Authors:
E. Addicott Queensland Herbarium, Mt. Coot-tha Road, Toowong, Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government, QLD 4066, Australia
James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia
James Cook University, P.O. Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia

Search for other papers by E. Addicott in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Laurance James Cook University, P.O. Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia

Search for other papers by S. Laurance in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Lyons UNSW Australia, NSW 2052, Australia
New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW 1232, Australia

Search for other papers by M. Lyons in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Butler Queensland Herbarium, Mt. Coot-tha Road, Toowong, Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government, QLD 4066, Australia

Search for other papers by D. Butler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J. Neldner Queensland Herbarium, Mt. Coot-tha Road, Toowong, Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government, QLD 4066, Australia

Search for other papers by J. Neldner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

Plant communities in extensive landscapes are often mapped remotely using detectable patterns based on vegetation structure and canopy species with a high relative cover. A plot-based classification which includes species with low relative canopy cover and ignores vegetation structure, may result in plant communities not easily reconcilable with the landscape patterns represented in mapping. In our study, we investigate the effects on classification outcomes if we (1) remove rare species based on canopy cover, and (2) incorporate vegetation structure by weighting species’ cover by different measures of vegetation height. Using a dataset of 101 plots of savanna vegetation in north-eastern Australia we investigated first, the effect of removing rare species using four cover thresholds (1, 5, 8 and 10% contribution to total cover) and second, weighting species by four height measures including actual height as well as continuous and categorical transformations. Using agglomerative hierarchical clustering we produced a classification for each dataset and compared them for differences in: patterns of plot similarity, clustering, species richness and evenness, and characteristic species. We estimated the ability of each classification to predict species cover using generalised linear models. We found removing rare species at any cover threshold produced characteristic species appearing to correspond to landscape scale changes and better predicted species cover in grasslands and shrublands. However, in woodlands it made no difference. Using actual height of vegetation layer maintained vegetation structure, emphasised canopy and then sub-canopy species in clustering, and predicted species cover best of the height-measures tested. Thus, removing rare species and weighting species by height are useful techniques for identifying plant communities from plot-based classifications which are conceptually consistent with those in landscape scale mapping. This increases the confidence of end-users in both the classifications and the maps, thus enhancing their use in land management decisions.

Supplementary Materials

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)