View More View Less
  • 1 Marcel Breuer Doctoral School of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Boszorkány u. 2, H-7624Pécs, Hungary
  • | 2 Ybl Miklós Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Óbuda University, Thököly út 74, H-1146Budapest, Hungary
  • | 3 Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Boszorkány u. 2, H-7624Pécs, Hungary
Open access

Abstract

The focus of this research is the connection between architecture and water, how this natural element has formed the way of thinking. To give a complex answer, it is required to observe this complex topic from different aspects: time, space (with macro and micro space typology), meaning, technology, art and architectural design method, which all together can create a network of ideas. This outlined network could provide a theoretical basis for a new complex design method – from the building scale to the urban scale – for the upcoming challenges of built environment in connection with water in the future.

Abstract

The focus of this research is the connection between architecture and water, how this natural element has formed the way of thinking. To give a complex answer, it is required to observe this complex topic from different aspects: time, space (with macro and micro space typology), meaning, technology, art and architectural design method, which all together can create a network of ideas. This outlined network could provide a theoretical basis for a new complex design method – from the building scale to the urban scale – for the upcoming challenges of built environment in connection with water in the future.

1 Introduction

The role of water in architecture is particularly significant, complex but above all unavoidable. The main question of this research is how did the presence of water influence the architectural mindset in connection with from small to large scale designs?

The research focuses not only on the physical relationship between water and the built environment, but also examines the impact of water on architecture. By examining and systematizing the relationships, the changes in the architectural mindset and the role of water in architecture can be traced. The main question of this research is how did the presence of water influence the architectural mindset in connection with from small to large scale designs?

Exploration of the different aspects can lead to understanding the potential and dangers of water in architectural terms, which offers additional opportunities under ever-changing circumstances and opening new avenues for design tasks, from architecture of buildings to urbanism.

1.1 Tendencies

It is a general tendency for growing cities to face new problems [1]. One of the complex problems is the provision of space for developments.

Several types of urban planning strategies have been developed and applied for this purpose: vertical expansion (high-rise buildings, vertical cities), horizontal expansion development of new neighborhoods [2] (to the detriment of the natural environment) and existing abandoned industrial areas (rehabilitation of deteriorated urban areas: new neighborhoods, city centers).

One of the big groups of architectural rehabilitation is the revitalization of former commercial or industrial areas, – which can be represented as architecturally valuable – and reintegrated into the life of the city, even as the center of a whole new quarter [3].

In many expanding cities in the horizontal sense, the former industrial zones have now been surrounded by the city, so that revitalized industrial areas form a bustling patch of the urban fabric.

These areas occupy a prominent position from the point of view of the city, because their former technological needs were influenced by the proximity of water. Depending on the technology used in the industrial area, the presence and availability of water was also a priority in the former installation.

1.2 Former waterfront industrial areas

Rehabilitation or rethinking of wasteland sites creates a new architectural quality, facilitating the connection between man, water and the built environment.

One possible way of rehabilitation is to revitalize – to add value to the existing function of the former industrial area, for example: Adventure Therapy Sailing School for Disabled and Non-Disabled Children – in the former industrial area of the Balatonfüred Shipyard, Hungary (Fig. 1) [4].

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Shackle adventure therapy sailing school for disabled and non-disabled children (Source: designed by: G. Heckenast)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 1; 10.1556/606.2020.00131

The Shackle Sailing School is an accessible water sports facility that everyone can enjoy without hindrance, and visit for discovery and love of the sport.

The name of the center is derived from the screw used in shipping equipment, which connects moving ship parts. “Shackle” is used as a visual metaphor to express the relationship between the built and natural environment, water and land, nature and man or man and man.

2 Water in architecture and its peripheries

Water is manifested in many ways in architecture, in a variety of scales and forms – from the small scale to the urban scale. These may be artificial or natural water surfaces, which may also convey architectural intentions.

Not only the built environment is shaped by water, but also construction technology – building materials made with water technology and water itself can serve as building materials (e.g., an igloo or ice hotel) [5].

In the built environment water can perform a variety of functions, whether it is agricultural, commercial, military, medical, engineering, decorative, spiritual, or even an energy source.

In architectural terms, it can appear in many places in a building, either directly or indirectly. Directly, for example, in so-called algae facades, on green walls, and indirectly through various applied arts – like adapted water surfaces or Ned Kahn's kinetic facade cladding [6].

The indirect relationship between architecture and water is well illustrated by fluid architecture, where water is present as a space-shaping design principle, though not physically.

Architecture is organically complemented by water-related garden and landscape design, which facilitates environmental integration, and adds new layers to the architectural work, adding space to the water (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Café Gloriette, Schönbrunn Palace, Vienna, Austria (Source: photo by G. Heckenast)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 1; 10.1556/606.2020.00131

3 The pillars of architecture

By exploring the thought principles, new approaches and systems of consideration are brought to the fore. The fundamental question could be answered by examination of their relationships: How has the presence of water influenced the (architectural) mindset? The question implies the relationship of humans to water, of which only one segment is the architectural aspect.

Different architectural attitudes to water are due, in part, to the diversity of architecture, and partly to other subjective factors.

Architecture – construction is a complex task with many frontiers, which in itself results in a multitude of viewpoints. In a given spatial situation – be it a building, a set of buildings, an urban space – these different responses to the viewpoints form a coherent unique piece of architecture.

Due to the diversity of the topic, a multi-perspective approach is essential with the method of critical thinking. The relationship between water and architecture is worth exploring from historical, spatial, meaningful, technical, and artistic perspectives; providing a basis for exploring architectural design approaches (Table 1).

Table 1.

The pillars of architecture

NoPillarsAspectsMain questionDescription
I.Historical overviewTimeHow did water appear in different periods of architectural history?An overview of the inter-relationships of architectural history from the beginning to the present day
II.Spatial connection systemSpaceHow does water appear in the built environment?Overview of spatial relationships: Water surface volume – Architectural scale. examination of spatial formulas from the urban scale to the living space
III.Relative systemsMeaningHow is one influenced by the presence of water in the built environment? Is water a measure of well-being?The relationship between man, architecture, and water from an environmental psychological, sociological, and cultural anthropological perspective
IV.Architecture-water-technology relationshipContinuity of empiricismHow can water be organized in architecture?History of technological development. Technical solutions and conditions of water usage in architecture.
A range of architectural and technical solutions for revitalizing built heritage.
V.Architecture-water-art relationshipWorld of ideasHow did one of the most influential environmental elements influence culture?Water as a means of expression in architecture and the arts, as well as in periphery
VI.Architectural design method and water connectionWater as an architectural factorWhich phase and how does water appear during architectural design?The tool of talent, need, conceptual element, illusion - architectural trends, architectural theory

By examining the relationship between water and architecture from different aspects, through their context and relationships, the influence and importance of water in architectural thinking can be traced. In this way, this mapping of relationships can serve as a starting point for formulating new contemporary architectural responses to each design task – whether saving the built heritage, reinterpreting it, or creating a new architectural piece in the water environment.

3.1 Historical overview

Water plays a key role in human history. The relationship between the built environment and water has manifested itself in different forms in different periods of architectural history [7]. Settlements, residential bridges, water palaces, canals, and fountains when and how does water appear in the built environment?

Eventually, a set of developmental rules emerged from the totality of rules applied at different ages.

3.2 Spatial connection system

A large part of the earth's surface is covered by water, it is also present in the atmosphere, and even underground there are significant water resources, so inevitably water interacts with the built environment – from the smallest scale to the urban scale [3]. By exploring the relationship between architecture and water in spatial aspect and by defining types, parallels between the morphology of water and the built environment can be discovered (e.g., Venice – Amsterdam, Budapest – Vienna) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Water cities: Amsterdam and Venice (Source: photo by G. Heckenast)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 1; 10.1556/606.2020.00131

As a result, an overview of spatial relationships is outlined: water surface volume versus architectural scale; trough examination of spatial formulas from the urban scale to the living space.

3.3 Relative systems

Examining the relationship between the built environment and water from a human perspective: what environmental psychological, sociological, and cultural anthropological aspects and regularities influence the formation of the built environment in the presence of water [8].

Is water a measure of well-being? How does water influence the quality of architectural space? What aspects can be used to create a healthy-living space.

3.4 Architecture – water – technology relationship

Recognizing the laws that are essential to ensure our existence how has water become manageable in the built environment over time? How did the scientific approach in construction take over from the instinctive construction methods? Why is technology becoming indispensable in architecture, particularly when the presence of water increases?

This peculiar history of technological development [9] reveals the emergence of different techniques, and new ways and directions have become available in architecture – transforming the architectural language as well. For example, the BMW Olympic Pavilion waterfall facade – as a living facade, or indirectly the green wall or algae facades, where water is a prerequisite.

3.5 Architecture – water – art relationship

Water as a means of expression in architecture: Water not only fulfills a need, it can also add meaning or creates a spatial illusion. Buildings and gardens form an integral whole, in which case water can serve as a conceptual bridge to the arts.

In the built environment, the artistic intention expressed in water interacts with several artistic disciplines (e.g., painting, sculpture, photography, film, etc.) [5], which abstract the water, thus adding new value to the architectural space.

3.6 Architectural design methods and water connection

The different answers to the basic water (nature) – architecture – human relationship question resulted in different architectural attitudes and mental tendencies [10, 11].

Different mentalities and trends of the time presented different architectural answers for each design task. By analyzing these rule-based responses, the relationship between architectural theory and water will be become more visible as design patterns.

For example, how did modern architecture relate to natural (Frank Lloyd Wright – Fallingwater House [12]) and artificial (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe – Barcelona pavilion [12]) water surfaces?

Water appears in architecture not only in its physical quality but also as a space-organizing principle (fluid spaces), as an abstract architectural element imitated water (e.g. wavy metal facade-installation by Ned Kahn [6]).

The relationship to water in architecture is a complex issue: how the role of water in architecture is transformed and how architecture has responded through different ages and geographical locations.

In the history of mankind, the presence of water has always played a key role – in addition to the basic subsistence need – in economical, commercial, cultural and military terms. Architecture responded to these needs with a complex set of requirements and criteria.

The relationship between the built environment and water has been manifested in different forms in different eras of architectural history, thus eventually forming a complex system of rules which have been applied in different ages. The following table (Table 2) summarizes the water-related achievements of each architectural era, which were a milestone and thus greatly influenced the further development of the architectural mindset [7, 13].

Table 2.

Architectural eras and water-related architectural inventions

NoArchitectural eraArchitectural stylesArchitectural inventions
I.Prehistoric timesMegalithic architectureReservoirs
Cave architectureRiver control
Ancient/tribal societies
II.Ancient civilizations and antiquityMiddle East, Far EastWater-conduit, sewerage sewer, bridges, water mills, gardens, palaces baths, toilets
New World, Ancient Greek, Roman Empire
III.Medieval architectureByzantine, (Pre-) Romanesque, GothicMilitary: defenses, castles, water mills and bridges (developed) canals of cities, houses on bridge
IV.Renaissance and BaroqueRenaissance, Mannerism Baroque, Rococo, Neoclassical, RevivalismUnderground cisterns, Paris Opera House, urban waste-water system, springhouses, public utility, water castles, gardens
V.19th centuryEclecticism, Orientalism Beaux-Arts, Art Nouveau, Industrial architectureUrban river control – urbanism, steel bridges, industrial water, waterworks, engineering facilities, steam engines, beam engine houses, urban docks, palm houses
VI.Modern architectureExpressionist, Art Deco, International Style, Bauhaus, Postmodern, Deconstructivism3F – form follows function, water differentiation, new technological solutions, flowing spaces
VII.Contemporary architectureThe 21st century International, contemporary trendsNew approach: water as a medium, new technologies, environmental awareness, fluid architecture, floating buildings
VIII.FuturologyUtopias, Research and developmentWater reinterpretation, swimming cities, underwater cities

There are several architectural responses to a water related problem posed which, in addition to meeting basic needs, appear as a subjective factor in architecture. This subjectivity gives character to architecture, making it lovable or not, recognizable or iconic – that can even re-position a city on the mental map of the individual.

The relationship of urban structures with water dates back a long time, to the first settlements. In order to understand the development process, it is possible to explore the structure of a city through its chronological typology of water, in relation to the location of the city. As urban water is easiest to typify, it is possible to trace what new approaches have been made to urban structures in each period of architectural history.

4 Typology

The built environment near water can be grouped according to several criteria: state, behavior and cyclical patterns.

The state of the water can be gaseous (steam, mist, fog), liquid (lake, river, waterfall, rain), solid (ice, iceberg, glacier, hail), and crystalline (snow, avalanche) should determine how the built environment is designed.

The water-related environment can also be grouped according to how they mimic the behavior of water, which takes the form of imprints in the built environment: wavy facades (sea, ocean), flowing spaces (stream, river), crystalline mass formations (ice, icebergs), or transparent structures (rain, waterfall).

Time also could be an additional factor for further examination in the relationship between water and the built environment: the phenomenon of low tide, rising/decreasing – water levels, intermittent droughts, or even floods.

One of the most striking and fundamental issues is regarding its volume, which essentially determines the structural relationship of a city to water. Construction near water at locations like riverside, urban lakes, lakeside, coastlines, ocean-fronts, archipelagos, including residential bridges, and water palaces, all pose different design challenges.

The amount of water is organized in different shapes and ways within a city, basically defining the character of the city, such as: under the city, around the city, through the city, near the city, away from the city – but still visible (e.g., on a mountain nearby). In terms of spatial extent, it can be linear (1D: rivers), surface (2D: lakes) or a medium (3D: underwater).

The groupings can be further subdivided into natural (rivers, lakes, seas, oceans) or artificial origins. Artificial waters include specific architectural and engineering structures: riverbed control, dams, canals, fountains, and water terraces.

Because of the complexity of the surrounding blue system, a number of typologies exist according to certain key characteristics (e.g., water related settlements, water usage [14]; river typology, and flood strategy [10, 15]), which can be integrated into a reorganized comprehensive system thereby it could form a bridge between the natural and the built environment.

Different levels can be distinguished according to the scale of the intervention. From the smallest level to the largest: at detail scale, at building scale, on a building complex scale, at an urban scale.

By regrouping and further narrowing the sets, the appearance of water in the built environment can be divided into two large groups. One large group is represented by the “macro environment” and the other by the “micro environment”, depending on its scale and spatial location.

4.1 Macro environment

The macro group represents a complex built environment on an urban scale, in a large, coherent natural environment. They are mostly a feature of coastline cities that expand horizontally around water. Settling on the water can also provide a solution to the new land needs of these cities, making water even more important, a key factor in developing sustainable cities (e.g., Amsterdam).

Near-water cities can be divided into five subcategories based on their relation to water: water cities, island cities, coastal cities, lakeside cities, and river cities (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Subcategories of “macro environment group” (Source: created by G. Heckenast)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 1; 10.1556/606.2020.00131

Where a city is partially or completely settled on water, they conduct major commercial activities in their area through their ports and canals. These cities are basically made up of a spatial network of islands, complete with built elements, mostly for shipping. Not only is the form of transport special in these cities, but because of the water implications, they have houses with special construction technology, adapting to the environmental conditions. For example: Venice, Amsterdam, Hamburg, Copenhagen, St. Petersburg, Suzhou, Cape Coral, etc.

Unlike water cities, island towns are partly or entirely based on one or more large islands. These islands are navigable, so they are lined with trade routes from which they carry out traffic and exchange of goods through their coastal ports. Surprisingly, several metropolises are built on islands (e.g., Montreal, New York, Tokyo, Hong Kong, etc.).

For coastal cities, the coastline is the dominant organizing force. They function as commercial centers through their ports, but they also display recreational functions closely linked to the shoreline. The city is surrounded by important trade routes from both the mainland and the water. Cities like Barcelona, Dubai, Lisbon, Los Angeles, Tel Aviv, Rio de Jainero, etc.

Lakeside towns are similar to coastal towns in terms of their location on the water, but there are differences in how they function – depending on the size of the lake. The waterfront, without the strong tide, favors more direct, water-friendly urban design. Examples of lakeside towns: Lausanne, Geneva, Como, Chicago, Toronto, Detroit, etc.

Last but not least, one of the most common urban designs is river towns. Their peculiarity is that the city or part of the city is permeated by the surface of the water, thus creating a very unique and distinctive city structure in each city. Along the river, coupled with commercial and industrial activities, there are decorative focus points, which create a linear routing and facade of the city, such as London, Budapest, Paris, Rome, Ottawa, Seoul, etc.

4.2 Micro environment

The micro group consists of smaller-scale architectural works that respond to the natural environment and live in a kind of symbiosis. The scale of buildings involving water-architectural interventions predicts the method of detailing required. There are three types: building in nature, water in building, and water analogy.

The building can be settled in nature in many forms, depending on the location of the water surface. The building can be adapted to the natural environment in different ways, and as a result, the relationship between the water surface and the urban “cell”/element results in a multiplicity of spatial relationships.

Based on the relationship between the building and the water surface, 11 spatial formulas can be distinguished (Fig. 5), which can be grouped into three groups according to their behavior. Buildings built on top of a mountain, over the sea, on the shore, or on a rock face have a visual connection with water. Buildings close to the water can be located in peninsulas, islands, stretching into the water or even flood plains. Aquatic buildings that have a direct physical connection can be water-based, floating, or submerged.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Spatial formulas of buildings in nature (Source: created by G. Heckenast)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 1; 10.1556/606.2020.00131

Water can appear in the building in many forms and functions. It can serve esthetic or representational purposes that stem from the architectural concept. It has a wide range of functions ranging from micro-climatic control to sporting purposes to acoustic elements. It can be further subdivided in terms of the origin of the water, whether natural (e.g., under the Opera House in Paris) or artificial, including pools, fountains.

Water, both indoors and outdoors, has a great impact on architecture through its physical presence.

The third group, within the micro category, is the analogy of water, which deals with the indirect presence of water. The adoption and adaptation of certain properties of water that are inherent in the nature of water itself can be achieved even when the water, as a physical element, is not present in the built environment. There are several architectural tools that can be used to make a reference to water: whether it is a spatial design, a façade, or a material.

There are an abundance of water analogs that take many forms: wave (Fig. 6), vortex, bubble, levitation, flow, crystal, or even a zoomorphic shape (marine animals).

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Water analogy in architecture (Source: drawn by G. Heckenast)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 1; 10.1556/606.2020.00131

Water analogies like flowing spaces or fluid architecture, do not just physically connect with water, but map the water itself and translate it into language of architectural space.

5 Conclusion

The architectural mindset was greatly influenced by water, not only its physical presence but also intellectually. By exploring the relationship between water and architecture it becomes more understandable the potential and dangers of water in architectural terms. Tracing the metamorphosis of water in architectural thinking can open up new opportunities in contemporary architecture from a technological and philosophical point of view, whether it is the inheritance of our built heritage or the creation of a new architectural work responding to the ever-changing circumstances. The aim of the research is to create a mind map of architectural thinking through the different aspects, which could be a theoretical basis for a detailed design method of the existing or future built environment as an answer to the upcoming challenges in the interest of living harmony with the nature.

References

  • [1]

    I. Kiss and A. Reith, “Architectural and urban design tools for reducing energy consumption in cities,” Pollack Period., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 151161, 2013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    Sz. Portschy, “Community participation in sustainable urban growth, case study of Almere, The Netherlands,” Pollack Period., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 145155, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    Z. Ryan, Building with Water: Concepts Typology Design. Birkhäuser Architecture, 2010.

  • [4]

    Shackle adventure therapy sailing school for disabled and non-disabled children. [Online]. Available: http://epiteszforum.hu/elmenyterapias-vitorlasiskola-heckenast-gabor-diplomaterve. Accessed: Dec. 23, 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    O. Herwig and A. Thallemer, Water: Unity of Art and Science. Arnoldsche Verlagsanstalt, 2008.

  • [6]

    Ned Kahn Studios. [Online]. Available: http://nedkahn.com/. Accessed: Dec. 23, 2019.

  • [7]

    M. Fazio, M. Moffett, and L. Wodehouse, A World History of Architecture. Laurence King Publishing, 2013.

  • [8]

    L. Steg and J. I. M. de Groot, Environmental Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.

  • [9]

    L. Margolis and A. Chaouni, Out of Water: Design Solutions for Arid Regions. Birkhauser, 2015.

  • [10]

    R. Barker and R. Coutts, AquaTecture: Buildings and Cities Designed to Live and Work with Water. RIBA Publishing, 2016.

  • [11]

    A. Lohrer, Basic Designing with Water. Birkhauser, 2008.

  • [12]

    I. Irving, Ed. 1001 Buildings you Must See before you Die. The World’s Architectural Masterpieces, Universe, 2007.

  • [13]

    N. Spiller, Digital Architecture Now. Thames & Hudson, 2009.

  • [14]

    A. Wylson, Aquatecture: Architecture and Water. Architectural Press, 1986.

  • [15]

    M. Prominski, A. Stokman, S. Zeller, D. Stimberg, and H. Voermanek, River, Space, Design. Birkhauser, 2017.

  • [1]

    I. Kiss and A. Reith, “Architectural and urban design tools for reducing energy consumption in cities,” Pollack Period., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 151161, 2013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    Sz. Portschy, “Community participation in sustainable urban growth, case study of Almere, The Netherlands,” Pollack Period., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 145155, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    Z. Ryan, Building with Water: Concepts Typology Design. Birkhäuser Architecture, 2010.

  • [4]

    Shackle adventure therapy sailing school for disabled and non-disabled children. [Online]. Available: http://epiteszforum.hu/elmenyterapias-vitorlasiskola-heckenast-gabor-diplomaterve. Accessed: Dec. 23, 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    O. Herwig and A. Thallemer, Water: Unity of Art and Science. Arnoldsche Verlagsanstalt, 2008.

  • [6]

    Ned Kahn Studios. [Online]. Available: http://nedkahn.com/. Accessed: Dec. 23, 2019.

  • [7]

    M. Fazio, M. Moffett, and L. Wodehouse, A World History of Architecture. Laurence King Publishing, 2013.

  • [8]

    L. Steg and J. I. M. de Groot, Environmental Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.

  • [9]

    L. Margolis and A. Chaouni, Out of Water: Design Solutions for Arid Regions. Birkhauser, 2015.

  • [10]

    R. Barker and R. Coutts, AquaTecture: Buildings and Cities Designed to Live and Work with Water. RIBA Publishing, 2016.

  • [11]

    A. Lohrer, Basic Designing with Water. Birkhauser, 2008.

  • [12]

    I. Irving, Ed. 1001 Buildings you Must See before you Die. The World’s Architectural Masterpieces, Universe, 2007.

  • [13]

    N. Spiller, Digital Architecture Now. Thames & Hudson, 2009.

  • [14]

    A. Wylson, Aquatecture: Architecture and Water. Architectural Press, 1986.

  • [15]

    M. Prominski, A. Stokman, S. Zeller, D. Stimberg, and H. Voermanek, River, Space, Design. Birkhauser, 2017.

Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instructions template is available in MS Word.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iványi, Amália

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iványi, Péter

 

Scientific Secretary

Miklós M. Iványi

Editorial Board

  • Bálint Bachmann (Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Jeno Balogh (Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)
  • Radu Bancila (Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Terrestrial Communications Ways, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, “Politehnica” University Timisoara, Romania)
  • Charalambos C. Baniotopolous (Department of Civil Engineering, Chair of Sustainable Energy Systems, Director of Resilience Centre, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, U.K.)
  • Oszkar Biro (Graz University of Technology, Institute of Fundamentals and Theory in Electrical Engineering, Austria)
  • Ágnes Borsos (Institute of Architecture, Department of Interior, Applied and Creative Design, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Matteo Bruggi (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale, Politecnico di Milano, Italy)
  • Ján Bujňák (Department of Structures and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia)
  • Anikó Borbála Csébfalvi (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Mirjana S. Devetaković (Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Serbia)
  • Szabolcs Fischer (Department of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Architerture, Civil Engineering and Transport Sciences Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
  • Radomir Folic (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad Serbia)
  • Jana Frankovská (Department of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia)
  • János Gyergyák (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Kay Hameyer (Chair in Electromagnetic Energy Conversion, Institute of Electrical Machines, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany)
  • Elena Helerea (Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania)
  • Ákos Hutter (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technolgy, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Károly Jármai (Institute of Energy and Chemical Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Hungary)
  • Teuta Jashari-Kajtazi (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Prishtina, Kosovo)
  • Róbert Kersner (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Rita Kiss  (Biomechanical Cooperation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • István Kistelegdi  (Department of Building Structures and Energy Design, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Stanislav Kmeť (President of University Science Park TECHNICOM, Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia)
  • Imre Kocsis  (Department of Basic Engineering Research, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Hungary)
  • László T. Kóczy (Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, University of Győr, Hungary)
  • Dražan Kozak (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia)
  • György L. Kovács (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Balázs Géza Kövesdi (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Engineering and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Tomáš Krejčí (Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Jaroslav Kruis (Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Miklós Kuczmann (Department of Automations, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
  • Tibor Kukai (Department of Engineering Studies, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Maria Jesus Lamela-Rey (Departamento de Construcción e Ingeniería de Fabricación, University of Oviedo, Spain)
  • János Lógó  (Department of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)
  • Carmen Mihaela Lungoci (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Universitatea Transilvania Brasov, Romania)
  • Frédéric Magoulés (Department of Mathematics and Informatics for Complex Systems, Centrale Supélec, Université Paris Saclay, France)
  • Gabriella Medvegy (Department of Interior, Applied and Creative Design, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Tamás Molnár (Department of Visual Studies, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Ferenc Orbán (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Zoltán Orbán (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Dmitrii Rachinskii (Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas, USA)
  • Chro Radha (Chro Ali Hamaradha) (Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Technical College of Engineering, Department of City Planning, Kurdistan Region, Iraq)
  • Maurizio Repetto (Department of Energy “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, Italy)
  • Zoltán Sári (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Grzegorz Sierpiński (Department of Transport Systems and Traffic Engineering, Faculty of Transport, Silesian University of Technology, Katowice, Poland)
  • Zoltán Siménfalvi (Institute of Energy and Chemical Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Hungary)
  • Andrej Šoltész (Department of Hydrology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia)
  • Zsolt Szabó (Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary)
  • Mykola Sysyn (Chair of Planning and Design of Railway Infrastructure, Institute of Railway Systems and Public Transport, Technical University of Dresden, Germany)
  • András Timár (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Barry H. V. Topping (Heriot-Watt University, UK, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)

POLLACK PERIODICA
Pollack Mihály Faculty of Engineering
Institute: University of Pécs
Address: Boszorkány utca 2. H–7624 Pécs, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36 72) 503 650

E-mail: peter.ivanyi@mik.pte.hu 

or amalia.ivanyi@mik.pte.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • SCOPUS

 

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,257
Scimago
Quartile Score
Civil and Structural Engineering Q3
Computer Science Applications Q3
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q3
Modeling and Simulation Q3
Software Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
340/243=1,4
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Civil and Structural Engineering 219/318 (Q3)
Computer Science Applications 487/693 (Q3)
General Materials Science 316/455 (Q3)
Modeling and Simulation 217/290 (Q4)
Software 307/389 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
1,09
Scopus
Cites
321
Scopus
Documents
67
Days from submission to acceptance 136
Days from acceptance to publication 239
Acceptance
Rate
48%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,262
Scimago
Quartile Score
Civil and Structural Engineering Q3
Computer Science Applications Q3
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q3
Modeling and Simulation Q3
Software Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
269/220=1,2
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Civil and Structural Engineering 206/310 (Q3)
Computer Science Applications 445/636 (Q3)
General Materials Science 295/460 (Q3)
Modeling and Simulation 212/274 (Q4)
Software 304/373 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,933
Scopus
Cites
290
Scopus
Documents
68
Acceptance
Rate
67%

 

Pollack Periodica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2021 Online subsscription: 321  EUR / 402 USD
Print + online subscription: 384 EUR / 480 USD
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 327 EUR / 411 USD 321
Print + online subscription: 393 EUR / 492 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

 

Pollack Periodica
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2006
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 16
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1788-1994 (Print)
ISSN 1788-3911 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
May 2021 0 16 19
Jun 2021 0 44 42
Jul 2021 0 65 66
Aug 2021 0 172 252
Sep 2021 0 231 174
Oct 2021 0 268 246
Nov 2021 0 0 0