A daganatos megbetegedések incidenciája az életkorral nő. Azáltal, hogy a családalapítás ideje egyre jobban kitolódik, folyamatosan nő azon daganatos betegek száma, akiknél az onkológiai kezelések hatással lehetnek a későbbi családalapításra. A nemzetközi irányelvek alapján minden fertilis korú pácienst, beleértve a fiatalkorúakat is, tájékoztatni kell a tervezett onkológiai kezelés termékenységet érintő káros következményeiről, és amennyiben indokolt, fertilitásprezervációs eljárás tanácsos. A termékenység megőrzését célzó eljárások alkalmazásával nagymértékben javul a páciensek életminősége, és a gyógyulást követően esélyt kaphatnak a családalapításra. A nemzetközi szakirodalom és ajánlások alapján összefoglaljuk a hazai daganatos nőbetegek termékenységének megőrzésére szóba jöhető lehetőségeket. Jelen tanulmányunkban az onkoterápiás eljárások gonadotoxikus hatásáról és a jelenleg rendelkezésre álló fertilitásprezervációs eljárásokról írunk. Munkánk második részében az egyes daganatos betegségcsoportokban szóba jöhető speciális lehetőségekkel foglalkozunk. A két tanulmány alapjául szolgálhat egy hazai protokoll kidolgozásának. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(28): 1094–1101.
von Wolff M, Andersen CY, Woodruff TK, et al. FertiPROTEKT, Oncofertility Consortium and the Danish Fertility-Preservation Networks – What can we learn from their experiences? Clin Med Insights Reprod Health 2019; 13: 1179558119845865.
Tschudin S, Bitzer J. Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15: 587–597.
Oncology and hematology. [Onkológia és hematológia.] Available from: https://onkologia.olo.hu/cikkek/fertilitasi-problemak-es-megoldasuk-gyermekkori-daganatos-megbetegedesbol-gyogyultaknal [accessed: March 17, 2023]. [Hungarian]
Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, et al. Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer 2012; 118: 1710–1717.
Vesztergom D, Téglás G, Nánássy L, et al. Fertility preservation in cancer patients: Hungarian experiences and attitudes. [A termékenység megőrzése daganatos betegségekben. Egy hazai felmérés tapasztalatai.] Orv Hetil. 2022; 163: 246–252. [Hungarian]
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Liljegren A. Safety of fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. Breast 2019; 43: 149.
ESHRE Guideline Group on Female Fertility Preservation, Anderson RA, Amant F, Braat D, et al. ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020: hoaa052.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019; 112: 1022–1033.
Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Demeestere I, et al. Fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in post-pubertal cancer patients: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31: 1664–1678.
Anderson RA, Cameron D, Clatot F, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency in children and women with cancer: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2022; 28: 417–434.
European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline Group on POI, Webber L, Davies M, Schrama S, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31: 926–937.
Jakab Z, Garami M. Registration of Childhood Cancer: National Childhood Cancer Registry is 50 years old. [Gyermekkori daganatok regisztrálása: 50 éves a Nemzeti Gyermekonkológiai Regiszter.] Gyermekgyógyászat 2021; 72: 399–404. [Hungarian]
Rozen G, Rogers P, Chander S, et al. Clinical summary guide: reproduction in women with previous abdominopelvic radiotherapy or total body irradiation. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020: hoaa045.
Marci R, Mallozzi M, Di Benedetto L, et al. Radiations and female fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018; 16: 112.
Biedka M, Kuźba-Kryszak T, Nowikiewicz T, et al. Fertility impairment in radiotherapy. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2016; 20: 199–204.
Teh WT, Stern C, Chander S, et al. The impact of uterine radiation on subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes. BioMed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 482968.
Spears N, Lopes F, Stefansdottir A, et al. Ovarian damage from chemotherapy and current approaches to its protection. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25: 673–693.
Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 126–136. Erratum: N Engl J Med. 2021; 385: 1824.
von Wolff M, Capp E, Jauckus J, et al. Timing of ovarian stimulation in patients prior to gonadotoxic therapy: an analysis of 684 stimulations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 199: 146–149.
Tsampras N, Gould D, Fitzgerald CT. Double ovarian stimulation (DuoStim) protocol for fertility preservation in female oncology patients. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017; 20: 248–253.
Oktay K, Turan V, Bedoschi G, et al. Fertility preservation success subsequent to concurrent aromatase inhibitor treatment and ovarian stimulation in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33: 2424–2429.
Sharma S, Ghosh S, Singh S, et al. Congenital malformations among babies born following letrozole or clomiphene for infertility treatment. PLOS ONE 2014; 9: e108219.
Rodgers RJ, Reid GD, Koch J, et al. The safety and efficacy of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation in women with early breast cancer: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32: 1033–1045.
Huober-Zeeb C, Lawrenz B, Popovici RM, et al. Improving fertility preservation in cancer: ovarian tissue cryobanking followed by ovarian stimulation can be efficiently combined. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 342–344.
Moravek MB, Confino R, Smith KN, et al. Long-term outcomes in cancer patients who did or did not pursue fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109: 349–355.
Von Wolff M, Bruckner T, Strowitzki T, et al. Fertility preservation: ovarian response to freeze oocytes is not affected by different malignant diseases – an analysis of 992 stimulations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35: 1713–1719.
Cobo A, García-Velasco JA, Coello A, et al. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105: 755–764.e8.
Garrido N, Bellver J, Remohí J, et al. Cumulative live-birth rates per total number of embryos needed to reach newborn in consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles: a new approach to measuring the likelihood of IVF success. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 40–46.
Lv XJ, Cheng XL, Tu YQ, et al. Association between the location of transposed ovary and ovarian dose in patients with cervical cancer treated with postoperative pelvic radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2019; 14: 230.
Hwang JH, Yoo HJ, Park SH, et al. Association between the location of transposed ovary and ovarian function in patients with uterine cervical cancer treated with (postoperative or primary) pelvic radiotherapy. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 1387–1393.e1-e2.
Sükösd Z, Fancsovits P, Gács Z, et al. The pioneering case of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in childhood in Hungary. [A termékenység megőrzése céljából gyermekkorban végzett petefészekszövet-fagyasztás első hazai esete.] Orv Hetil. 2023; 164: 104–109. [Hungarian]
Fancsovits P, Urbancsek J, Fónyad L, et al. First attempts in the introduction of cryopreservation of ovarian tissues. [Kezdeti tapasztalataink a petefészekszövet-fagyasztás bevezetésével.] Orv Hetil. 2016; 157: 1947–1954. [Hungarian]
Beckmann MW, Dittrich R, Lotz L, et al. Fertility protection: complications of surgery and results of removal and transplantation of ovarian tissue. Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 36: 188–196.
Kyono K, Hashimoto T, Toya M, et al. A transportation network for human ovarian tissue is indispensable to success for fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 34: 1469–1474.
Dolmans MM, von Wolff M, Poirot C, et al. Transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a series of 285 women: a review of five leading European centers. Fertil Steril. 2021; 115: 1102–1115.
Bastings L, Beerendonk CC, Westphal JR, et al. Autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in cancer survivors and the risk of reintroducing malignancy: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19: 483–506.
Lambertini M, Horicks F, Del Mastro L, et al. Ovarian protection with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy in cancer patients: from biological evidence to clinical application. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019; 72: 65–77.
Lambertini M, Moore HC, Leonard RC, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy for preservation of ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36: 1981–1990.
Roness H, Kashi O, Meirow D. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105: 20–29.
Steigrad S, Hacker NF, Kolb B. In vitro fertilization surrogate pregnancy in a patient who underwent radical hysterectomy followed by ovarian transposition, lower abdominal wall radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 1547–1549.
Gubbala K, Laios A, Gallos I, et al. Outcomes of ovarian transposition in gynaecological cancers; a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2014; 7: 69.
Buonomo B, Multinu F, Casarin J, et al. Ovarian transposition in patients with cervical cancer prior to pelvic radiotherapy: a systematic review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31: 360–370.
Moria A, Das M, Shehata F, et al. Ovarian reserve and oocyte maturity in women with malignancy undergoing in vitro maturation treatment. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 1621–1623.
Sonmezer M, Oktay K. Fertility preservation in female patients. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 251–266.
Sápy T, Póka R. Oncofertility and therapeutic modalities. Survey of literature. [Onkofertilitás és kezelési lehetőségek. Irodalmi áttekintés.] Orv Hetil. 2017; 158: 683–691. [Hungarian]
Langmár Z, Mátrai M, Bánhidy F, et al. Procedures for fertility preservation in female cancer patients. [A termékenység megőrzésének lehetőségei rosszindulatú daganatos nőbetegek kezelése kapcsán.] Orv Hetil. 2007; 148: 2219–2224. [Hungarian]