and this trend may lead to the emergence of resistant pathogens. There is a great need to develop antifungal medications with new mechanisms. One of these options is to apply proteins with natural antifungal effects. The objective was to measure the antifungal efficacy of Xenorhabdus budapestensis in vitro on clinical Candida species (Candida albicans, Candida lusitaniae, Candida krusei, Candida kefyr, Candida tropicalis, and Candida glabrata). Materials and methods: We defined the sensitivity of the Candida species towards antibiotics. We conducted agar diffusion tests with the cleaned biopreparation of X. budapestensis (100%) and its dilutions (80%, 60%, 40%, and 20%). Zones of inhibition were measured after 24, 48, and 96 hr.

Results

Most of the tested Candida species have shown sensitivity to the biopreparation and its 40% dilution. The area of the zones of inhibition did not decrease after several days. The most sensitive species was C. lusitaniae and the least sensitive was C. krusei.

Conclusion

We assume that the proteins produced by X. budapestensis have antifungal effect, as the area of the zones of inhibition did not change.

Introduction

The number of diseases caused by fungi is gradually increasing. The most common species is Candida albicans, the other group consists of non-albicans Candida species as per its frequency [1].

C. albicans is part of the normal human microflora, but under certain circumstances, it may cause superficial or invasive fungal diseases. It may produce a biofilm on a biotic or abiotic surface and its adhesion is supported by adhesins [2]. Its hyphae may produce certain hydrolases, which promote their entry to the host cell. They are also capable of easily adapting to various pH levels and other stress factors within the human body [3].

Candida glabrata is the second most common species, it has been isolated from human faeces in 1917 [4]. Its growth temperature optimum is 37 °C, which is the core temperature of the healthy human body. Its tolerance towards different stress factors is very high and tolerates the absence of nutrients well. It is also resistant against the attacks of the immune system. It has shown high resistance against azole-type antifungal medications. A protein called adhesin ensures its adhesion to the cell membrane. It easily produces biofilm on medical devices, such as catheters [5].

Candida lusitaniae occurs more rarely than the rest of the Candida species. The first reports of this species were presented in 1979. Its teleomorph form is called Clavispora lusitaniae. It is resistant to Amphotericin B and produces haemolysin [6]. The sensitivity towards Amphotericin B can be increased if combined with fluconazole and 5-fluorocytosine [7]. One of the reasons behind the resistance is the change in the biosynthesis of ergosterol. Due to that, the ergosterol content of the cell membrane decreases [8].

Candida kefyr has been isolated from kefir in 1909, its former name is Candida pseudotropicalis. Its teleomorph form is the yeast of kefir, the Kluyveromyces marxianus [9]. Rarely, it may cause invasive infections, especially simultaneously with malignant diseases of the haematopoietic system [10]. It produces protease, haemolysin, and phospholipase [6].

The prevalence of Candida krusei is increasing similar to C. glabrata. It is fluconazole resistant due to the altered functioning of the P450 isoenzyme [11]. It also shows decreased resistance to Amphotericin B and flucytosine. It is likely to produce biofilm [12] and to produce phospholipase [6].

Candida tropicalis was first reported as Oidium tropicale in 1910. It is a frequently isolated Candida species especially in cancer patients. It has a strong adhesive feature and easily produces biofilm [6]. Its prevalence is greatly increased due to the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics or long-lasting catheters. The matrix of the biofilm differs from the ones produced by other species due to its hexosamine content. It is resistant to Amphotericin B and fluconazole. Its hypha-producing ability and enzyme production (phospholipase, protease, and haemolysin) only increase its virulence [6].

The number of C. krusei, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis infections also increases gradually.

Objectives and Methodology

The objective of our work is to test the antimicrobial effects of the protein produced by the Gram-negative insect pathogen bacteria Xenorhabdus budapestensis on six Candida species (C. albicans, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, C. lusitaniae, C. kefyr, and C. glabrata). The isolated specimens are from clinical samples.

Our experiment has been motivated by two factors. One of them is the results originating from the previous testing of the cell-free culture media (CFCM) and its cleared biopreparation [purified fraction (PF)] of X. budapestensis on Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria originating from veterinary and human infections [1316].

The other factor is the experiments conducted with Xenorhabdus cabanillasii bacteria. This bacterium was able to inhibit the growth of various filamentous fungus species, including Fusarium oxysporum and Candida as well [17]. It has to be noted that our team has also conducted experiments with filamentous fungi (Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergullus flavus, and Fuzarium spp.). However, with the clinical samples, we have not been able to achieve any antifungal effects that could be considered as lasting. These experiments prove that there are major differences between the antimicrobial proteins of the various Xenorhabdus species.

The antimicrobial agent of X. budapestensis is a hexapeptide protein, which was named as bicornutin-A back in 2009 [18]. Researchers in Frankfurt also noted the antimicrobial effects of X. budapestensis. MALDI spectrometry has proven that this hybrid molecule protein is rich in arginine and contains putrescine and phenylethylamin, and was named as fabclavin. Moreover, a 6,848-bp section of the bicA gene has been discovered, which is responsible for the production of bicornutin-A. The gene cluster has been recognised in E.coli DH10B bacteria with the heterologous expression of the bicA gene [19].

Our work was carried out in the microbiology laboratory of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Semmelweis University cooperating with the Research Institute of Bioengineering, Membrane Technology and Energetics of the University of Pannonia. We have received the tested Candida species from the clinical microbiology laboratory of Semmelweis University.

The process of producing CFCM

The CFCM and the cleaned biopreparation were made from the Xenorhabdus antimicrobial peptide (XAMP)-producing primer variant of the DSM-16342T entomopathogenic bacteria strain of X. budapestensis, which was able to produce the substance with the highest antimicrobial effect in previous studies [20].

The bacterium, which produces the antimicrobial substance, was grown in lysogeny broth at 25 °C temperature, shaken at 200 rpm and at increasing levels in three steps. After reaching the stationary phase, we have centrifuged the cell culture (15,000 × g, 20 °C, 20 min) and filtered it with a 0.22-μm pore-diameter (Merck Millipore, Merck Kft., An affliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) filter. The CFCM was produced from this. A further 3 L of conditioned CFCM were cleaned, from which the fraction rich in cleaned peptides (PF) was prepared.

The prepared solutions were shaken for 48 hr on 150 rpm with 20 g/L Amberlite® XAD 1180R cation ion-exchange resin – previously activated in distilled water (121 °C, 30 min) with an autoclave – in order to better adsorb the bioactive substances. Then, the washing of the resin and extraction was carried out in multiple steps with applying methanol solutions of different concentrations in the following order: 1 L sterile distilled water, 500 ml of 25% MeOH, 3 × 300 ml of 50% MeOH, 3 × 300 ml of 80% MeOH, and finally 300 ml cc MeOH, which has been acidised with 3 ml 2 N HCl. The concentrated, acidic methanol fraction, which contains the components with antimicrobial effect, has been vaporised to an approximate volume of 50 ml with the help of rotational vacuum distillation on 35 °C, then it was neutralised to pH 6 with a 2N NH4OH solution. Then, the neutralised sample has been completely dried out. That is how the process ended with a substance with 47.7 mg/ml dry material content, which was stored in 10 ml distilled water in a sterile tube in a refrigerator until its application.

Testing of the bioprepatation was conducted on six clinical samples of Candida species (C. albicans, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, C. lusitaniae, C.kefyr, and C. glabrata). We have transferred one unit from each pure culture of the yeast per species with a sterile inoculation loop to 10 ml Sabouraud-dextrose culture medium, which has been cultured in a thermostat at 28 °C under aerobic conditions after vortexing. The yeast cultures picked for testing were set to 0.5 McFarland standard on the following day.

We have transferred 300 μl of each of these cultures and mixed them with 2.7 ml of soft agar, which has been previously heated up to 54 °C, then poured them to the agar plates with a quick movement. After a 20-min wait, the soft agar settled and holes were made with a 9-mm pin drill, which were capable of holding substances up to 100 μl [21]. Each plate contained five holes (Figure 1).


            Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Agar diffusion technique on Sabouraud agar

Citation: Developments in Health Sciences DHS 1, 3; 10.1556/2066.2.2018.17

The stock solution was available in 10 ml volumes (0.47 mg dissolved in 10 ml distilled water), which was our 100% solution. The distilled water made 80%, 60%, 40%, and 20% dilutions. The dilutions have been performed according to the macro dilution methods published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute [22]. The diluted solutions had the following dry material contents: 100% (0.47), 80% (0.38), 60% (0.28), 40% (0.19), and 20% (0.095) μg/ml. Three parallel series were made.

The sensitivity of tested Candida species to certain antifungal medications has been determined by paper disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar fungi (MHF) (Figure 2; Table 1). Based on the area of zones of inhibition, we may differentiate susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) species. A certain yeast species can be considered susceptible, if the inhibition zone is ≥20 mm (or ≥10 mm in case of griseofulvin); intermediate, if the inhibition zone is between 12 and 19 mm; and resistant, if the inhibition zone is ≤11 mm in vitro [23].


            Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Determining the antifungal sensitivity of C. krusei with paper disk method

Citation: Developments in Health Sciences DHS 1, 3; 10.1556/2066.2.2018.17

Table 1.

The sensitivity of Candida species for antifungal medications with paper disk method

Tested active agents C. albicans C. glabrata C. lusitaniae C. kefyr C. tropicalis C. krusei
Origin of yeast from human culture Haemo-culture Cannula Sputum Sputum Wound exudate Trachea
ECO (10 μg) S S S S I I
ITC (50 μg) R R R I R R
FC (1 μg) R I R I R R
FLU (100 μg) R R S I R I
KTC (10 μg) I R R I S S
GRS (10 μg) R R R R R R
AMB (20 ut) R I R S R R
CLT (50 μg) S S S S I S
ECO (50 μg) S S S S S I
MCZ (10 μg) R R R R R R

Note. Abbreviation of antifungal disks according to the manufacturers. AMB: amphotericin B (20 ut); CLT: clotrimazole (50 μg); FLU: fluconazole(100 μg); ECO 10: econazole (10 μg); ECO 50: econazole (50 μg); ITC: itraconazol (50 μg); FC: flucytosine (1 μg); KTC: ketoconazole (10 μg); GRS: griseofulvin (10 μg), MCZ: miconazole (10 μg); S: susceptible; I: intermediate; R: resistant.

Data analysis was carried out with IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 software [IBM Corp. Released 2011, Armonk, NY; descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)].

Results

The first evaluation of the plates was performed after 24 hr and the zones of inhibition were also measured (Figure 3). The plates were put in a thermostat for further incubation and the measurements were carried out again after 48 and 96 hr (Figures 4 and 5).


          Figure 3.
Figure 3.

The average results of the antifungal effects of X. budapestensis at 24 hr

Citation: Developments in Health Sciences DHS 1, 3; 10.1556/2066.2.2018.17


          Figure 4.
Figure 4.

The average results of the antifungal effects of X. budapestensis at 48 hr

Citation: Developments in Health Sciences DHS 1, 3; 10.1556/2066.2.2018.17


          Figure 5.
Figure 5.

The average results of the antifungal effects of X. budapestensis at 96 hr

Citation: Developments in Health Sciences DHS 1, 3; 10.1556/2066.2.2018.17

The vertical axis displays the area of the zones of inhibition in millimeters, whereas the horizontal axis displays the tested Candida species. The columns with different colors represent different dilutions. Certain fungi species displayed a minor increase in the average area of the zones of inhibition compared to the 24-hr values. However, the diameter of the zones remained the same at later tests.

The 96-hr average values of the three parallel zones of inhibition can be seen in Figure 5. A minor increase in the diameter can be observed with certain dilutions, but a decrease could never be observed, not even after 96 hr.

Discussion

We tested the efficiency of the antimicrobial proteins synthesised by X. budapestensis on six different Candida species isolated from clinical samples with agar diffusion method. We have worked with five different dilutions of the cleaned, protein-rich biopreparation. Based on the results of the zones of inhibition after a 24-hr incubation period, it can be observed that the tested protein had an immediate antifungal effect on the Candida species. Every tested Candida species showed sensitivity to the 100% dilution, as the zones of inhibition have exceeded 20 mm in most of the cases. C. lusitaniae appeared to be the most sensitive, whereas C. krusei the least sensitive. The sensitivity has been confirmed with 80% dilutions as well, the zones of inhibition were all larger than 20 mm with every fungus. In case of 60% and 40% dilutions, the Candida species still showed sensitivity though with less intensity.

Based on our previous research, the 20% dilution was enough to produce the desired effect [15]. In a similar study mentioned at the methodology part, the protein produced by X. cabanillasi called “cabanillasin” had a greater inhibitor effect on C. krusei and C. lusitaniae than on C. albicans and C. glabrata after the 24-hr measurement.

However, the activity of cabanillasin on the tested fungi has decreased after 48 hr in these experiments [17].

Every single tested species showed sensitivity in our case. After 48 hr, some of the Candida species showed an increase in the diameter of the zones of inhibition with certain dilutions, but none of the species showed a significant decrease. Similar to the 24-hr results, we have measured zones of inhibition greater than 20 mm in case of 100%, 80%, 60%, and 40% dilutions.

The last measurement of the zones of inhibition was carried out after 96 hr. It is observable from the results that there was no decrease in the diameter of the zones of inhibition with any of the Candida species. Therefore, it can be assumed that “fungicide” effect was reached in our experiment. The dry material content was 0.19 μg/ml, thus this value can be called the Minimal Fungicidal Concentration (MFC), which was created by the 40% dilution.

Dry material content was different for each dilution as they had different protein amounts. Solutions with higher concentration had more useful proteins with antimicrobial effect.

There was no relation between the antifungal and XAMP sensitivity of the Candida species. Despite a considerably high resistance against other antifungal compounds, C. lusitaniae showed the highest sensitivity to the proteins in the biopreparation.

It was important to clarify in this study whether different concentrations and protein content have any effect on the intensity and to what degree if there is any. To prove the hypothesis, we used single-factor ANOVA on 5% significance level.

The result of the test is p < .001; therefore, the null hypothesis, which claims that the generated effect depends on the dilution, can be confirmed. This proves that our hypothesis has been confirmed, meaning that significantly greater zones of inhibition have been measured at higher concentration levels and that there is correlation between the antimicrobial effect and the dilution of the biopreparation.

Conclusions

Every tested Candida species has shown sensitivity to the proteins synthesised by X. budapestensis up to 40% dilution. The area of the zones of inhibition did not decrease as time passed during our agar diffusion experiment. We assume that the proteins in the biopreparation have a “fungicide” effect. The greatest sensitivity was shown by C. Lusitaniae, whereas C. krusei was the least sensitive. Our results confirmed the previous experiments in which C. albicans showed sensitivity to the antimicrobial protein of X. cabanillasi [17].

The frequent and unprofessional usage of antifungal medications significantly decreases the sensitivity of fungi towards these products. Reasons behind the resistance mechanism may include: decreased amount of active agents get into the cell, increased amount of active agents are excreted through the efflux pumps, or the target molecule is modified [24]. There is an increasing need to develop new antifungal medications with new mechanisms and with different active agents.

During our previous studies, we have also confirmed the bactericide effect of the biopreparation of X. budapestensis on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive, but every tested bacterium showed sensitivity to even the 20% dilution [15].

Abbreviations

bicA

: bicornutin-A gene

CFCM

: cell-free culture media

HCL

: hydrogen chloride

MALDI

: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation

MeOH

: methyl alcohol

MFC

: minimal fungicidal concentration

MHF

: Mueller–Hinton agar fungi

NH4OH

: ammonium hydroxid

PF

: purified fraction

pH

: pondus hidrogenii

SD

: Sabouraud dextrose agar

XAMP

: Xenorhabdus antimicrobial peptide

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank associate professor Dr. Katalin Kristóf who provided the identified Candida species to us.

Conflict of Interest/Funding

The authors declare no conflict of interest and no financial support was received for this study.

References

  • 1.

    Chen LY , Kuo SC , Wu HS , et al. Associated clinical characteristics of patients with candidemia among different Candida species. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013;46(6):4638.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Pál T . A Medical Microbiology Textbook. Budapest: Medicina Publishing; 2012.

  • 3.

    Mayer FL , Wilson D , Hube B . Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanism. Virulence 2013;4(2):11928.

  • 4.

    Bolotin-Fukuhara M , Fairhead C . Candida glabrata the other yeast pathogen [Editorial]. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16(2).

  • 5.

    Gabaldón T , Carraté L . The birth of a deadly yeast: tracing the evolutionary emergence of virulence traitsin Candida glabrata. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16(2).

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Negri M , Silva S , Henriques M , Oliveira R . Insights into Candida tropicalis nosocomial infections and virulence factors. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(7):1399412.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Zhang H , Ran Y , Liu Y , Xiang Y , Zhang R , Dai Y . Clavispora lusitaniae and Chaetomium atrobrunneum as rare agents of cutaneous infection. Mycopathologia 2009;169(5):37380.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Peyron F , Favel A , Calaf R , Michel-Nquyen A , Bonaly R , Coulon J . Sterol and fatty acid composition of Candida lusitaniae clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(2):5313.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Dufresne SF , Marr KA , Sydnor E , et al. Epidemiology of Candida kefyr in patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(6):18307.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Staab JF , Neofytos D , Rhee P , et al. Target enzyme mutations confer differential echinocandin susceptibilities in Candida kefyr. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(9):54217.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Kaufmann CA , Marr KA , Thorner AR . Treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 12]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-candidemia-and-invasive-candidiasis-in-adults

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Amaral-Lopes S , Moura A . Neonatal fungal sepsis by Candida krusei: a report of three cases and a literature review. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2012;1(1):246.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Böszörményi E . Entomopathogen bacterium antibiotic activity and symbiotic capacity of gnotobiological analyses [Dissertation]. Budapest: Eötvös University; 2010. 115 p.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Böszörményi E , Vozik D , Mária H , et al. Entomopatogén nematoda-szimbionta baktériumok antimikrobiális peptidjeinek hatása antibiotikummal szemben polirezisztens és multirezisztens patogén baktériumokra [Entomopatogenic nematode-symbiotic bacteria antimicrobial peptides effect poly and multidrug resistant patogens bacteria]. Georgicon Agric. 2013;16(1):8590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Böszörményi E , Barcs I , Domján Gy , et al. Xenorhabdus budapestensis entomopathogenic bacteriacell free conditioned medium and purified peptide fraction effect on some zoonotic bacteria. Orv Hetil. 2015;156(44):17826.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Furgani G , Böszörményi E , Fodor A , et al. Xenorhabdus antibiotics: a comparative analysis and potential utility for controlling mastitis caused by bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;104(3):74558.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Houard J , Aumelas A , Noël T , et al. Cabanillasin, a new antifungal metabolite, produced by entomopathogenic Xenorhabdus cabanillasi JM26. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2013;66(10):61720.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Böszörményi E , Ersek T , Fodor A , et al.. Isolation and activity of Xenorhabdus antimicrobial compounds against the plant pathogens Erwinia amylovora and Phytophthora nicotianae. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;107(3):74659.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Fuchs SW , Grundmann F , Kurz M , Kaiser M , Bode HB . Fabclavines: bioactive peptide-polyketide-polyamino hybrids from Xenorhabdus. Chembiochem. 2014;15(4):5126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Lengyel K , Lang E , Fodor A , Szállás E , Schumann P , Stackebrandt E . Description of four novel species of Xenorhabdus, family Enterobacteriaceae: Xenorhabdus budapestensis sp. nov., Xenorhabdus ehlersii sp. nov., Xenorhabdus innexi sp. nov., and Xenorhabdus szentirmaii sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2005;28(2):11522.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Bonev B , Hooper J , Parisot J . Principles of assessing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics using the agar diffusion method. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(6):1295301.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard. 9th ed. CLSI document M07-A9. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Rosco Diagnostica. Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts 2011 [Internet]. Taastrup, Denmark: Rosco Diagnostica; 2011 [cited 2018 Mar 12]. Available from: http://www.rosco.dk/gfx/pdf/yeasts.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Maubon D , Garnaud C , Calandra T , Sanglard D , Cornet M . Resistance of Candida spp. to antifungal drugs in the ICU: where are we now? Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(9):124155.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1.

    Chen LY , Kuo SC , Wu HS , et al. Associated clinical characteristics of patients with candidemia among different Candida species. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013;46(6):4638.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Pál T . A Medical Microbiology Textbook. Budapest: Medicina Publishing; 2012.

  • 3.

    Mayer FL , Wilson D , Hube B . Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanism. Virulence 2013;4(2):11928.

  • 4.

    Bolotin-Fukuhara M , Fairhead C . Candida glabrata the other yeast pathogen [Editorial]. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16(2).

  • 5.

    Gabaldón T , Carraté L . The birth of a deadly yeast: tracing the evolutionary emergence of virulence traitsin Candida glabrata. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16(2).

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Negri M , Silva S , Henriques M , Oliveira R . Insights into Candida tropicalis nosocomial infections and virulence factors. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(7):1399412.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Zhang H , Ran Y , Liu Y , Xiang Y , Zhang R , Dai Y . Clavispora lusitaniae and Chaetomium atrobrunneum as rare agents of cutaneous infection. Mycopathologia 2009;169(5):37380.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Peyron F , Favel A , Calaf R , Michel-Nquyen A , Bonaly R , Coulon J . Sterol and fatty acid composition of Candida lusitaniae clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(2):5313.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Dufresne SF , Marr KA , Sydnor E , et al. Epidemiology of Candida kefyr in patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(6):18307.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Staab JF , Neofytos D , Rhee P , et al. Target enzyme mutations confer differential echinocandin susceptibilities in Candida kefyr. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(9):54217.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Kaufmann CA , Marr KA , Thorner AR . Treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 12]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-candidemia-and-invasive-candidiasis-in-adults

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Amaral-Lopes S , Moura A . Neonatal fungal sepsis by Candida krusei: a report of three cases and a literature review. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2012;1(1):246.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Böszörményi E . Entomopathogen bacterium antibiotic activity and symbiotic capacity of gnotobiological analyses [Dissertation]. Budapest: Eötvös University; 2010. 115 p.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Böszörményi E , Vozik D , Mária H , et al. Entomopatogén nematoda-szimbionta baktériumok antimikrobiális peptidjeinek hatása antibiotikummal szemben polirezisztens és multirezisztens patogén baktériumokra [Entomopatogenic nematode-symbiotic bacteria antimicrobial peptides effect poly and multidrug resistant patogens bacteria]. Georgicon Agric. 2013;16(1):8590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Böszörményi E , Barcs I , Domján Gy , et al. Xenorhabdus budapestensis entomopathogenic bacteriacell free conditioned medium and purified peptide fraction effect on some zoonotic bacteria. Orv Hetil. 2015;156(44):17826.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Furgani G , Böszörményi E , Fodor A , et al. Xenorhabdus antibiotics: a comparative analysis and potential utility for controlling mastitis caused by bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;104(3):74558.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Houard J , Aumelas A , Noël T , et al. Cabanillasin, a new antifungal metabolite, produced by entomopathogenic Xenorhabdus cabanillasi JM26. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2013;66(10):61720.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Böszörményi E , Ersek T , Fodor A , et al.. Isolation and activity of Xenorhabdus antimicrobial compounds against the plant pathogens Erwinia amylovora and Phytophthora nicotianae. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;107(3):74659.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Fuchs SW , Grundmann F , Kurz M , Kaiser M , Bode HB . Fabclavines: bioactive peptide-polyketide-polyamino hybrids from Xenorhabdus. Chembiochem. 2014;15(4):5126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Lengyel K , Lang E , Fodor A , Szállás E , Schumann P , Stackebrandt E . Description of four novel species of Xenorhabdus, family Enterobacteriaceae: Xenorhabdus budapestensis sp. nov., Xenorhabdus ehlersii sp. nov., Xenorhabdus innexi sp. nov., and Xenorhabdus szentirmaii sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2005;28(2):11522.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Bonev B , Hooper J , Parisot J . Principles of assessing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics using the agar diffusion method. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(6):1295301.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard. 9th ed. CLSI document M07-A9. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Rosco Diagnostica. Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts 2011 [Internet]. Taastrup, Denmark: Rosco Diagnostica; 2011 [cited 2018 Mar 12]. Available from: http://www.rosco.dk/gfx/pdf/yeasts.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Maubon D , Garnaud C , Calandra T , Sanglard D , Cornet M . Resistance of Candida spp. to antifungal drugs in the ICU: where are we now? Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(9):124155.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior Editors

Editor-in-Chief: Zoltán Zsolt NAGY
Vice Editors-in-Chief: Gabriella Bednárikné DÖRNYEI, Ákos KOLLER
Managing Editor: Johanna TAKÁCS
Associate Managing Editor: Katalin LENTI FÖLDVÁRI-NAGY LÁSZLÓNÉ

 

Editorial Board

  • Zoltán BALOGH (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Klára GADÓ (Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • István VINGENDER (Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Attila DOROS (Department of Imaging and Medical Instrumentation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Judit Helga FEITH (Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Mónika HORVÁTH (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Illés KOVÁCS (Department of Clinical Ophthalmology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Ildikó NAGYNÉ BAJI (Department of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Tamás PÁNDICS (Department for Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • József RÁCZ (Department of Addictology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Lajos A. RÉTHY (Department of Family Care Methodology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • János RIGÓ (Department of Clinical Studies in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Andrea SZÉKELY (Department of Oxyology and Emergency Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Márta VERESNÉ BÁLINT (Department of Dietetics and Nutritional Sicences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Gyula DOMJÁN (Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Péter KRAJCSI (Department of Morphology and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • György LÉVAY (Department of Morphology and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Csaba NYAKAS (Department of Morphology and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Vera POLGÁR (Department of Morphology and Physiology, InFaculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • László SZABÓ (Department of Family Care Methodology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Katalin TÁTRAI-NÉMETH (Department of Dietetics and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Katalin KOVÁCS ZÖLDI (Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Gizella ÁNCSÁN (Library, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • András FALUS (Department of Genetics, Cell- and Immunbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Zoltán UNGVÁRI (Department of Public Health, Faculty of medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Romána ZELKÓ (Faculty of Pharmacy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Mária BARNAI (Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Studies, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary)
  • László Péter KANIZSAI (Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary)
  • Bettina FŰZNÉ PIKÓ (Department of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary)
  • Imre SEMSEI (Faculty of Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary)
  • Teija-Kaisa AHOLAAKKO (Laurea Universities of Applied Sciences, Vantaa, Finland)
  • Ornella CORAZZA (University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom)
  • Oliver FINDL (Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria)
  • Tamás HACKI (University Hospital Regensburg, Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Regensburg, Germany)
  • Xu JIANGUANG (Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China)
  • Paul GM LUITEN (Department of Molecular Neurobiology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands)
  • Marie O'TOOLE (Rutgers School of Nursing, Camden, United States)
  • Evridiki PAPASTAVROU (School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos, Cyprus)
  • Pedro PARREIRA (The Nursing School of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal)
  • Jennifer LEWIS SMITH (Collage of Health and Social Care, University of Derby, Cohehre President, United Kingdom)
  • Yao SUYUAN (Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Heilongjiang, China)
  • Valérie TÓTHOVÁ (Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)
  • Tibor VALYI-NAGY (Department of Pathology, University of Illonois of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States)
  • Chen ZHEN (Central European TCM Association, European Chamber of Commerce for Traditional Chinese Medicine)
  • László FÖLDVÁRI-NAGY (Department of Morphology and Physiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Developments in Health Sciences
Publication Model Online only Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge none
Subscription Information Gold Open Access

Developments in Health Sciences
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2018
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
2
Founder Semmelweis Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-1085 Budapest, Hungary Üllői út 26.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2630-9378 (Print)
ISSN 2630-936X (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Jun 2024 0 37 9
Jul 2024 0 48 4
Aug 2024 0 48 8
Sep 2024 0 34 5
Oct 2024 0 166 5
Nov 2024 0 93 2
Dec 2024 0 6 0