Decentralized wastewater systems treat, dispose and reuse the wastewater in the vicinity of source, reducing the sewage transportation cost to minimal. As an alternative to centralized systems it can function as a satellite system or an individual wastewater treatment unit. Design an onsite facility applies the same sizing procedure compared the conventional large scale systems, whereas the input flow data and its variability, the model parameters could differ. In this study a small size treatment unit was designed by biokinetic modeling, where the model parameters were estimated using analytical methods. As a result of the calculation the biomass build-up and the quality of the treated effluent was predicted and the operation parameters were determined in summer and winter operation.
Ebtehaj I. , Bonakdari, H., Sharifi A. Design criteria for sediment transport in sewers based on self-cleansing concept, Journal of Zhejiang University, Science A, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2014, pp. 914–924.
Libralato G. , Ghirardini, A. V., Avezzù F. To centralise or to decentralise: An overview of the most recent trends in wastewater treatment management, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2012, pp. 61–68.
Gutterer B. , Sasse, L., Panzerbieter, T., Reckerzügel T. Decentralized wastewater treatment systems (DEWATS) and sanitation in developing countries, Water, Engineering and Development Centre, Loughborough University of Technology, UK, 2009.
Moelants N. , Janssen, G., Smets, I., Van Impe J. Field performance assessment of onsite individual wastewater treatment systems, Water Science and Technology, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1–6.
Singh S. , Haberl, R., Moog, O., Shrestha, R. R., Shrestha, P., Shrestha R. Performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor and hybrid constructed wetland treating high-strength wastewater in Nepal - A model for DEWATS, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2009, pp. 654–660.
Reynaud N. , Buckley C. Field-data on parameters relevant for design, operation and monitoring of communal decentralized wastewater treatment systems (DEWATS), Water Practice and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2015, pp. 787–798.
Sándor, D. B. Szabó A. , Fleit E., Bakacsi Z., Zajzon G. PVA-PAA hydrogel micro-carrier for the improvement of phase separation efficiency of biomass in wastewater treatment, Pollack Periodica, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2017, pp. 91–102.
Karches T. Effect of aeration on residence time in biological wastewater treatment, Pollack Periodica, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2018, pp. 97–106.
Inc. Metcalf & Eddy , Tchobanoglous G., Stensel H. D., Tsuchihashi R., Burton F. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, McGraw-Hill, 2013.
Smets I. Y. , Haegebaert, J. V., Carrette, R., Van Impe, J. F. Linearization of the activated sludge model ASM1 for fast and reliable predictions, Water Research, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2003, pp. 1831–1851.
Gujer W. , Henze, M., Mino, T., van Loosdrecht M. Activated sludge model No. 3, Water Science and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 1999, pp. 183–193
Meister M. , Winkler, D., Rezavand, M., Rauch W. Integrating hydrodynamics and biokinetics in wastewater treatment modeling by using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 99, 2017, pp. 1–12.
Brun R. , Kühni M., Siegrist H., Gujer W., Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters - Systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets, Water Research, Vol. 36, No. 16, 2002, pp. 4113–4127.
Lopez-Vazquez C. M. ; Oehmen A., Hooijmans C. M., Brdjanovic D., Gijzen H. J., Yuan Z., van Loosdrecht M. C. M. Modeling the PAO-GAO competition: Effects of carbon source, pH and temperature, Water Research, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2009, pp. 450–462.