Authors:
István Ecsedi Institute of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, H-3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary

Search for other papers by István Ecsedi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Attila Baksa Institute of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, H-3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary

Search for other papers by Attila Baksa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2727-2498
Open access

Abstract

A mathematical model is developed to determine the steady-state electric current flow through in non-homogeneous isotropic conductor whose shape has a three-dimensional hollow body. The equations of the Maxwell's theory of electric current flow in a non-homogeneous isotropic solid conductor body are used to formulate the corresponding electric boundary value problem. The determination of the steady motion of charges is based on the concept of the electrical conductance. The derivation of the upper and lower bound formulae for the electrical conductance is based on Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Two numerical examples illustrate the applications of the derived upper and lower bound formulae.

Abstract

A mathematical model is developed to determine the steady-state electric current flow through in non-homogeneous isotropic conductor whose shape has a three-dimensional hollow body. The equations of the Maxwell's theory of electric current flow in a non-homogeneous isotropic solid conductor body are used to formulate the corresponding electric boundary value problem. The determination of the steady motion of charges is based on the concept of the electrical conductance. The derivation of the upper and lower bound formulae for the electrical conductance is based on Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Two numerical examples illustrate the applications of the derived upper and lower bound formulae.

1 Introduction

Electrical resistance of an electrical conductor is a measure of the difficulty to pass a steady electric current through the conductor. The well-known elementary form of Ohm's law states that when the conductor carries a current I from a point P 1 at potential U 1 to a point P 2 at potential U 2 then U 1U 2 = RI, where R is the resistance of the conductor between points P 1 and P 2, it depends only on the shape and temperature and the material of the conductor. The inverse of electric resistance is the electric conductance G = 1/R. This paper deals with the electric resistance of a three-dimensional non-homogeneous conductor body. Examination of non-homogeneous structural elements is a very important task. Maróti's study [1] deals with the bending vibration of axially non-homogeneous beams. The buckling problem of axially functionally graded beams is considered in paper [2]. For prescribed frequency and buckling loads Maróti and Elishakoff [2] determined the Young's modulus in axial direction as a function of axial coordinate. The non-homogeneous isotropic hollow conductor is bounded by two closed surfaces V 1 and V 2 , which have no common point. The current flows inside the conductor from inner boundary surface V 1 whose potential is U 1 to the outer boundary surface V 2 whose potential is U 2 , U 1 > U 2 . Two-side estimation will be proven for the electrical conductance of non-homogeneous isotropic hollow three-dimensional conductor. The mathematical formalism follows the methods, which were used in papers [3–5]. In paper [3] upper and lower bounds are proven for the electrical resistance of homogeneous isotropic ring like axisymmetric conductor. In paper [4] the capacitance of two-dimensional cylindrical capacitor, which consists of non-homogeneous dielectric materials is studied. Examples illustrate the applications of the derived bounding formulae of capacitance [4]. A mathematical heat transfer model is developed for the steady-state heat transfer problem for homogeneous isotropic body of rotation in [5] and it is used to obtain estimations of thermal heat transfer conductance.

Let us consider the steady motion of charges in the non-homogeneous hollow conductor shown in Fig. 1. The conductor body occupies the space domain V and its boundary surfaces are V 1 and V 2 . The electric potential U on the boundary surfaces V 1 and V 2 are prescribed, so the following boundary conditions are valid [6–8],
U ( r ) = U i = c o n s t a n t , r V i ( i = 1,2 ) ,
where r denotes the position vector (Fig. 1). According to Maxwell's theory [6–8] the steady motion of charges is described by the next equations:
j = σ E ,       j = 0 , E = U .
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Hollow non-homogeneous conductor body bounded by closed surfaces

Citation: Pollack Periodica 2022; 10.1556/606.2022.00621

Differential form of Ohm's law formulates that at constant temperature in isotropic conductor the current density vector j is proportional to the electric field vector E . Here σ = σ ( r ) is the conductivity of the non-homogenous hollow conductor. In Eq. (2) is the del operator and the dot between two vectors denotes the scalar product [9]. From the above equations it follows that
σ ( r ) Δ U + σ U = 0 , r V ,   Δ = .
Introducing a new function u = u ( r ) by the next definition,
U ( r ) = ( U 1 U 2 ) u ( r ) + U 2 U 1 U 2 .
It is evident that u = u ( r ) satisfies the following boundary value problem,
σ ( r ) Δ u + σ u = 0 , r V , u = 1 , r V 1 , u = 0 , r V 2 .
The function u = u ( x , y ) plays crucial role in the expressions of electrical resistance and electrical conductance. An electric current in the conductor is the continuous passage of the current along that conductor. The constant potential difference between the closed surfaces V 1 and V 2 maintains the steady flow of the electric current. The amount of charge flowing through surface V 1 per unit time is I. The determination of I is based on the next equation
I = V 1 j n d A = ( U 1 U 2 ) V 1 σ ( r ) n u d A = ( U 1 U 2 ) V 1 σ ( r ) u n d A .
In Eq. (6), n is the outer normal unit vector of the inner boundary surface V 1 and d A is the area element of V 1 . The electrical resistance R and the conductance G of the hollow conductor is defined as [6, 8],
R = U 1 U 2 I = 1 V 1 σ ( r ) u n d A , G = I U 1 U 2 = V 1 σ ( r ) u n d A .
From Eq. (5) it follows that
V u [ σ ( r ) Δ u + σ u ] d V = V 1 u σ ( r ) n u d A V σ ( r ) | u | 2 d V = 0 ,
G = V σ ( r ) | u | 2 d V , R = 1 V σ ( r ) | u | 2 d V .
Note that if
σ u = 0 , r V ,
then u ( r ) = u 0 ( r ) , where u 0 ( r ) is a unique solution of the following Dirichlet type boundary-value problem
Δ u 0 = 0 ,   r V ,   u 0 = 1 ,   r V 1 ,   u 0 = 0 ,   r V 2 .
In this case
G = V σ ( r ) | u 0 | 2 d V .

There are several approximation methods to get the solution of the boundary-value problem Eq. (5), most of which use the results of variational calculus for example as Ritz method, finite element method [8, 9]. Other methods are also known and they used, for example finite difference methods, method of weighted residuals, boundary element method [10]. It must be mentioned that, many numerical-analytical method are used R-functions to solve the boundary value problems of electrodynamics [11–13]. The efficiency of the R-Function Method (RFM) to solving the boundary value problems of electrostatics in very complicated domain is illustrated in paper by Kravchenko and Basarab [14]. They considered a boundary-value problem of electrodynamics in the fractal regions of the Sierpiski carpet and the Koch island types [14]. Iványi solved a number of two-dimensional boundary value problems of static and stationary electromagnetisms by variational method connecting of them with the use of R-functions [12, 13, 15, 16]. It is not the aim of this paper is to give a detailed list of different analytical and numerical methods, which are used widespread in electrical engineering calculations.

2 Upper bound for G and lower bound for R

If the function F = F ( r ) which is continuously differentiable in V V satisfies the boundary conditions (13) then the inequality relation (14) is valid

F ( r ) = 1 , r V 1 , F ( r ) = 0 , r V 2 ,
G V σ ( r ) | F | 2 d V .

The proof of inequality (14) 3 can be derived by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality relation (15),

( V σ ( r ) F u d V ) 2 V σ ( r ) | F | 2 d V V σ ( r ) | u | 2 d V .
A simple computation leads to the result
V σ ( r ) F u d V = V 1 σ ( r ) n u d A = V σ ( r ) | u | 2 d V .

The combination of the inequality relation (15) with Eq. (16) and using formula (9) gives (14). A brief discussion shows that the sign of equality in relation (14) is valid only if F ( r ) u ( r ) .

3 Lower bound for G, upper bound for R

Let q = q ( r ) be a vector field defined in the hollow space domain V V , which satisfies the following equations

q = 0 , r V , n q = 0 , r V 1 ,
in this case
G ( V 1 σ ( r ) n q d A ) 2 V σ ( r ) q 2 d V , V q 2 d V 0 .

In lower bound formula (18) equality is reached only if q λ u , where λ is an arbitrary constant which is different from zero.

The proof of lower bound formula (18) is based on the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality relation (19)

( V σ ( r ) p q d V ) 2 V σ ( r ) p 2 d V V σ ( r ) q 2 d V .
Let
p = u
be in inequality relation (19). A simple calculation yields the result
V σ ( r ) u q d V = V u σ ( r ) n q d A V u σ ( r ) q d V = V 1 σ ( r ) n q d A .
Substitution Eq. (21) into Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (19) gives
( V 1 σ ( r ) n q d A ) 2 V σ ( r ) | u | 2 d V V σ ( r ) q 2 d V .

From inequality relation (22) the proof of lower bound formula, (18) can be obtained immediately.

Let f = f ( r ) be non-identically constant function in V V , which satisfies the Laplace equation in  V

f = Δ f = 0 , r V .
The following lower bound formula is valid for G
G ( V 1 f n d A ) 2 V | f | 2 σ ( r ) d V .

The proof of (24) can be obtained from (18) with under-mentioned q ( r )

q ( r ) = f σ ( r ) , r V V .

4 Numerical examples

In the numerical examples the spherical coordinate system is used. The connection between the Cartesian coordinates x , y , z and the spherical coordinates r , ϕ , ϑ is x = r cos ϕ sin ϑ , y = r sin ϕ sin ϑ , z = r cos ϑ . Developed numerical example relate to axisymmetric electrical problems.

The meridian section of hollow spherical domain is shown in Fig. 2. The specific conductivity is a given function of the radial coordinate
σ ( r , α ) = σ 0 exp ( α r a 1 ) .

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Meridian section of hollow spherical domain

Citation: Pollack Periodica 2022; 10.1556/606.2022.00621

Application of Theorem 1 to the function F ( r ) = F ( r ) = 1 1 / r 1 / a 1 1 / a 2 1 / a 1 gives
G ( α ) G U ( α ) = 1 ( a 1 a 2 ) 2 { 4 π σ 0 a 1 a 2 [ a 1 exp ( α a 2 a 1 ) + E i ( 1 , α a 2 a 1 ) α a 2 a 2 exp ( α ) a 2 E i ( 1 , α ) α ] } ,
here E i ( 1 , x ) is the exponential integral [17, 18]. Putting the following function f ( r ) = f ( r ) = r 1 in the lower bound formula (24) gives
G ( α ) G L ( α ) = 4 π σ 1 a 1 a 2 a 1 exp ( α a 2 a 1 ) + E i ( 1 , α a 2 a 1 ) α a 2 + a 2 exp ( α ) a 2 E i ( 1 , α ) α .
Lengthy, but elementary calculations shows that, the exact value of electrical conductivity which is obtained from the solution of boundary value problem (5) is
G ( α ) = 4 π σ 1 a 1 a 2 a 1 exp ( α a 2 a 1 ) + a 2 exp ( α ) + α a 2 E i ( 1 , α a 2 a 1 ) α a 2 E i ( 1 , α )
that in this case is G ( α ) = G L ( α ) . The validity of upper bound (14) for α = 2.5 and α = 2.5 examplifies as follows
G L 2.5 = G 2.5 = 2.651169 × 10 6   1 Ω G U 2.5 = 3.301497 × 10 6   1 / Ω ,
G L ( 2.5 ) = G ( 2.5 ) = 1.59105 × 10 6   1 Ω G U ( 2.5 ) = 1.981333 × 10 6   1 / Ω .

Figure 3 shows the upper and the lower bounds of the conductance G as a function of α for 2 α 2 . In this example a 1 = 0.3 m , a 2 = 0.5 m , σ 0 = 7.69 × 10 6   1 / Ω m .

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Upper and lower bounds for the conductance of non-homogeneous spherical conductor as a function of α for  1.5 α 1.5

Citation: Pollack Periodica 2022; 10.1556/606.2022.00621

Figure 4 shows the plot of function F = F ( r ) , the plot of exact analytical solution u = u ( r ) and the plot of u F = u F ( r ) which is obtained from Finite Element (FE) approximation in the case of Example 1 for α = 2.5 . The FE model is developed in ABAQUS with DC3D8 elements (node numbers are 706 356 ) and for definition of the nonlinear material a special user subroutine usdfld() is applied.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Comparison of exact solution, approximate solution and FE approximation

Citation: Pollack Periodica 2022; 10.1556/606.2022.00621

The meridian section of axisymmetric hollow domain bounded by two spherical surfaces as it is shown in Fig. 5. The following data are used a 1 = 0.3 m , a 2 = 0.5 m , b = 0.025 , σ 1 = 7.69 × 10 6 1 / m Ω , σ ( r , n ) = σ 1 ( r a 1 ) n .

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

The meridian section of axisymmetric hollow domain bounded by two spherical surfaces with different centre points

Citation: Pollack Periodica 2022; 10.1556/606.2022.00621

Let F ( r , ϑ ) = ln R ( ϑ ) r ( ln R ( ϑ ) a 1 ) 1 be in Theorem 1 and in Theorem 3 f ( r ) = r 1 .

Figure 6 shows the upper and the lower bounds as a function of power index for 2 n 2 .

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Upper and lower bounds for the conductance as a function of power index n

Citation: Pollack Periodica 2022; 10.1556/606.2022.00621

5 Conclusions

A mathematical model is developed to determine the steady-state electric current flow through in non-homogeneous isotropic conductor whose shape is a three-dimensional hollow body. The hollow body considered is bounded by two closed surfaces which have no common points. The derivation of the upper and lower bound formulae for the electrical conductance is based on the two types of Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Two numerical examples illustrate the applications of the derived upper and lower bounds for the conductance. The derived upper and lower bound formulae of electric conductance can be used to check the results of numerical computations obtained by finite element method, boundary element method and by any other numerical methods.

References

  • [1]

    Gy. Maróti , “Finding closed-form solutions of beam vibration,” Pollack Period., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 141154, 2011.

  • [2]

    Gy. Maróti and I. Elishakoff , “On buckling of axially functionally graded beams,” Pollack Period., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 313, 2012.

  • [3]

    I. Ecsedi , Á. J. Lengyel , A. Baksa , and D. Gönczi , “Bounds for the electrical resistance for homogenous conducting body of rotation,” Multidiszciplináris tudományok, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 104122, 2021.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]

    I. Ecsedi and Á. J. Lengyel , “Bounding formulae for capacitance of cylindrical capacitor with non-homogeneous material,” WSEAS Trans. Electron., vol. 13, pp. 125131, 2021.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    I. Ecsedi , Á. J. Lengyel , and D. Gönczi , “Bounds for the thermal conductance of body of rotation,” Int. Rev. Model. Simulations, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 185193, 2020.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [6]

    J. D. Jackson , Classical Electrodynamics. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1988.

  • [7]

    P. P. Silvester and R. L. Ferrari , Finite Elements for Electrical Engineers. Cambridge Univeristy Press, 1983.

  • [8]

    P. Hammond , Energy Method in Electromagnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

  • [9]

    G. A. Korn and T. M. Korn , Handbook for Scientists and Engineers. New York: D. von Nosrand, 1961.

  • [10]

    A. P. Boresi , K. P. Chong , and S. Saigal , Approximate Solution Methods in Engineering Mechanics. John Willey & Sons, Inc, 2003.

  • [11]

    V. L. Rvachev and T. I. Sheiko , “R-functions in boundary value problems in mechanics,” Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 151188, 1995.

  • [12]

    A. Iványi , Continuous and Discrete Simulations in Electrodynamics (in Hungarian). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2003.

  • [13]

    A. Iványi , “R-functions in electromagnetism,” Technical Report No. TUB-TR-93-EE08, Budapest, 1993.

  • [14]

    V. F. Kravchenko and M. A. Basarab , “Solving the boundary value problems of electrodynamics in the regions of fractal geometry by the method of R-functions” (in Russian), Tech. Phys. Lett., vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 10551057, 2003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [15]

    A. Iványi , “Variational methods for static electric field” (in Hungarian), Elektrotechnika, vol. 71, pp. 2125, 1978.

  • [16]

    A. Iványi , “Determination of static and stationary electromagnetic fields by variational calculus,” Period. Polytech. Electr. Eng., vol. 23, pp. 201208, 1979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [17]

    E. Masina , “A review on the exponential-integral special function and other strictly related special functions,” Lecture Notes, University of Bolona, Italy, 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [18]

    The exponential integral, Wolfram Mathworld. [Online]. Available: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExponentialIntegral.html. Accessed: Jan. 21, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [1]

    Gy. Maróti , “Finding closed-form solutions of beam vibration,” Pollack Period., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 141154, 2011.

  • [2]

    Gy. Maróti and I. Elishakoff , “On buckling of axially functionally graded beams,” Pollack Period., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 313, 2012.

  • [3]

    I. Ecsedi , Á. J. Lengyel , A. Baksa , and D. Gönczi , “Bounds for the electrical resistance for homogenous conducting body of rotation,” Multidiszciplináris tudományok, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 104122, 2021.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]

    I. Ecsedi and Á. J. Lengyel , “Bounding formulae for capacitance of cylindrical capacitor with non-homogeneous material,” WSEAS Trans. Electron., vol. 13, pp. 125131, 2021.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    I. Ecsedi , Á. J. Lengyel , and D. Gönczi , “Bounds for the thermal conductance of body of rotation,” Int. Rev. Model. Simulations, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 185193, 2020.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [6]

    J. D. Jackson , Classical Electrodynamics. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1988.

  • [7]

    P. P. Silvester and R. L. Ferrari , Finite Elements for Electrical Engineers. Cambridge Univeristy Press, 1983.

  • [8]

    P. Hammond , Energy Method in Electromagnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

  • [9]

    G. A. Korn and T. M. Korn , Handbook for Scientists and Engineers. New York: D. von Nosrand, 1961.

  • [10]

    A. P. Boresi , K. P. Chong , and S. Saigal , Approximate Solution Methods in Engineering Mechanics. John Willey & Sons, Inc, 2003.

  • [11]

    V. L. Rvachev and T. I. Sheiko , “R-functions in boundary value problems in mechanics,” Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 151188, 1995.

  • [12]

    A. Iványi , Continuous and Discrete Simulations in Electrodynamics (in Hungarian). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2003.

  • [13]

    A. Iványi , “R-functions in electromagnetism,” Technical Report No. TUB-TR-93-EE08, Budapest, 1993.

  • [14]

    V. F. Kravchenko and M. A. Basarab , “Solving the boundary value problems of electrodynamics in the regions of fractal geometry by the method of R-functions” (in Russian), Tech. Phys. Lett., vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 10551057, 2003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [15]

    A. Iványi , “Variational methods for static electric field” (in Hungarian), Elektrotechnika, vol. 71, pp. 2125, 1978.

  • [16]

    A. Iványi , “Determination of static and stationary electromagnetic fields by variational calculus,” Period. Polytech. Electr. Eng., vol. 23, pp. 201208, 1979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [17]

    E. Masina , “A review on the exponential-integral special function and other strictly related special functions,” Lecture Notes, University of Bolona, Italy, 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [18]

    The exponential integral, Wolfram Mathworld. [Online]. Available: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExponentialIntegral.html. Accessed: Jan. 21, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instructions template is available in MS Word.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iványi, Amália

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iványi, Péter

 

Scientific Secretary

Miklós M. Iványi

Editorial Board

  • Bálint Bachmann (Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Jeno Balogh (Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)
  • Radu Bancila (Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Terrestrial Communications Ways, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, “Politehnica” University Timisoara, Romania)
  • Charalambos C. Baniotopolous (Department of Civil Engineering, Chair of Sustainable Energy Systems, Director of Resilience Centre, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, U.K.)
  • Oszkar Biro (Graz University of Technology, Institute of Fundamentals and Theory in Electrical Engineering, Austria)
  • Ágnes Borsos (Institute of Architecture, Department of Interior, Applied and Creative Design, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Matteo Bruggi (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale, Politecnico di Milano, Italy)
  • Petra Bujňáková (Department of Structures and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia)
  • Anikó Borbála Csébfalvi (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Mirjana S. Devetaković (Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Serbia)
  • Szabolcs Fischer (Department of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Architerture, Civil Engineering and Transport Sciences Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
  • Radomir Folic (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad Serbia)
  • Jana Frankovská (Department of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia)
  • János Gyergyák (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Kay Hameyer (Chair in Electromagnetic Energy Conversion, Institute of Electrical Machines, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany)
  • Elena Helerea (Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania)
  • Ákos Hutter (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technolgy, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Károly Jármai (Institute of Energy and Chemical Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Hungary)
  • Teuta Jashari-Kajtazi (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Prishtina, Kosovo)
  • Róbert Kersner (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Rita Kiss  (Biomechanical Cooperation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • István Kistelegdi  (Department of Building Structures and Energy Design, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Stanislav Kmeť (President of University Science Park TECHNICOM, Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia)
  • Imre Kocsis  (Department of Basic Engineering Research, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Hungary)
  • László T. Kóczy (Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, University of Győr, Hungary)
  • Dražan Kozak (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia)
  • György L. Kovács (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Balázs Géza Kövesdi (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Engineering and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Tomáš Krejčí (Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Jaroslav Kruis (Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Miklós Kuczmann (Department of Automations, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
  • Tibor Kukai (Department of Engineering Studies, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Maria Jesus Lamela-Rey (Departamento de Construcción e Ingeniería de Fabricación, University of Oviedo, Spain)
  • János Lógó  (Department of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)
  • Carmen Mihaela Lungoci (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Universitatea Transilvania Brasov, Romania)
  • Frédéric Magoulés (Department of Mathematics and Informatics for Complex Systems, Centrale Supélec, Université Paris Saclay, France)
  • Gabriella Medvegy (Department of Interior, Applied and Creative Design, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Tamás Molnár (Department of Visual Studies, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Ferenc Orbán (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Zoltán Orbán (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Dmitrii Rachinskii (Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas, USA)
  • Chro Radha (Chro Ali Hamaradha) (Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Technical College of Engineering, Department of City Planning, Kurdistan Region, Iraq)
  • Maurizio Repetto (Department of Energy “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, Italy)
  • Zoltán Sári (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Grzegorz Sierpiński (Department of Transport Systems and Traffic Engineering, Faculty of Transport, Silesian University of Technology, Katowice, Poland)
  • Zoltán Siménfalvi (Institute of Energy and Chemical Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Hungary)
  • Andrej Šoltész (Department of Hydrology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia)
  • Zsolt Szabó (Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary)
  • Mykola Sysyn (Chair of Planning and Design of Railway Infrastructure, Institute of Railway Systems and Public Transport, Technical University of Dresden, Germany)
  • András Timár (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Barry H. V. Topping (Heriot-Watt University, UK, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)

POLLACK PERIODICA
Pollack Mihály Faculty of Engineering
Institute: University of Pécs
Address: Boszorkány utca 2. H–7624 Pécs, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36 72) 503 650

E-mail: peter.ivanyi@mik.pte.hu 

or amalia.ivanyi@mik.pte.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • SCOPUS

 

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,26
Scimago Quartile Score Civil and Structural Engineering (Q3)
Materials Science (miscellaneous) (Q3)
Computer Science Applications (Q4)
Modeling and Simulation (Q4)
Software (Q4)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,5
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Civil and Structural Engineering 232/326 (Q3)
Computer Science Applications 536/747 (Q3)
General Materials Science 329/455 (Q3)
Modeling and Simulation 228/303 (Q4)
Software 326/398 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,613

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,257
Scimago
Quartile Score
Civil and Structural Engineering Q3
Computer Science Applications Q3
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q3
Modeling and Simulation Q3
Software Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
340/243=1,4
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Civil and Structural Engineering 219/318 (Q3)
Computer Science Applications 487/693 (Q3)
General Materials Science 316/455 (Q3)
Modeling and Simulation 217/290 (Q4)
Software 307/389 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
1,09
Scopus
Cites
321
Scopus
Documents
67
Days from submission to acceptance 136
Days from acceptance to publication 239
Acceptance
Rate
48%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,262
Scimago
Quartile Score
Civil and Structural Engineering Q3
Computer Science Applications Q3
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q3
Modeling and Simulation Q3
Software Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
269/220=1,2
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Civil and Structural Engineering 206/310 (Q3)
Computer Science Applications 445/636 (Q3)
General Materials Science 295/460 (Q3)
Modeling and Simulation 212/274 (Q4)
Software 304/373 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,933
Scopus
Cites
290
Scopus
Documents
68
Acceptance
Rate
67%

 

Pollack Periodica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 327 EUR / 411 USD 321
Print + online subscription: 393 EUR / 492 USD
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 336 EUR / 411 USD
Print + online subscription: 405 EUR / 492 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

 

Pollack Periodica
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2006
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1788-1994 (Print)
ISSN 1788-3911 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Jun 2022 0 0 0
Jul 2022 0 0 0
Aug 2022 0 0 0
Sep 2022 0 0 0
Oct 2022 0 39 23
Nov 2022 0 34 18
Dec 2022 0 1 1