This study attempts to investigate how Hungarians think about life. By applying a nationwide representative survey of Hungarian adults, we wished to answer the following two research questions: a) what are the major metaphorical conceptualizations of life among Hungarians?; and b) what factors, such as socio-economic status and basic value orientations, might influence the prevalence for the metaphors used to talk about life? Our results suggest that there are considerable generational differences: while the negative mindset (in the form of more negative metaphors) is still common within the older generation, there is a shift towards a more positive and more “American” conceptualization of life among younger people in Hungary.
Benczes, R. – Ságvári, B. (2018): Where Metaphors Really Come from: Social Factors as Contextual Influence in Hungarian Teenagers’ Metaphorical Conceptualizations of Life. Cognitive Linguistics 29(1): 121‒54.
Bjørnskov, C. (2006): Determinants of Generalized Trust: A Cross-Country Comparison. Public Choice 130(1–2): 1–21.
Cameron, L. (2007): Confrontation or Complementarity? Metaphor in Language and Cognitive Metaphor Theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5: 107–136.
Cavafy, C. P. (1992): Collected Poems. Translated by Edmund Keeley and Philip Sherrard. Edited by George Savidis. Revised Edition. Princeton University Press.
Haser, V. (2005): Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoff, E. (2006): How Social Contexts Support and Shape Language Development. Developmental Review 26: 55–88.
Inglehart, R. (1997): Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kertész, A. – Rákosi, Cs. (2009): Cyclic vs. Circular Argumentation in the Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cognitive Linguistics 20(4): 703–732.
Knack, S. – Keefer, P. (1997): Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1251–1288.
Kövecses, Z. (2005): Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2006): Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010 [2002]): Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Second, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2015): Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. – Johnson, M. (1980): Metaphors We Live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. – Johnson, M. (1997): Language, Thought, and Culture. In: O’Brien, J. – Kollock, P. (eds): The Production of Reality: Essays and Readings on Social Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Lakoff, G. – Turner, M. (1989): More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Leezenberg, M. (2001): Contexts of Metaphor. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McGlone, M. S. (2007): What Is the Explanatory Value of a Conceptual Metaphor? Language and Communication 27(2): 109–126.
Pryor, F. L. (2005): National Values and Economic Growth. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64(2): 451–483.
Rakova, M. (2002): The Philosophy of Embedded Realism: A High Price to Pay? Cognitive Linguistics 13(3): 215–244.
Schmidt, G. – Brdar, M. (2009): Variation in the Linguistic Expression of the Conceptual Metaphor LIFE IS A (GAMBLING) GAME. In: Brdar, M. – Ozmazić, M. – Pavičić Takač, V. (eds): Cognitive Approaches to English: Fundamental, Methodological, Interdisciplinary and Applied Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 271–292.
Schwartz, Sh. H. (2007): Value Orientations: Measurement, Antecedents and Consequences across Nations. In: Jowell, R., Roberts, C., Fitzgerald, R., and Eva, G. (eds): Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey. London: Sage, pp. 161–193.