Niche theory predicts that coexisting species will partition resources to limit the effects of interspecific competition. We examined microhabitat partitioning in six sets of steppe birds associated to agroecosystems in central Spain (female and male Great Bustards Otis tarda, female and male Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax, Red-legged Partridges Alectoris rufa and Eurasian Stone-curlews Burhinus oedicnemus) to estimate realized niche breadth, overlap and segregation. Principal Components Analysis on data from used and random microhabitat locations produced two axes we retained for analysis related with two key factors: cover-visibility and food availability. Non-parametric kernel density functions were calculated for each of the PCA axes and species (or sexes), and niche overlap estimated as the area shared between species’ density functions. Null models were run to evaluate overlap significance. In analyses of microhabitat selection by the six sets of birds, 13 out of 15 pairs had significant resource partitioning and niche segregation, except for the pairs partridge and female Great Bustard and the two sexes of Great Bustard. Eurasian Stone-curlew showed wider trophic niche breadth, although segregated from the other species, probably because of its higher invertebrate requirements. Great and Little Bustards segregated in both niche axes, selecting microhabitat according to their body size. Accessibility to food resources and shelter seems to be similar for partridges and female Great Bustards, overlapping in their selection, which may indicate the existence of segregation in other niche factors (e.g., feeding habits). Great Bustard males showed niche overlap with females. Little Bustard males showed feeding microhabitat selection patterns similar to those of females, although they preferred more open microhabitats to meet their sexual display requirements. The entire assemblage had significantly less overlap than expected by chance, suggesting that differential microhabitat selection and realized niche partitioning may explain coexistence in steppe bird communities. Our results suggest that the maintenance of different microhabitat structure should be a priority in the management of agricultural environments.
Buenestado F.J. , P. Ferreras, M. Delibes-Mateos, F.S. Tortosa, J.A. Blanco-Aguiar and R. Villafuerte. 2008. Habitat selection and home range size of Red-legged Partridges in Spain. Agr. Ecosys. Environ. 126: 158–162.
Chase, J.H. and M.A. Leibold. 2003. Ecological Niches. Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.
Chesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 343–366.
Clere, E. and V. Bretagnolle. 2001. Food availability for birds in farmland habitats: biomass and diversity of arthropods by pitfall trapping technique. Rev. Ecol.-Terre Vie 56: 275–297.
Concepción, E.D. and M. Díaz. 2011. Field, landscape and regional effects of farmland management on specialist open-land birds: Does body size matter? Agr. Ecosys. Environ 142: 303–310.
Cramp, S. and K.E.L. Simmons (eds). 1980. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vols. II and III. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Dayan, T. and D. Simberloff. 2005. Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. Ecol. Lett. 8: 875–894.
Davis, S.K. 2004. Area sensitivity in grassland passerines: effects of patch size, patch shape and vegetation structure on bird abundance and occurrence in southern Saskatchewan. Auk 121: 1130–1145.
De Bello, F., C.P. Carmona, N.W.H. Mason, M.T. Sebastir and J. Lepš. 2013. Which trait dissimilarity for functional diversity: trait means or trait overlap? J. Veg. Sci. 24: 807–819.
De Juana, E. 2005. Steppe birds: a characterization. In: G. Bota, M. B. Morales, S. Manosa, and J. Camprodon (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Steppe-land Birds. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. pp. 25–48.
Delgado, A. and F. Moreira. 2000. Bird assemblages of an Iberian cereal steppe. Agr. Ecosys. Environ 78: 65–76.
Delgado, M.P., J. Traba, E.L. García de la Morena and M.B. Morales. 2010. Habitat selection and density-dependent relationships in spatial occupancy by male Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax. Ardea 98: 185–194.
del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D.A. Christie and E. de Juana. (eds.). 2013. Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona (retrieved from http://www.hbw.com/node/53766 on 13 January 2015).
Devictor, V., J. Clavel, R. Julliard, S. Lavergne, D. Mouillot, W. Thuiller, P. Venail, S. Villéger and N. Mouquet. 2010. Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J. Appl. Ecol. 47: 15–25.
Evans, K.L., J.J.D. Greenwood and K.J. Gaston. 2005. Dissecting the species–energy relationship. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 272: 2155–2163.
Geange, S.W., S. Pledger, K.C. Burns and J.S. Shima. 2011. A unified analysis of niche overlap incorporating data of different types. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2: 175–184.
Giannangeli, L., A. De Sanctis, R. Manginelli and F.M. Medina. 2004. Seasonal variation of the diet of the Stone Curlew Burhinus oedicnemus distinctus at the island of La Palma, Canary Islands. Ardea 92: 175–184.
Gilliam, J.F. and D. Fraser. 1987. Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with foraging minnows. Ecology 68: 1856–1862.
Green, R.E. 1984. The feeding ecology and survival of partridge chicks (Alectoris rufa and Perdix perdix) on arable farmland in East Anglia. J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 817–830.
Green, R.E., G.A. Tyler and C.G.R. Bowden. 2000. Habitat selection, ranging behaviour and diet of the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus) in southern England. J. Zool. 250: 161–183.
Guerrero I. , M.B. Morales, J.J. Onate, T. Aavik, J. Bengtsson, F. Berendse, L.W. Clement, C. Dennis, S. Eggers, M. Emmerson, C. Fischer, A. Flohre, F. Geiger, V. Hawro, P. Inchausti, A. Kalamees, R. Kinks, J. Liira, L. Meléndez, T. Pärt, C. Thies, T. Tscharntke, A. Olszewski and W.W. Weisser. 2011. Taxonomic and functional diversity of farmland bird communities across Europe: effects of biogeography and agricultural intensification. Biodivers. Conserv. 20: 3663–36813.
Gurd, D.B. 2008. Mechanistic analysis of interspecific competition using foraging trade-offs: implications for duck assemblages. Ecology 89: 495–505.
Hromada M. , L. Kuczynski, A. Kristin and P. Tryjanowski. 2003. Animals of different phenotype differentially utilize foraging niche – the Great Grey Shrike case study. Ornis Fennica 80: 71–78.
Hubbell, S.P. 2001. The Unified Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA.
Jiguet, F. 2002. Arthropods in diet of Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax during the breeding season in western France. Bird Study 49: 105–109.
Jiguet, F. and Bretagnolle, V. 2014. Sexy males and choosy females on exploded leks: correlates of male attractiveness in the Little Bustard. Behav. Process 103: 246–255.
Krebs, J.R. and N.B. Davies. 1987. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Kullberg, C. 1998. Spatial niche dynamics under predation risk in the Willow Tit Parus montanus. J. Avian Biol. 29: 235–240.
Lane, S.J., J.C. Alonso, J.A. Alonso and M.A. Naveso. 1999. Seasonal changes in diet and diet selection of great bustards (Otis tarda) in north-west Spain. J. Zool. 247: 201–214.
Lane, S.J., J.C. Alonso and C.A. Martín. 2001. Habitat preferences of great bustard Otis tarda flocks in the arable steppes of central Spain: are potentially suitable areas unoccupied? J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 193–203.
Leibold, M.A. 1998. Similarity and local co-existence of species in regional biotas. Evol. Ecol. 12: 95–110.
Leibold, M.A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J.M. Chase, M.F. Hoopes, R.D. Holt, J.B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau and A. Gonzalez. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7: 601–613.
Lima, S.L. and L.M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619–640.
López-Jamar, J., F. Casas, M. Díaz and M.B. Morales. 2010. Local differences in habitat selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda in changing agricultural landscapes: implications for farmland bird conservation. Bird Conserv. Int. 21: 328–341.
MacArthur, R.H. and R. Levins. 1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101: 377–385.
Mason, N.W.H., F. de Bello, J. Doležal and J. Lepš. 2011. Niche overlap reveals the effects of competition, disturbance and contrasting assembly processes in experimental grassland communities. J. Ecol. 99: 788–796.
McMahon, B.J., D. Giralt, M. Raurell, L. Brotons and G. Bota. 2010. Identifying set-aside features for bird conservation and management in north-eastern Iberian pseudo-steppes. Bird Study 57: 289–300.
Milinski, M. and R. Heller. 1978. Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Nature 275: 642–644.
Morales, M.B., J.T. García and B.E. Arroyo. 2005. Can landscape composition changes predict spatial and annual variation of Little bustard male abundance? Anim. Conserv. 8: 167–174.
Morales, M.B., J. Traba, E. Carriles, M. P. Delgado and E. L. García de la Morena. 2008. Sexual differences in microhabitat selection of breeding Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax: ecological segregation based on vegetation structure. Acta Oecol. 34: 345–535.
Morales, M.B. and J. Traba. 2009. Compromisos adaptativos en la selección de hábitat de aves esteparias. In: H. Dopazo and A. Navarro (eds.), Evolución y Adaptación. 150 anos después del origen de las especies. Obrapropia S.L. Valencia. pp. 304–313.
Morales, M.B., J. Traba, M.P. Delgado and E.L. García de la Morena. 2013. The use of fallows by nesting Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax females: Implications for conservation in mosaic cereal farmland. Ardeola 60: 3–15.
Moreira, F., R. Morgado and S. Arthur. 2004. Great bustard Otis tarda habitat selection in relation to agricultural use in Southern Portugal. Wildlife Biol. 10: 251–260.
Moreno, V., M.B. Morales and J. Traba. 2010. Avoiding over-implementation of agri-environmental schemes for steppe bird conservation: a species-focused proposal based on specialist criteria. J. Environ. Manage. 91: 1802–1809.
Mouillot, D., W. Stubbs, M. Faure, O. Dumay, J. Tomasini, J. Wilson and T. Chi. 2005. Niche overlap estimates based on quantitative functional traits: a new family of non-parametric indices. Oecologia 145: 345–353.
Olea, P., Casas, F., Redpath, S.M. and Vinuela, J. 2010. Bottoms up: great bustards use the sun to maximise signal efficacy. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 927–937.
Onrubia, A. and T. Andrés. 2005. Impact of human activities on steppic-land birds: A review in the context of western palearctic. In: G. Bota, M. B. Morales, S. Manosa, and J. Camprodon (eds.), Ecology and conservation of steppe-land birds. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. pp. 185–210.
R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL: http://www.R-project.org. ISBN3-900051-07-0.
Roberts, A.M. and E.B. Liebgold. 2008. The effects of perceived mortality risk on habitat selection in a terrestrial salamander. Behav. Ecol. 19: 621–626.
Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327–335.
Rosenzweig, M.L. and Z. Abramsky. 1986. Centrifugal community organization. Oikos 46: 339–348.
Rotenberry, J.T. and J.A. Wiens. 1980. Habitat structure, patchiness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology 61: 1228–1250.
Rotenberry, J.T. and J.A. Wiens. 2009. Habitat relations of shrubsteppe birds: a 20-year retrospective. Condor 111: 401–413.
Sanderson, F.J., P. F. Donald and I.J. Burfield. 2005. Farmland birds in Europe: from policy change to population decline and back again. In: G. Bota, M. B. Morales, S. Manosa, and J. Camprodon (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Steppe-land Birds. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. pp. 211–236.
Sanza, M.A., J. Traba, M.B. Morales, D. Rivera and M.P. Delgado. 2012. Effects of landscape, conspecifics and heterospecifics on habitat selection by breeding farmland birds: the case of Calandra Lark (Melanocorypha calandra) and Corn Bunting (Emberiza calandra). J. Ornithol. 153: 525–533.
Serrano, D. and C. Astraín. 2005. Microhabitat use and segregation of two sibling species of Calandrella larks during the breeding season: conservation and management strategies. Biol. Conserv. 125: 391–397.
StatSoft Inc. 2007. STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System). Version 8.0. Tulsa, OK, USA.
Suárez, F., M.A. Naveso and E. De Juana. 1997. Farming in the drylands of Spain: the birds of the pseudosteppe. In: D.J. Pain and M. W. Pienkowski (eds.), Farming and Birds in Europe. London Academic Press, London. pp 297–330.
Traba, J., E.L. García de la Morena, M.B. MoraleS and F. Suárez. 2007. Determining high value areas for steppe birds in Spain: hot spots, complementarity and the efficiency of protected areas. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 3255–3275.
Traba, J., M.P. Delgado, D. Albendea and M.B. Morales. 2012. Selección de macro y microhábitat del alcaraván común (Burhinus oedicnemus) en dos localidades madrilenas durante la estación reproductiva. Anu. Ornitol. Madrid 2009–2010: 23–40.
Traba, J., P. Sastre and M.B. Morales. 2013. Factors determining species richness and community composition in steppe birds of peninsular Spain. In: M. B. Morales and J. Traba (eds.), Steppe Ecosystems: Biological Diversity, Management and Restoration. NOVA Science Publishers, New York. pp. 29–46.
Tryjanowski P. , T. Hartel, A. Báldi, P. Szymanski, M. Tobolka, I. Herzon, A. Golawski, M. Konvicka, M. Hromada, L. Jerzak, K. Kujawa, M. Lenda, M. Orlowski, M. Panek, P. Skórka, T. H. Sparks, S. Tworek, A. Wuczynski, and M. Zmihorski. 2011. Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. Acta Ornithol. 46: 1–12.
Werner, E.E., J.F. Gilliam, D.J. Hall and G.G. Mittelbach. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64: 1540–1548.
Whittaker, R.H., S.A. Levin and R.B. Root. 1973. Niche, habitat and ecotope. Am. Nat. 107: 321–338.
Worton, B.J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.