Authors:
Hiba Barbara Marcel Breuer Doctoral School, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Boszorkány u. 2, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary

Search for other papers by Hiba Barbara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9904-4841
and
Tamás Molnár Department of Visual Studies, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Boszorkány u. 2, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary

Search for other papers by Tamás Molnár in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

Abstract

The urban story of the Ex European city in Biskra presents an inevitable impact on the perceptive images of the Algerian cities. The examination of the building’s condition in the historical center indicates a deteriorated state in most of the structure caused by various degradations. The field study aims to classify the French quarter’s constructions according to multiple criteria, based on the identifications of related conservation statuses. Thus the census data contributes to the regeneration of the checkerboard condition while proceeding with the resolution of the threatening mutations - amplifying the qualities and potentials for a sustainable renewal of this built heritage.

Abstract

The urban story of the Ex European city in Biskra presents an inevitable impact on the perceptive images of the Algerian cities. The examination of the building’s condition in the historical center indicates a deteriorated state in most of the structure caused by various degradations. The field study aims to classify the French quarter’s constructions according to multiple criteria, based on the identifications of related conservation statuses. Thus the census data contributes to the regeneration of the checkerboard condition while proceeding with the resolution of the threatening mutations - amplifying the qualities and potentials for a sustainable renewal of this built heritage.

1 Introduction

“A city is more than a place in space; it is a drama in time” wrote Patrick Geddes [1]. The scenes, the events and memories framed in a particular place through different periods, hence synchronize to construe the meanings and the values of each line in the city [2]. The urban heritage is the essential dimension to the recognition of the tangible and intangible features of the space; it considers the importance of the surrounding environment based on the perspectives of the built heritage, which determines the sensibility for multiple experiences, and the shaping of people’s identities in their urban landscapes [3, 4]. The hierarchy of the urban images in Algeria today is defined by the evolution of various qualities, including the logical compositions of past influences and cultural diversities. The French city’s inherited remains and the planning of the so-called colonial checkerboard in Biskra introduce a particular thinking. With the design of series of monuments; hotels; and public spaces; and other interesting equipment; the urban center responds perfectly to the needs of the users, providing the unique Saharan experience in the city of Biskra: “The gate of the desert” [5–7].

Nonetheless, an increasing number of French cultural and historical properties are today at risk, against a small interest for action and development plans from the responsible authorities, which creates the first motivation for the subsequent field investigation. The study presents a detailed classification for the current condition in the colonial checkerboard of Biskra. The visit of the site, the reviews on the outdoors and the exterior envelopes with the structural and esthetic circumstances of the constructions formulates the support for the data collection process. The resolution and the enhancement of different types of degradations and problems, is an intermediate link between the amplification of the ephemeral qualities presented in the site and the opportunities for upgrading its situation and elaborating solid planning. Along with these steps the paper is mainly structured to connect three dependent concepts (Fig. 1): recognizing the qualities, the analysis of the problems, and the interpretation of the potentials. Thus the diagnosis of the degradations on the urban and the architectural scales is the vital interest of the research project. The work’s multidisciplinary opens the doors to understanding the French-built heritage and the importance of approaching the issues around its perception and integration.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Conceptual framework: towards the requalification of the Ex European city in Biskra (Source: Author)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 2; 10.1556/606.2020.00232

2 Background of the study area

The oasis of the Ziban presents the first glimpse of the grand Sahara of Algeria. With a unique character and a vernacular outlook, the Saharan Kasbah of the old Biskra reflects the typical local planning of the region’s traditional settlements. With the French arrival, the alignment project in the Northern side of the old oasis proceeded an orthogonal grid planning for a European quarter, introduced with a distinct regularity, and urban variation when sighted with the general local structure of Biskra [6, 7].

The urban development of the colonial Checkerboard enclosed the qualities of the ultimate European plan, with organized repartition of the equipment responding to the needs of the city and its occupants, and reflecting the significance of its built heritage. The city of Biskra today is witnessing an interesting rate when it comes to urban growth. This phenomenon is directly affecting the qualities of the French historical center that is suffering from severe and advanced debilitations affecting the stability and permanence of its built heritage. The Market place remains the living core of the site; the rest of the structure lacks the same vitality and became gradually neglected and enclosed compared to the city’s expansion towards the peripheries in favor of modern settlements [8, 9]. The research project’s objective is to create a detailed classification of the site’s constructions according to multiple criteria. The inventory on the different blocks is the key to generating the recent situation and diagnosing the building’s condition, working towards revitalizing the Checkerboard quarter.

3 Method and field study process

In order to approach the aims of the research, the site has been visited continuously; the initial observations were followed by taking multiple photos, sketches, videos and notes. The comparison and analysis of ancient documents and historical plans were also a fundamental base to conclude the stratification and the site’s modifications as well as the past narratives and descriptions mentioning the colonial Checkerboard and its emergence. As follows, the choice of the study area is based on the outlining of the European quarter’s historical implantations. The center’s evolution suggests that the site responds to the logical order of three successive phases [9]. The first starts from the south of “Saint Germain” fort and the old core of the village “Ras Elma”, respectively; the next two dispositions follow the existing structure’s axes in a coherent urban composition. The study zone delimitation was narrowed to the last two implantations as it represents no visible link with the local urban planning. While the first disposition still shares the connection with the local village, the chosen area seems to reflect the French planning’s the perfect regularity in the old Biskra (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

The Plan of the Checkerboard (Source: Google maps treated by the author)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 2; 10.1556/606.2020.00232

3.1 Definition of the research criterions

The first step in this investigation process starts with the division of the study area into several blocks (Fig. 3). As follows, each block is coded according to its related series of constructions; subsequently the assessment was applied to 273 plots occupying 46 blocks. The assignment of pertinent criteria for each building in different neighborhoods regroups the cases into relevant categories and conditions, setting up the site’s composing units. For facilitating the inquiry process, the collected data was abbreviated into codes defining the criteria of the study (Table 1).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Overview on some constructions in the site (Source: Author)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 2; 10.1556/606.2020.00232

Table 1.

Coding and definition of the research criteria

CriteriaDefinitionCoding
FunctionsPublicNon residentialPU
PrivateResidentialPR
Esthetic styles1830–1910Neo classicalNC
1910–1930Neo moorishNM
1930–1962ModernismM
Post 1962Post-independencePI
ModificationsFrench in original stateFO
Reconstructed with original characterFRO
Reconstructed with modern characterFRN
Completely renewedN
Constructive systemTraditionalLocal earth materialsTRD
MixedTraditional and modernMx
ModernConcrete and steel materialsMn
StoreysGround levelG
Multiple levelsG+ n°
ConditionsGoodNo visible pathologies1
AverageSuperficial pathologies2
BadThreatening pathologies3
Very badAbandoned constructions4
DemolishedTerrains in ruins5

3.1.1 The functions of the buildings

A dense residential fabric takes over most of the site, however important distributions are introduced in several blocks presenting more or less valuable monuments. Newly added activities; mostly commercial are present in the Checkerboard, in forms of different stores in the Neo-classical arcades characterizing the site’s urban façades.

3.1.2 The esthetic styles

The historical emergence of the French styles, introduces a variety of designs when it comes to the ornamentations and the aesthetics of the buildings [6, 7] (Fig. 3). The approach adapts the post-revolution style for most of the constructions known with the Neo-classical and the Neo-Moorish design styles, mostly used in the larger scale constructions that require attractive exteriors and façades, and other details of private residences. Some examples of the Eclecticism style, especially in the former city hall’s features, construct one of the crucial landmarks in the Checkerboard.

3.1.3 The stratification, evolution and modifications

Even though the colonial Checkerboard appears to be in the original form of its first planning, the constructions have known multiple changes and modifications. Three main elements stratify the buildings’ changes: First, the actions of time and climate; figuring in the rapid aging of the constructions. Second, the modern additions and the introduction of new materials to the original units. Third, the neglecting and the abandonment of other groups for various reasons, either related to the regional development plans or the habitant’s personal choices.

3.1.4 The constructive system

The use of the materials available in the site is the main logic of the local auto constructed system, which vastly influenced the French adaptations in the Checkerboard. Earth materials, local clays bricks dried in the sun, and stones of the river, all form the face of the traditional constructive system [5, 8]. A radical change was known after introducing modern materials, including concrete and steel. However, the French’s layout homogeneity does not separate from the recognition of its modifications and the use of these construction systems. The meeting of a moderate logic of local designs and modern regularity is the essential thinking behind the planning of the Checkerboard in the Sahara’s low regions.

3.1.5 The number of storeys

Historically speaking, the Checkerboard creation generates ground floor planning and one level building for the private residences [8]. For public units, certain monumentality is given to the design, among the decorative style’s choice and the overall appearance of the urban façades. Nonetheless, the post-independence buildings present the high residential units that can reach more than four levels, which eventually impacts the harmony of the different blocks and the typology of its constructions.

3.1.6 The condition of the buildings

The analysis approach is based on the previous criterion and represents the most critical phase of this study. The definition of the condition states is followed by the logical sequencing of different types of buildings. The esthetic of the façades and its visual appearance along to the building’s structural functioning are crucial elements to assessing the general harmony with the surrounding environment and the diagnosis of the physical and humid pathologies. Respectively, a scale from 1 to 5 was defined, where 5 represents the worst state of conservation, and the total abandonment of the built space. The logic description of each situation was constituted as follows:

  • 1: Good, 2: Average, 3: Bad, 4: Very bad 5: demolished/in ruins.

Table 2 shows an example of the inventory sheet and the analysis method on one of the blocks (Block N°9) (Fig. 3).

Table 2.

Evaluation sheet and data collection of Block N°9: classification and building conditions

Block n°FunctionEsthetic StyleModificationsConstructive systemStoryCondition
12345
A9PRPINMnG+2
B9PRNCFOTrdG
C9PRNCFOTrdG
D9PRNCFOTrdG
E9PRPI- NCFRMMxG+1
F9PRNCFOTrdG+1
G9PRNCFOTrdG 
H9PRPIFRMMxG
I9PRPIFRMMxG
J9PRPINMnG+1● 
K9PUNMFOTrdG+2
L9PRNCFOTRDG

4 The initial results of the study

The essential findings of the assessment and the diagnosis phase (Fig. 4) were directly conducted by the criteria of the research, revealing the global condition of the French Checkerboard. The modern innovations of the constructions; resume an influential time-lapse for architectural and urban mutations in the site. As stated in the preliminary observations on the 46 blocks; the majority of the built heritage in the center is in an extreme state of disrepair, while there are an important number of valuable monuments; some are standing in a moderate state against a lot more that are in danger; neglected and called for action. Three general categories were classified during the study, regrouping the total of the evaluated constructions:

  1. A.French buildings in the original state;
  2. B.French buildings in a reconstructed state, two subcategories were defined:
    1. B.1.Reconstructed state, where most parts are remaining French (French character);
    2. B.2.Reconstructed state, where most parts are renewed (modern character);
  3. C.Post independent buildings in a new state.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Classification of the buildings in the site: a) Blocks 1 to 23; b) Blocks 24 to 46

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 2; 10.1556/606.2020.00232

4.1 Building classification

The interpretation of the results in the data collection phase indicates the analysis of 273 plots. However, ten terrains are found demolished or in ruins, decreasing the built space’s total to 263 constructions, 147 of which are entirely renewed in the post-colonial periods, with modern architectural style, 49 properties are partially reconstructed, where 34 buildings preserve a French character; 15 are rebuilt with a contemporary styles, but still indicate the effects of the French design. Lastly, 67 constructions stand in the original French state, with minor changes in the authentic architectural and structural systems.

4.2 The state of conservation

According to the assessment scale of the building conditions, 11 of the original French construction are considered in an average state; 45 are classified in bad condition, whereas ten more are in an endangered status; either by the severe collapse of the load-bearing elements or the total abandonment of the units. The results on the reconstructed buildings of a modern character cover 11 properties; moreover 23 reconstructed buildings conserving an authentic style are classified between the average and the bad state, rarely a good condition (Table 3). Contrarily to the post-independent constructions that reflect (54%) of a good condition. Very few public monuments and French buildings are classified in a valuable state.

Table 3.

The state of conservation in the Colonial check board

ConditionGoodAverageBadVery badTotalPercentage
F.O11145106724.54%
F.R.O123643412.45%
F.R.M3111/155.49%
Total5455215273100%

5 The interpretation of the results

The previous investigations on the French Checkerboard have mentioned the conditions of the buildings in the past years. The initial study of 1998, covering the French-built state, implies that in a total of 71.6% of the colonial cases, 65% are in good condition [8]. Moreover, according to the 2001 survey, applied on the first implantation of the site, including the historic core of the village Ras Elma, indicates that on 62% of the colonial buildings; most cases are found between good and average conditions, whereas 38% of the constructions return to the post-colonial period [9]. The interest of the present research project indicates the decline of the status of the French buildings and the advanced issues affecting the historical center. The original findings validate the continuous degradations; thus, the rate of renewal and reconstructions in the modern period has rapidly increased. The private residences create a problematic state when most original constructions are in a very bad condition; the well-shaped buildings are taking over significant parts of the Checkerboard. The use of high story buildings is the modern approach in the urban center that presents a contradiction to the single story buildings known in the French period, which profoundly influences the authenticity; the harmony and the urban image of the Ex European city in Biskra.

On the micro-level, the architectural envelope analysis affirms that deteriorations are encountering the bad condition of the buildings. A generation of the alterations resumes the leading causes of the degradation, where the majority of the structure suffers from the effects of humid deteriorations, caused by infiltrations from the terrain; many parts sustain superficial and deep cracks, which affect the structural system and the foundations; threatening the stability of the constructions. In general, the same types of pathologies were repetitive and revealed during the study (Fig. 5), including: physical pathologies: from different types of cracking, to the collapse of the old parts, along with the crumbling of earth material and the detachment of the mortar. Moreover, the humid pathologies: presented with water infiltrations, condensations, humidity stains, and capillary effect are the essential issue of the terrain, and is probably justified with the historical disposition of the Checkerboard along the Seguias channels [8], presenting the dangerous effect of water on the traditional system using earth as the primary material of construction.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Major problems affecting the construction materials (Source: Author)

Citation: Pollack Periodica 16, 2; 10.1556/606.2020.00232

On a macro level, the urban issues are the conclusion for many problems at the site. The degradation of the built environment is added up to the devaluation of the public spaces, the streetscapes and the urban structuring units. The non-supportable streets and the increase of car use, in addition to the insufficiency of the parking spots, has a negative impact on the pedestrian experience and the user’s perception of the significance and qualities of the historical center, the attention towards this issues is highly recommended to preserve the values of the place and guide its future development [9, 10]. The modern refurbishments of the colonial center create a contradictory state compared to the original French constructions. Even though it seems to be in good condition, the unplanned renewals do not necessarily present the same qualities. The reconstructed buildings give a focused interest to the design of the interiors rather than the exterior envelope. When the indoors answer modernity needs, some of the façades remain unfinished, influencing as a result, the urban image of the Checkerboard, and the sustainability of the historical heritage of this period.

6 General conclusion

The French checkerboard is a remarkable symbol concerning the transfer and the sharing of design qualities, concepts, and architectural perspectives. This research introduces an approach to understanding the colonial heritage and its perceptions in the Algerian society. The investigation of Biskra’s historical center focuses on the classification of building conditions that occur to be decreasing through the years. The evaluation of the modification rate results and the modernization of the original French buildings is considered one of the main reasons behind the fading of its qualities. Some reckless actions and lack of awareness towards this heritage have an equal impact on the global image and harmony of the Ex-European city.

The French historical center’s potentiality in Biskra today relies on the acknowledgment of the remaining qualities; in a way that serves the needs of the urban space and its users. The interaction and the connection between the ambiances of the built environment and the experiences it provides. It justifies the values of French monuments along to the importance of the perceptions conforming to the site’s cultural journeys, which not only guides to the revalorization of the built heritage and its significance but equitably contributes to the raising of social consciousness and comprehending the legacy of the 19th and 20th centuries in Algeria.

References

  • [1]

    J. A. Clapp, The City: A Dictionary of Quotable Thoughts on Cities and Urban Life. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    E. Yaldız, D. Aydın, and S. B. Sıramkaya, “Loss of city identities in the process of change: the city of Konya-Turkey,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 140, pp. 221233, 2014.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    A. Versaci, “The evolution of urban heritage concept in France, between conservation and rehabilitation programs,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 225, pp. 314, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]

    F. Fatiguso, M. De Finoa, E. Cantatorea, and V. Caponioa, “Resilience of historic built environments: inherent qualities and potential strategies,” Proced. Eng., vol. 180, pp. 10241033, 2017.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    P. Pizzaferri, Biskra, Queen of the Ziban and the South of Constantine, vol. 1–2. France: Jaques Gandinis Edition (in French), 2011.

  • [6]

    H. Barbara and T. Molnár, “The French legacies in Algeria: the architecture of a shared identity, the case of the Kasbah, Algiers and the colonial check board, Biskra,” in Conference Proceedings, the 6th International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies, Pécs, Hungary, May 9–10, 2019, 2019, pp. 244252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    H. Barbara and T. Molnár, “Towards understanding the colonial heritage in Algeria: The case of Sheridan villa,” Pollack Period., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 223234, 2019.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    M. Côte, The City and the Desert: The Algerian Low-Sahara. Paris: Karthala (in French), 2005.

  • [9]

    L. Sriti, A. Belakehal, K. Boussora, and A. Z. Saouli, “The colonial check board of Biskra where the history of the marginalization of a city center,” Courrier du Savoir, no. 2, pp. 5359 (in French), 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [10]

    K. Kovás-Andor, “The architectural renewal of the main square of Kecskemét and its surrounding areas,” Pollack Period., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 119126, 2014.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [1]

    J. A. Clapp, The City: A Dictionary of Quotable Thoughts on Cities and Urban Life. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    E. Yaldız, D. Aydın, and S. B. Sıramkaya, “Loss of city identities in the process of change: the city of Konya-Turkey,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 140, pp. 221233, 2014.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    A. Versaci, “The evolution of urban heritage concept in France, between conservation and rehabilitation programs,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 225, pp. 314, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]

    F. Fatiguso, M. De Finoa, E. Cantatorea, and V. Caponioa, “Resilience of historic built environments: inherent qualities and potential strategies,” Proced. Eng., vol. 180, pp. 10241033, 2017.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    P. Pizzaferri, Biskra, Queen of the Ziban and the South of Constantine, vol. 1–2. France: Jaques Gandinis Edition (in French), 2011.

  • [6]

    H. Barbara and T. Molnár, “The French legacies in Algeria: the architecture of a shared identity, the case of the Kasbah, Algiers and the colonial check board, Biskra,” in Conference Proceedings, the 6th International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies, Pécs, Hungary, May 9–10, 2019, 2019, pp. 244252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    H. Barbara and T. Molnár, “Towards understanding the colonial heritage in Algeria: The case of Sheridan villa,” Pollack Period., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 223234, 2019.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    M. Côte, The City and the Desert: The Algerian Low-Sahara. Paris: Karthala (in French), 2005.

  • [9]

    L. Sriti, A. Belakehal, K. Boussora, and A. Z. Saouli, “The colonial check board of Biskra where the history of the marginalization of a city center,” Courrier du Savoir, no. 2, pp. 5359 (in French), 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [10]

    K. Kovás-Andor, “The architectural renewal of the main square of Kecskemét and its surrounding areas,” Pollack Period., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 119126, 2014.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iványi, Amália

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iványi, Péter

 

Scientific Secretary

Miklós M. Iványi

Editorial Board

  • Bálint Bachmann (Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Jeno Balogh (Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)
  • Radu Bancila (Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Terrestrial Communications Ways, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, “Politehnica” University Timisoara, Romania)
  • Charalambos C. Baniotopolous (Department of Civil Engineering, Chair of Sustainable Energy Systems, Director of Resilience Centre, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, U.K.)
  • Oszkar Biro (Graz University of Technology, Institute of Fundamentals and Theory in Electrical Engineering, Austria)
  • Ágnes Borsos (Institute of Architecture, Department of Interior, Applied and Creative Design, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Matteo Bruggi (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale, Politecnico di Milano, Italy)
  • Petra Bujňáková (Department of Structures and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia)
  • Anikó Borbála Csébfalvi (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Mirjana S. Devetaković (Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Serbia)
  • Szabolcs Fischer (Department of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Architerture, Civil Engineering and Transport Sciences Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
  • Radomir Folic (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad Serbia)
  • Jana Frankovská (Department of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia)
  • János Gyergyák (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Kay Hameyer (Chair in Electromagnetic Energy Conversion, Institute of Electrical Machines, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany)
  • Elena Helerea (Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania)
  • Ákos Hutter (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technolgy, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Károly Jármai (Institute of Energy and Chemical Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Hungary)
  • Teuta Jashari-Kajtazi (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Prishtina, Kosovo)
  • Róbert Kersner (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Rita Kiss  (Biomechanical Cooperation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • István Kistelegdi  (Department of Building Structures and Energy Design, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Stanislav Kmeť (President of University Science Park TECHNICOM, Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia)
  • Imre Kocsis  (Department of Basic Engineering Research, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Hungary)
  • László T. Kóczy (Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, University of Győr, Hungary)
  • Dražan Kozak (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia)
  • György L. Kovács (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Balázs Géza Kövesdi (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Engineering and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Tomáš Krejčí (Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Jaroslav Kruis (Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Miklós Kuczmann (Department of Automations, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
  • Tibor Kukai (Department of Engineering Studies, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Maria Jesus Lamela-Rey (Departamento de Construcción e Ingeniería de Fabricación, University of Oviedo, Spain)
  • János Lógó  (Department of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)
  • Carmen Mihaela Lungoci (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Universitatea Transilvania Brasov, Romania)
  • Frédéric Magoulés (Department of Mathematics and Informatics for Complex Systems, Centrale Supélec, Université Paris Saclay, France)
  • Gabriella Medvegy (Department of Interior, Applied and Creative Design, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Tamás Molnár (Department of Visual Studies, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Ferenc Orbán (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Zoltán Orbán (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Dmitrii Rachinskii (Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas, USA)
  • Chro Radha (Chro Ali Hamaradha) (Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Technical College of Engineering, Department of City Planning, Kurdistan Region, Iraq)
  • Maurizio Repetto (Department of Energy “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, Italy)
  • Zoltán Sári (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Grzegorz Sierpiński (Department of Transport Systems and Traffic Engineering, Faculty of Transport, Silesian University of Technology, Katowice, Poland)
  • Zoltán Siménfalvi (Institute of Energy and Chemical Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Hungary)
  • Andrej Šoltész (Department of Hydrology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia)
  • Zsolt Szabó (Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary)
  • Mykola Sysyn (Chair of Planning and Design of Railway Infrastructure, Institute of Railway Systems and Public Transport, Technical University of Dresden, Germany)
  • András Timár (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Barry H. V. Topping (Heriot-Watt University, UK, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)

POLLACK PERIODICA
Pollack Mihály Faculty of Engineering
Institute: University of Pécs
Address: Boszorkány utca 2. H–7624 Pécs, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36 72) 503 650

E-mail: peter.ivanyi@mik.pte.hu 

or amalia.ivanyi@mik.pte.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • SCOPUS
  • CABELLS Journalytics

 

2023  
Scopus  
CiteScore 1.5
CiteScore rank Q3 (Civil and Structural Engineering)
SNIP 0.849
Scimago  
SJR index 0.288
SJR Q rank Q3

Pollack Periodica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 381 EUR / 420 USD
Print + online subscription: 456 EUR / 520 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

 

2023  
Scopus  
CiteScore 1.5
CiteScore rank Q3 (Civil and Structural Engineering)
SNIP 0.849
Scimago  
SJR index 0.288
SJR Q rank Q3

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Aug 2024 0 20 5
Sep 2024 0 17 2
Oct 2024 0 24 6
Nov 2024 0 8 3
Dec 2024 0 0 1
Jan 2025 0 5 5
Feb 2025 0 0 0