Author:
Krisztina FicsorUniversity of Debrecen Faculty of Law Debrecen Hungary

Search for other papers by Krisztina Ficsor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

In this essay, the author attempts to reveal the character and theoretical limits of judicial formalism. Formalism is a normative theory of adjudication which means that it provides determined answers to the question of how judges should decide legal cases. Judicial formalism is related to the view that legal reasoning is a special area of practical reasoning because legal reasoning should rely on reasons and arguments that stem from a limited domain of practical reasons: lawyers should justify legal decisions by relying on the reasons that originate in socalled source-based law. However, one of the tasks of legal theory is to solve the problem of judicial formalism which arises during legal practice. It can often occur that the decision, which follows clearly from the sourcebased law, is unjust or unfair if we take all relevant factors and the wider context of the case into consideration. The theoretical issue is whether judges are allowed to depart from the source-based law and if they are, in what type of cases can they do this. This essay tries to throw light on the theoretical conceptions within which the problem of formalism can be handled, for example, the theory of the nature of law or virtue jurisprudence.

  • Alexander, L. (1999): With Me It’s All or Nothing: Formalism in Law and Morality. University of Chicago Law Review 66: 530–565, 531.

    Alexander L. , 'With Me It’s All or Nothing: Formalism in Law and Morality ' (1999 ) 66 University of Chicago Law Review : 530 -565 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Alexander, L.- Sherwin, E. (2008): Demistifying Legal Reasoning. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 133.

    Sherwin E. , '', in Demistifying Legal Reasoning , (2008 ) -.

  • Bencze, M. (2011): Elvek és gyakorlatok. Jogalkalmazási minták és problémák a bírói ítélkezésben (Principles and Practices. Decisional Patterns and Problems in Adjudication). Gondolat, Budapest.

    Bencze M. , '', in Elvek és gyakorlatok. Jogalkalmazási minták és problémák a bírói ítélkezésben , (2011 ) -.

  • Bencze, M.- Matzak, M.- Kühn, Z. (2010): Constitutions, EU Law and Judicial Strategies in the Czech Republic. Hungary and Poland. Journal of Public Policy 30: 81–99.

    Kühn Z. , 'Constitutions, EU Law and Judicial Strategies in the Czech Republic. Hungary and Poland ' (2010 ) 30 Journal of Public Policy : 81 -99 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Blutman, L. (2010): Bírói jogalkalmazás és szöveghű értelmezés (Adjudication and Textual Interpretation). Jogesetek Magyarázata 4: 94–104.

    Blutman L. , 'Bírói jogalkalmazás és szöveghű értelmezés ' (2010 ) 4 Jogesetek Magyarázata : 94 -104 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bódig, M. (2004): A szabály és a jog. Egy kontingens fogalmi kapcsolat analitikai dimenziói (Rules and the Law. Analytical Dimensions of a Contingent Conceptual Relation). In: Szabó, M. (ed.): Regula Iuris. Szabály és/vagy norma a jogelméletben (Regula Iuris. Rule and/or Norm in Legal Theory). Miskolc: Bíbor 93–108.

    Bódig M. , '', in Regula Iuris. Szabály és/vagy norma a jogelméletben , (2004 ) -.

  • Bódig, M. (2006): Egy hiányjelenség a jogban: a joghézag. (A Phenomenon of Deficiency in Law: Ambuigity.) Café Bábel 53: 33–42.

    Bódig M. , 'Egy hiányjelenség a jogban: a joghézag ' (2006 ) 53 Café Bábel : 33 -42 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bódig M. (2007): Legal Interpretation, Intentionalism and the Authority of Law. Acta Juridica Hungarica 48: 125–142.

    Bódig M. , 'Legal Interpretation, Intentionalism and the Authority of Law ' (2007 ) 48 Acta Juridica Hungarica : 125 -142 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bódig, M.: Rules, Principles, and the Problem of the Limits of Legal Reasoning. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1318638

  • Dworkin, R. (1985): A Matter of Principle. Harvard University Press.

    Dworkin R. , '', in A Matter of Principle , (1985 ) -.

  • Dworkin, R. (1986): Law’s Empire. Cambridge, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 176–192.

    Dworkin R. , '', in Law’s Empire , (1986 ) -.

  • Dworkin, R. (2011): Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 402.

    Dworkin R. , '', in Justice for Hedgehogs , (2011 ) -.

  • Leiter, B. (1999): Positivism, Formalism, Realism. Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence by Anthony Sebok. Columbia Law Review 99: 1138–1164.

    Leiter B. , 'Positivism, Formalism, Realism. Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence by Anthony Sebok ' (1999 ) 99 Columbia Law Review : 1138 -1164 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Leiter, B.: Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What is the Issue? Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1646110 , 1

  • Manning, J.F. (1999): Constitutional Structure and Statutory Formalism. The University of Chicago Law Review 66: 685–697.

    Manning J.F. , 'Constitutional Structure and Statutory Formalism ' (1999 ) 66 The University of Chicago Law Review : 685 -697 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Michelman, F. I. (1999): A Brief Anatomy of Adjudicative Rule-Formalism. University of Chicago Law Review 66: 934–942.

    Michelman F. I. , 'A Brief Anatomy of Adjudicative Rule-Formalism ' (1999 ) 66 University of Chicago Law Review : 934 -942 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Moore, M. S. (1980–1981): The Semantics of Judging. Southern California Law Review 54: 151–294.

    Moore M. S. , 'The Semantics of Judging ' (1980 ) 54 Southern California Law Review : 151 -294 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Posner, R. (1986–1987): Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution. Case Western Reverse Law Review 37: 179–217.

    Posner R. , 'Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution ' (1986 ) 37 Case Western Reverse Law Review : 179 -217 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Raz, J. (2009): Between Authority and Interpretation. On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Raz J. , '', in Between Authority and Interpretation. On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason , (2009 ) -.

  • Schauer, F. (1988–1989): Formalism. Yale Law Journal 97: 509–548.

    Schauer F. , 'Formalism ' (1988 ) 97 Yale Law Journal : 509 -548 .

  • Schauer, F. (2009): Thinking Like a Lawyer. A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press, 29–35.

    Schauer F. , '', in Thinking Like a Lawyer. A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning , (2009 ) -.

  • Schauer, F. (1991): Rules and the Rule of Law. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 14: 645–694. 651–657.

    Schauer F. , 'Rules and the Rule of Law ' (1991 ) 14 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy : 645 -694 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Schauer, F. (2004): The Limited Domain of the Law. Virginia Law Review 90: 1909–1956.

    Schauer F. , 'The Limited Domain of the Law ' (2004 ) 90 Virginia Law Review : 1909 -1956 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Solum, L. B. (2010): The Interpretation-Construction Distinction. Constitutional Commentary 27: 95–118.

    Solum L. B. , 'The Interpretation-Construction Distinction ' (2010 ) 27 Constitutional Commentary : 95 -118 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Solum, L. B. (2003): Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centered Theory of Judging. Research Paper No. 2003–4. In: Social Science Research Network electronic library at: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=369940 . 184

    Solum L. B. , '', in Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centered Theory of Judging , (2003 ) -.

  • Summers, R. S. (1992a): The Formal Character of Law. Cambridge Law Journal 51: 242–262. pp. 245–246.

    Summers R. S. , 'The Formal Character of Law ' (1992 ) 51 Cambridge Law Journal : 242 -262 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Summers, R. (1992b): Essays on the Nature of Law and Legal Reasoning. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 141.

    Summers R. , '', in Essays on the Nature of Law and Legal Reasoning , (1992 ) -.

  • Tate, A. jr. (1975): The Justice Function of the Judge. Southern University Law Review 1: 250–265.

    Tate A. , 'The Justice Function of the Judge ' (1975 ) 1 Southern University Law Review : 250 -265 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Weinrib, E. (1987–1988): Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law. Yale Law Journal 97: 949–1016.

    Weinrib E. , 'Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law ' (1987 ) 97 Yale Law Journal : 949 -1016 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Collapse
  • Expand

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Éva Jakab

Co-Editor(s):
Viktor Lőrincz,
Fruzsina Orosz

Editor(s):
Samanatha Cheesman,
Zsuzsa Fejes,
Attila Kun,
Gábor Sulyok,
Márton Varju

Editorial Board

    1. Attila Badó
    1. Myátyás Bódig (Aberdeen)
    1. Zoltán Csehi
    1. Péter Cserne (Hull)
    1. Balázs Gellér
    1. András Jakab
    1. Miklós Király
    1. György Kiss
    1. Jan Kudrna (Praha)
    1. Herbert Küpper (Regensburg)
    1. Konrad Lachmayer (Durham)
    1. Andzrej Stanisław Mączyński (Kraków)
    1. Guido Pfeifer (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Miklós Szabó
    1. Zoltán Szente
    1. G.J.J. Heerma van Voss (Leiden)
    1. Bernd Waas (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Fryderyk Zoll (Osnabrück)

Advisory Board

    1. Péter Erdő
    1. Gábor Hamza
    1. Attila Harmathy
    1. László Kecskés
    1. Tibor Király
    1. László Korinek
    1. László Sólyom
    1. Lajos Vékás
    1. Imre Vörös

Acta Juridica Hungarica
P.O. Box 25
HU–1250 Budapest,Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 355 7384
Fax. (36 1) 375 7858
E-mail: acta.juridica@tk.mta.hu

  Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Information technology and the Law
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Worldwide Political Science Abstractss
  • Translation Studies Abstracts
  • SCOPUS
  • Cabell's Directories
  • HeinOnline

 

Acta Juridica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1959
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-2574 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2616 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Aug 2022 0 0 1
Sep 2022 0 2 1
Oct 2022 0 0 0
Nov 2022 0 4 4
Dec 2022 0 5 0
Jan 2023 0 15 2
Feb 2023 0 0 0