View More View Less
  • 1 King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 2 King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Open access

Objectives

The study’s aim was to assess the medical students’ knowledge and understanding of concepts related to basic nanotechnology and its applications in nanomedicine among medical students at King Saud University.

Methods

An observational cross-sectional study was carried out by using an online questionnaire that was sent to all the medical students studying at King Saud University during the summer of 2016 July–August. The sample size of the study was 162 medical students. The questionnaire consisted of 11 items, including both fixed and free answer-type questions. The questionnaire was sent to 1413 medical students, with a response percentage of 8.72%.

Results

Students’ perception of the basic nanotechnology was assessed, 63.0% (n = 102) of the students identified the correct definition of nanoparticle size. Unfortunately, only 40.7% (n = 66) of the students heard about nanomedicine. Most of the information sources where from university 25.3%, 24.1% from internet, and 11% from television. 81.8% of our medical students, had little knowledge about the risk-benefits of nanomedicine. Interestingly, about 72.8% (n = 118) of the students think that nanotechnology is not effectively used in the medical field.

Conclusion

Medical students at king Saud university, showed that they have inadequate knowledge about nanotechnology and its applications in nanomedicine. Nanomedicine education should be implemented in the curriculum of the medical colleges in Saudi Arabia, to improve the awareness and future involvement in nanomedicine.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1]

    Capon A , Gillespie J, Rolfe M, Smith W. (2015) Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes. BMC Public Health 15(1) 113. [Serial on the Internet]. (2015, May), [cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Academic Search Complete.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    ESF, E. S. F. Nanomedicine: An ESF-European Medical Research Councils (EMRC) Forward Look Report. Strasbourg cedex, France, (2004)

  • [3]

    Brenner S. (2013) The Clinical Nanomedicine Handbook Boca Raton: CRC Press; [Monograph on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]. Available from: Discovery eBooks.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]

    Marikar F , Ilangakoon P, Jaliya S, Jayasena L, Kalavitigoda S, Kulathunga S, et al. (2014) Sri Lankan Medical Undergraduates Awareness of Nanotechnology and Its Risks. Education Research International [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Publisher Provided Full Text Searching File.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    Nerlich B , Clarke D, Ulph F. (2007) Risks and benefits of nanotechnology: How young adults perceive possible advances in nanomedicine compared with conventional treatments. Health, Risk & Society 9(2) 159171. [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Environment Complete.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [6]

    Michael D. C , Jane M. (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6(4): 395. [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Publisher Provided Full Text Searching File.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    Silva Costa H. , Sethe S, Pego A., Olsson I. (2011) Scientists’a[euro][TM] perception of ethical issues in nanomedicine: a case study. Nanomedicine (4): 681. [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Academic OneFile.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    Patra D. , Haribabu E., McComas K. (2010) Perceptions of nanoethics among practitioners in a developing country: A case of India. Nanoethics (1) 67. [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]. Available from: Academic OneFile.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [9]

    Bottini M. , Rosato N., Gloria F., Adanti S., Corradino N., Magrini A., et al. (2011) Public optimism towards nanomedicine. International Journal of Nanomedicine (default) 3473. [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Directory of Open Access Journals.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [10]

    George S , Kaptan G, Lee J, Frewer L. (2014) Awareness on adverse effects of nanotechnology increases negative perception among public: survey study from Singapore. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 16(12) 111. [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Academic Search Complete.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [11]

    Farshchi P. , Sadrnezhaad S., Nejad N., Mahmoodi M., Ibrahimi Ghavam Abadi L.. (2011) Nanotechnology in the public eye: the case of Iran, as a developing country. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13(8) 35113519. [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Academic Search Complete.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [12]

    Sahin N. , Ekli E. (2013) Nanotechnology awareness, opinions and risk perceptions among middle school students. International Journal of Technology & Design Education 23(4): 867881. [Serial on the Internet, cited December 26, 2015]; Available from: Education Research Complete.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation