Authors:
,
,
,
, and
M. Gulyás
M. Gulyás
Szent István University of Gödöllő Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry H-2100 Gödöllő Páter K. út 1. Hungary
Search for other papers by M. Gulyás in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Gulyás in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
A. Tomocsik
A. Tomocsik
University of Debrecen Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences, Research Institute of Nyíregyháza H-4400 Nyíregyháza Westsik Vilmos út 4-6 Hungary
Search for other papers by A. Tomocsik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. Tomocsik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
V. Orosz
V. Orosz
University of Debrecen Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences, Research Institute of Nyíregyháza H-4400 Nyíregyháza Westsik Vilmos út 4-6 Hungary
Search for other papers by V. Orosz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V. Orosz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
M. Makádi
M. Makádi
University of Debrecen Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences, Research Institute of Nyíregyháza H-4400 Nyíregyháza Westsik Vilmos út 4-6 Hungary
Search for other papers by M. Makádi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Makádi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
G. Füleky
G. Füleky
Szent István University of Gödöllő Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry H-2100 Gödöllő Páter K. út 1. Hungary
Search for other papers by G. Füleky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. Füleky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The required quality of compost depends on its final use. All the requirements must be focused on obtaining a product with an acceptable aspect and smell, which is hygienic and free from (or with only traces of) impurities and contaminants. The concept of compost quality especially relevant when the compost is used directly, as a substrate for seedling production or in pots; these applications need high-quality compost. The quality of compost based on concentrations of heavy metals and organic pollutants and on the absence of pathogens. The aim of the experiment was to prove the absence of the risk using this material in cereal production. The results of the last years suggest that there was no toxic element accumulation in the grain yield of triticale plants.Monitoring of phatogen reduction shows the conventional treatment by mesophilic digestion gives a limited reduction in the content of phatogens. The potential toxic effect of anaerobic digestate was measured in biotest with ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and garden cress (Lepidium sativum) plants. The rapid biotests proved toxic reduction of plant growth and root development at high rate application of digestate in the first days of germination. The reason of the reduction of root could be explained with the high ammonium concentration of digestate.
Please, download the file from HERE.
Editor-in-Chief
- Jenő KONTSCHÁN Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
Technical Editor
- Ágnes TURÓCI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
Section Editor
- K SALÁNKI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
Editorial Board
- Z BOZSÓ Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
- PE CHETVERIKOV Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia
- JX CUI Henan Institute of Science and Technology, China
- J FODOR Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
- Z IMREI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
- BM KAYDAN Çukurova University, Turkey
- L KISS University of Southern Queensland, Australia
- V MARKÓ Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary
- MW NEGM Ibaraki University, Japan
- L PALKOVICS Széchenyi István University, Hungary
- M POGÁNY Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
- D RÉDEI National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan
- A TOLSTIKOV University of Tyumen, Russia
- J VUTS Rothamsted Research, UK
- GQ WANG Guangxi University, China
Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
P.O. Box 102
H-1525 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 487 7534
Fax: (36 1) 487 7555
E-mail: acta@atk.hu
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- Biological Abstracts
- BIOSIS Previews
- CAB Abstracts
- CABELLS Journalytics
- Chemical Abstracts
- Elsevier GEO Abstracts
- Globals Health
- Referativnyi Zhurnal
- SCOPUS
- Zoological Abstracts
| 2022 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
22 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0.211 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Insect Science (Q4) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
1.1 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Insect Science 124/173 (28th PCTL) Plant Science 385/487 (21st PCTL) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0.375 |
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
21 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,29 |
| Scimago Quartile Score | Insect Science (Q3) Plant Science (Q3) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
1,3 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Insect Science 107/172 (Q3) Plant Science 316/482 (Q3) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,481 |
| 2020 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
20 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,185 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Insect Science Q4 Plant Science Q4 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
75/98=0,8 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
Insect Science 129/153 (Q4) Plant Science 353/445 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,438 |
| Scopus Cites |
313 |
| Scopus Documents |
20 |
| Days from submission to acceptance | 64 |
| Days from acceptance to publication | 209 |
| Acceptance Rate |
48% |
| 2019 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
19 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,177 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Insect Science Q4 Plant Science Q4 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
66/103=0,6 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
Insect Science 125/142 (Q4) Plant Science 344/431 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,240 |
| Scopus Cites |
212 |
| Scopus Documents |
24 |
| Acceptance Rate |
35% |
| Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2023 | Online subsscription: 472 EUR / 576 USD Print + online subscription: 552 EUR / 670 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1966 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
2 |
| Founder | Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  |
| Founder's Address |
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0238-1249 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2691 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2023 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2023 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2023 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2023 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Nov 2023 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Dec 2023 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Authors:
, , , , , , , and
Author:
Authors:
, , , , , and
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory