Author:
Éva Dékány Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Search for other papers by Éva Dékány in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

This paper gives a broad overview of the ideas underlying the Chomskyan approach to linguistics. It identifies the main innovation of generative grammar in linguistics and clarifies some recurring misunderstandings about the language faculty, recursion and language universals. The paper also discusses some of the main empirical results of generative syntax.

  • Adger, David . 2015a. Mythical myths: Comments on Vyvyan Evans' “The Language Myth”. Lingua 158. 7680.

  • Adger, David . 2015b. Syntax. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews in Cognitive Science 6. 131147.

  • Adger, David, Daniel Harbour and Laurel J. Watkins. 2010. Mirrors and microparameters: Phrase structure beyond free word order. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 122, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adger, David and Peter Svenonius. 2015. Linguistic explanation and domain specialization: A case study in bound variable anaphora. Frontiers in Psychology 6. Article 1421.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alberti, Gábor and Tibor Laczkó. 2018a. Syntax of Hungarian: Nouns and Noun Phrases. Volume 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Alberti, Gábor and Tibor Laczkó. 2018b. Syntax of Hungarian: Nouns and Noun Phrases. Volume 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Allott, Nicholas and Georges Rey. 2017. The many errors of Vyvyan Evans' The language myth. The Linguistic Review 34. 120.

  • Arsenijević, Boban and Wolfram Hinzen. 2012. On the absence of X-within-X recursion in human grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 43. 423440.

  • Bates, Elizabeth . 1994. Modularity, domain specificity and the development of language. Neuroscience 10. 136149.

  • Biber, Douglas . 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bickerton, Derek . 1974. Creolization, linguistic universals, natural semantax and the brain. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 124141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bresnan, Joan (ed.). 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Brody, Michael . 1995. Lexico-logical form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Brody, Michael . 2000. Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 2956.

  • Brody, Michael . 2002. Towards and elegant syntax. London: Routledge.

  • Brody, Michael . 2019. Some biolinguistic remarks. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 66. 335348.

  • Broekhuis, Hans . 2013a. Syntax of Dutch: Adjectives and Adjectival Phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Broekhuis, Hans . 2013b. Syntax of Dutch: Adpositions and Adpositional Phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Broekhuis, Hans and Norbert Corver. 2015. Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and Verb Phrases. Volume 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Broekhuis, Hans and Norbert Corver. 2016. Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and Verb Phrases. Volume 3. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Broekhuis, Hans and Norbert Corver. 2019. Syntax of Dutch: Coordination and ellipsis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Broekhuis, Hans, Norbert Corver and Riet Vos. 2015. Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and Verb Phrases. Volume 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Broekhuis, Hans and Marcel den Dikken. 2012. Syntax of Dutch: Nouns and Noun Phrases. Volume 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Broekhuis, Hans and Evelien Keizer. 2012. Syntax of Dutch: Nouns and Noun Phrases. Volume 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Chomsky, Noam . 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

  • Chomsky, Noam . 1977. On wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.) Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press. 71132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chomsky, Noam . 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Chomsky, Noam . 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.) The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chomsky, Noam . 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, Noam . 2014. Minimal recursion: Exploring the prospects. In T. Roeper and M. Speas (eds.) Recursion: Complexity in cognition. Berlin: Springer. 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chomsky, Noam, Angel J. Gallego and Dennis Ott. to appear. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christiansen, Morten H. and Nick Chater. 2015. The language faculty that wasn't: A usage-based account of natural language recursion. Frontiers in Psychology 6. Article 1182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cinque, Guglielmo . 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cinque, Guglielmo . 2005. Deriving Greenberg's Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315332.

  • Cornips, Leonie and Cecilia Poletto. 2005. On standardising syntactic elicitation techiques (part 1). Lingua 115. 939957.

  • Cowart, Wayne . 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

  • Culbertson, Jennifer and David Adger. 2014. Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111. 58425847.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D'Alessandro, Roberta . to appear. The achievements of genreative syntax: A time-chart. Catalan Journal of Linguistics.

  • Dikken, Marcel den . 2019. Book review of Syntactic structures after 60 years. Acta Linguistica Academica 66. 429444.

  • Evans, Vyvyan . 2014. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Everett, Daniel Leonard . 1983. A língua Pirahã e a teoria da sintaxe. Descriçaõ, perspectivas e teoria. Doctoral dissertation. University of Campinas.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Everett, Daniel Leonard . 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46. 621646.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Everett, Daniel Leonard , 2019. A simple logical issue regarding claims about recursion and the FLN. Blog entry. https://daneverettbooks.com/category/dark-matter-of-the-mind/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gillam, Sandra L. and Alan G. Kamhi. 2010. Specific language impairment. In J. S. Damico, N. Müller and M. J. Ball (eds.) The handbook of language and speech disorders. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 210226.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenberg, Joseph H . 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of human language. Report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13–15, 1961. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 5890.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hale, John . 1999. Representational versus derivational approaches to syntax: Optimality theory and chains. Mansucript, Johns Hopkins University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, Zellig S. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Harris, Zellig S . 1957. Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure. Language 33. 283340.

  • Hartshorne, Joshua K., Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Steven Pinker. 2018. A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition 177. 263277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky and W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 15691579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.

  • Hoekstra, Teun and Jan G. Kooij. 1988. The innateness hypothesis. In J. Hawkins (ed.) Explaining language universals. Oxford: Blackwell. 3155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hornstein, Norbert . 2013. Three grades of grammatical involvement: syntax from a minimalist perspective. Mind and Language 28. 392420.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hornstein, Norbert, Howard Lasnik, Pritty-Patel Grosz and Charles Yang (eds.). 2018. Syntactic structures after 60 years: The impact of the Chomskyan revolution in linguistics. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, Cheng-Teh James . 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. New York: Garland.

  • Huang, Cheng-Teh James, Y.-H. Audrei Li and Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kandel, Eric R. and A. J. Hudspeth. 2013. The brain and behaviour. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. M. Jessell, S. A. Siegelbaum and A. J. Hudspeth (eds.) Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill. 120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lightfoot, David . 2019. Chomsky's I-languages: Rethinking catastrophic changes. Acta Linguistica Academica 66. 349370.

  • Marino, Caterina and Judit Gervain. 2019. The impact of generative linguistics on psychology: Language acquisition, a paradigm example. Acta Linguistica Academica 66. 371396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marty, Paul, Emmanuel Chemla and Jon Sprouse. 2019. The effect of three basic task features on the sensitivity of acceptability judgment tasks. Manuscript. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004588

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mendívil-Giró, José-Luis . 2018. Is Universal Grammar ready for retirement? A short review of a longstanding misinterpretation. Journal of Linguistics 54. 859888.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, Jim and Regina Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Murphy, Andrew . 2017. Toward a unified theory of wh-in-situ and islands. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26. 189231.

  • Musso, Mariacristina, Andrea Moro, Volkmar Glauche, Michel Rijntjes, Jürgen Reichenbach, Christian Büchel and Cornelius Weiller. 2003. Broca's Area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6. 774781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Muysken, Peter . 1979. Quechua causatives and Logical Form: A case study in markedness. In A. Belletti, L. Brandi and L. Rizzi (eds.) Theory of markedness in generative grammar. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore. 445473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nevins, Andrew, David Pesetsky and Cilene Rodrigues. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85. 355404.

  • Newmeyer, Frederick J . 2010. What conversational English tells us about the nature of grammar: A critique of Thompson's analysis of object complements. In K. Boye and E. Engberg-Pedersen (eds.) Usage and structure: A festschrift for Peter Harder. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newmeyer, Frederick J . 2013. Goals and methods of generative syntax. In M. den Dikken (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 6192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinker, Steven . 1994. The language instinct. New York: William Morrow & Company.

  • Pléh, Csaba . 2019. The inspirational role of Chomsky in the cognitive turn in psychology. Acta Linguistica Academica 66. 397428.

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag. 1987. Information-based syntax and semantics, Volume 1: Fundamentals. CSLI: Stanford.

  • Ross, John Robert . 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

  • Schütze, Carson . 1996. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Neil and Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli. 1995. The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

  • Sprouse, Jon and Diogo Almeida. 2012. Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger's Core Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 48. 609652.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sprouse, Jon and Diogo Almeida. 2013. The empirical status of data in syntax: A reply to Gibson and Fedorenko. Language and Cognitive Processes 28. 222228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sprouse, Jon and Diogo Almeida. 2017. Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments. Glossa 2. Article 14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Svenonius, Peter . 2016. Significant mid-level results of generative linguistics. Manuscript, University of Tromsø. http://blogg.uit.no/psv000/2016/08/30/significant-mid-level-results-of-generative-linguistics/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tettamanti, Marco, Hatem Alkadhi, Andrea Moro, Daniela Perani, Spyros Kollias and Dorothea Weniger. 2002. Neural correlates for the acquisition of natural language syntax. NeuroImage 17. 700709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tomasello, Michael (ed.). 1998. The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tomasello, Michael . 2005. Comments on Everett's “Cultural constraints on grammar and congition in Pirahã”. Current Anthropology 46. 640641.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tsai, W. T. Dylan . 1994. On nominal islands and LF extraction in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 121175.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE

Editors

Editor-in-Chief: András Cser

Editor: György Rákosi

Review Editor: Tamás Halm

Editorial Board

  • Anne Abeillé / Université Paris Diderot
  • Željko Bošković / University of Connecticut
  • Marcel den Dikken / Eötvös Loránd University; Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Hans-Martin Gärtner / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Elly van Gelderen / Arizona State University
  • Anders Holmberg / Newcastle University
  • Katarzyna Jaszczolt / University of Cambridge
  • Dániel Z. Kádár / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • István Kenesei / University of Szeged; Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Anikó Lipták / Leiden University
  • Katalin Mády / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Gereon Müller / Leipzig University
  • Csaba Pléh / Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Central European University
  • Giampaolo Salvi / Eötvös Loránd University
  • Irina Sekerina / College of Staten Island CUNY
  • Péter Siptár / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Gregory Stump / University of Kentucky
  • Peter Svenonius / University of Tromsø
  • Anne Tamm / Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church
  • Akira Watanabe / University of Tokyo
  • Jeroen van de Weijer / Shenzhen University

 

Acta Linguistica Academica
Address: Benczúr u. 33. HU–1068 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (+36 1) 351 0413; (+36 1) 321 4830 ext. 154
Fax: (36 1) 322 9297
E-mail: ala@nytud.mta.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Arts and Humanities Citation Index
  • Bibliographie Linguistique/Linguistic Bibliography
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Linguistics Abstracts
  • Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts
  • MLA International Bibliography
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • LinguisList

 

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
56
Journal Impact Factor 0.5
Rank by Impact Factor

Linguistics (Q4)

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0.4
5 Year
Impact Factor
0.5
Journal Citation Indicator 0.59
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

Language and Linguistics (Q2)
Linguistics (Q3)

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
13
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.592
Scimago Quartile Score

Cultural Studies (Q1)
Linguistics and Language (Q1)
Literature and Literary Theory (Q1)

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.4
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Literature and Literary Theory 24/982 (97th PCTL)
Cultural Studies 212/1203 (82nd PCTL)
Scopus
SNIP
1.159

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
63
Journal Impact Factor 0,690
Rank by Impact Factor

Linguistics 145/194

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,667
5 Year
Impact Factor
1,286
Journal Citation Indicator 0,67
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

Language & Linguistics 141/370

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,341
Scimago Quartile Score Cultural Studies (Q1)
Linguistics and Language (Q1)
Literature and Literary Theory (Q1)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,4
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Literature and Literary Theory 22/934 (D1)
Cultural Studies 164/1127 (Q1)
Scopus
SNIP
1,070

2020

 

Total Cites

219

WoS

Journal
Impact Factor

0,523

Rank by

Linguistics 150/193 (Q4)

Impact Factor

 

Impact Factor

0,432

without

Journal Self Cites

5 Year

0,500

Impact Factor

Journal 

0,72

Citation Indicator

 

Rank by Journal 

Linguistics 144/259 (Q3)

Citation Indicator 

 

Citable

19

Items

Total

19

Articles

Total

0

Reviews

Scimago

10

H-index

Scimago

0,295

Journal Rank

Scimago

Cultural Studies Q1

Quartile Score

Language and Linguistics Q2

 

Linguistics and Language Q2

 

Literature and Literary Theory Q1

Scopus

72/87=0,8

Scite Score

Scopus

Literature and Literary Theory 42/825 (Q1)

Scite Score Rank

Cultural Studies 247/1037 (Q1)

Scopus

1,022

SNIP

Days from 

58

submission

to acceptance

Days from 

68

acceptance

to publication

Acceptance

51%

Rate

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
155
Impact Factor 0,222
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,156
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,322
Immediacy
Index
0,870
Citable
Items
23
Total
Articles
23
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
11,2
Citing
Half-Life
16,6
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00006
Article Influence
Score
0,056
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,00780
Average
IF
Percentile
9,358
Scimago
H-index
9
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,281
Scopus
Scite Score
53/85=0,6
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Cultural Studies 293/1002 (Q2)
Literature and Literary Theory 60/823(Q1)
Scopus
SNIP
0,768
Acceptance
Rate
25%

 

Acta Linguistica Academica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 572 EUR / 696 USD
Print + online subscription: 656 EUR / 796 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Linguistica Academica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2017 (1951)
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia   
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2559-8201 (Print)
ISSN 2560-1016 (Online)